Consequences be damned apparently

For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul commies to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.

In memory of our lost political forum members. :cry:

Moderator: Biker

User avatar
DandyDon
Redneck Commie
Posts: 2008
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:05 pm

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#51

Post by DandyDon »

Antknot wrote: Wed Dec 25, 2019 12:14 am
DandyDon wrote: Tue Dec 24, 2019 7:04 pm
Biker wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2019 6:32 pm Image
Hmm, OK.

The fact that the train uses diesel means nothing because that's what they all run on, so it's not like she could have chosen another kind of train. Also, taking a train is much better for the environment because it moves 100s of people in one vehicle along with large amounts of cargo at a fraction of the energy. Everybody driving individual cars is what's bad for the environment.

Europe's recycling practices are much better than ours. All that single use stuff actually gets recycled over there, unlike here where we just throw it in the trash or out the window. What is she supposed to carry her bread and butter in? Bread and butter don't come in a different type of container, it's stupid to point out they're single use because she couldn't buy it differently if she wanted to. I do notice reusable drink bottles, so it appears she is controlling what she can.


It's sooo weird Bikers memes that just show up in his feed are the exact same ones posted by my FB RWNJ friends.
One point: Not all European trains are Deisel a bunch are electric.
True, a lot of the more urban ones do (Hmm... Germany supplies what, 60+% of their electricity via renewables?). The trains that travel all across Europe use diesel just because of the infrastructure logistics.
User avatar
beagleboy
Biker's Biatch
Posts: 2120
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:23 pm
Location: Free born

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#52

Post by beagleboy »

As I understood it a lot of trains in Europe are dual mode and can switch from electric to diesel depending upon the route.

Our train from Berlin to Prague was diesel. 4 1/2 hour journey and it cost us $36 for first class. $5 extra to get first class and the car was almost completely empty. Such an easy trip to get through the stations.
User avatar
DandyDon
Redneck Commie
Posts: 2008
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:05 pm

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#53

Post by DandyDon »

beagleboy wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 4:57 pm As I understood it a lot of trains in Europe are dual mode and can switch from electric to diesel depending upon the route.

Our train from Berlin to Prague was diesel. 4 1/2 hour journey and it cost us $36 for first class. $5 extra to get first class and the car was almost completely empty. Such an easy trip to get through the stations.
All modern trains are electric. The diesel engines only supply power for the generators.
User avatar
beagleboy
Biker's Biatch
Posts: 2120
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:23 pm
Location: Free born

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#54

Post by beagleboy »

We were considering vacationing in the UK but I don't think we can risk that type of weather.
User avatar
Burn1dwn
Non-Gay Omar
Posts: 3735
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:23 pm

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#55

Post by Burn1dwn »

Biker wrote: Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:58 pm Image
Have you been waiting 16 years to post this? :lol:
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 14903
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#56

Post by CHEEZY17 »

We're all gonna be dead or underwater in 10 years anyway.
AMIRITE!?
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
User avatar
Stapes
World's Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 12853
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#57

Post by Stapes »

Biker stole Greta's childhood
I blame Biker.
Antknot
Not UJR's Military Attaché
Posts: 6740
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#58

Post by Antknot »

Don't know if I would want her childhood. To produce a human with that grim a demeanor (at least the public one) it couldn't have been all that great.
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 14903
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#59

Post by CHEEZY17 »

Antknot wrote: Wed Jan 01, 2020 2:17 am Don't know if I would want her childhood. To produce a human with that grim a demeanor (at least the public one) it couldn't have been all that great.
Shes been coached and taught her public demeanor. I hope shes happier when there are no cameras around. Kinda sad really.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
User avatar
Charliesheen
Snarky Fucker
Posts: 9252
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:49 am

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#60

Post by Charliesheen »

I think people who adore and obey the little moppet need to find a more established religion. Clearly there’s something missing in their lives.
A cunt is a cunt by any other name.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7939
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#61

Post by necronomous »

Quote by Paul Watson, a founder of Greenpeace: "It doesn't matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true."

Quote by Jim Sibbison, public relations official for the Environmental Protection Agency: "We routinely wrote scare stories...Our press reports were more or less true...We were out to whip the public into a frenzy about the environment."

Quote by emeritus professor Daniel Botkin: "The only way to get our society to truly change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe."

Quote by Al Gore, former U.S. vice president: "I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are"

Quote by Stephen Schneider, Stanford Univ.: "That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have."

Quote by Sir John Houghton, lead editor of first three IPCC reports: “If we want a good environmental policy in the future we’ll have to have a disaster.”

Quote from Monika Kopacz, atmospheric scientist: "The problem is, only sensational exaggeration makes the kind of story that will get politicians’ — and readers’ — attention. So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate, but in today’s world, this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing to reduce the scientific uncertainty."

Quote by Chris Folland of UK Meteorological Office: “The data don't matter. We're not basing our recommendations upon the data. We're basing them upon the climate models.”

