ABC News Broadcasts Fake Syria Bombing Video

[beagleboy]

https://gizmodo.com/abc-news-broadcasts ... do_twitter


ABC News Broadcasts Fake Syria Bombing Video That's Actually From a Kentucky Military Show in 2017

[AnalHamster]

This is what Trump means when he calls the media the enemy of the people

No it isn't.

[Wut]

A war hoax? Is that a thing?

Regardless, you'd think they'd know better.

[Charliesheen]

Nah. They knew exactly what they were doing.

[necronomous]

This is what Trump means when he calls the media the enemy of the people

No it isn't.

How come you can't admit the other side of things? Nevermind, I know.

[DandyDon]

This is what Trump means when he calls the media the enemy of the people

Narrator: No, it is not.

Trump calls anything that does not cast him in an ethereal glow FAKE NEWS, and any network that reports actual facts that show his bullshit "the enemy of the people". He's even turning on Fox now.



Trump phoned Fox News to complain coverage of him was not supportive enough

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 54771.html

[VinceBordenIII]

A war hoax? Is that a thing?

Regardless, you'd think they'd know better.

They’re in such a hurry to scoop the competition that they don’t check. Before the Internet people didn’t have a way to see how retarded they really are. And they don’t talk about things that go against their collective beliefs.

[AnalHamster]

This is what Trump means when he calls the media the enemy of the people

No it isn't.

How come you can't admit the other side of things? Nevermind, I know.

They got duped, then admitted it and apologised. That's a mistake. Actual fake news is when they deliberately lie or keep repeating lies, not when they immediately retract and apologise. This is not what chump means by fake news, he thinks there is a conspiracy out to get him through deliberately misleading. The fact that there isn't a conspiracy is why you righties get so excited by simple errors like this one.

[necronomous]

This is what Trump means when he calls the media the enemy of the people

No it isn't.

How come you can't admit the other side of things? Nevermind, I know.

They got duped, then admitted it and apologised. That's a mistake. Actual fake news is when they deliberately lie or keep repeating lies, not when they immediately retract and apologise. This is not what chump means by fake news, he thinks there is a conspiracy out to get him through deliberately misleading. The fact that there isn't a conspiracy is why you righties get so excited by simple errors like this one.

Not a righty. And you think just getting it out there "by mistake" does no harm? I'm sure there are a lot of people out there who have been hurt by accidentally releasing misinformation. People without jobs, ostracized, demonized, etc.

[AnalHamster]

This is what Trump means when he calls the media the enemy of the people

No it isn't.

How come you can't admit the other side of things? Nevermind, I know.

They got duped, then admitted it and apologised. That's a mistake. Actual fake news is when they deliberately lie or keep repeating lies, not when they immediately retract and apologise. This is not what chump means by fake news, he thinks there is a conspiracy out to get him through deliberately misleading. The fact that there isn't a conspiracy is why you righties get so excited by simple errors like this one.

Not a righty. And you think just getting it out there "by mistake" does no harm? I'm sure there are a lot of people out there who have been hurt by accidentally releasing misinformation. People without jobs, ostracized, demonized, etc.

Yes you are, non righties can grasp that meeting a russian to get help from their interference campaign constitutes collusion. You can't.

I don't think this particular mistake did any harm, no. What's the takeaway? There's a violent conflict going on after Turkey invaded Syria? There is. It was retracted quickly, the only damage is to their credibility for not being better at fact checking.

Sustained fake news campaigns that lead to false beliefs amongst your viewership is the harm from fake news. For example fox viewers still disproportionately believing we found WMD in Iraq and wondering where obama's birth cerificate is.

[necronomous]

This is what Trump means when he calls the media the enemy of the people

No it isn't.

How come you can't admit the other side of things? Nevermind, I know.

They got duped, then admitted it and apologised. That's a mistake. Actual fake news is when they deliberately lie or keep repeating lies, not when they immediately retract and apologise. This is not what chump means by fake news, he thinks there is a conspiracy out to get him through deliberately misleading. The fact that there isn't a conspiracy is why you righties get so excited by simple errors like this one.

Not a righty. And you think just getting it out there "by mistake" does no harm? I'm sure there are a lot of people out there who have been hurt by accidentally releasing misinformation. People without jobs, ostracized, demonized, etc.

Yes you are, non righties can grasp that meeting a russian to get help from their interference campaign constitutes collusion. You can't.

I don't think this particular mistake did any harm, no. What's the takeaway? There's a violent conflict going on after Turkey invaded Syria? There is. It was retracted quickly, the only damage is to their credibility for not being better at fact checking.

Sustained fake news campaigns that lead to false beliefs amongst your viewership is the harm from fake news. For example fox viewers still disproportionately believing we found WMD in Iraq and wondering where obama's birth cerificate is.

No you can't. For example a sustained barrage of Trump colluding with Russian that you can't provide evidence for.

