TRUMP: EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO NEW WORLD ORDER

[PopcornSutton]

TRUMP: EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO NEW WORLD ORDER
By James D Veltmeyer, MD
April 17, 2020

The ongoing attacks by the political establishment on President Donald Trump – which began even before he was elected – are without parallel in history. The savagery, frenzy, and outright hysteria displayed by the President’s enemies within the Democrat Party, the media, and the various power centers of the globalist elites have no prior precedent.

This President has been spied on, lied about, made the subject of phony foreign dossiers, insulted, ridiculed, scorned, mocked and threatened. We have witnessed Hollywood celebrities advocate for blowing up the White House, demand the President be beaten, jailed or even assassinated, and his children tortured and sexually abused.

We have seen politicians in Washington try to convict the President of non-existent crimes, investigate him and his family members for everything from tax returns to guests at his hotels, project on to him crimes that they themselves have committed, and seed his Administration with leakers and double-agents.
No other President in American history has been treated in such a shameful manner. Not Lincoln. Not FDR. Not Nixon. Not Reagan. What is it about this President that has roused such demons in his political foes? What is it about this President that drives his opponents to the brink of insanity? What is it about this President that so terrifies and terrorizes the Pelosis, Schiffs, Schumers and the George Soroses? Is it simply that he is not part of the club, a brash outsider with a different style? Is it merely because he’s outspoken and tramples on political correctness? Is it because he’s sometimes unpresidential in his demeanor (at least in their minds)? Not at all. After all, aren’t these the same folks who loved Bill Clinton whose extracurricular activities involved cigars and staining blue dresses in the Oval Office?

Of course, Clinton was beloved by the globalist elites who pull the strings on world governments. He gave them NAFTA, after all. He gave them the WTO. He made tens of billions of dollars for them and their stockholders through these unfair trade deals that cost America five million manufacturing jobs and closed 70,000 factories. He also gave the military-industrial complex plenty of profit-making military interventions, from Haiti to Bosnia to Serbia and Iraq. Bill Clinton, for all his corruption, delivered the goods for the New World Order.

Donald Trump, of course, never played ball with these globalists. He was elected explicitly on an anti-globalist platform that put America first. From day one, he started to implement that America-first agenda, earning him the undying enmity of all those whose profits are secured by selling out American workers, American jobs, and America’s national sovereignty. President Trump pulled us out of the TPP. Billions in lost profits for the globalists. President Trump pulled us out of the job-destroying Paris Climate Accords. Billions in lost profits for foreign nations like Communist China, at our expense. Read NASA's Report. President Trump began the process of securing the U.S. border. Billions in lost cheap illegal immigrant labor for the Business Roundtable.

President Trump imposed tariffs on China, becoming the first President ever to address Beijing’s annual $500 billion rape of our economy. Billions in lost profits for corporations who ship our jobs to one of the worst tyrannies on the planet. President Trump renegotiated NAFTA. Again, billions in lost profits for the cheap labor crowd. President Trump launched the process of extricating the U.S. from endless foreign wars and avoiding new wars with nations like Iran and North Korea. Billions – perhaps trillions – in lost profits for the globalist war machine.

Is the picture becoming a little clearer? In each instance, the President’s policies have represented a dramatic upending of the globalist agenda of both parties, the Carter-Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama agendas of continuous war and the continuous looting of America’s wealth and hollowing out of the American middle class. With both parties and their representatives in Congress beholden to campaign donors whose profits are threatened by Trump’s America-first initiatives, is it no wonder that both Democrats and Never-Trump Republicans, all Globalist-Socialist, are determined to bring this President down? Most of the mass media is controlled by these same global corporations. After all, doesn’t Amazon’s Jeff Bezos - the richest man in the world – own the Washington Post? As was said in Watergate, just follow the money. And while you’re following the money, see if it leads to a $500 million left-wing slush fund run by a shadowy Soros and Clinton-linked group called Arabella Advisors which is funding the anti-Trump political agenda through dozens of high-sounding front groups.

