The Necro-Hammy Romance - aka Necro's epic dodge

For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul commies to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.

In memory of our lost political forum members. :cry:

Moderator: Biker

Post Reply
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#201

Post by necronomous »

AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:58 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:55 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:38 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:35 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:27 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:19 pm
Of course I can. If you sucked his dick that absolutely does not prove collusion. Maybe you just like Putin's cock. But while receiving orders to collude while you're sucking cock sure. If you can show me the evidence that that was ordered and not hearsay. And it was given by trump and there's proof of it. And not claimed by CNN. It's not a tactic. It's listening without judgement until I'm sure. Either way. Does me saying yes or no change your evidence?
Well done, you have progressed to admitting collusion is possible.

Now then, if you were to meet with someone you believed to represent the Russian government, offering to help with the election, would that be colluding with the russian interference in the election? You've been running from this simple question for a half dozen pages, you fucking pussy. Can you answer it now?
I admitted it in the beginning. And if I didn't I sure would have if you asked, do you think Trump is capable of collision. Sure he's capable. That has nothing to do with the campaign. So keep going. Nope I wouldn't say I was colluding if I met with someone from the Russian government to help with the campaign. I'm not on the campaign. And it wouldn't matter if I did and it was or wasn't, was it trump meeting with them? No. And what did I ask? What's your proof of Trump's collusion? So go on. You think the meeting was collision. Got it. Now go.
No you didn't, you flat out stated at the beginning that it was a conspiracy theory. Want me to quote you?

So, are you now admitting that the trump tower meeting, going to meet someone claiming to be from the Russian government who wanted to help interfere in the campaign, was colluding with the interference? It's a simp[le question you've been dodging for a long time now, finally going to answer it?
Sure did. At this moment, that's what has been presented. But that is not the question, do you think Trump is capable of collusion. In which case I would have said sure. You didn't ask that. You said you can prove he did. And I said go for it, and then you didn't. And that's where we are. But me thinking that currently it's a conspiracy, doesn't mean you can't change my mind, it just means I'm not going to agree with you about hearsay (unless it's a credible source, not CNN) and shit that goes orange man bad.
Hell now that I'm thinking about it, could you even admit it's not alternate things, with the same amount of reasoning of course? Honestly, we all know the answer is you couldn't. But you don't have to right cause you are right. You're always right and NO ONE could tell you different.
Do you think Trump is capable of collusion? It appears you just said yes, could you confirm that is your asnwer?

While you're at it could you answer the question I've asked you a hundred or so times now? Is going to a meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government colluding with the russian government? What's 1+1?
Yes trump is. The next question is irrelevant because trump wasn't there. And unless you can show the connection, it means nothing. So go.
Also,.nice dodge on that last part.
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#202

Post by AnalHamster »

necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:02 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:58 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:55 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:38 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:35 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:27 pm

Well done, you have progressed to admitting collusion is possible.

Now then, if you were to meet with someone you believed to represent the Russian government, offering to help with the election, would that be colluding with the russian interference in the election? You've been running from this simple question for a half dozen pages, you fucking pussy. Can you answer it now?
I admitted it in the beginning. And if I didn't I sure would have if you asked, do you think Trump is capable of collision. Sure he's capable. That has nothing to do with the campaign. So keep going. Nope I wouldn't say I was colluding if I met with someone from the Russian government to help with the campaign. I'm not on the campaign. And it wouldn't matter if I did and it was or wasn't, was it trump meeting with them? No. And what did I ask? What's your proof of Trump's collusion? So go on. You think the meeting was collision. Got it. Now go.
No you didn't, you flat out stated at the beginning that it was a conspiracy theory. Want me to quote you?

So, are you now admitting that the trump tower meeting, going to meet someone claiming to be from the Russian government who wanted to help interfere in the campaign, was colluding with the interference? It's a simp[le question you've been dodging for a long time now, finally going to answer it?
Sure did. At this moment, that's what has been presented. But that is not the question, do you think Trump is capable of collusion. In which case I would have said sure. You didn't ask that. You said you can prove he did. And I said go for it, and then you didn't. And that's where we are. But me thinking that currently it's a conspiracy, doesn't mean you can't change my mind, it just means I'm not going to agree with you about hearsay (unless it's a credible source, not CNN) and shit that goes orange man bad.
Hell now that I'm thinking about it, could you even admit it's not alternate things, with the same amount of reasoning of course? Honestly, we all know the answer is you couldn't. But you don't have to right cause you are right. You're always right and NO ONE could tell you different.
Do you think Trump is capable of collusion? It appears you just said yes, could you confirm that is your asnwer?

