If you cowardly cretinous babies had the balls to answer a simple question it would only need to be asked once. You really are all pathetically childish and incapable of discussion.
Question for the righties
Moderator: Biker
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Question for the righties
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: Question for the righties
Perhaps I should start a scam charity and steal money from veterans and spend it on myself, won't hear a peep about that from the likes of youBigRedRetard wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 4:56 pmWhatever AH junior. You are a tax cheat and a hypocrite.CaptQuint wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 4:12 pmThat's none of your business. But I do see you didn't answer my questions (as expected)BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 4:05 pmI have no idea what is in Trumps tax returns. I do know he paid more than you. Are you paying off your back taxes?CaptQuint wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 2:52 pmI was honest about it. Why is Trump so desperate to keep Congress from looking at his when The IRS is legally required to turn them over? Why are you okay with Trump sticking our tax monies in his pocket?
(Don't worry, I don't expect you to actually answer those questions)
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7939
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: Question for the righties
You couldn't answer mine. Same thing. Have a great day.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 4:30 pmIf you cowardly cretinous babies had the balls to answer a simple question it would only need to be asked once. You really are all pathetically childish and incapable of discussion.
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: Question for the righties
I will, but I'll also start a fraudulent University and bilk people out their money and you wouldn't say a word.BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 5:34 pmPay your taxes. Including the back ones.CaptQuint wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 5:00 pmPerhaps I should start a scam charity and steal money from veterans and spend it on myself, won't hear a peep about that from the likes of youBigRedRetard wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 4:56 pmWhatever AH junior. You are a tax cheat and a hypocrite.CaptQuint wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 4:12 pmThat's none of your business. But I do see you didn't answer my questions (as expected)BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 4:05 pmI have no idea what is in Trumps tax returns. I do know he paid more than you. Are you paying off your back taxes?CaptQuint wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 2:52 pm
I was honest about it. Why is Trump so desperate to keep Congress from looking at his when The IRS is legally required to turn them over? Why are you okay with Trump sticking our tax monies in his pocket?
(Don't worry, I don't expect you to actually answer those questions)
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- Stapes
- World's Only Blue Collar Guy
- Posts: 12853
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
- Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey
Re: Question for the righties
Capt Q owes the tax man a few thousand at most. Trump is topping over 215 million for golf trips so far. I know where my outrage lies.
I blame Biker.
- Stapes
- World's Only Blue Collar Guy
- Posts: 12853
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
- Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey
Re: Question for the righties
I found him some loopholesBigRedRetard wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 5:52 pmA few thousand? He must have been making minimum wage.
I blame Biker.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Question for the righties
Try reading the OP.Biker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 5:53 pmWhat questions have I not answered for you, princess?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 4:30 pmIf you cowardly cretinous babies had the balls to answer a simple question it would only need to be asked once. You really are all pathetically childish and incapable of discussion.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Question for the righties
Collusion is proven in the Mueller report as well as obstruction. The current obstruction is undeniable, he is obstructing the congressional impeachment inquiry.
So are you denying the facts of what happened, or declaring it just doesn't matter because chump did it? Are you happy to state as a matter of principal that you think a dem potus, e.g. obama, should be allowed to use US foreign aid money to force allies to do his political dirty work, e.g. announcing they are investigating whether chump peed on prostitutes?
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Question for the righties
Because you are mistaken, unlike you I have listened to and read his words. He stated he could not find enough evidence to establish criminal conspiracy, which is a crime. Collusion is not a crime, he detailed examples of it. Would you like to go through some?
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: Question for the righties
"If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so." Robert Mueller
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: Question for the righties
They did, that's what that statement means.BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 6:39 pmAnd if they had confidence that the president clearly did commit a crime they would have said so.
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: Question for the righties
So why obstruct?
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: Question for the righties
Listen, you just choose to be willfully ignorant. No one can help you.BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 6:46 pmNo it does not. Its says they did not have confidence that the president committed a crime. If they did, they would have said so.CaptQuint wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 6:44 pmThey did, that's what that statement means.BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 6:39 pmAnd if they had confidence that the president clearly did commit a crime they would have said so.
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Question for the righties
What do you think the word collusion means? If a member of the trump campaign shares data with a russian agent, asks for help from the russians, literally goes to a meeting billed as someone from the russian government wanting to help with the campaign, plans things around when russians are going to leak stuff, do you deny those things are examples of collusion with the russian campaign?