Folks, the New World Order gang is in full retreat all over the globe. From Brexit in the UK to the populist governments of Hungary and Poland to the Yellow Vest movement in France and Salvini in Italy, the middle and working classes are demanding the overthrow of their nation-destroying overlords. The overlords who have flooded their countries with unassailable immigrants from North Africa and surrendered their sovereignty to the European Union and its unaccountable bureaucrats in Brussels. They have lived the unfulfilled promises of the globalists, that giving up national sovereignty and relocating jobs abroad would usher in a new era of peace and prosperity. The exact opposite has happened. The globalist vision has resulted in $7 trillion of pointless wars in the Middle East, an immigration crisis, the loss of jobs, and declining standards of living.

In the United States, Donald J. Trump has emerged as the New World Order’s most tenacious and determined foe as he fights the good fight for the American people, our constitutional rights and liberties and the sovereignty of our nation. He is an existential threat to the New World Order. Unlike other Republican presidents of the recent past, he can’t be bought and has no price. Unlike them, he doesn’t give in and he doesn’t give up.

Go ahead, globalists. Try your impeachment games. Try your Senate trials. It won’t work. In fact, it will backfire on all of you as – after three years of trying to prevent the Electoral College from voting for Trump, stopping the inauguration, unleashing Jim Comey and the FBI, CIA spying, Robert Mueller and his phony Russiagate probe, tax returns, emoluments, Kavanaugh, and all the rest -- the patience of the American public is wearing thin. We aren’t as stupid as you think. Something you will recognize clearly come November 3, 2020.

“How little do my countrymen know what precious blessings they are in possession of, and which no other people on earth enjoy!” ― Thomas Jefferson

[CHEEZY17]

Trump is no angel. He deserves much of what he gets.
That said, there is no doubt that there are people in this world who have a goal to take him down regardless of any New World Order.

[CaptQuint]

Trump is no angel. He deserves much of what he gets.
That said, there is no doubt that there are people in this world who have a goal to take him down regardless of any New World Order.

The same can be said of any leader, did not McConnell say the senates goal was to make Obama a one term President?

[CHEEZY17]

Trump is no angel. He deserves much of what he gets.
That said, there is no doubt that there are people in this world who have a goal to take him down regardless of any New World Order.

The same can be said of any leader, did not McConnell say the senates goal was to make Obama a one term President?

Of course. Thats part of the consequences of being the man in charge. The question that comes with that is this: Can we agree that some of those people who are making it their mission to hurt him reside within the press corp?

[AnalHamster]

What is he being accused of that isn't true? The press reporting that he's an incompetent dimwit who colluded with Russia are just doing their job. Your president is encouraging far right protests against your governors during a national crisis for fucks sake, how is anyone still fooled?

[CaptQuint]

Trump is no angel. He deserves much of what he gets.
That said, there is no doubt that there are people in this world who have a goal to take him down regardless of any New World Order.

The same can be said of any leader, did not McConnell say the senates goal was to make Obama a one term President?

Of course. Thats part of the consequences of being the man in charge. The question that comes with that is this: Can we agree that some of those people who are making it their mission to hurt him reside within the press corp?

/
If you mean hurt him by accurately reporting on what he does and says? Fox and conservative radio went after Obama with lies and deceit and racism

[spudoc]

What is he being accused of that isn't true? The press reporting that he's an incompetent dimwit who colluded with Russia are just doing their job. Your president is encouraging far right protests against your governors during a national crisis for fucks sake, how is anyone still fooled?

This is it in a nutshell. Trump does something or says something, the press reports it, Trump denies it and cries "fake news". The press responds with irrefutable evidence that Trump did or said whatever and Trump fans like Cheezy cry that the press is biased against Trump.