Still not a righty, but if you want to believe that, idiocy is a good look on you.

[beagleboy]

Before the internet became so robust I suspect major media was doing this sort of thing very routinely. In 1995 it would have been difficult to search out and find old video to prove it even if you cared.

Dan Rather was considered non-partisan and if you listen to his crap today you'd have to scratch your head and wonder why.

[AnalHamster]

No it isn't.

How come you can't admit the other side of things? Nevermind, I know.

They got duped, then admitted it and apologised. That's a mistake. Actual fake news is when they deliberately lie or keep repeating lies, not when they immediately retract and apologise. This is not what chump means by fake news, he thinks there is a conspiracy out to get him through deliberately misleading. The fact that there isn't a conspiracy is why you righties get so excited by simple errors like this one.

Not a righty. And you think just getting it out there "by mistake" does no harm? I'm sure there are a lot of people out there who have been hurt by accidentally releasing misinformation. People without jobs, ostracized, demonized, etc.

Yes you are, non righties can grasp that meeting a russian to get help from their interference campaign constitutes collusion. You can't.

I don't think this particular mistake did any harm, no. What's the takeaway? There's a violent conflict going on after Turkey invaded Syria? There is. It was retracted quickly, the only damage is to their credibility for not being better at fact checking.

Sustained fake news campaigns that lead to false beliefs amongst your viewership is the harm from fake news. For example fox viewers still disproportionately believing we found WMD in Iraq and wondering where obama's birth cerificate is.

No you can't. For example a sustained barrage of Trump colluding with Russian that you can't provide evidence for.

Still not a righty, but if you want to believe that, idiocy is a good look on you.

Sure I can, if you stop running away.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

[necronomous]

How come you can't admit the other side of things? Nevermind, I know.

They got duped, then admitted it and apologised. That's a mistake. Actual fake news is when they deliberately lie or keep repeating lies, not when they immediately retract and apologise. This is not what chump means by fake news, he thinks there is a conspiracy out to get him through deliberately misleading. The fact that there isn't a conspiracy is why you righties get so excited by simple errors like this one.

Not a righty. And you think just getting it out there "by mistake" does no harm? I'm sure there are a lot of people out there who have been hurt by accidentally releasing misinformation. People without jobs, ostracized, demonized, etc.

Yes you are, non righties can grasp that meeting a russian to get help from their interference campaign constitutes collusion. You can't.

I don't think this particular mistake did any harm, no. What's the takeaway? There's a violent conflict going on after Turkey invaded Syria? There is. It was retracted quickly, the only damage is to their credibility for not being better at fact checking.

Sustained fake news campaigns that lead to false beliefs amongst your viewership is the harm from fake news. For example fox viewers still disproportionately believing we found WMD in Iraq and wondering where obama's birth cerificate is.

No you can't. For example a sustained barrage of Trump colluding with Russian that you can't provide evidence for.

Still not a righty, but if you want to believe that, idiocy is a good look on you.

Sure I can, if you stop running away.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

Still no proof.
Let's not fuck up this thread with your non answers though. One is enough.

[AnalHamster]

They got duped, then admitted it and apologised. That's a mistake. Actual fake news is when they deliberately lie or keep repeating lies, not when they immediately retract and apologise. This is not what chump means by fake news, he thinks there is a conspiracy out to get him through deliberately misleading. The fact that there isn't a conspiracy is why you righties get so excited by simple errors like this one.

Not a righty. And you think just getting it out there "by mistake" does no harm? I'm sure there are a lot of people out there who have been hurt by accidentally releasing misinformation. People without jobs, ostracized, demonized, etc.

Yes you are, non righties can grasp that meeting a russian to get help from their interference campaign constitutes collusion. You can't.

I don't think this particular mistake did any harm, no. What's the takeaway? There's a violent conflict going on after Turkey invaded Syria? There is. It was retracted quickly, the only damage is to their credibility for not being better at fact checking.

Sustained fake news campaigns that lead to false beliefs amongst your viewership is the harm from fake news. For example fox viewers still disproportionately believing we found WMD in Iraq and wondering where obama's birth cerificate is.

No you can't. For example a sustained barrage of Trump colluding with Russian that you can't provide evidence for.

Still not a righty, but if you want to believe that, idiocy is a good look on you.

Sure I can, if you stop running away.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

Still no proof.
Let's not fuck up this thread with your non answers though. One is enough.

If you want to reply to what I said on the topic feel free, looks like you're pleading the 5th again.

[necronomous]

Not a righty. And you think just getting it out there "by mistake" does no harm? I'm sure there are a lot of people out there who have been hurt by accidentally releasing misinformation. People without jobs, ostracized, demonized, etc.

Yes you are, non righties can grasp that meeting a russian to get help from their interference campaign constitutes collusion. You can't.

