Well it was on bikers feed so it must the unimpeachable information..
Gullible trolls
Moderator: Biker
Well it was on bikers feed so it must the unimpeachable information..
Irrelevant where it came from or even if inaccurate. Any honest, logical person can acknowledge that that system is ripe for abuse and shenanigans.
Well we know you keep pushing that..... and every time you get shown that there are multiple checks and balances in place to catch any attempts at fraud and that there is no such thing as systematic Nationwide election fraud and that most of these examples you come up with are localized that have nothing to do with signatures or voter ID you refuse to accept any of that. For the first person you should worry about being honest or logicalis yourselfCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:21 pmIrrelevant where it came from or even if inaccurate. Any honest, logical person can acknowledge that that system is ripe for abuse and shenanigans.
that sounded as if you were talking about systemic racism by police officers against unarmed black men.Stapes wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:29 pm
Well we know you keep pushing that..... and every time you get shown that there are multiple checks and balances in place to catch any attempts at fraud and that there is no such thing as systematic Nationwide election fraud and that most of these examples you come up with are localized that have nothing to do with signatures or voter ID you refuse to accept any of that. For the first person you should worry about being honest or logicalis yourself
Stupid.... As usualAnimal wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:39 pmthat sounded as if you were talking about systemic racism by police officers against unarmed black men.Stapes wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:29 pm
Well we know you keep pushing that..... and every time you get shown that there are multiple checks and balances in place to catch any attempts at fraud and that there is no such thing as systematic Nationwide election fraud and that most of these examples you come up with are localized that have nothing to do with signatures or voter ID you refuse to accept any of that. For the first person you should worry about being honest or logicalis yourself
Yeah not like that case was heard in full and dismissed back in 2020 on the basis of no evidence being produced or anything. It's a claim you want to believe so it must be true.
Do you understand how our national elections work? It's all local. Every single one. It begins at the local level and then they tally up the collective total. So, if a "local" area is up to some shenanigans it can affect a national election; particularly if the margins are razor thin as we saw this past election.Stapes wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:29 pmWell we know you keep pushing that..... and every time you get shown that there are multiple checks and balances in place to catch any attempts at fraud and that there is no such thing as systematic Nationwide election fraud and that most of these examples you come up with are localized that have nothing to do with signatures or voter ID you refuse to accept any of that. For the first person you should worry about being honest or logicalis yourselfCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:21 pmIrrelevant where it came from or even if inaccurate. Any honest, logical person can acknowledge that that system is ripe for abuse and shenanigans.
Except we do have secure elections. That these people get caught proves that. Do you think some magic policy is going to stop people from trying to cheat? There are already multiple checks and balances and it works.... the system works...... it's only you holding your breath and stomping your feet and saying that it doesn'tCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:42 pmDo you understand how our national elections work? It's all local. Every single one. It begins at the local level and then they tally up the collective total. So, if a "local" area is up to some shenanigans it can affect a national election; particularly if the margins are razor thin as we saw this past election.Stapes wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:29 pmWell we know you keep pushing that..... and every time you get shown that there are multiple checks and balances in place to catch any attempts at fraud and that there is no such thing as systematic Nationwide election fraud and that most of these examples you come up with are localized that have nothing to do with signatures or voter ID you refuse to accept any of that. For the first person you should worry about being honest or logicalis yourselfCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:21 pmIrrelevant where it came from or even if inaccurate. Any honest, logical person can acknowledge that that system is ripe for abuse and shenanigans.
That's why your continued claim that there is no "Nationwide election fraud" is a strawman. Nobody is claiming that there is a nationwide secret club with secret meetings causing mass fraud. That's why those 1,300 cases of fraud you ignore blow a hole in your bullshit. Yes, they are all local and they matter because ALL elections start locally. The fraud can happen when ballots go behind closed doors, often unsolicited, and then turned in with nothing but a signature as verification. It could be your neighbor voting for his elderly grandmother. It could be the nursing home down the street "helping" their residents vote. It could be anybody really. Rational people understand this and want to have secure elections. Your party is the only one fighting against improving our elections.
