For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul commies to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.
In trouble?
Looks like he shows up to mock you when you humiliate yourself, still dwelling on that one eh?
Not at all, just remembered I'd see that name before, out of the blue.
The only question is if you messaged them for relief or put your hand up their cotton ass and started typing.
Doesn't matter.
In trouble?
Looks like he shows up to mock you when you humiliate yourself, still dwelling on that one eh?
Not at all, just remembered I'd see that name before, out of the blue.
The only question is if you messaged them for relief or put your hand up their cotton ass and started typing.
Doesn't matter.
Do you really not grasp you're getting thoroughly humiliated here? Why would I need help? You are taking this seriously aren't you
In trouble?
Looks like he shows up to mock you when you humiliate yourself, still dwelling on that one eh?
Not at all, just remembered I'd see that name before, out of the blue.
The only question is if you messaged them for relief or put your hand up their cotton ass and started typing.
Doesn't matter.
Do you really not grasp you're getting thoroughly humiliated here? Why would I need help? You are taking this seriously aren't you
For the love of Christ, you fop, there is no humiliation, because there is only you and I here. That's it. No matter what you believe, how you worry about your image, or imagine others worrying about theirs, it doesn't matter, because it's just us.
Look at you: you miss sleep, you enlist help (of some sort), all for what? So someone on the net who you don't even know, will think well of you? Or be afraid of you? Shit. You're a fucking fool.
Bye, AH.
Now see, if you were half as intellectual or sharp as you think you are, you'd have searched posts on me. I get that your ego thinks it's only about you, but I will pop up with comments on anyone when they're being an idiot. It's not my fault you're taking up the majority of that label right now.
In trouble?
Looks like he shows up to mock you when you humiliate yourself, still dwelling on that one eh?
Not at all, just remembered I'd see that name before, out of the blue.
The only question is if you messaged them for relief or put your hand up their cotton ass and started typing.
Doesn't matter.
Do you really not grasp you're getting thoroughly humiliated here? Why would I need help? You are taking this seriously aren't you
For the love of Christ, you fop, there is no humiliation, because there is only you and I here. That's it. No matter what you believe, how you worry about your image, or imagine others worrying about theirs, it doesn't matter, because it's just us.
Look at you: you miss sleep, you enlist help (of some sort), all for what? So someone on the net who you don't even know, will think well of you? Or be afraid of you? Shit. You're a fucking fool.
Bye, AH.
Yeah, this has been thoroughly humiliating for you. I've put you on the ropes and kicked your ass for 10 pages because I enjoy doing that when you big babies can't admit mistakes, pretty simple. This happens to you because you are too childish to admit error, it's something you should work on with a therapist. This one is gonna fester.
So to sum up, you attempted to redefine the Iraq war as 1 month long, and won't address whether you think immediately surrendering to an Iran backed insurgency would have been a win. Hint - it would not.
So I see the US and S.A. can't even convince their ally UAE that Iran is responsible for the oil ships attacked in the past few weeks. Think that will slow down the warmongers? Me either.
And Dot is definitely not an AH troll. In fact I am positive he was a member before AH on the original UJ.
Now see, if you were half as intellectual or sharp as you think you are, you'd have searched posts on me. I get that your ego thinks it's only about you, but I will pop up with comments on anyone when they're being an idiot. It's not my fault you're taking up the majority of that label right now.
You know, I don’t recall ever saying I was an intellectual? Is there some post where I said that?
VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 2:38 am
You know, I don’t recall ever saying I was an intellectual? Is there some post where I said that?
You do know what subtext is, right? Or is that another word you’ve redefined in your own alternate reality? You’re already confusing me for being a Brit so if you wanna prove you’re dumb, I can’t stop you. It’s your rep you’re aiming the torpedo at.
VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 2:38 am
You know, I don’t recall ever saying I was an intellectual? Is there some post where I said that?
You do know what subtext is, right? Or is that another word you’ve redefined in your own alternate reality? You’re already confusing me for being a Brit so if you wanna prove you’re dumb, I can’t stop you. It’s your rep you’re aiming the torpedo at.
“Rep.” Lol! I don’t give a fuck about rep on an Internet forum. I do appreciate that somehow you see me as an intellectual, but I assure you I’ve never put myself forward as one.
VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 2:38 am
You know, I don’t recall ever saying I was an intellectual? Is there some post where I said that?
You do know what subtext is, right? Or is that another word you’ve redefined in your own alternate reality? You’re already confusing me for being a Brit so if you wanna prove you’re dumb, I can’t stop you. It’s your rep you’re aiming the torpedo at.
“Rep.” Lol! I don’t give a fuck about rep on an Internet forum. I do appreciate that somehow you see me as an intellectual, but I assure you I’ve never put myself forward as one.
You spent 10 pages trying to argue the iraq war lasted a month to avoid contradicting yourself, which you did anyway
Intellectual, no. But the childish inability to admit error is absolutely wrapped up in your ego.
VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 1:03 pm
“Rep.” Lol! I don’t give a fuck about rep on an Internet forum. I do appreciate that somehow you see me as an intellectual, but I assure you I’ve never put myself forward as one.
You sure? Cause you’re trying awfully hard otherwise. And it’s telling that you think I’m saying I see you as smart. I don’t. I see you as trying to come off that way, and failing. You’d have to be honest with yourself to admit that.
Chuck has no place to talk about contribution, since going back to the original site.
VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 2:38 am
You know, I don’t recall ever saying I was an intellectual? Is there some post where I said that?
You do know what subtext is, right? Or is that another word you’ve redefined in your own alternate reality? You’re already confusing me for being a Brit so if you wanna prove you’re dumb, I can’t stop you. It’s your rep you’re aiming the torpedo at.