While you're at it could you answer the question I've asked you a hundred or so times now? Is going to a meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government colluding with the russian government? What's 1+1?
Yes trump is. The next question is irrelevant because trump wasn't there. And unless you can show the connection, it means nothing. So go.
I've been trying for 6 pages now to move on to trump's involvement in that example, all you have to do is admit that meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government constitutes colluding with the russian government, your inability to do that is what has delayed me explaining trump's involvement for 6 pages. Ready to cave and admit you can see blatant collusion?
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#203

Post by necronomous »

AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:07 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:02 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:58 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:55 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:38 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:35 pm
I admitted it in the beginning. And if I didn't I sure would have if you asked, do you think Trump is capable of collision. Sure he's capable. That has nothing to do with the campaign. So keep going. Nope I wouldn't say I was colluding if I met with someone from the Russian government to help with the campaign. I'm not on the campaign. And it wouldn't matter if I did and it was or wasn't, was it trump meeting with them? No. And what did I ask? What's your proof of Trump's collusion? So go on. You think the meeting was collision. Got it. Now go.
No you didn't, you flat out stated at the beginning that it was a conspiracy theory. Want me to quote you?

So, are you now admitting that the trump tower meeting, going to meet someone claiming to be from the Russian government who wanted to help interfere in the campaign, was colluding with the interference? It's a simp[le question you've been dodging for a long time now, finally going to answer it?
Sure did. At this moment, that's what has been presented. But that is not the question, do you think Trump is capable of collusion. In which case I would have said sure. You didn't ask that. You said you can prove he did. And I said go for it, and then you didn't. And that's where we are. But me thinking that currently it's a conspiracy, doesn't mean you can't change my mind, it just means I'm not going to agree with you about hearsay (unless it's a credible source, not CNN) and shit that goes orange man bad.
Hell now that I'm thinking about it, could you even admit it's not alternate things, with the same amount of reasoning of course? Honestly, we all know the answer is you couldn't. But you don't have to right cause you are right. You're always right and NO ONE could tell you different.
Do you think Trump is capable of collusion? It appears you just said yes, could you confirm that is your asnwer?

While you're at it could you answer the question I've asked you a hundred or so times now? Is going to a meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government colluding with the russian government? What's 1+1?
Yes trump is. The next question is irrelevant because trump wasn't there. And unless you can show the connection, it means nothing. So go.
I've been trying for 6 pages now to move on to trump's involvement in that example, all you have to do is admit that meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government constitutes colluding with the russian government, your inability to do that is what has delayed me explaining trump's involvement for 6 pages. Ready to cave and admit you can see blatant collusion?
You don't need me to admit anything to prove something is true if it's true. Just go.lay out your case
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#204

Post by AnalHamster »

necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:10 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:07 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:02 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:58 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:55 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:38 pm

No you didn't, you flat out stated at the beginning that it was a conspiracy theory. Want me to quote you?

So, are you now admitting that the trump tower meeting, going to meet someone claiming to be from the Russian government who wanted to help interfere in the campaign, was colluding with the interference? It's a simp[le question you've been dodging for a long time now, finally going to answer it?
Sure did. At this moment, that's what has been presented. But that is not the question, do you think Trump is capable of collusion. In which case I would have said sure. You didn't ask that. You said you can prove he did. And I said go for it, and then you didn't. And that's where we are. But me thinking that currently it's a conspiracy, doesn't mean you can't change my mind, it just means I'm not going to agree with you about hearsay (unless it's a credible source, not CNN) and shit that goes orange man bad.
Hell now that I'm thinking about it, could you even admit it's not alternate things, with the same amount of reasoning of course? Honestly, we all know the answer is you couldn't. But you don't have to right cause you are right. You're always right and NO ONE could tell you different.
Do you think Trump is capable of collusion? It appears you just said yes, could you confirm that is your asnwer?

While you're at it could you answer the question I've asked you a hundred or so times now? Is going to a meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government colluding with the russian government? What's 1+1?
Yes trump is. The next question is irrelevant because trump wasn't there. And unless you can show the connection, it means nothing. So go.
I've been trying for 6 pages now to move on to trump's involvement in that example, all you have to do is admit that meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government constitutes colluding with the russian government, your inability to do that is what has delayed me explaining trump's involvement for 6 pages. Ready to cave and admit you can see blatant collusion?
You don't need me to admit anything to prove something is true if it's true. Just go.lay out your case
I don't need to prove anything to people capable of seeing evidence, I'm trying to get you - someone who can't admit collusion is collusion to admit collusion.

