This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

For all the Trumpeteers and Liberal Commies to post their screeds.
User avatar
necronomous
Vice President of the AnalHamster fan club
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#1

Post by necronomous » Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:26 am


User avatar
Stapes
Worlds Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#2

Post by Stapes » Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:07 am

You really find some doozys. You should look up John Solomon. He's about as credible as your orange leader.
Not in the a.m. bro.

User avatar
necronomous
Vice President of the AnalHamster fan club
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#3

Post by necronomous » Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:28 am

Stapes wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:07 am
You really find some doozys. You should look up John Solomon. He's about as credible as your orange leader.
Did you read it

User avatar
CHEEZY17
Loves Him Some Ass
Posts: 3522
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#4

Post by CHEEZY17 » Thu Mar 12, 2020 11:17 am

Pee tape!
“The trouble with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”

User avatar
PopcornSutton
Forum God
Posts: 417
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2019 9:11 am

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#5

Post by PopcornSutton » Thu Mar 12, 2020 12:30 pm

Stapes wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:07 am
You really find some doozys. You should look up John Solomon. He's about as credible as your orange leader.
Jim Acosta is your hero, right?

User avatar
Charliesheen
Snarky Fucker
Posts: 2535
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:49 am
Location: Almost as Nice as Bermuda

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#6

Post by Charliesheen » Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:03 pm

necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:28 am
Stapes wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:07 am
You really find some doozys. You should look up John Solomon. He's about as credible as your orange leader.
Did you read it
Clearly no.

And it destroys the Perfessors narrative as well. So obvious. As with Flynn, the original accusation was bullshit. Once you know that, set a perjury trap and throw the federal government at him.

User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 4174
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#7

Post by AnalHamster » Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:11 pm

Misinformation for dimwits, but people dumb enough to fall for it are too dumb to discuss it.

User avatar
necronomous
Vice President of the AnalHamster fan club
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#8

Post by necronomous » Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:21 pm

AnalHamster wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:11 pm
Misinformation for dimwits, but people dumb enough to fall for it are too dumb to discuss it.
Ahhhhhh, You shouldn't be so hard on yourself. Cheer up champ. People will think you're smart one day. I'm sure of it.

User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 4174
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#9

Post by AnalHamster » Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:29 pm

necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:21 pm
AnalHamster wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:11 pm
Misinformation for dimwits, but people dumb enough to fall for it are too dumb to discuss it.
Ahhhhhh, You shouldn't be so hard on yourself. Cheer up champ. People will think you're smart one day. I'm sure of it.
People think I'm smart today, and that you are a moron. Seems to matter to you, so you should be aware of the basic reality. You are too afraid to answer the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians'. There's just no working around that, you exposed yourself. It's done. Sorry.

User avatar
Stapes
Worlds Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#10

Post by Stapes » Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:31 pm

These are the same morons still twisting in their sleep about Benghazi and Hillary's emails.
Not in the a.m. bro.

User avatar
necronomous
Vice President of the AnalHamster fan club
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#11

Post by necronomous » Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:07 pm

AnalHamster wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:29 pm
necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:21 pm
AnalHamster wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:11 pm
Misinformation for dimwits, but people dumb enough to fall for it are too dumb to discuss it.
Ahhhhhh, You shouldn't be so hard on yourself. Cheer up champ. People will think you're smart one day. I'm sure of it.
People think I'm smart today, and that you are a moron. Seems to matter to you, so you should be aware of the basic reality. You are too afraid to answer the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians'. There's just no working around that, you exposed yourself. It's done. Sorry.
And those people are you. You're too afraid to show the proof you said you had. You exposed yourself as a liar. It's done. Sorry.
If you could just answer the question I asked first "what's the proof" we could move on and I might answer your question. But you're too much of a coward to answer it. We all know it.
Last edited by necronomous on Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
necronomous
Vice President of the AnalHamster fan club
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#12

Post by necronomous » Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:07 pm

Stapes wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:31 pm
These are the same morons still twisting in their sleep about Benghazi and Hillary's emails.
Idiots

User avatar
necronomous
Vice President of the AnalHamster fan club
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#13

Post by necronomous » Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:07 pm


User avatar
Wut
Denmarkian Citizen
Posts: 2667
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
Location: Bermuda

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#14

Post by Wut » Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:30 pm

Charliesheen wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:03 pm
necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:28 am
Stapes wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:07 am
You really find some doozys. You should look up John Solomon. He's about as credible as your orange leader.
Did you read it
Clearly no.