"The Model-T is awesome and gets us everywhere we need to go. The automobile as we know it is as perfect as it can ever be! There is simply no need for improvements."Stapes wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:51 pmExcept we do have secure elections. That these people get caught proves that. Do you think some magic policy is going to stop people from trying to cheat? There are already multiple checks and balances and it works.... the system works...... it's only you holding your breath and stomping your feet and saying that it doesn'tCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:42 pmDo you understand how our national elections work? It's all local. Every single one. It begins at the local level and then they tally up the collective total. So, if a "local" area is up to some shenanigans it can affect a national election; particularly if the margins are razor thin as we saw this past election.Stapes wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:29 pmWell we know you keep pushing that..... and every time you get shown that there are multiple checks and balances in place to catch any attempts at fraud and that there is no such thing as systematic Nationwide election fraud and that most of these examples you come up with are localized that have nothing to do with signatures or voter ID you refuse to accept any of that. For the first person you should worry about being honest or logicalis yourselfCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:21 pmIrrelevant where it came from or even if inaccurate. Any honest, logical person can acknowledge that that system is ripe for abuse and shenanigans.
That's why your continued claim that there is no "Nationwide election fraud" is a strawman. Nobody is claiming that there is a nationwide secret club with secret meetings causing mass fraud. That's why those 1,300 cases of fraud you ignore blow a hole in your bullshit. Yes, they are all local and they matter because ALL elections start locally. The fraud can happen when ballots go behind closed doors, often unsolicited, and then turned in with nothing but a signature as verification. It could be your neighbor voting for his elderly grandmother. It could be the nursing home down the street "helping" their residents vote. It could be anybody really. Rational people understand this and want to have secure elections. Your party is the only one fighting against improving our elections.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 1:57 am"The Model-T is awesome and gets us everywhere we need to go. The automobile as we know it is as perfect as it can ever be! There is simply no need for improvements."Stapes wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:51 pmExcept we do have secure elections. That these people get caught proves that. Do you think some magic policy is going to stop people from trying to cheat? There are already multiple checks and balances and it works.... the system works...... it's only you holding your breath and stomping your feet and saying that it doesn'tCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:42 pmDo you understand how our national elections work? It's all local. Every single one. It begins at the local level and then they tally up the collective total. So, if a "local" area is up to some shenanigans it can affect a national election; particularly if the margins are razor thin as we saw this past election.Stapes wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:29 pmWell we know you keep pushing that..... and every time you get shown that there are multiple checks and balances in place to catch any attempts at fraud and that there is no such thing as systematic Nationwide election fraud and that most of these examples you come up with are localized that have nothing to do with signatures or voter ID you refuse to accept any of that. For the first person you should worry about being honest or logicalis yourself
That's why your continued claim that there is no "Nationwide election fraud" is a strawman. Nobody is claiming that there is a nationwide secret club with secret meetings causing mass fraud. That's why those 1,300 cases of fraud you ignore blow a hole in your bullshit. Yes, they are all local and they matter because ALL elections start locally. The fraud can happen when ballots go behind closed doors, often unsolicited, and then turned in with nothing but a signature as verification. It could be your neighbor voting for his elderly grandmother. It could be the nursing home down the street "helping" their residents vote. It could be anybody really. Rational people understand this and want to have secure elections. Your party is the only one fighting against improving our elections.