I've been trying for 6 pages now to move on to trump's involvement in that example, all you have to do is admit that meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government constitutes colluding with the russian government, your inability to do that is what has delayed me explaining trump's involvement for 6 pages. Ready to cave and admit you can see blatant collusion?
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#205

Post by necronomous »

AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:15 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:10 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:07 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:02 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:58 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:55 pm
Sure did. At this moment, that's what has been presented. But that is not the question, do you think Trump is capable of collusion. In which case I would have said sure. You didn't ask that. You said you can prove he did. And I said go for it, and then you didn't. And that's where we are. But me thinking that currently it's a conspiracy, doesn't mean you can't change my mind, it just means I'm not going to agree with you about hearsay (unless it's a credible source, not CNN) and shit that goes orange man bad.
Hell now that I'm thinking about it, could you even admit it's not alternate things, with the same amount of reasoning of course? Honestly, we all know the answer is you couldn't. But you don't have to right cause you are right. You're always right and NO ONE could tell you different.
Do you think Trump is capable of collusion? It appears you just said yes, could you confirm that is your asnwer?

While you're at it could you answer the question I've asked you a hundred or so times now? Is going to a meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government colluding with the russian government? What's 1+1?
Yes trump is. The next question is irrelevant because trump wasn't there. And unless you can show the connection, it means nothing. So go.
I've been trying for 6 pages now to move on to trump's involvement in that example, all you have to do is admit that meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government constitutes colluding with the russian government, your inability to do that is what has delayed me explaining trump's involvement for 6 pages. Ready to cave and admit you can see blatant collusion?
You don't need me to admit anything to prove something is true if it's true. Just go.lay out your case
I don't need to prove anything to people capable of seeing evidence, I'm trying to get you - someone who can't admit collusion is collusion to admit collusion.

I've been trying for 6 pages now to move on to trump's involvement in that example, all you have to do is admit that meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government constitutes colluding with the russian government, your inability to do that is what has delayed me explaining trump's involvement for 6 pages. Ready to cave and admit you can see blatant collusion?
I've delayed nothing. You're a grown ass man (maybe, it's becoming debatable at this point). Either way at this point, you have free will. The only thing stopping you, is you. If you don't want to make a case for your side, ok. You have a make believe thought about me. You can have it all you want. Again, it means shit to me. Make your point, or don't, but never say no one asked, nor gave you the opportunity. It's on you Oreo.
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#206

Post by AnalHamster »

necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:31 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:15 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:10 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:07 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:02 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:58 pm

Do you think Trump is capable of collusion? It appears you just said yes, could you confirm that is your asnwer?

While you're at it could you answer the question I've asked you a hundred or so times now? Is going to a meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government colluding with the russian government? What's 1+1?
Yes trump is. The next question is irrelevant because trump wasn't there. And unless you can show the connection, it means nothing. So go.
I've been trying for 6 pages now to move on to trump's involvement in that example, all you have to do is admit that meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government constitutes colluding with the russian government, your inability to do that is what has delayed me explaining trump's involvement for 6 pages. Ready to cave and admit you can see blatant collusion?
You don't need me to admit anything to prove something is true if it's true. Just go.lay out your case
I don't need to prove anything to people capable of seeing evidence, I'm trying to get you - someone who can't admit collusion is collusion to admit collusion.

I've been trying for 6 pages now to move on to trump's involvement in that example, all you have to do is admit that meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government constitutes colluding with the russian government, your inability to do that is what has delayed me explaining trump's involvement for 6 pages. Ready to cave and admit you can see blatant collusion?
I've delayed nothing. You're a grown ass man (maybe, it's becoming debatable at this point). Either way at this point, you have free will. The only thing stopping you, is you. If you don't want to make a case for your side, ok. You have a make believe thought about me. You can have it all you want. Again, it means shit to me. Make your point, or don't, but never say no one asked, nor gave you the opportunity. It's on you Oreo.
You understand you are now refusing to state whether or not fellating Putin while receiving orders would constitute collusion? If you want to move forward, admit collusion exists.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#207

Post by necronomous »

AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:07 am
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:31 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:15 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:10 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:07 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:02 pm

Yes trump is. The next question is irrelevant because trump wasn't there. And unless you can show the connection, it means nothing. So go.
I've been trying for 6 pages now to move on to trump's involvement in that example, all you have to do is admit that meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government constitutes colluding with the russian government, your inability to do that is what has delayed me explaining trump's involvement for 6 pages. Ready to cave and admit you can see blatant collusion?
You don't need me to admit anything to prove something is true if it's true. Just go.lay out your case
I don't need to prove anything to people capable of seeing evidence, I'm trying to get you - someone who can't admit collusion is collusion to admit collusion.