And it destroys the Perfessors narrative as well. So obvious. As with Flynn, the original accusation was bullshit. Once you know that, set a perjury trap and throw the federal government at him.
No one has ever mentioned perjury traps until republicans elected a pathological liar, then it was panic because poor little Trump would somehow get snookered into lying by the evil Democrats who, I guess, would have been smarter than the stable genius.

User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 4174
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#15

Post by AnalHamster » Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:20 pm

necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:07 pm
AnalHamster wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:29 pm
necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:21 pm
AnalHamster wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:11 pm
Misinformation for dimwits, but people dumb enough to fall for it are too dumb to discuss it.
Ahhhhhh, You shouldn't be so hard on yourself. Cheer up champ. People will think you're smart one day. I'm sure of it.
People think I'm smart today, and that you are a moron. Seems to matter to you, so you should be aware of the basic reality. You are too afraid to answer the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians'. There's just no working around that, you exposed yourself. It's done. Sorry.
And those people are you. You're too afraid to show the proof you said you had. You exposed yourself as a liar. It's done. Sorry.
If you could just answer the question I asked first "what's the proof" we could move on and I might answer your question. But you're too much of a coward to answer it. We all know it.
Proof is ready any time you grow up a little and are capable of admitting that it is in fact collusion to collude with the russians. While you are unable to do that, proof is just not possible for you as you simply cannot communicate.

User avatar
necronomous
Vice President of the AnalHamster fan club
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#16

Post by necronomous » Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:27 pm

AnalHamster wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:20 pm
necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:07 pm
AnalHamster wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:29 pm
necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:21 pm
AnalHamster wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:11 pm
Misinformation for dimwits, but people dumb enough to fall for it are too dumb to discuss it.
Ahhhhhh, You shouldn't be so hard on yourself. Cheer up champ. People will think you're smart one day. I'm sure of it.
People think I'm smart today, and that you are a moron. Seems to matter to you, so you should be aware of the basic reality. You are too afraid to answer the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians'. There's just no working around that, you exposed yourself. It's done. Sorry.
And those people are you. You're too afraid to show the proof you said you had. You exposed yourself as a liar. It's done. Sorry.
If you could just answer the question I asked first "what's the proof" we could move on and I might answer your question. But you're too much of a coward to answer it. We all know it.
Proof is ready any time you grow up a little and are capable of admitting that it is in fact collusion to collude with the russians. If you are unable to do that, proof is not possible fr you as you simply cannot communicate.
Ok show it. I'm ready when you are. But you won't. You're too cowardly to discuss it. Either your facts are so weak that if I don't automatically agree to a statement that, I am assuming would be in your proof, you have nothing to stand on, so you're relying on a gotcha, or you have none. Either way, you can't admit that you have nothing because you're a fucking coward. Everyone knows it. Even your mom knows it.

User avatar
necronomous
Vice President of the AnalHamster fan club
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#17

Post by necronomous » Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:28 pm

Wut wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:30 pm
Charliesheen wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:03 pm
necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:28 am
Stapes wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:07 am
You really find some doozys. You should look up John Solomon. He's about as credible as your orange leader.
Did you read it
Clearly no.

And it destroys the Perfessors narrative as well. So obvious. As with Flynn, the original accusation was bullshit. Once you know that, set a perjury trap and throw the federal government at him.
No one has ever mentioned perjury traps until republicans elected a pathological liar, then it was panic because poor little Trump would somehow get snookered into lying by the evil Democrats who, I guess, would have been smarter than the stable genius.
Did you read it?

User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 4174
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#18

Post by AnalHamster » Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:31 pm

You know the drill by now, you poor fool. If you want me to school you on the russian collusion you already conceded is very likely, you need to start by answering the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians.' You simply cannot pretend you can look at or acknowledge anything at all when you have to evade the question is it collusion to collude. That is just ridiculous. And then you need to get back to the point you were already at, admitting based on point 1 that it was already very likely, and then we can move forward.

User avatar
Wut
Denmarkian Citizen
Posts: 2667
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
Location: Bermuda

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#19

Post by Wut » Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:39 pm

necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:28 pm
Wut wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:30 pm
Charliesheen wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:03 pm
necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:28 am
Stapes wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:07 am
You really find some doozys. You should look up John Solomon. He's about as credible as your orange leader.
Did you read it
Clearly no.

And it destroys the Perfessors narrative as well. So obvious. As with Flynn, the original accusation was bullshit. Once you know that, set a perjury trap and throw the federal government at him.
No one has ever mentioned perjury traps until republicans elected a pathological liar, then it was panic because poor little Trump would somehow get snookered into lying by the evil Democrats who, I guess, would have been smarter than the stable genius.
Did you read it?
I was responding to his concern about a perjury trap, did you read my post?