-Stapes in 1920
if everybody would just be honest we could just say that we are going to change the laws to make sure you fruit loops can't bus every inner city person to a 24 hour voting location and hold their hand to make an X on the part of the ballot of your choosing.Stapes wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:23 am Gee.... Never heard of improvements that made things more difficult. I don't know why your stretching so hard to make your rediculous point. Everybody knows what the purpose of these" improvements" are..... Has nothing to do with election security or fraud.... Stop acting like some naive child
Inner city: flumper code for blackAnimal wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:29 amif everybody would just be honest we could just say that we are going to change the laws to make sure you fruit loops can't bus every inner city person to a 24 hour voting location and hold their hand to make an X on the part of the ballot of your choosing.Stapes wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:23 am Gee.... Never heard of improvements that made things more difficult. I don't know why your stretching so hard to make your rediculous point. Everybody knows what the purpose of these" improvements" are..... Has nothing to do with election security or fraud.... Stop acting like some naive child
Stapes, do you at least acknowledge the possibility that ballots that are delivered to a home, solicited or unsolicited, can be filled out by the person it is not intended for and that there is almost no way of knowing if that ballot is legit or not?Stapes wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:23 amCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 1:57 am"The Model-T is awesome and gets us everywhere we need to go. The automobile as we know it is as perfect as it can ever be! There is simply no need for improvements."Stapes wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:51 pmExcept we do have secure elections. That these people get caught proves that. Do you think some magic policy is going to stop people from trying to cheat? There are already multiple checks and balances and it works.... the system works...... it's only you holding your breath and stomping your feet and saying that it doesn'tCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:42 pmDo you understand how our national elections work? It's all local. Every single one. It begins at the local level and then they tally up the collective total. So, if a "local" area is up to some shenanigans it can affect a national election; particularly if the margins are razor thin as we saw this past election.Stapes wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:29 pmWell we know you keep pushing that..... and every time you get shown that there are multiple checks and balances in place to catch any attempts at fraud and that there is no such thing as systematic Nationwide election fraud and that most of these examples you come up with are localized that have nothing to do with signatures or voter ID you refuse to accept any of that. For the first person you should worry about being honest or logicalis yourself
That's why your continued claim that there is no "Nationwide election fraud" is a strawman. Nobody is claiming that there is a nationwide secret club with secret meetings causing mass fraud. That's why those 1,300 cases of fraud you ignore blow a hole in your bullshit. Yes, they are all local and they matter because ALL elections start locally. The fraud can happen when ballots go behind closed doors, often unsolicited, and then turned in with nothing but a signature as verification. It could be your neighbor voting for his elderly grandmother. It could be the nursing home down the street "helping" their residents vote. It could be anybody really. Rational people understand this and want to have secure elections. Your party is the only one fighting against improving our elections.
-Stapes in 1920
Gee.... Never heard of improvements that made things more difficult. I don't know why your stretching so hard to make your rediculous point. Everybody knows what the purpose of these" improvements" are..... Has nothing to do with election security or fraud.... Stop acting like some naive child
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:45 amStapes, do you at least acknowledge the possibility that ballots that are delivered to a home, solicited or unsolicited, can be filled out by the person it is not intended for and that there is almost no way of knowing if that ballot is legit or not?Stapes wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:23 amCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 1:57 am"The Model-T is awesome and gets us everywhere we need to go. The automobile as we know it is as perfect as it can ever be! There is simply no need for improvements."Stapes wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:51 pmExcept we do have secure elections. That these people get caught proves that. Do you think some magic policy is going to stop people from trying to cheat? There are already multiple checks and balances and it works.... the system works...... it's only you holding your breath and stomping your feet and saying that it doesn'tCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:42 pmDo you understand how our national elections work? It's all local. Every single one. It begins at the local level and then they tally up the collective total. So, if a "local" area is up to some shenanigans it can affect a national election; particularly if the margins are razor thin as we saw this past election.Stapes wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:29 pm
Well we know you keep pushing that..... and every time you get shown that there are multiple checks and balances in place to catch any attempts at fraud and that there is no such thing as systematic Nationwide election fraud and that most of these examples you come up with are localized that have nothing to do with signatures or voter ID you refuse to accept any of that. For the first person you should worry about being honest or logicalis yourself
That's why your continued claim that there is no "Nationwide election fraud" is a strawman. Nobody is claiming that there is a nationwide secret club with secret meetings causing mass fraud. That's why those 1,300 cases of fraud you ignore blow a hole in your bullshit. Yes, they are all local and they matter because ALL elections start locally. The fraud can happen when ballots go behind closed doors, often unsolicited, and then turned in with nothing but a signature as verification. It could be your neighbor voting for his elderly grandmother. It could be the nursing home down the street "helping" their residents vote. It could be anybody really. Rational people understand this and want to have secure elections. Your party is the only one fighting against improving our elections.
