Yeah and the IRS will send you a new one EVERY YEAR. So don't lose it or you have to paper file.
(it's a six digit number I think)
Moderator: Biker
Yeah and the IRS will send you a new one EVERY YEAR. So don't lose it or you have to paper file.
You're right.beagleboy wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 9:25 pmYeah and the IRS will send you a new one EVERY YEAR. So don't lose it or you have to paper file.
(it's a six digit number I think)
Charliesheen wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:13 pm If so he deserves it...
Then:Ronstadt said, “If you read the history, you won’t be surprised. It is exactly the same. You find a common enemy for everybody to hate. I was sure that Trump was going to get elected the day he announced. I said he’s going to—it is going to be like Hitler and the Mexicans are the new Jews. And sure enough, that is what he delivered.”
Now:
Parkinson's is a bitch.
I think you've got it backward. Remember before the election in 2016, President Trump warned everyone about Russian interference, and the left had a big giggle. B. Hussein Obama, in particular, took great joy in saying "The 1980s want their foreign policy back." Oh, and he also said "Maybe [President] Trump should focus more on getting votes than in worrying about fictional Russian interference." And the loony, anti-America liberal left had a good chuckle again.
100% Fauxian and Chumper bullshitBiker wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:06 pm100%Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:27 pmI think you've got it backward. Remember before the election in 2016, President Trump warned everyone about Russian interference, and the left had a big giggle. B. Hussein Obama, in particular, took great joy in saying "The 1980s want their foreign policy back." Oh, and he also said "Maybe [President] Trump should focus more on getting votes than in worrying about fictional Russian interference." And the loony, anti-America liberal left had a good chuckle again.
And then there's the time that B. Hussein Obama flat-out said our elections couldn't be interfered with. Totally dismissing the possibility.
Tell us again who doesn't take it seriously?
Wut wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 2:12 pmI'm ok with voter ID so long as it's cheap and easy to get, free would be best. I'm also ok with same day registration. I'm not so sure about on line voting as I think it's open for abuse and manipulation.Charliesheen wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:42 pm Schmertz, you believe in voter ID? Same day registration? Online ballots?
I don't think voting is secure as it needs to be, in PA you don't get a receipt and there's no paper record, for example.
Cool. Solid step.CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:22 pmWut wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 2:12 pmI'm ok with voter ID so long as it's cheap and easy to get, free would be best. I'm also ok with same day registration. I'm not so sure about on line voting as I think it's open for abuse and manipulation.Charliesheen wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:42 pm Schmertz, you believe in voter ID? Same day registration? Online ballots?
I don't think voting is secure as it needs to be, in PA you don't get a receipt and there's no paper record, for example.
Every Pa. county will have new voting machines — with paper trails — in 2020
https://www.inquirer.com/politics/penns ... 00101.html
If the quote was about election interference it might even be relevant.Biker wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:13 pm[media]FSchmertz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:11 pm100% Fauxian and Chumper bullshitBiker wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:06 pm100%Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:27 pmI think you've got it backward. Remember before the election in 2016, President Trump warned everyone about Russian interference, and the left had a big giggle. B. Hussein Obama, in particular, took great joy in saying "The 1980s want their foreign policy back." Oh, and he also said "Maybe [President] Trump should focus more on getting votes than in worrying about fictional Russian interference." And the loony, anti-America liberal left had a good chuckle again.
And then there's the time that B. Hussein Obama flat-out said our elections couldn't be interfered with. Totally dismissing the possibility.
Tell us again who doesn't take it seriously?
[/media]
Good, it's about time.CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:22 pmWut wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 2:12 pmI'm ok with voter ID so long as it's cheap and easy to get, free would be best. I'm also ok with same day registration. I'm not so sure about on line voting as I think it's open for abuse and manipulation.Charliesheen wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:42 pm Schmertz, you believe in voter ID? Same day registration? Online ballots?
I don't think voting is secure as it needs to be, in PA you don't get a receipt and there's no paper record, for example.
Every Pa. county will have new voting machines — with paper trails — in 2020
https://www.inquirer.com/politics/penns ... 00101.html
No, because this discussion is about election interference.
Except that it's not. He legitimately said all those things. So tell me again, who doesn't take Russian interference in our elections seriously?FSchmertz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:11 pm100% Fauxian and Chumper bullshitBiker wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:06 pm100%Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:27 pmI think you've got it backward. Remember before the election in 2016, President Trump warned everyone about Russian interference, and the left had a big giggle. B. Hussein Obama, in particular, took great joy in saying "The 1980s want their foreign policy back." Oh, and he also said "Maybe [President] Trump should focus more on getting votes than in worrying about fictional Russian interference." And the loony, anti-America liberal left had a good chuckle again.
And then there's the time that B. Hussein Obama flat-out said our elections couldn't be interfered with. Totally dismissing the possibility.
Tell us again who doesn't take it seriously?
Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 9:34 pmExcept that it's not. He legitimately said all those things. So tell me again, who doesn't take Russian interference in our elections seriously?FSchmertz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:11 pm100% Fauxian and Chumper bullshitBiker wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:06 pm100%Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:27 pmI think you've got it backward. Remember before the election in 2016, President Trump warned everyone about Russian interference, and the left had a big giggle. B. Hussein Obama, in particular, took great joy in saying "The 1980s want their foreign policy back." Oh, and he also said "Maybe [President] Trump should focus more on getting votes than in worrying about fictional Russian interference." And the loony, anti-America liberal left had a good chuckle again.
