Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2019 2:04 pm
Define "great".VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:58 am I’m going to be sacrilegy and say The Doors weren’t that great. Neither were The Who.
UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://ujrefugees.net/
Define "great".VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:58 am I’m going to be sacrilegy and say The Doors weren’t that great. Neither were The Who.
OkQillerDaemon wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 11:40 amAlright, if we're going there, neither were Guns N' Roses.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:42 amOr the Beatles.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:58 am I’m going to be sacrilegy and say The Doors weren’t that great. Neither were The Who.
By the way, The Who was a fantastic live band.
Growing up one of my grandfathers was deemed fat. He was definitely fat shamed for it because he had a heart attack (we all have high cholesterol). Been scanning pictures lately and it's shocking how he was maybe 20 lbs overweight. By today's standards he wouldn't be considered all that abnormal at all.
You are so wrong about that.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:42 amOr the Beatles.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:58 am I’m going to be sacrilegy and say The Doors weren’t that great. Neither were The Who.
what about Grand Funk Railroad?QillerDaemon wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 11:40 amAlright, if we're going there, neither were Guns N' Roses.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:42 amOr the Beatles.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:58 am I’m going to be sacrilegy and say The Doors weren’t that great. Neither were The Who.
By the way, The Who was a fantastic live band.
They were some kind of wonderful...Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 5:27 pmwhat about Grand Funk Railroad?QillerDaemon wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 11:40 amAlright, if we're going there, neither were Guns N' Roses.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:42 amOr the Beatles.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:58 am I’m going to be sacrilegy and say The Doors weren’t that great. Neither were The Who.
By the way, The Who was a fantastic live band.
Shit food is world wide- so its not surprising to see Europe hovering over 20% obese...beagleboy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 2:40 pm
Growing up one of my grandfathers was deemed fat. He was definitely fat shamed for it because he had a heart attack (we all have high cholesterol). Been scanning pictures lately and it's shocking how he was maybe 20 lbs overweight. By today's standards he wouldn't be considered all that abnormal at all.
It's the olive oil, they shit it all out before the calories are absorbedReservoir Dog wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 7:39 pm Is anyone else kind of suprised that Italy is at the lower end of the scale?
LolVinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 4:17 pmYou are so wrong about that.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:42 amOr the Beatles.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:58 am I’m going to be sacrilegy and say The Doors weren’t that great. Neither were The Who.
Does your endless capacity to be condescending about things that are completely subjective ever get tiring?necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 8:30 pmLolVinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 4:17 pmYou are so wrong about that.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:42 amOr the Beatles.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:58 am I’m going to be sacrilegy and say The Doors weren’t that great. Neither were The Who.
Ok
I would try to help you to understand, but I suspect you are ineducable on this matter.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 8:30 pmLolVinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 4:17 pmYou are so wrong about that.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:42 amOr the Beatles.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:58 am I’m going to be sacrilegy and say The Doors weren’t that great. Neither were The Who.
Ok
VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:54 pmI would try to help you to understand, but I suspect you are ineducable on this matter.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 8:30 pmLolVinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 4:17 pmYou are so wrong about that.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:42 amOr the Beatles.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:58 am I’m going to be sacrilegy and say The Doors weren’t that great. Neither were The Who.
Ok
This is what I'm saying. Hello Goodbye had a sort of "hopeful" clarity you didn't hear before that. Like a bowl of fresh fruit, or something (humor me). Then, on the other side of the 45, I am the Walrus. Trippy as fuck to most listeners. So far removed from what people were used to.FreakShowFanatic wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 10:04 pmVinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:54 pmI would try to help you to understand, but I suspect you are ineducable on this matter.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 8:30 pmLolVinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 4:17 pmYou are so wrong about that.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:42 amOr the Beatles.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:58 am I’m going to be sacrilegy and say The Doors weren’t that great. Neither were The Who.
Ok
So his condescending is fine, it's just mine that's a problem. The lol. Ok is just a way to say whatever your opinion is, is yours and mine is mine and we aren't going to agree so let's fucking drop it. The fact you see it as condescending is your problem, not mine. The fact that no one asked is also their problem. Everyone here always wants to assume the worst about people. You guys have fun with that.spudoc wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:54 pmDoes your endless capacity to be condescending about things that are completely subjective ever get tiring?necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 8:30 pmLolVinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 4:17 pmYou are so wrong about that.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:42 amOr the Beatles.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:58 am I’m going to be sacrilegy and say The Doors weren’t that great. Neither were The Who.
Ok
LolVinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:54 pmI would try to help you to understand, but I suspect you are ineducable on this matter.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 8:30 pmLolVinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 4:17 pmYou are so wrong about that.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:42 amOr the Beatles.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:58 am I’m going to be sacrilegy and say The Doors weren’t that great. Neither were The Who.
Ok
The problem is that you have a long history of being a condescending douche. And like obtuse douches everywhere you don't see the problem as yours.necronomous wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 1:37 amSo his condescending is fine, it's just mine that's a problem. The lol. Ok is just a way to say whatever your opinion is, is yours and mine is mine and we aren't going to agree so let's fucking drop it. The fact you see it as condescending is your problem, not mine. The fact that no one asked is also their problem. Everyone here always wants to assume the worst about people. You guys have fun with that.spudoc wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:54 pmDoes your endless capacity to be condescending about things that are completely subjective ever get tiring?necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 8:30 pmLolVinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 4:17 pmYou are so wrong about that.necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:42 amOr the Beatles.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:58 am I’m going to be sacrilegy and say The Doors weren’t that great. Neither were The Who.
Ok
You mean I have a long history of putting up with condescending, smug, snobbish, assholes like most of you. And like most obtuse condescending, smug, snobbish, assholes everywhere you don't see the problem as yours. I respond how I'm talked to. The problem is you only see when I do it, not when you do it. Like now. You're ok with him being condescending, and a huge snob about music ( which he proved in the next comment that he was being smug in the first comment by saying I'm ineducable) or how you now are thinking you know more than I do. And that's fine, but if I do it, then that's what the problem is. So again, I respond ok, because I'm laughing at what you're pretending not to see and saying ok, because we aren't going to agree and that's fine. You have your opinion, and I have mine, and I know arguing is not going to make you agree with me and vice versa. You call me condescending because you don't want to admit I'm responding to you condescending me. So ok.spudoc wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 2:20 amThe problem is that you have a long history of being a condescending douche. And like obtuse douches everywhere you don't see the problem as yours.necronomous wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 1:37 amSo his condescending is fine, it's just mine that's a problem. The lol. Ok is just a way to say whatever your opinion is, is yours and mine is mine and we aren't going to agree so let's fucking drop it. The fact you see it as condescending is your problem, not mine. The fact that no one asked is also their problem. Everyone here always wants to assume the worst about people. You guys have fun with that.spudoc wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:54 pmDoes your endless capacity to be condescending about things that are completely subjective ever get tiring?necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 8:30 pmLol
Ok