-Stapes in 1920
Gee.... Never heard of improvements that made things more difficult. I don't know why your stretching so hard to make your rediculous point. Everybody knows what the purpose of these" improvements" are..... Has nothing to do with election security or fraud.... Stop acting like some naive child
You keep beating this fucking drum. There have been , according to what you posted, 1,100 voter fraud convictions in the last 40 years. This is not indicative of a problem. Just the opposite in fact. You just cannot handle the fact that your guy lost and that black voters may have played a large part in that. Maybe if your party tried to include blacks rather than keeping them from voting you wouldn’t need to continue with this lie.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:42 pmDo you understand how our national elections work? It's all local. Every single one. It begins at the local level and then they tally up the collective total. So, if a "local" area is up to some shenanigans it can affect a national election; particularly if the margins are razor thin as we saw this past election.Stapes wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:29 pmWell we know you keep pushing that..... and every time you get shown that there are multiple checks and balances in place to catch any attempts at fraud and that there is no such thing as systematic Nationwide election fraud and that most of these examples you come up with are localized that have nothing to do with signatures or voter ID you refuse to accept any of that. For the first person you should worry about being honest or logicalis yourselfCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:21 pmIrrelevant where it came from or even if inaccurate. Any honest, logical person can acknowledge that that system is ripe for abuse and shenanigans.
That's why your continued claim that there is no "Nationwide election fraud" is a strawman. Nobody is claiming that there is a nationwide secret club with secret meetings causing mass fraud. That's why those 1,300 cases of fraud you ignore blow a hole in your bullshit. Yes, they are all local and they matter because ALL elections start locally. The fraud can happen when ballots go behind closed doors, often unsolicited, and then turned in with nothing but a signature as verification. It could be your neighbor voting for his elderly grandmother. It could be the nursing home down the street "helping" their residents vote. It could be anybody really. Rational people understand this and want to have secure elections. Your party is the only one fighting against improving our elections.
What did you find out about that totally made up and unbelievable (according to you) story about the Biden administration not letting media or congress visit the Biden Concentration Camps (TM)?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 9:13 am 63 cases from the campaign dismissed as frivolous and baseless, and they've just kept right on going. Even the people bringing the cases probably don't believe it at this point, it's just about placating the retarded base, keeping the fundraising humming and pushing their fairly open attempts to get less people to vote next time..
Someone made a claim, I asked them to back it because I hadn't heard about it over here in the UK. Kinda sad you think that is such a big deal isn't it?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:15 amWhat did you find out about that totally made up and unbelievable (according to you) story about the Biden administration not letting media or congress visit the Biden Concentration Camps (TM)?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 9:13 am 63 cases from the campaign dismissed as frivolous and baseless, and they've just kept right on going. Even the people bringing the cases probably don't believe it at this point, it's just about placating the retarded base, keeping the fundraising humming and pushing their fairly open attempts to get less people to vote next time..
Dupe.
Not really as you like to brag that you think you're more reliably informed on US events than we are. Yet somehow, you missed this huge fucking story that was in our top news stories for weeks (and is still ongoing). It's more of an implication of your news sources.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:02 pmSomeone made a claim, I asked them to back it because I hadn't heard about it over here in the UK. Kinda sad you think that is such a big deal isn't it?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:15 amWhat did you find out about that totally made up and unbelievable (according to you) story about the Biden administration not letting media or congress visit the Biden Concentration Camps (TM)?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 9:13 am 63 cases from the campaign dismissed as frivolous and baseless, and they've just kept right on going. Even the people bringing the cases probably don't believe it at this point, it's just about placating the retarded base, keeping the fundraising humming and pushing their fairly open attempts to get less people to vote next time..
Dupe.
Well I generally am, I missed that story. More an indication of how much time I was spending reading american news sources than what the sources were, I've been busy. Seriously kinda weird how excited that made you isn't it?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:06 pmNot really as you like to brag that you think you're more reliably informed on US events than we are. Yet somehow, you missed this huge fucking story that was in our top news stories for weeks (and is still ongoing). It's more of an implication of your news sources.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:02 pmSomeone made a claim, I asked them to back it because I hadn't heard about it over here in the UK. Kinda sad you think that is such a big deal isn't it?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:15 amWhat did you find out about that totally made up and unbelievable (according to you) story about the Biden administration not letting media or congress visit the Biden Concentration Camps (TM)?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 9:13 am 63 cases from the campaign dismissed as frivolous and baseless, and they've just kept right on going. Even the people bringing the cases probably don't believe it at this point, it's just about placating the retarded base, keeping the fundraising humming and pushing their fairly open attempts to get less people to vote next time..