I've been trying for 6 pages now to move on to trump's involvement in that example, all you have to do is admit that meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government constitutes colluding with the russian government, your inability to do that is what has delayed me explaining trump's involvement for 6 pages. Ready to cave and admit you can see blatant collusion?
I've delayed nothing. You're a grown ass man (maybe, it's becoming debatable at this point). Either way at this point, you have free will. The only thing stopping you, is you. If you don't want to make a case for your side, ok. You have a make believe thought about me. You can have it all you want. Again, it means shit to me. Make your point, or don't, but never say no one asked, nor gave you the opportunity. It's on you Oreo.
You understand you are now refusing to state whether or not fellating Putin while receiving orders would constitute collusion? If you want to move forward, admit collusion exists.
Do what you want twinkle tits. Go or don't. I asked, you failed.
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#208

Post by AnalHamster »

necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:39 am
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:07 am
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:31 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:15 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:10 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:07 pm

I've been trying for 6 pages now to move on to trump's involvement in that example, all you have to do is admit that meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government constitutes colluding with the russian government, your inability to do that is what has delayed me explaining trump's involvement for 6 pages. Ready to cave and admit you can see blatant collusion?
You don't need me to admit anything to prove something is true if it's true. Just go.lay out your case
I don't need to prove anything to people capable of seeing evidence, I'm trying to get you - someone who can't admit collusion is collusion to admit collusion.

I've been trying for 6 pages now to move on to trump's involvement in that example, all you have to do is admit that meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government constitutes colluding with the russian government, your inability to do that is what has delayed me explaining trump's involvement for 6 pages. Ready to cave and admit you can see blatant collusion?
I've delayed nothing. You're a grown ass man (maybe, it's becoming debatable at this point). Either way at this point, you have free will. The only thing stopping you, is you. If you don't want to make a case for your side, ok. You have a make believe thought about me. You can have it all you want. Again, it means shit to me. Make your point, or don't, but never say no one asked, nor gave you the opportunity. It's on you Oreo.
You understand you are now refusing to state whether or not fellating Putin while receiving orders would constitute collusion? If you want to move forward, admit collusion exists.
Do what you want twinkle tits. Go or don't. I asked, you failed.
You're asking me to get you to admit trump colluded while refusing to state whether going to the Kemlin to fellate Putin while receiving orders to collude would constitute collusion.

If Putin, with his dick in your mouth, gives you instructions in how to collude, would you be colluding? Do you have any idea how retarded you look being unable to answer that? :lol:
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#209

Post by necronomous »

AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:44 am
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:39 am
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:07 am
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:31 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:15 pm
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:10 pm
You don't need me to admit anything to prove something is true if it's true. Just go.lay out your case
I don't need to prove anything to people capable of seeing evidence, I'm trying to get you - someone who can't admit collusion is collusion to admit collusion.

I've been trying for 6 pages now to move on to trump's involvement in that example, all you have to do is admit that meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government constitutes colluding with the russian government, your inability to do that is what has delayed me explaining trump's involvement for 6 pages. Ready to cave and admit you can see blatant collusion?
I've delayed nothing. You're a grown ass man (maybe, it's becoming debatable at this point). Either way at this point, you have free will. The only thing stopping you, is you. If you don't want to make a case for your side, ok. You have a make believe thought about me. You can have it all you want. Again, it means shit to me. Make your point, or don't, but never say no one asked, nor gave you the opportunity. It's on you Oreo.
You understand you are now refusing to state whether or not fellating Putin while receiving orders would constitute collusion? If you want to move forward, admit collusion exists.
Do what you want twinkle tits. Go or don't. I asked, you failed.
You're asking me to get you to admit trump colluded while refusing to state whether going to the Kemlin to fellate Putin while receiving orders to collude would constitute collusion.