[CaptQuint]

What is he being accused of that isn't true? The press reporting that he's an incompetent dimwit who colluded with Russia are just doing their job. Your president is encouraging far right protests against your governors during a national crisis for fucks sake, how is anyone still fooled?

[Stapes]

Nothing so gullible as the low IQ right. They love being puppets. They dance for the NRA, they dance for the Sunday preacher, they dance for their phony politicians with their fake bibles and American flag lapel pins. Dupes all of them.

[CHEEZY17]

The myopia is comical. Every one of you never seems to remember when a story is false, or only half true and is still reported. All of the retractions and corrections? Never happened.
You have members of the media coming out and saying that many in the media have an agenda yet you just ignore it like it doesnt exist because your default position is ORANGE MAN BAD!!1!111 With that as your datum its really not surprising you cant [wont] see any other perspective.

[Charliesheen]

Like trying to reason with a alcoholic.

[spudoc]

Like trying to reason with a alcoholic.

I think Cheezy has a little more clarity than that.

[AnalHamster]

The myopia is comical. Every one of you never seems to remember when a story is false, or only half true and is still reported. All of the retractions and corrections? Never happened.
You have members of the media coming out and saying that many in the media have an agenda yet you just ignore it like it doesnt exist because your default position is ORANGE MAN BAD!!1!111 With that as your datum its really not surprising you cant [wont] see any other perspective.

What stories are you referring to specifically?

[CHEEZY17]

The myopia is comical. Every one of you never seems to remember when a story is false, or only half true and is still reported. All of the retractions and corrections? Never happened.
You have members of the media coming out and saying that many in the media have an agenda yet you just ignore it like it doesnt exist because your default position is ORANGE MAN BAD!!1!111 With that as your datum its really not surprising you cant [wont] see any other perspective.

What stories are you referring to specifically?

Google is your friend. Are you honestly trying to imply there havent been any retractions or corrections regarding Trump? Media outlets jumping the gun without verifying sources or claims?

[CaptQuint]

The myopia is comical. Every one of you never seems to remember when a story is false, or only half true and is still reported. All of the retractions and corrections? Never happened.
You have members of the media coming out and saying that many in the media have an agenda yet you just ignore it like it doesnt exist because your default position is ORANGE MAN BAD!!1!111 With that as your datum its really not surprising you cant [wont] see any other perspective.

What stories are you referring to specifically?

Google is your friend. Are you honestly trying to imply there havent been any retractions or corrections regarding Trump? Media outlets jumping the gun without verifying sources or claims?

You mean like when Hillary accused Trump of being born in Kenya?

[AnalHamster]

The myopia is comical. Every one of you never seems to remember when a story is false, or only half true and is still reported. All of the retractions and corrections? Never happened.
You have members of the media coming out and saying that many in the media have an agenda yet you just ignore it like it doesnt exist because your default position is ORANGE MAN BAD!!1!111 With that as your datum its really not surprising you cant [wont] see any other perspective.

What stories are you referring to specifically?

Google is your friend. Are you honestly trying to imply there havent been any retractions or corrections regarding Trump? Media outlets jumping the gun without verifying sources or claims?

So you are unable to cite any story when asked. I think that tells me, you and everyone else all that we need to know, no?

[FreakShowFanatic]

The myopia is comical. Every one of you never seems to remember when a story is false, or only half true and is still reported. All of the retractions and corrections? Never happened.
You have members of the media coming out and saying that many in the media have an agenda yet you just ignore it like it doesnt exist because your default position is ORANGE MAN BAD!!1!111 With that as your datum its really not surprising you cant [wont] see any other perspective.

What stories are you referring to specifically?

Google is your friend. Are you honestly trying to imply there havent been any retractions or corrections regarding Trump? Media outlets jumping the gun without verifying sources or claims?

So you are unable to cite any story when asked. I think that tells me, you and everyone else all that we need to know, no?

No, because Cheezy knows what the fuck is going on, speaks fact & you are a fucking idiot. Think about it.