Quote by David Frame, climate modeler, Oxford University: “Rather than seeing models as describing literal truth, we ought to see them as convenient fictions which try to provide something useful.”

Quote by Christine Stewart, former Canadian Environment Minister: “No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits.... climate change gives the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world.”

Quote by Timoth Wirth, U.S./UN functionary, former Democrat Senator: “We’ve got to ride the global-warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.”

Quote by Richard Benedik, former U.S./UN bureaucrat: "A global climate treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect."
User avatar
Stapes
World's Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 12853
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#62

Post by Stapes »

Image



Image


Image
I blame Biker.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7939
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#63

Post by necronomous »

Stapes wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 7:38 pm Image



Image


Image
An arsonist started the fire.
User avatar
Stapes
World's Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 12853
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#64

Post by Stapes »

lol

ok
I blame Biker.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7939
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#65

Post by necronomous »

Stapes wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:23 pm lol

ok
Lol
Ok
User avatar
Wut
Denmarkian Citizen
Posts: 5841
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
Location: On a rock

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#66

Post by Wut »

:link:
necronomous wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:02 pm
Stapes wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 7:38 pm Image



Image


Image
An arsonist started the fire.
The fire? There's only one? Lolololol that's retarded.
wut?
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7939
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#67

Post by necronomous »

Wut wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:32 pm :link:
necronomous wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:02 pm
Stapes wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 7:38 pm Image



Image


Image
An arsonist started the fire.
The fire? There's only one? Lolololol that's retarded.
I thought we were throwing ludicrous ideas out about what started the fires. You think a degree in weather change causes a fire is just as hilarious.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7939
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#68

Post by necronomous »

User avatar
Stapes
World's Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 12853
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#69

Post by Stapes »

I blame Biker.
Antknot
Not UJR's Military Attaché
Posts: 6740
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#70

Post by Antknot »

Image
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7939
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#71

Post by necronomous »

The vast majority of high quality long-term temperature data comes from the US, and in fact much of the planet has little or no long-term temperature data. Because of the poor coverage, it is doubtful that the published global temperature record has any scientific validity. The US is one of very few places with reliable temperature data.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm ... id=1653928

In 1986, NASA’s top climate scientist James Hansen predicted the US would heat up 4-6 degrees by 2020.

https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=X ... 00,1495975

https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=l ... nsen&hl=en

But three years later, NOAA reported that there had been no warming in the US over the past century.

https://www.nytimes.com/1989/01/26/us/u ... tml?src=pm

And by 1999, Hansen’s US temperature data (left graph below) showed cooling since the 1940s.

In the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country.

https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_07/

This was very disturbing to both NASA and NOAA. Their CO2 warming theory was failing badly, so they simply changed the data, turning cooling into warming. This happened at the same time Michael Mann was erasing the Medieval Warm Period.

https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_07/

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/

The blue line below shows the five year mean of the average annual temperature at all NOAA United States Historical Climatology Network Stations. The red line shows the graph they release to the public, which has been highly altered to create the appearance of warming – which does not exist in the thermometer data.



ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2.5

If they believe there is error in the data, the correct way to handle it is to leave the data intact, and put error bars on it. Not alter the data and pass it to the public as if it represents the actual thermometer data.

The next graph shows the adjustments they are making, which creates a spectacular hockey stick of data tampering since the 1960s.

Plotted with atmospheric CO2 on the X-axis instead of time, it becomes apparent that the data is being altered precisely (R² = 0.97) to match global warming theory. The ultimate junk science.

Most of the recent data tampering has been due to simply making data up. In their monthly temperature data, they mark estimated (as opposed to measured) temperatures with a capital “E.” So far in 2019, sixty-one percent of the monthly temperature data is now estimated by a computer model, rather than actual measured thermometer data. The amount of fake data is up 500% since 30 years ago.

When we group the NOAA adjusted temperatures into two groups:

Measured and adjusted (blue) Estimated (red) Almost all of the US warming since 1990 is due to fake data from computer models, which now makes up 60% of the data.

The fake data is running two degrees warmer than the measured adjusted data. Not hard to create warming when you are simply making the data up.

Climate scientists openly discussed getting rid of the 1940s warmth, and they did just that.

http://di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt

But even with all their data tampering, the fraudsters couldn’t come close to to Hansen’s six degrees warming by 2020.

https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=l ... nsen&hl=en

There is overwhelming evidence of fraud in NOAA and NASA’s handling of climate data, and it is very important they are held to account.
User avatar
Stapes
World's Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 12853
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#72

Post by Stapes »

If your going to just copy and paste something that looks like you put together you might want to say so and put links.




necronomous wrote: Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:42 am The vast majority of high quality long-term temperature data comes from the US, and in fact much of the planet has little or no long-term temperature data. Because of the poor coverage, it is doubtful that the published global temperature record has any scientific validity. The US is one of very few places with reliable temperature data.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm ... id=1653928

In 1986, NASA’s top climate scientist James Hansen predicted the US would heat up 4-6 degrees by 2020.

https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=X ... 00,1495975

https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=l ... nsen&hl=en

But three years later, NOAA reported that there had been no warming in the US over the past century.

https://www.nytimes.com/1989/01/26/us/u ... tml?src=pm

And by 1999, Hansen’s US temperature data (left graph below) showed cooling since the 1940s.