If Putin, with his dick in your mouth, gives you instructions in how to collude, would you be colluding? Do you have any idea how retarded you look being unable to answer that? :lol:
I already answered that if you were blowing Putin and receive order to collude, that would be collusion. Page or so ago when you asked. I guess you missed it.
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#210

Post by AnalHamster »

necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:59 am
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:44 am
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:39 am
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:07 am
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:31 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:15 pm

I don't need to prove anything to people capable of seeing evidence, I'm trying to get you - someone who can't admit collusion is collusion to admit collusion.

I've been trying for 6 pages now to move on to trump's involvement in that example, all you have to do is admit that meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government offering help from the russian government constitutes colluding with the russian government, your inability to do that is what has delayed me explaining trump's involvement for 6 pages. Ready to cave and admit you can see blatant collusion?
I've delayed nothing. You're a grown ass man (maybe, it's becoming debatable at this point). Either way at this point, you have free will. The only thing stopping you, is you. If you don't want to make a case for your side, ok. You have a make believe thought about me. You can have it all you want. Again, it means shit to me. Make your point, or don't, but never say no one asked, nor gave you the opportunity. It's on you Oreo.
You understand you are now refusing to state whether or not fellating Putin while receiving orders would constitute collusion? If you want to move forward, admit collusion exists.
Do what you want twinkle tits. Go or don't. I asked, you failed.
You're asking me to get you to admit trump colluded while refusing to state whether going to the Kemlin to fellate Putin while receiving orders to collude would constitute collusion.

If Putin, with his dick in your mouth, gives you instructions in how to collude, would you be colluding? Do you have any idea how retarded you look being unable to answer that? :lol:
I already answered that if you were blowing Putin and receive order to collude, that would be collusion. Page or so ago when you asked. I guess you missed it.
Very good progress, so now you have admitted collusion is possible, can you admit that the trump tower meeting was collusion?
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#211

Post by necronomous »

AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:11 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:59 am
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:44 am
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:39 am
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:07 am
necronomous wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:31 pm
I've delayed nothing. You're a grown ass man (maybe, it's becoming debatable at this point). Either way at this point, you have free will. The only thing stopping you, is you. If you don't want to make a case for your side, ok. You have a make believe thought about me. You can have it all you want. Again, it means shit to me. Make your point, or don't, but never say no one asked, nor gave you the opportunity. It's on you Oreo.
You understand you are now refusing to state whether or not fellating Putin while receiving orders would constitute collusion? If you want to move forward, admit collusion exists.
Do what you want twinkle tits. Go or don't. I asked, you failed.
You're asking me to get you to admit trump colluded while refusing to state whether going to the Kemlin to fellate Putin while receiving orders to collude would constitute collusion.

If Putin, with his dick in your mouth, gives you instructions in how to collude, would you be colluding? Do you have any idea how retarded you look being unable to answer that? :lol:
I already answered that if you were blowing Putin and receive order to collude, that would be collusion. Page or so ago when you asked. I guess you missed it.
Very good progress, so now you have admitted collusion is possible, can you admit that the trump tower meeting was collusion?
Now back to the beginning. Go or don't Gus, up to you.
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#212

Post by AnalHamster »

necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:48 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:11 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:59 am
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:44 am
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:39 am
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:07 am

You understand you are now refusing to state whether or not fellating Putin while receiving orders would constitute collusion? If you want to move forward, admit collusion exists.
Do what you want twinkle tits. Go or don't. I asked, you failed.
You're asking me to get you to admit trump colluded while refusing to state whether going to the Kemlin to fellate Putin while receiving orders to collude would constitute collusion.

If Putin, with his dick in your mouth, gives you instructions in how to collude, would you be colluding? Do you have any idea how retarded you look being unable to answer that? :lol:
I already answered that if you were blowing Putin and receive order to collude, that would be collusion. Page or so ago when you asked. I guess you missed it.
Very good progress, so now you have admitted collusion is possible, can you admit that the trump tower meeting was collusion?
Now back to the beginning. Go or don't Gus, up to you.
So you still can't admit the trump tower meeting constituted collusion, and can't deny it either. Yep, we're going to need to establish you can grasp what collusion is. You've figured out putin's dick in your mouth while giving you orders would be, now you need to try to think real hard and see if you can figure out if meeting someone from the russian government offering help with the campaign constitutes collusion with their interference. Hint: the answer is yes it does. Keep trying lil' fella, I believe in you.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#213

Post by necronomous »

AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:57 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:48 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:11 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:59 am
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:44 am
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:39 am
Do what you want twinkle tits. Go or don't. I asked, you failed.
You're asking me to get you to admit trump colluded while refusing to state whether going to the Kemlin to fellate Putin while receiving orders to collude would constitute collusion.