“Rep.” Lol! I don’t give a fuck about rep on an Internet forum. I do appreciate that somehow you see me as an intellectual, but I assure you I’ve never put myself forward as one.
You spent 10 pages trying to argue the iraq war lasted a month to avoid contradicting yourself, which you did anyway
Intellectual, no. But the childish inability to admit error is absolutely wrapped up in your ego.
See? Even though I let it go, you can't stop, because that's just who you are.
I made no "error," whether you agreed with me or not. I stated my position and made my case. The fact that you can't accept that and simply disagree is your problem, and you seem to be the one worried about your rep. You're a phony, AH. And you're an affected Internet bully. No amount of support or "rep" is going to fix that.
Now come retort, and maybe then you can let this go.
VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 1:03 pm
“Rep.” Lol! I don’t give a fuck about rep on an Internet forum. I do appreciate that somehow you see me as an intellectual, but I assure you I’ve never put myself forward as one.
You sure? Cause you’re trying awfully hard otherwise. And it’s telling that you think I’m saying I see you as smart. I don’t. I see you as trying to come off that way, and failing. You’d have to be honest with yourself to admit that.
Chuck has no place to talk about contribution, since going back to the original site.
VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 2:38 am
You know, I don’t recall ever saying I was an intellectual? Is there some post where I said that?
You do know what subtext is, right? Or is that another word you’ve redefined in your own alternate reality? You’re already confusing me for being a Brit so if you wanna prove you’re dumb, I can’t stop you. It’s your rep you’re aiming the torpedo at.
“Rep.” Lol! I don’t give a fuck about rep on an Internet forum. I do appreciate that somehow you see me as an intellectual, but I assure you I’ve never put myself forward as one.
You spent 10 pages trying to argue the iraq war lasted a month to avoid contradicting yourself, which you did anyway
Intellectual, no. But the childish inability to admit error is absolutely wrapped up in your ego.
See? Even though I let it go, you can't stop, because that's just who you are.
I made no "error," whether you agreed with me or not. I stated my position and made my case. The fact that you can't accept that and simply disagree is your problem, and you seem to be the one worried about your rep. You're a phony, AH. And you're an affected Internet bully. No amount of support or "rep" is going to fix that.
Now come retort, and maybe then you can let this go.
Was that your position that it lasted 1 month, or your position that it lasted 8 years? Perhaps your position that both mutually contradictory things can be true?
I don't have anything to let go, if you want to continue the thread feel free. If you don't don't. So long as you do I'm going to keep laughing at you.
The thing you actually wanted to argue was that the invasion phase was a kick ass walkover, because US conventional forces can't be seriously opposed by the conventional forces of any enemy short of China or Russia, which still lose but have major home field advantages and would inflict heavy, heavy losses, with a high risk of nuclear destruction to all. Shitty little places like Iraq have no chance. Iran would inflict far more casualties but it would still be relatively easy to sweep away their conventional emplacements. You found yourself in a bit of a pickle though from your wording choice which your ego wouldn't allow you to walk back, so you spent 10 pages pretending the actual war only lasted a month, whilst intermittently admitting it didn't, hence your total humiliation. Invasion phase and insurgency phase, it's all the same war and you don't get to have one without the other unless national interests are just irrelevant. Which they ain't.
The reason it didn't last a month is that handing an Iraq sized country over to death-to-america islamic extremists backed by Iran is actually a loss for america. The reason it took 8 years and still failed to prevent the iraq civil war is that assymetrical warfare is not the same as conventional warfare. We didn't beat the insurgency because we couldn't, overwhelming firepower and total air superiority just does not get that job done, a lesson that has been repeated a few times now but is apparently needing to be learnt from scratch in Iran for some folks. Iraq was not a quick and easy win, Iran would not be a quick and easy win. Fighting insurgents in their own land is brutal and expensive, taking decades and resulting in heavy casualties. And it's not that we're so dainty with the ROE, the soviets gave zero fucks about that yet still got their asses kicked trying it, and Obama would drone strike a kiddies party if the clown was a high value target. The obvious lesson is not to go in in the first place, unless the reasons for doing so justify the painful decades of costly nation building that is part of the actual cost and duration of the resulting war. That's why it matters that fools are still declaring Iraq was quick and easy, you need to recognise the actual cost of that conflict, which requires at a minimum recognition of when that conflict actually was.
Here endeth the lesson. Or it would, if you were capable of dropping it.
VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 1:03 pm
“Rep.” Lol! I don’t give a fuck about rep on an Internet forum. I do appreciate that somehow you see me as an intellectual, but I assure you I’ve never put myself forward as one.
You sure? Cause you’re trying awfully hard otherwise. And it’s telling that you think I’m saying I see you as smart. I don’t. I see you as trying to come off that way, and failing. You’d have to be honest with yourself to admit that.
Chuck has no place to talk about contribution, since going back to the original site.
By even the simplest of metrics you don't compare well against any regular poster. But hey, it's good to know you think it worthy to show up sporadically and let us know who you think is idiotic.Like AH, I bet ur real chill @ parties.
Charliesheen wrote: ↑Sat Jun 29, 2019 11:08 am
By even the simplest of metrics you don't compare well against any regular poster. But hey, it's good to know you think it worthy to show up sporadically and let us know who you think is idiotic.Like AH, I bet ur real chill @ parties.
Not everyone measures things by how well they can regurgitate Limbaugh.
Your metric, not mine. I can't catch him because my job involves very little driving. But when I can listen, I do. He hasn't lost a step and is still blamed for manipulating republicans.