User avatar
necronomous
Vice President of the AnalHamster fan club
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#20

Post by necronomous » Thu Mar 12, 2020 7:35 pm

Wut wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:39 pm
necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:28 pm
Wut wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:30 pm
Charliesheen wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:03 pm
necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:28 am
Stapes wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:07 am


You really find some doozys. You should look up John Solomon. He's about as credible as your orange leader.
Did you read it
Clearly no.

And it destroys the Perfessors narrative as well. So obvious. As with Flynn, the original accusation was bullshit. Once you know that, set a perjury trap and throw the federal government at him.
No one has ever mentioned perjury traps until republicans elected a pathological liar, then it was panic because poor little Trump would somehow get snookered into lying by the evil Democrats who, I guess, would have been smarter than the stable genius.
Did you read it?
I was responding to his concern about a perjury trap, did you read my post?
Yes. I was asking if you read the article

User avatar
necronomous
Vice President of the AnalHamster fan club
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#21

Post by necronomous » Thu Mar 12, 2020 7:39 pm

AnalHamster wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:31 pm
You know the drill by now, you poor fool. If you want me to school you on the russian collusion you already conceded is very likely, you need to start by answering the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians.' You simply cannot pretend you can look at or acknowledge anything at all when you have to evade the question is it collusion to collude. That is just ridiculous. And then you need to get back to the point you were already at, admitting based on point 1 that it was already very likely, and then we can move forward.
I've pretended nothing. Everything in that paragraph is an assumption of stupidity made on your behalf because you are a coward to just point out the proof you supposedly have. I've evaded no questions as I am still waiting for my question to be answered that you have clearly failed to answer. You know the drill by now, that if you have proof, it should stand regardless of anything I have to say. Thus we all know you have no proof. Because you're a moron. Your parents are ashamed of you. We all are.

User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 4174
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#22

Post by AnalHamster » Thu Mar 12, 2020 8:01 pm

necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 7:39 pm
AnalHamster wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:31 pm
You know the drill by now, you poor fool. If you want me to school you on the russian collusion you already conceded is very likely, you need to start by answering the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians.' You simply cannot pretend you can look at or acknowledge anything at all when you have to evade the question is it collusion to collude. That is just ridiculous. And then you need to get back to the point you were already at, admitting based on point 1 that it was already very likely, and then we can move forward.
I've pretended nothing. Everything in that paragraph is an assumption of stupidity made on your behalf because you are a coward to just point out the proof you supposedly have. I've evaded no questions as I am still waiting for my question to be answered that you have clearly failed to answer. You know the drill by now, that if you have proof, it should stand regardless of anything I have to say. Thus we all know you have no proof. Because you're a moron. Your parents are ashamed of you. We all are.
I was pointing out the proof I have, you conceded on the first part it showed a high probability trump colluded, then you backtracked and started to, and continue to, evade the question "is it collusion to collude with the Russians." Don't you understand that refusing to answer that question means you are simply a joke? How can anyone communicate with someone who can't answer is 2+2 4? Poor fool.

User avatar
beagleboy
President of the AnalHamster fan club
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:23 pm
Location: Free born

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#23

Post by beagleboy » Thu Mar 12, 2020 8:08 pm

Fuckit. The Russians probably wrote that damn article. They are everywhere.

User avatar
Charliesheen
Snarky Fucker
Posts: 2535
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:49 am
Location: Almost as Nice as Bermuda

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#24

Post by Charliesheen » Thu Mar 12, 2020 8:55 pm

AnalHamster wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:29 pm
necronomous wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:21 pm
AnalHamster wrote:
Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:11 pm
Misinformation for dimwits, but people dumb enough to fall for it are too dumb to discuss it.
Ahhhhhh, You shouldn't be so hard on yourself. Cheer up champ. People will think you're smart one day. I'm sure of it.
People think I'm smart today, and that you are a moron. Seems to matter to you, so you should be aware of the basic reality. You are too afraid to answer the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians'. There's just no working around that, you exposed yourself. It's done. Sorry.
You meant person. Not people. One person is wowed by your wiki trips. Send out some bottles or a barrel and maybe that will change.

User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 4174
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk

#25

Post by AnalHamster » Thu Mar 12, 2020 9:12 pm

'Wiki trips' is the term used by my obsessive fan club to whine about me always knowing what I am talking about. Sometimes wiki is one of the multiple sources I have looked at, what really chafes y'alls balls though is simply that I only talk about things I have researched and know about. If something interests me and I don't know about it already, then I inform myself. I do so more thoroughly and rapidly than you can comprehend, because you can't do it. I'm simply smarter than you. I understand how that must be frustrating for a lesser mind.

Post Reply