If Putin, with his dick in your mouth, gives you instructions in how to collude, would you be colluding? Do you have any idea how retarded you look being unable to answer that? :lol:
I already answered that if you were blowing Putin and receive order to collude, that would be collusion. Page or so ago when you asked. I guess you missed it.
Very good progress, so now you have admitted collusion is possible, can you admit that the trump tower meeting was collusion?
Now back to the beginning. Go or don't Gus, up to you.
So you still can't admit the trump tower meeting constituted collusion, and can't deny it either. Yep, we're going to need to establish you can grasp what collusion is. You've figured out putin's dick in your mouth while giving you orders would be, now you need to try to think real hard and see if you can figure out if meeting someone from the russian government offering help with the campaign constitutes collusion with their interference. Hint: the answer is yes it does. Keep trying lil' fella, I believe in you.
Go or don't nut juggler.
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#214

Post by AnalHamster »

necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:03 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:57 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:48 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:11 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:59 am
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:44 am

You're asking me to get you to admit trump colluded while refusing to state whether going to the Kemlin to fellate Putin while receiving orders to collude would constitute collusion.

If Putin, with his dick in your mouth, gives you instructions in how to collude, would you be colluding? Do you have any idea how retarded you look being unable to answer that? :lol:
I already answered that if you were blowing Putin and receive order to collude, that would be collusion. Page or so ago when you asked. I guess you missed it.
Very good progress, so now you have admitted collusion is possible, can you admit that the trump tower meeting was collusion?
Now back to the beginning. Go or don't Gus, up to you.
So you still can't admit the trump tower meeting constituted collusion, and can't deny it either. Yep, we're going to need to establish you can grasp what collusion is. You've figured out putin's dick in your mouth while giving you orders would be, now you need to try to think real hard and see if you can figure out if meeting someone from the russian government offering help with the campaign constitutes collusion with their interference. Hint: the answer is yes it does. Keep trying lil' fella, I believe in you.
Go or don't nut juggler.
Why would I go? You've got at least another 20 pages of dodging this question in you:
Can figure out if meeting someone from the russian government offering help with the campaign constitutes collusion with their interference. Hint: the answer is yes it does. Keep trying lil' fella, I believe in you.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#215

Post by necronomous »

AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:24 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:03 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:57 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:48 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:11 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:59 am
I already answered that if you were blowing Putin and receive order to collude, that would be collusion. Page or so ago when you asked. I guess you missed it.
Very good progress, so now you have admitted collusion is possible, can you admit that the trump tower meeting was collusion?
Now back to the beginning. Go or don't Gus, up to you.
So you still can't admit the trump tower meeting constituted collusion, and can't deny it either. Yep, we're going to need to establish you can grasp what collusion is. You've figured out putin's dick in your mouth while giving you orders would be, now you need to try to think real hard and see if you can figure out if meeting someone from the russian government offering help with the campaign constitutes collusion with their interference. Hint: the answer is yes it does. Keep trying lil' fella, I believe in you.
Go or don't nut juggler.
Why would I go? You've got at least another 20 pages of dodging this question in you:
Can figure out if meeting someone from the russian government offering help with the campaign constitutes collusion with their interference. Hint: the answer is yes it does. Keep trying lil' fella, I believe in you.
Go or don't. You can show the evidence change my mind or not, and that seems where we're heading. So go licorice nipples.
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#216

Post by AnalHamster »

necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:53 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:24 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:03 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:57 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:48 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:11 pm

Very good progress, so now you have admitted collusion is possible, can you admit that the trump tower meeting was collusion?
Now back to the beginning. Go or don't Gus, up to you.
So you still can't admit the trump tower meeting constituted collusion, and can't deny it either. Yep, we're going to need to establish you can grasp what collusion is. You've figured out putin's dick in your mouth while giving you orders would be, now you need to try to think real hard and see if you can figure out if meeting someone from the russian government offering help with the campaign constitutes collusion with their interference. Hint: the answer is yes it does. Keep trying lil' fella, I believe in you.
Go or don't nut juggler.
Why would I go? You've got at least another 20 pages of dodging this question in you:
Can figure out if meeting someone from the russian government offering help with the campaign constitutes collusion with their interference. Hint: the answer is yes it does. Keep trying lil' fella, I believe in you.
Go or don't. You can show the evidence change my mind or not, and that seems where we're heading. So go licorice nipples.
I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#217