I don't think this particular mistake did any harm, no. What's the takeaway? There's a violent conflict going on after Turkey invaded Syria? There is. It was retracted quickly, the only damage is to their credibility for not being better at fact checking.

Sustained fake news campaigns that lead to false beliefs amongst your viewership is the harm from fake news. For example fox viewers still disproportionately believing we found WMD in Iraq and wondering where obama's birth cerificate is.

No you can't. For example a sustained barrage of Trump colluding with Russian that you can't provide evidence for.

Still not a righty, but if you want to believe that, idiocy is a good look on you.

Sure I can, if you stop running away.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

Still no proof.
Let's not fuck up this thread with your non answers though. One is enough.

If you want to reply to what I said on the topic feel free, looks like you're pleading the 5th again.

You wanna fuck up two threads with the same crap. Come on, don't do a WTC.

[AnalHamster]

Yes you are, non righties can grasp that meeting a russian to get help from their interference campaign constitutes collusion. You can't.

I don't think this particular mistake did any harm, no. What's the takeaway? There's a violent conflict going on after Turkey invaded Syria? There is. It was retracted quickly, the only damage is to their credibility for not being better at fact checking.

Sustained fake news campaigns that lead to false beliefs amongst your viewership is the harm from fake news. For example fox viewers still disproportionately believing we found WMD in Iraq and wondering where obama's birth cerificate is.

No you can't. For example a sustained barrage of Trump colluding with Russian that you can't provide evidence for.

Still not a righty, but if you want to believe that, idiocy is a good look on you.

Sure I can, if you stop running away.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

Still no proof.
Let's not fuck up this thread with your non answers though. One is enough.

If you want to reply to what I said on the topic feel free, looks like you're pleading the 5th again.

You wanna fuck up two threads with the same crap. Come on, don't do a WTC.

If you want to reply to what I said on the topic feel free, looks like you're pleading the 5th again.

[necronomous]

No you can't. For example a sustained barrage of Trump colluding with Russian that you can't provide evidence for.

Still not a righty, but if you want to believe that, idiocy is a good look on you.

Sure I can, if you stop running away.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

Still no proof.
Let's not fuck up this thread with your non answers though. One is enough.

If you want to reply to what I said on the topic feel free, looks like you're pleading the 5th again.

You wanna fuck up two threads with the same crap. Come on, don't do a WTC.

If you want to reply to what I said on the topic feel free, looks like you're pleading the 5th again.

Rude

[beagleboy]

Charles Jaco lives pretty close to my office and is still active in the media. He's a complete asshole supposedly.

[AnalHamster]

Sure I can, if you stop running away.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

Still no proof.
Let's not fuck up this thread with your non answers though. One is enough.

If you want to reply to what I said on the topic feel free, looks like you're pleading the 5th again.

You wanna fuck up two threads with the same crap. Come on, don't do a WTC.

If you want to reply to what I said on the topic feel free, looks like you're pleading the 5th again.

Rude

OK, well you clearly can't reply to what I said on the topic yet need to have the last word so go ahead. Doesn't bother me none and one thread chasing you to answer a simple question at a time will do.

[necronomous]

Still no proof.
Let's not fuck up this thread with your non answers though. One is enough.

If you want to reply to what I said on the topic feel free, looks like you're pleading the 5th again.

You wanna fuck up two threads with the same crap. Come on, don't do a WTC.

If you want to reply to what I said on the topic feel free, looks like you're pleading the 5th again.

Rude

OK, well you clearly can't reply to what I said on the topic yet need to have the last word so go ahead. Doesn't bother me none and one thread chasing you to answer a simple question at a time will do.

Which do you want answered? Because if it's the collusion one, that's just rude. Also, my wife just sent a pussy pic. It's hot as fuck. Want to see it?

[Wut]

If you want to reply to what I said on the topic feel free, looks like you're pleading the 5th again.

You wanna fuck up two threads with the same crap. Come on, don't do a WTC.

If you want to reply to what I said on the topic feel free, looks like you're pleading the 5th again.

Rude

OK, well you clearly can't reply to what I said on the topic yet need to have the last word so go ahead. Doesn't bother me none and one thread chasing you to answer a simple question at a time will do.

Which do you want answered? Because if it's the collusion one, that's just rude. Also, my wife just sent a pussy pic. It's hot as fuck. Want to see it?

I do.

[necronomous]

You wanna fuck up two threads with the same crap. Come on, don't do a WTC.

If you want to reply to what I said on the topic feel free, looks like you're pleading the 5th again.

Rude

OK, well you clearly can't reply to what I said on the topic yet need to have the last word so go ahead. Doesn't bother me none and one thread chasing you to answer a simple question at a time will do.

Which do you want answered? Because if it's the collusion one, that's just rude. Also, my wife just sent a pussy pic. It's hot as fuck. Want to see it?

I do.

I bet you do, you cheeky little minx.