[CHEEZY17]

The myopia is comical. Every one of you never seems to remember when a story is false, or only half true and is still reported. All of the retractions and corrections? Never happened.
You have members of the media coming out and saying that many in the media have an agenda yet you just ignore it like it doesnt exist because your default position is ORANGE MAN BAD!!1!111 With that as your datum its really not surprising you cant [wont] see any other perspective.

What stories are you referring to specifically?

Google is your friend. Are you honestly trying to imply there havent been any retractions or corrections regarding Trump? Media outlets jumping the gun without verifying sources or claims?

So you are unable to cite any story when asked. I think that tells me, you and everyone else all that we need to know, no?

Jeezus. H. Christ. Really, dude?

Three journalists leaving CNN after retracted article
https://money.cnn.com/2017/06/26/media/ ... index.html

MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell retracts and apologizes for thinly sourced Trump finances story
https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/28/media/ms ... index.html

CNN corrects story on email to Trumps about Wikileaks
https://money.cnn.com/2017/12/08/media/ ... index.html

CNN error extends run of journalistic mishaps
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/ ... ism-287914

Media errors give Trump fresh ammunition
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3405 ... mp-attacks

[AnalHamster]

The myopia is comical. Every one of you never seems to remember when a story is false, or only half true and is still reported. All of the retractions and corrections? Never happened.
You have members of the media coming out and saying that many in the media have an agenda yet you just ignore it like it doesnt exist because your default position is ORANGE MAN BAD!!1!111 With that as your datum its really not surprising you cant [wont] see any other perspective.

What stories are you referring to specifically?

Google is your friend. Are you honestly trying to imply there havent been any retractions or corrections regarding Trump? Media outlets jumping the gun without verifying sources or claims?

So you are unable to cite any story when asked. I think that tells me, you and everyone else all that we need to know, no?

Jeezus. H. Christ. Really, dude?

Three journalists leaving CNN after retracted article
https://money.cnn.com/2017/06/26/media/ ... index.html

MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell retracts and apologizes for thinly sourced Trump finances story
https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/28/media/ms ... index.html

CNN corrects story on email to Trumps about Wikileaks
https://money.cnn.com/2017/12/08/media/ ... index.html

CNN error extends run of journalistic mishaps
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/ ... ism-287914

Media errors give Trump fresh ammunition
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3405 ... mp-attacks

So you are referring to a few examples of clearly and fully retracted articles as happens in reporting and trying to pretend it is somehow exceptional and not clearly retracted.

Try to think for a moment, you poor dupe. You are being duped into thinking explicitly acknowledged mistakes are a conspiracy. If it's a conspiracy why the retractions dummy? Do you think there are no mistakes or retractions that do not involve trump, or is this just a regular part of reporting that happens even when trump is not involved? Try to think.

[kwebber]

Did anyone look up who this James D Veltmeye MD was? Looks to me like he's just another Trump Republican cuck, who lied about his credentials when he was running for office. Why would anyone put any value to his rambling opinions, because he has the letters MD after his name!?!? LOL!! I'm assuming he has his own Fox News show?

https://muckrack.com/james-d-veltmeyer/articles

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/ne ... story.html


And for anyone to suggest that Trump is anything but a Wall Street stooge, you are delusional. He IS Wall Street, and so are his friends, and members of his administration.

Trump, however, went on to select many people with Wall Street ties for government roles, including former Goldman Sachs executive Steven Mnuchin as Treasury secretary; Goldman's president and chief operating officer, Gary Cohn, as chief economic adviser; and Goldman managing director Jim Donovan as deputy Treasury secretary.

[CHEEZY17]

The myopia is comical. Every one of you never seems to remember when a story is false, or only half true and is still reported. All of the retractions and corrections? Never happened.
You have members of the media coming out and saying that many in the media have an agenda yet you just ignore it like it doesnt exist because your default position is ORANGE MAN BAD!!1!111 With that as your datum its really not surprising you cant [wont] see any other perspective.