In the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country.

https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_07/

This was very disturbing to both NASA and NOAA. Their CO2 warming theory was failing badly, so they simply changed the data, turning cooling into warming. This happened at the same time Michael Mann was erasing the Medieval Warm Period.

https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_07/

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/

The blue line below shows the five year mean of the average annual temperature at all NOAA United States Historical Climatology Network Stations. The red line shows the graph they release to the public, which has been highly altered to create the appearance of warming – which does not exist in the thermometer data.



ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2.5

If they believe there is error in the data, the correct way to handle it is to leave the data intact, and put error bars on it. Not alter the data and pass it to the public as if it represents the actual thermometer data.

The next graph shows the adjustments they are making, which creates a spectacular hockey stick of data tampering since the 1960s.

Plotted with atmospheric CO2 on the X-axis instead of time, it becomes apparent that the data is being altered precisely (R² = 0.97) to match global warming theory. The ultimate junk science.

Most of the recent data tampering has been due to simply making data up. In their monthly temperature data, they mark estimated (as opposed to measured) temperatures with a capital “E.” So far in 2019, sixty-one percent of the monthly temperature data is now estimated by a computer model, rather than actual measured thermometer data. The amount of fake data is up 500% since 30 years ago.

When we group the NOAA adjusted temperatures into two groups:

Measured and adjusted (blue) Estimated (red) Almost all of the US warming since 1990 is due to fake data from computer models, which now makes up 60% of the data.

The fake data is running two degrees warmer than the measured adjusted data. Not hard to create warming when you are simply making the data up.

Climate scientists openly discussed getting rid of the 1940s warmth, and they did just that.

http://di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt

But even with all their data tampering, the fraudsters couldn’t come close to to Hansen’s six degrees warming by 2020.

https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=l ... nsen&hl=en

There is overwhelming evidence of fraud in NOAA and NASA’s handling of climate data, and it is very important they are held to account.
I blame Biker.
User avatar
Stapes
World's Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 12853
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#73

Post by Stapes »

and just to be fair that article was written by a guy named Tony Heller. A youtube climate denier and birther under the pseudonym Steven Geller. He is a pure, unadulterated bullshit artist with no background in Climatology.


I don't think it takes too much thought process to understand that the earth is warming. There is too much date to say otherwise. Whether it is do to human beings, natural cyclical weather or a combination of both.....it would be hard to argue that CO2 emissions add to the problem and just the huge amount of deforestation over the past couple hundred years make us vulnerable. It wouldn't take too many failed crops and dried up water reservoirs worldwide to cause some real problems.
I blame Biker.
User avatar
DandyDon
Redneck Commie
Posts: 2008
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:05 pm

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#74

Post by DandyDon »

Stapes wrote: Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:43 am and just to be fair that article was written by a guy named Tony Heller. A youtube climate denier and birther under the pseudonym Steven Geller. He is a pure, unadulterated bullshit artist with no background in Climatology.


I don't think it takes too much thought process to understand that the earth is warming. There is too much date to say otherwise. Whether it is do to human beings, natural cyclical weather or a combination of both.....it would be hard to argue that CO2 emissions add to the problem and just the huge amount of deforestation over the past couple hundred years make us vulnerable. It wouldn't take too many failed crops and dried up water reservoirs worldwide to cause some real problems.
Here in SC we have 71F, thunderstorms, and tornadoes in January. In 54 years I have never seen this kind of weather.
Antknot
Not UJR's Military Attaché
Posts: 6740
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: Consequences be damned apparently

#75

Post by Antknot »

DandyDon wrote: Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:50 am
Stapes wrote: Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:43 am and just to be fair that article was written by a guy named Tony Heller. A youtube climate denier and birther under the pseudonym Steven Geller. He is a pure, unadulterated bullshit artist with no background in Climatology.


I don't think it takes too much thought process to understand that the earth is warming. There is too much date to say otherwise. Whether it is do to human beings, natural cyclical weather or a combination of both.....it would be hard to argue that CO2 emissions add to the problem and just the huge amount of deforestation over the past couple hundred years make us vulnerable. It wouldn't take too many failed crops and dried up water reservoirs worldwide to cause some real problems.
Here in SC we have 71F, thunderstorms, and tornadoes in January. In 54 years I have never seen this kind of weather.
Don't know about you, but, the weather is playing merry hell with my arthritis.
Post Reply