Post by necronomous »

AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:55 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:53 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:24 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:03 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:57 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:48 pm
Now back to the beginning. Go or don't Gus, up to you.
So you still can't admit the trump tower meeting constituted collusion, and can't deny it either. Yep, we're going to need to establish you can grasp what collusion is. You've figured out putin's dick in your mouth while giving you orders would be, now you need to try to think real hard and see if you can figure out if meeting someone from the russian government offering help with the campaign constitutes collusion with their interference. Hint: the answer is yes it does. Keep trying lil' fella, I believe in you.
Go or don't nut juggler.
Why would I go? You've got at least another 20 pages of dodging this question in you:
Can figure out if meeting someone from the russian government offering help with the campaign constitutes collusion with their interference. Hint: the answer is yes it does. Keep trying lil' fella, I believe in you.
Go or don't. You can show the evidence change my mind or not, and that seems where we're heading. So go licorice nipples.
I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
Still haven't refused anything. I just said, go on. Let me hear what you got. You don't want to, that's on you. But hey if that's all you got I'll render my judgement then. This is not proof that Trump colluded. Ok so I guess we're done. Anyone else have any proof that Trump himself colluded?
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#218

Post by AnalHamster »

necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:58 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:55 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:53 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:24 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:03 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:57 pm

So you still can't admit the trump tower meeting constituted collusion, and can't deny it either. Yep, we're going to need to establish you can grasp what collusion is. You've figured out putin's dick in your mouth while giving you orders would be, now you need to try to think real hard and see if you can figure out if meeting someone from the russian government offering help with the campaign constitutes collusion with their interference. Hint: the answer is yes it does. Keep trying lil' fella, I believe in you.
Go or don't nut juggler.
Why would I go? You've got at least another 20 pages of dodging this question in you:
Can figure out if meeting someone from the russian government offering help with the campaign constitutes collusion with their interference. Hint: the answer is yes it does. Keep trying lil' fella, I believe in you.
Go or don't. You can show the evidence change my mind or not, and that seems where we're heading. So go licorice nipples.
I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
Still haven't refused anything. I just said, go on. Let me hear what you got. You don't want to, that's on you. But hey if that's all you got I'll render my judgement then. This is not proof that Trump colluded. Ok so I guess we're done. Anyone else have any proof that Trump himself colluded?
Yes, we've established you are too chickenshit to confirm or deny if you can understand whether the trump tower meeting was collusion. That's why I'm going to keep asking you, over and over and over.

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#219

Post by necronomous »

AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:03 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:58 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:55 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:53 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:24 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:03 pm

Go or don't nut juggler.
Why would I go? You've got at least another 20 pages of dodging this question in you:
Can figure out if meeting someone from the russian government offering help with the campaign constitutes collusion with their interference. Hint: the answer is yes it does. Keep trying lil' fella, I believe in you.
Go or don't. You can show the evidence change my mind or not, and that seems where we're heading. So go licorice nipples.
I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
Still haven't refused anything. I just said, go on. Let me hear what you got. You don't want to, that's on you. But hey if that's all you got I'll render my judgement then. This is not proof that Trump colluded. Ok so I guess we're done. Anyone else have any proof that Trump himself colluded?
Yes, we've established you are too chickenshit to confirm or deny if you can understand whether the trump tower meeting was collusion. That's why I'm going to keep asking you, over and over and over.

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
So you still haven't presented anything against Trump. So again all evidence presented shows trump didn't collude. You can keep going over and over how trump didn't collude. I will look at ALL evidence you show. I admit you showed me all the evidence you seem to have. And nothing in this bit shows Trump colluded. All done then. Anyone else?
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#220

Post by AnalHamster »

necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:48 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:03 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:58 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:55 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:53 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:24 pm

Why would I go? You've got at least another 20 pages of dodging this question in you:
Can figure out if meeting someone from the russian government offering help with the campaign constitutes collusion with their interference. Hint: the answer is yes it does. Keep trying lil' fella, I believe in you.
Go or don't. You can show the evidence change my mind or not, and that seems where we're heading. So go licorice nipples.
I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
Still haven't refused anything. I just said, go on. Let me hear what you got. You don't want to, that's on you. But hey if that's all you got I'll render my judgement then. This is not proof that Trump colluded. Ok so I guess we're done. Anyone else have any proof that Trump himself colluded?
Yes, we've established you are too chickenshit to confirm or deny if you can understand whether the trump tower meeting was collusion. That's why I'm going to keep asking you, over and over and over.

