Re: More Democratic Mail-In Ballot Fraud
Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:34 pm
UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://ujrefugees.net/
You're right, I was meaning Kentucky all the shithole states I mix up
Yep, we should require folks to risk their lives, and make it hard for the darkees...er...I mean "illegal" voters to vote.
ding ding dingkwebber wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:52 pm From what I've heard aboot mail in voting it's that only registered voters get ballots? Then they check whatever boxes they want to, then mail them back? 1 ballot per registered voter? Then those ballots are cross checked to make sure there are no duplicates? Apparently that has been going on in your country for decades, without too many problems? So for people to print fake ballots, they would have to have the names and addresses of every person whose ballot they are faking? And if the real person then mails in their real ballot, there will be some investigation, and catch any potential fraudsters? Or, if registered voters never got their ballots, they would contact the elections office and report that? Sounds like it would be very hard to commit voter fraud? So, is it possible, just possible that obese small hands is laying the table to contest the election already?
Eh, give them credit. They know the elderly that watch Faux are their constituents, so they probably do this. It's patriotic to vote, as long as you're "the right-y sort."Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:23 pm I think you should all just be honest. The democrats want mail in ballots because then they can each get 30 or 40 of them and carry them around to every alzheimer bed ridden relative they have, hold it near them and fill it out and then turn it in. Then go by some poor folks houses with some lottery scratch offs and get them to sign a few, etc.
Republicans aren't going to be having the time to do that kind of crap.
Jesus fucking christ, I don't remember you being this much of a partisan fucking hack. That being said, logistically, what is the real possibility that people could go around find all the ballots for alzheimers victims, then go around to all those people and get them to sign the ballots? Do you think a concerted attempt like that would go completely unnoticed? No one would see people doing that? None of the victims would mention anything to family members, or care staff? Even if it did go unnoticed, the number of ballots that it would take to throw an election would be massive. Dude, you need to give your fucking head a shake. It is not possible that something like that would go unnoticed.Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:23 pm I think you should all just be honest. The democrats want mail in ballots because then they can each get 30 or 40 of them and carry them around to every alzheimer bed ridden relative they have, hold it near them and fill it out and then turn it in. Then go by some poor folks houses with some lottery scratch offs and get them to sign a few, etc.
Republicans aren't going to be having the time to do that kind of crap.
i'm off the clock at the end of the day today.kwebber wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:42 pmJesus fucking christ, I don't remember you being this much of a partisan fucking hack. That being said, logistically, what is the real possibility that people could go around find all the ballots for alzheimers victims, then go around to all those people and get them to sign the ballots? Do you think a concerted attempt like that would go completely unnoticed? No one would see people doing that? None of the victims would mention anything to family members, or care staff? Even if it did go unnoticed, the number of ballots that it would take to throw an election would be massive. Dude, you need to give your fucking head a shake. It is not possible that something like that would go unnoticed.Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:23 pm I think you should all just be honest. The democrats want mail in ballots because then they can each get 30 or 40 of them and carry them around to every alzheimer bed ridden relative they have, hold it near them and fill it out and then turn it in. Then go by some poor folks houses with some lottery scratch offs and get them to sign a few, etc.
Republicans aren't going to be having the time to do that kind of crap.
At some point in the last year he bought a subscription to Republican talking points and he's running with it.kwebber wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:42 pmJesus fucking christ, I don't remember you being this much of a partisan fucking hack. That being said, logistically, what is the real possibility that people could go around find all the ballots for alzheimers victims, then go around to all those people and get them to sign the ballots? Do you think a concerted attempt like that would go completely unnoticed? No one would see people doing that? None of the victims would mention anything to family members, or care staff? Even if it did go unnoticed, the number of ballots that it would take to throw an election would be massive. Dude, you need to give your fucking head a shake. It is not possible that something like that would go unnoticed.Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:23 pm I tqhink you should all just be honest. The democrats want mail in ballots because then they can each get 30 or 40 of them and carry them around to every alzheimer bed ridden relative they have, hold it near them and fill it out and then turn it in. Then go by some poor folks houses with some lottery scratch offs and get them to sign a few, etc.
Republicans aren't going to be having the time to do that kind of crap.
Biker shared his "feed"Wut wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:22 pmAt some point in the last year he bought a subscription to Republican talking points and he's running with it.kwebber wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:42 pmJesus fucking christ, I don't remember you being this much of a partisan fucking hack. That being said, logistically, what is the real possibility that people could go around find all the ballots for alzheimers victims, then go around to all those people and get them to sign the ballots? Do you think a concerted attempt like that would go completely unnoticed? No one would see people doing that? None of the victims would mention anything to family members, or care staff? Even if it did go unnoticed, the number of ballots that it would take to throw an election would be massive. Dude, you need to give your fucking head a shake. It is not possible that something like that would go unnoticed.Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:23 pm I tqhink you should all just be honest. The democrats want mail in ballots because then they can each get 30 or 40 of them and carry them around to every alzheimer bed ridden relative they have, hold it near them and fill it out and then turn it in. Then go by some poor folks houses with some lottery scratch offs and get them to sign a few, etc.