What stories are you referring to specifically?

Google is your friend. Are you honestly trying to imply there havent been any retractions or corrections regarding Trump? Media outlets jumping the gun without verifying sources or claims?

So you are unable to cite any story when asked. I think that tells me, you and everyone else all that we need to know, no?

Jeezus. H. Christ. Really, dude?

Three journalists leaving CNN after retracted article
https://money.cnn.com/2017/06/26/media/ ... index.html

MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell retracts and apologizes for thinly sourced Trump finances story
https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/28/media/ms ... index.html

CNN corrects story on email to Trumps about Wikileaks
https://money.cnn.com/2017/12/08/media/ ... index.html

CNN error extends run of journalistic mishaps
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/ ... ism-287914

Media errors give Trump fresh ammunition
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3405 ... mp-attacks

So you are referring to a few examples of clearly and fully retracted articles as happens in reporting and trying to pretend it is somehow exceptional and not clearly retracted.

Try to think for a moment, you poor dupe. You are being duped into thinking explicitly acknowledged mistakes are a conspiracy. If it's a conspiracy why the retractions dummy? Do you think there are no mistakes or retractions that do not involve trump, or is this just a regular part of reporting that happens even when trump is not involved? Try to think.

You wanted examples of retractions and I provided you a shit ton. Move the goal posts much? Just admit you were wrong and move on. Sure mistakes happen. It just so happens that in Trumps case they all happen toward slamming him. You need to ask yourself why you cant admit that some people in the journalistic profession clearly work toward an agenda; especially when others in the media openly point it out or admit it. Which, by the way, is exactly what this was about. Why cant you be intellectually honest on this topic?

[AnalHamster]

What stories are you referring to specifically?

Google is your friend. Are you honestly trying to imply there havent been any retractions or corrections regarding Trump? Media outlets jumping the gun without verifying sources or claims?

So you are unable to cite any story when asked. I think that tells me, you and everyone else all that we need to know, no?

Jeezus. H. Christ. Really, dude?

Three journalists leaving CNN after retracted article
https://money.cnn.com/2017/06/26/media/ ... index.html

MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell retracts and apologizes for thinly sourced Trump finances story
https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/28/media/ms ... index.html

CNN corrects story on email to Trumps about Wikileaks
https://money.cnn.com/2017/12/08/media/ ... index.html

CNN error extends run of journalistic mishaps
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/ ... ism-287914

Media errors give Trump fresh ammunition
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3405 ... mp-attacks

So you are referring to a few examples of clearly and fully retracted articles as happens in reporting and trying to pretend it is somehow exceptional and not clearly retracted.

Try to think for a moment, you poor dupe. You are being duped into thinking explicitly acknowledged mistakes are a conspiracy. If it's a conspiracy why the retractions dummy? Do you think there are no mistakes or retractions that do not involve trump, or is this just a regular part of reporting that happens even when trump is not involved? Try to think.

You wanted examples of retractions and I provided you a shit ton. Move the goal posts much? Just admit you were wrong and move on. Sure mistakes happen. It just so happens that in Trumps case they all happen toward slamming him. You need to ask yourself why you cant admit that some people in the journalistic profession clearly work toward an agenda; especially when others in the media openly point it out or admit it. Which, by the way, is exactly what this was about. Why cant you be intellectually honest on this topic?

The disconnect with reality is you declaring any retraction of anything shows a conspiracy rather than responsible reporting which is why things get retracted in the first place.

[CaptQuint]

Fox News has an agenda, their employees angle for a job with The Trump Administration, and people that leave The Trump Administration get work at Fox News.

Hope Hicks is returning to the White House — here are 21 people who have gone through the revolving door between Fox and the Trump administration

https://www.businessinsider.com/19-peop ... ion-2019-5

Remember when Sean Hannity said that Trump attempting to fire Mueller was fakenews?