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: Question for the righties
So say there was no underlying crime, you agree a crime was committed in trying to prevent an investigation into that supposed crime correct?
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: Question for the righties
Why Would Paul Manafort Share Polling Data with Russia?
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-des ... ith-russia
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-des ... ith-russia
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7939
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: Question for the righties
Why? What's the difference?BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 6:55 pm Can a mod merge this thread with the 20 other collusion threads?
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Question for the righties
What do you think the word collusion means? If a member of the trump campaign shares data with a russian agent, asks for help from the russians, literally goes to a meeting billed as someone from the russian government wanting to help with the campaign, plans things around when russians are going to leak stuff, do you deny those things are examples of collusion with the russian campaign?Biker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 6:55 pmdid not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 6:54 pmWhat do you think the word collusion means? If a member of the trump campaign shares data with a russian agent, asks for help from the russians, literally goes to a meeting billed as someone from the russian government wanting to help with the campaign, plans things around when russians are going to leak stuff, do you deny those things are examples of collusion with the russian campaign?
Accept it, snowflake. It’s over
Try to think about why you are compelled to avoid admitting you can understand what the word collusion means, because it's pretty pathetic for a grown man to think 'la la la I can't hear' you is an argument.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Question for the righties
Mueller stated clearly that collusion is not a criminal term, then he laid out a lot of examples of collusion. What do you think the word means, you tedious childish pathetic fucking coward?Biker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 7:00 pmAccording to you, Mueller must not know what the word meansAnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 6:59 pmWhat do you think the word collusion means? If a member of the trump campaign shares data with a russian agent, asks for help from the russians, literally goes to a meeting billed as someone from the russian government wanting to help with the campaign, plans things around when russians are going to leak stuff, do you deny those things are examples of collusion with the russian campaign?Biker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 6:55 pmdid not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 6:54 pmWhat do you think the word collusion means? If a member of the trump campaign shares data with a russian agent, asks for help from the russians, literally goes to a meeting billed as someone from the russian government wanting to help with the campaign, plans things around when russians are going to leak stuff, do you deny those things are examples of collusion with the russian campaign?
Accept it, snowflake. It’s over
Try to think about why you are compelled to avoid admitting you can understand what the word collusion means, because it's pretty pathetic for a grown man to think 'la la la I can't hear' you is an argument.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Question for the righties
No, that is a lie. Or delusion. Hard to tell since you are too cowardly to discuss it isn't it. Too afraid to answer what do you think the word means, it's fucking pathetic.Biker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 7:07 pmDoesn’t matter what it means since Mueller declared there wasn’t anyAnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 7:02 pmMueller stated clearly that collusion is not a criminal term, then he laid out a lot of examples of collusion. What do you think the word means, you tedious childish pathetic fucking coward?Biker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 7:00 pmAccording to you, Mueller must not know what the word meansAnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 6:59 pmWhat do you think the word collusion means? If a member of the trump campaign shares data with a russian agent, asks for help from the russians, literally goes to a meeting billed as someone from the russian government wanting to help with the campaign, plans things around when russians are going to leak stuff, do you deny those things are examples of collusion with the russian campaign?Biker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 6:55 pmdid not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 6:54 pm
What do you think the word collusion means? If a member of the trump campaign shares data with a russian agent, asks for help from the russians, literally goes to a meeting billed as someone from the russian government wanting to help with the campaign, plans things around when russians are going to leak stuff, do you deny those things are examples of collusion with the russian campaign?
Accept it, snowflake. It’s over
Try to think about why you are compelled to avoid admitting you can understand what the word collusion means, because it's pretty pathetic for a grown man to think 'la la la I can't hear' you is an argument.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Question for the righties
So secret cooperation between the campaign and the russians would be collusion. So going to a meeting billed as being with someone from the russian government who wants to give you help with the campaign would be collusion. Sharing polling data with a russian agent would be collusion. Coordinating with leaks you know are coming would be collusion. These things all happened.
- VinceBordenIII
- Loves swimmin' with bowlegged women!
- Posts: 3075
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2019 11:03 pm
Re: Question for the righties
Didn’t happen, stretching definitions, NO COLLUSION.
-
- Not UJR's Military Attaché
- Posts: 6741
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
- Location: South Carolina
Re: Question for the righties
Then why keep harping onr the point?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 6:31 pmBecause you are mistaken, unlike you I have listened to and read his words. He stated he could not find enough evidence to establish criminal conspiracy, which is a crime. Collusion is not a crime, he detailed examples of it. Would you like to go through some?