Republicans aren't going to be having the time to do that kind of crap.
They dont have to when they can do this.Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:23 pm I think you should all just be honest. The democrats want mail in ballots because then they can each get 30 or 40 of them and carry them around to every alzheimer bed ridden relative they have, hold it near them and fill it out and then turn it in. Then go by some poor folks houses with some lottery scratch offs and get them to sign a few, etc.
Republicans aren't going to be having the time to do that kind of crap.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/30/politics ... index.htmlThe Senate will incorporate the annual intelligence policy legislation into the National Defense Authorization Act -- but only after stripping language from the intelligence bill that would have required presidential campaigns to report offers of foreign election help.
Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Tuesday that Senate Republicans forced the removal of the election reporting provision as a condition to include the intelligence bill on the must-pass defense policy legislation.
Earlier this month, the Senate Intelligence Committee approved an amendment on an 8-7 vote from Warner and GOP Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, which added a provision to the Intelligence Authorization Act requiring campaigns to notify federal authorities about offers of foreign election help.
Doesn't this go to conference with the House before it's enacted?DandyDon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:49 pmThey dont have to when they can do this.Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:23 pm I think you should all just be honest. The democrats want mail in ballots because then they can each get 30 or 40 of them and carry them around to every alzheimer bed ridden relative they have, hold it near them and fill it out and then turn it in. Then go by some poor folks houses with some lottery scratch offs and get them to sign a few, etc.
Republicans aren't going to be having the time to do that kind of crap.
Senate strips provision from intelligence bill requiring campaigns to report foreign election help
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/30/politics ... index.htmlThe Senate will incorporate the annual intelligence policy legislation into the National Defense Authorization Act -- but only after stripping language from the intelligence bill that would have required presidential campaigns to report offers of foreign election help.
Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Tuesday that Senate Republicans forced the removal of the election reporting provision as a condition to include the intelligence bill on the must-pass defense policy legislation.
Earlier this month, the Senate Intelligence Committee approved an amendment on an 8-7 vote from Warner and GOP Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, which added a provision to the Intelligence Authorization Act requiring campaigns to notify federal authorities about offers of foreign election help.
It hasn't passed yet. The bill hasn't reached the senate floor for a vote. Even if it passes there, it would never get through the House, which is controlled by the democrats. The question is no longer if GOP Senators are working with foreign nations to get re-elected, the question is now What foreign nations are they working with? Remember when those GOP Senators spent The Fourth of July in MOSCOW? I remember.FSchmertz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 01, 2020 12:17 amDoesn't this go to conference with the House before it's enacted?DandyDon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:49 pmThey dont have to when they can do this.Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:23 pm I think you should all just be honest. The democrats want mail in ballots because then they can each get 30 or 40 of them and carry them around to every alzheimer bed ridden relative they have, hold it near them and fill it out and then turn it in. Then go by some poor folks houses with some lottery scratch offs and get them to sign a few, etc.
Republicans aren't going to be having the time to do that kind of crap.
Senate strips provision from intelligence bill requiring campaigns to report foreign election help
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/30/politics ... index.htmlThe Senate will incorporate the annual intelligence policy legislation into the National Defense Authorization Act -- but only after stripping language from the intelligence bill that would have required presidential campaigns to report offers of foreign election help.
Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Tuesday that Senate Republicans forced the removal of the election reporting provision as a condition to include the intelligence bill on the must-pass defense policy legislation.
Earlier this month, the Senate Intelligence Committee approved an amendment on an 8-7 vote from Warner and GOP Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, which added a provision to the Intelligence Authorization Act requiring campaigns to notify federal authorities about offers of foreign election help.
What's real is they try and they caught. That's how the system is set up. Meaning there is no wide spread voter fraud like the fevered brainwashed minds of the right think there is. If anything the right has spent the last 20 years gaming the system in their favor.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 12:45 pm Yep. Its real.
Southfield clerk will go to trial on six felony charges
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/ ... 346760002/
once again brilliant deductive reasoning from the man that thinks the only fish in the lake are the ones you catch.Stapes wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 1:19 pmWhat's real is they try and they caught. That's how the system is set up. Meaning there is no wide spread voter fraud like the fevered brainwashed minds of the right think there is. If anything the right has spent the last 20 years gaming the system in their favor.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 12:45 pm Yep. Its real.
Southfield clerk will go to trial on six felony charges
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/ ... 346760002/