And then there's the time that B. Hussein Obama flat-out said our elections couldn't be interfered with. Totally dismissing the possibility.
Tell us again who doesn't take it seriously?
Wut wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:55 pm Anyone who emphasizes Obama's middle name to discredit him, discredits themselves.
It also looks like you're buying hannitys misinterpretation of Obama's statements.
https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/s ... -coverage/
Obama was talking about voter fraud, not Russian interference.
I like that you assume I use his middle name to discredit him. I don't. Don't need to. He did enough to discredit himself during his "presidency" (so to speak) that i dont need to pile on.Wut wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 9:45 pmDeathproof wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 9:34 pmExcept that it's not. He legitimately said all those things. So tell me again, who doesn't take Russian interference in our elections seriously?FSchmertz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:11 pm100% Fauxian and Chumper bullshitBiker wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:06 pm100%Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:27 pmI think you've got it backward. Remember before the election in 2016, President Trump warned everyone about Russian interference, and the left had a big giggle. B. Hussein Obama, in particular, took great joy in saying "The 1980s want their foreign policy back." Oh, and he also said "Maybe [President] Trump should focus more on getting votes than in worrying about fictional Russian interference." And the loony, anti-America liberal left had a good chuckle again.
And then there's the time that B. Hussein Obama flat-out said our elections couldn't be interfered with. Totally dismissing the possibility.
Tell us again who doesn't take it seriously?Wut wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:55 pm Anyone who emphasizes Obama's middle name to discredit him, discredits themselves.
It also looks like you're buying hannitys misinterpretation of Obama's statements.
https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/s ... -coverage/
Obama was talking about voter fraud, not Russian interference.
Yeah it's really kind or juvenile and pointless.
ODS anyone?Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:05 pmI like that you assume I use his middle name to discredit him. I don't. Don't need to. He did enough to discredit himself during his "presidency" (so to speak) that i dont need to pile on.Wut wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 9:45 pmDeathproof wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 9:34 pmExcept that it's not. He legitimately said all those things. So tell me again, who doesn't take Russian interference in our elections seriously?FSchmertz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:11 pm100% Fauxian and Chumper bullshitBiker wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:06 pm100%Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:27 pm
I think you've got it backward. Remember before the election in 2016, President Trump warned everyone about Russian interference, and the left had a big giggle. B. Hussein Obama, in particular, took great joy in saying "The 1980s want their foreign policy back." Oh, and he also said "Maybe [President] Trump should focus more on getting votes than in worrying about fictional Russian interference." And the loony, anti-America liberal left had a good chuckle again.
And then there's the time that B. Hussein Obama flat-out said our elections couldn't be interfered with. Totally dismissing the possibility.
Tell us again who doesn't take it seriously?Wut wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:55 pm Anyone who emphasizes Obama's middle name to discredit him, discredits themselves.
It also looks like you're buying hannitys misinterpretation of Obama's statements.
https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/s ... -coverage/
Obama was talking about voter fraud, not Russian interference.
And no, I'm not "buying" any interpretation of Hussein's statements. He was talking about Russian interference. How do we know? Because he said "Russian interference". Please, pretend Hussein and the loony left care about voter fraud, while they screech opposition to voter ID laws.
Again, your side is the side not taking it seriously. The hypocrisy and TDS is strong.
I know a lot of touring musicians, they are all immature way late in life
Damn straight. But something needs to be done about the Facebook posts.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:25 pmCool. Solid step.CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:22 pmWut wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 2:12 pmI'm ok with voter ID so long as it's cheap and easy to get, free would be best. I'm also ok with same day registration. I'm not so sure about on line voting as I think it's open for abuse and manipulation.Charliesheen wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:42 pm Schmertz, you believe in voter ID? Same day registration? Online ballots?
I don't think voting is secure as it needs to be, in PA you don't get a receipt and there's no paper record, for example.
Every Pa. county will have new voting machines — with paper trails — in 2020
https://www.inquirer.com/politics/penns ... 00101.html
Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:05 pmI like that you assume I use his middle name to discredit him. I don't. Don't need to. He did enough to discredit himself during his "presidency" (so to speak) that i dont need to pile on.Wut wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 9:45 pmDeathproof wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 9:34 pmExcept that it's not. He legitimately said all those things. So tell me again, who doesn't take Russian interference in our elections seriously?FSchmertz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:11 pm100% Fauxian and Chumper bullshitBiker wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 4:06 pm100%Deathproof wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:27 pm
I think you've got it backward. Remember before the election in 2016, President Trump warned everyone about Russian interference, and the left had a big giggle. B. Hussein Obama, in particular, took great joy in saying "The 1980s want their foreign policy back." Oh, and he also said "Maybe [President] Trump should focus more on getting votes than in worrying about fictional Russian interference." And the loony, anti-America liberal left had a good chuckle again.
And then there's the time that B. Hussein Obama flat-out said our elections couldn't be interfered with. Totally dismissing the possibility.
Tell us again who doesn't take it seriously?Wut wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:55 pm Anyone who emphasizes Obama's middle name to discredit him, discredits themselves.
It also looks like you're buying hannitys misinterpretation of Obama's statements.
https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/s ... -coverage/
Obama was talking about voter fraud, not Russian interference.
I don't understand why the House didn't immediately bring him up for his repeated violations of the Emoluments Clause the moment the Republicans lost control. He wipes his ass with the very Constitution he (and all WH staff including his children) swore to uphold. That's personal corruption for his own benefit, the very thing the Founding Fathers were afraid of. He had already violated that clause his first day in office.