[CHEEZY17]

Google is your friend. Are you honestly trying to imply there havent been any retractions or corrections regarding Trump? Media outlets jumping the gun without verifying sources or claims?

So you are unable to cite any story when asked. I think that tells me, you and everyone else all that we need to know, no?

Jeezus. H. Christ. Really, dude?

Three journalists leaving CNN after retracted article
https://money.cnn.com/2017/06/26/media/ ... index.html

MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell retracts and apologizes for thinly sourced Trump finances story
https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/28/media/ms ... index.html

CNN corrects story on email to Trumps about Wikileaks
https://money.cnn.com/2017/12/08/media/ ... index.html

CNN error extends run of journalistic mishaps
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/ ... ism-287914

Media errors give Trump fresh ammunition
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3405 ... mp-attacks

So you are referring to a few examples of clearly and fully retracted articles as happens in reporting and trying to pretend it is somehow exceptional and not clearly retracted.

Try to think for a moment, you poor dupe. You are being duped into thinking explicitly acknowledged mistakes are a conspiracy. If it's a conspiracy why the retractions dummy? Do you think there are no mistakes or retractions that do not involve trump, or is this just a regular part of reporting that happens even when trump is not involved? Try to think.

You wanted examples of retractions and I provided you a shit ton. Move the goal posts much? Just admit you were wrong and move on. Sure mistakes happen. It just so happens that in Trumps case they all happen toward slamming him. You need to ask yourself why you cant admit that some people in the journalistic profession clearly work toward an agenda; especially when others in the media openly point it out or admit it. Which, by the way, is exactly what this was about. Why cant you be intellectually honest on this topic?

The disconnect with reality is you declaring any retraction of anything shows a conspiracy rather than responsible reporting which is why things get retracted in the first place.

Fucking pathetic. Lets get to the nuts and bolts since you cant admit it when youre wrong. We'll have to start at the basics then: Do you think that there are people within the news media who have a bias toward Trump and that their bias can influence the material they create?

[AnalHamster]

So you are unable to cite any story when asked. I think that tells me, you and everyone else all that we need to know, no?

Jeezus. H. Christ. Really, dude?

Three journalists leaving CNN after retracted article
https://money.cnn.com/2017/06/26/media/ ... index.html

MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell retracts and apologizes for thinly sourced Trump finances story
https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/28/media/ms ... index.html

CNN corrects story on email to Trumps about Wikileaks
https://money.cnn.com/2017/12/08/media/ ... index.html

CNN error extends run of journalistic mishaps
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/ ... ism-287914

Media errors give Trump fresh ammunition
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3405 ... mp-attacks

So you are referring to a few examples of clearly and fully retracted articles as happens in reporting and trying to pretend it is somehow exceptional and not clearly retracted.

Try to think for a moment, you poor dupe. You are being duped into thinking explicitly acknowledged mistakes are a conspiracy. If it's a conspiracy why the retractions dummy? Do you think there are no mistakes or retractions that do not involve trump, or is this just a regular part of reporting that happens even when trump is not involved? Try to think.

You wanted examples of retractions and I provided you a shit ton. Move the goal posts much? Just admit you were wrong and move on. Sure mistakes happen. It just so happens that in Trumps case they all happen toward slamming him. You need to ask yourself why you cant admit that some people in the journalistic profession clearly work toward an agenda; especially when others in the media openly point it out or admit it. Which, by the way, is exactly what this was about. Why cant you be intellectually honest on this topic?

The disconnect with reality is you declaring any retraction of anything shows a conspiracy rather than responsible reporting which is why things get retracted in the first place.

Fucking pathetic. Lets get to the nuts and bolts since you cant admit it when youre wrong. We'll have to start at the basics then: Do you think that there are people within the news media who have a bias toward Trump and that their bias can influence the material they create?

Do you think there are never any retractions that are not trump related? If you can answer that honestly you will have to admit your trump cock guzzling error. If you can't, you are simply a retard.