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
So you still haven't presented anything against Trump. So again all evidence presented shows trump didn't collude. You can keep going over and over how trump didn't collude. I will look at ALL evidence you show. I admit you showed me all the evidence you seem to have. And nothing in this bit shows Trump colluded. All done then. Anyone else?
You say all done every post, yet you are compelled to make another. You just can't face running away and you can't answer. Sucks to be you I guess.

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
User avatar
Stapes
World's Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 12853
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#221

Post by Stapes »

The Mueller investigation identified over a two hundred contacts between russian operatives and Trump campaign staff And at least 38 meetings. None of them reported and the trumpets tried to cover them all up.
I blame Biker.
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#222

Post by AnalHamster »

Woah hold on there, are you trying to suggest there may be some kind of link between Trump and the Trump campaign?
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#223

Post by necronomous »

AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:01 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:48 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:03 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:58 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:55 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:53 pm
Go or don't. You can show the evidence change my mind or not, and that seems where we're heading. So go licorice nipples.
I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
Still haven't refused anything. I just said, go on. Let me hear what you got. You don't want to, that's on you. But hey if that's all you got I'll render my judgement then. This is not proof that Trump colluded. Ok so I guess we're done. Anyone else have any proof that Trump himself colluded?
Yes, we've established you are too chickenshit to confirm or deny if you can understand whether the trump tower meeting was collusion. That's why I'm going to keep asking you, over and over and over.

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
So you still haven't presented anything against Trump. So again all evidence presented shows trump didn't collude. You can keep going over and over how trump didn't collude. I will look at ALL evidence you show. I admit you showed me all the evidence you seem to have. And nothing in this bit shows Trump colluded. All done then. Anyone else?
You say all done every post, yet you are compelled to make another. You just can't face running away and you can't answer. Sucks to be you I guess.

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
I'm fair, and want to give you a chance. You're not taking it.
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#224

Post by AnalHamster »

necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:25 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:01 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:48 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:03 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:58 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:55 pm

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
Still haven't refused anything. I just said, go on. Let me hear what you got. You don't want to, that's on you. But hey if that's all you got I'll render my judgement then. This is not proof that Trump colluded. Ok so I guess we're done. Anyone else have any proof that Trump himself colluded?
Yes, we've established you are too chickenshit to confirm or deny if you can understand whether the trump tower meeting was collusion. That's why I'm going to keep asking you, over and over and over.

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
So you still haven't presented anything against Trump. So again all evidence presented shows trump didn't collude. You can keep going over and over how trump didn't collude. I will look at ALL evidence you show. I admit you showed me all the evidence you seem to have. And nothing in this bit shows Trump colluded. All done then. Anyone else?
You say all done every post, yet you are compelled to make another. You just can't face running away and you can't answer. Sucks to be you I guess.

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
I'm fair, and want to give you a chance. You're not taking it.
I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?

#225

Post by necronomous »

AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:28 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:25 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:01 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:48 pm
AnalHamster wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:03 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:58 pm
Still haven't refused anything. I just said, go on. Let me hear what you got. You don't want to, that's on you. But hey if that's all you got I'll render my judgement then. This is not proof that Trump colluded. Ok so I guess we're done. Anyone else have any proof that Trump himself colluded?
Yes, we've established you are too chickenshit to confirm or deny if you can understand whether the trump tower meeting was collusion. That's why I'm going to keep asking you, over and over and over.

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
So you still haven't presented anything against Trump. So again all evidence presented shows trump didn't collude. You can keep going over and over how trump didn't collude. I will look at ALL evidence you show. I admit you showed me all the evidence you seem to have. And nothing in this bit shows Trump colluded. All done then. Anyone else?
You say all done every post, yet you are compelled to make another. You just can't face running away and you can't answer. Sucks to be you I guess.

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.
I'm fair, and want to give you a chance. You're not taking it.
I can show one piece of evidence, you have to look at it.
I've looked at it. It doesn't prove Trump colluded. Got anything else?
Post Reply