Wait, they lied about the WMDs?
Moderator: Biker
- beagleboy
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:23 pm
- Location: Free born
Wait, they lied about the WMDs?
https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/conf ... cbf7ef281a
The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has begun responding to queries by the press about a leaked document which contradicts official OPCW findings on an alleged chemical weapons attack last year in Douma, Syria. The prepared statement they’ve been using in response to these queries confirms the authenticity of the document.
To recap, a few days ago the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media (WGSPM) published a document signed by a man named Ian Henderson, whose name is seen listed in expert leadership positions on OPCW documents from as far back as 1998 and as recently as 2018. It’s unknown who leaked the document and what other media organizations they may have tried to send it to.
The report picks apart the extremely shaky physics and narratives of the official OPCW analysis on the gas cylinders allegedly dropped from Syrian government aircraft in the Douma attack, and concludes that “The dimensions, characteristics and appearance of the cylinders, and the surrounding scene of the incidents, were inconsistent with what would have been expected in the case of either cylinder being delivered from an aircraft,” saying instead that manual placement of the cylinders in the locations investigators found them in is “the only plausible explanation for observations at the scene.”
To be clear, this means that according to the assessment signed by an OPCW-trained expert, the cylinders alleged to have dispensed poison gas which killed dozens of people in Douma did not arrive in the locations that they were alleged to have arrived at via aircraft dropped by the Syrian government, but via manual placement by people on the ground, where photographs were then taken and circulated around the world as evidence against the Syrian government which was used to justify air strikes by the US, UK and France. There were swift military consequences meted out on what appears now to be a lie. At the time, the people on the ground were the Al Qaeda-linked Jaysh Al-Islam, who had at that point nothing to lose and everything to gain by staging a false flag attack in a last-ditch attempt to get NATO powers to function as their air force, since they’d already effectively lost the battle against the Syrian government.
The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has begun responding to queries by the press about a leaked document which contradicts official OPCW findings on an alleged chemical weapons attack last year in Douma, Syria. The prepared statement they’ve been using in response to these queries confirms the authenticity of the document.
To recap, a few days ago the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media (WGSPM) published a document signed by a man named Ian Henderson, whose name is seen listed in expert leadership positions on OPCW documents from as far back as 1998 and as recently as 2018. It’s unknown who leaked the document and what other media organizations they may have tried to send it to.
The report picks apart the extremely shaky physics and narratives of the official OPCW analysis on the gas cylinders allegedly dropped from Syrian government aircraft in the Douma attack, and concludes that “The dimensions, characteristics and appearance of the cylinders, and the surrounding scene of the incidents, were inconsistent with what would have been expected in the case of either cylinder being delivered from an aircraft,” saying instead that manual placement of the cylinders in the locations investigators found them in is “the only plausible explanation for observations at the scene.”
To be clear, this means that according to the assessment signed by an OPCW-trained expert, the cylinders alleged to have dispensed poison gas which killed dozens of people in Douma did not arrive in the locations that they were alleged to have arrived at via aircraft dropped by the Syrian government, but via manual placement by people on the ground, where photographs were then taken and circulated around the world as evidence against the Syrian government which was used to justify air strikes by the US, UK and France. There were swift military consequences meted out on what appears now to be a lie. At the time, the people on the ground were the Al Qaeda-linked Jaysh Al-Islam, who had at that point nothing to lose and everything to gain by staging a false flag attack in a last-ditch attempt to get NATO powers to function as their air force, since they’d already effectively lost the battle against the Syrian government.
- beagleboy
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:23 pm
- Location: Free born
Re: Wait, they lied about the WMDs?
Many people claimed this going back for years.
Obama draws a red line in the sand, he's winning the war and magically chemical weapons kill a bunch of civilians and Obama rushes to ask for permission to attack Syrian troops.
Obama draws a red line in the sand, he's winning the war and magically chemical weapons kill a bunch of civilians and Obama rushes to ask for permission to attack Syrian troops.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Wait, they lied about the WMDs?
The russky disinformation teams will always find dupes.
- Cassandros
- Hamsterphile
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:38 pm
Re: Wait, they lied about the WMDs?
LOL@Ruskies.
Yeah, the US and UK governments would never lie. (Unless, you know, they are part of the opposite party).
Clearly "the Russians" did it.
Yeah, the US and UK governments would never lie. (Unless, you know, they are part of the opposite party).
Clearly "the Russians" did it.
“The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither, the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great deal of both.” --Milton Friedman
- beagleboy
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:23 pm
- Location: Free born
Re: Wait, they lied about the WMDs?
British journalist Jonathan Steele on the BBC saying he was in attendance at the OPCW/Douma panel and witnessed a new OPCW whistleblower say his findings were suppressed on the absence of evidence for chlorine gas use on the scene in Syria. The British should do something about their BBC shows being Putin puppets.
The sound is on the tweet.
yes, that's a second whistleblower.
- beagleboy
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:23 pm
- Location: Free born
- beagleboy
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:23 pm
- Location: Free born
Re: Wait, they lied about the WMDs?
uh oh, Russian agents Wikileaks have new information.
https://wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/
Four leaked documents from the OPCW reveal that toxicologists ruled out deaths from chlorine exposure and a senior official ordered the deletion of the dissenting engineering report from OPCW’s internal repository of documents.
https://wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/
Four leaked documents from the OPCW reveal that toxicologists ruled out deaths from chlorine exposure and a senior official ordered the deletion of the dissenting engineering report from OPCW’s internal repository of documents.
- CHEEZY17
- Libertarian house cat
- Posts: 14909
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm
Re: Wait, they lied about the WMDs?
Fucking Russians are everywhere.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
- beagleboy
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:23 pm
- Location: Free born
Re: Wait, they lied about the WMDs?
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/sy ... 62336.html
Pretty good article on the subject. I haven't verified but I've seen several journalists report that the whistleblower report has been completely ignored by mainstream news outlets. A search for OPCW on google news shows only secondary news outlets.
Pretty good article on the subject. I haven't verified but I've seen several journalists report that the whistleblower report has been completely ignored by mainstream news outlets. A search for OPCW on google news shows only secondary news outlets.