Dupe.
Again: not really. It's just amusing that you claim to be better informed but clearly you aren't.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:19 pmWell I generally am, I missed that story. More an indication of how much time I was spending reading american news sources than what the sources were, I've been busy. Seriously kinda weird how excited that made you isn't it?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:06 pmNot really as you like to brag that you think you're more reliably informed on US events than we are. Yet somehow, you missed this huge fucking story that was in our top news stories for weeks (and is still ongoing). It's more of an implication of your news sources.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:02 pmSomeone made a claim, I asked them to back it because I hadn't heard about it over here in the UK. Kinda sad you think that is such a big deal isn't it?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:15 amWhat did you find out about that totally made up and unbelievable (according to you) story about the Biden administration not letting media or congress visit the Biden Concentration Camps (TM)?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 9:13 am 63 cases from the campaign dismissed as frivolous and baseless, and they've just kept right on going. Even the people bringing the cases probably don't believe it at this point, it's just about placating the retarded base, keeping the fundraising humming and pushing their fairly open attempts to get less people to vote next time..
Dupe.
Uh huh. Missing one story sure does mean I'm not better informed on other things, you gots some smarts there fo sho.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 3:13 pmAgain: not really. It's just amusing that you claim to be better informed but clearly you aren't.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:19 pmWell I generally am, I missed that story. More an indication of how much time I was spending reading american news sources than what the sources were, I've been busy. Seriously kinda weird how excited that made you isn't it?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:06 pmNot really as you like to brag that you think you're more reliably informed on US events than we are. Yet somehow, you missed this huge fucking story that was in our top news stories for weeks (and is still ongoing). It's more of an implication of your news sources.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:02 pmSomeone made a claim, I asked them to back it because I hadn't heard about it over here in the UK. Kinda sad you think that is such a big deal isn't it?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:15 amWhat did you find out about that totally made up and unbelievable (according to you) story about the Biden administration not letting media or congress visit the Biden Concentration Camps (TM)?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 9:13 am 63 cases from the campaign dismissed as frivolous and baseless, and they've just kept right on going. Even the people bringing the cases probably don't believe it at this point, it's just about placating the retarded base, keeping the fundraising humming and pushing their fairly open attempts to get less people to vote next time..
Dupe.
what it is actually an indication of is how far the media has moved in favor of the left. They don't even cover a story of the Biden administration covering up a border crisis and you are living proof of it. You are someone that lives and breathes the news and you never ran across a story that should be huge. And a story that was huge when the shoe was on Trump's foot. Which you pointed out when you started this by wagging your finger in our faces because Trump did it.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:19 pm
Well I generally am, I missed that story. More an indication of how much time I was spending reading american news sources than what the sources were, I've been busy. Seriously kinda weird how excited that made you isn't it?
It was/is just one of the biggest stories around that's all. Yeah, no biggie. Just the Biden administration denying media and congressional access to the Biden Concentration Camps (TM) because they're such a cluster fuck.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 3:16 pmUh huh. Missing one story sure does mean I'm not better informed on other things, you gots some smarts there fo sho.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 3:13 pmAgain: not really. It's just amusing that you claim to be better informed but clearly you aren't.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:19 pmWell I generally am, I missed that story. More an indication of how much time I was spending reading american news sources than what the sources were, I've been busy. Seriously kinda weird how excited that made you isn't it?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:06 pmNot really as you like to brag that you think you're more reliably informed on US events than we are. Yet somehow, you missed this huge fucking story that was in our top news stories for weeks (and is still ongoing). It's more of an implication of your news sources.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:02 pmSomeone made a claim, I asked them to back it because I hadn't heard about it over here in the UK. Kinda sad you think that is such a big deal isn't it?
It's an indication that I wasn't here much or following the US news much for a couple of weeks is all. I can see why you all think this is such a big deal though, it's kinda flattering.Animal wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 3:23 pmwhat it is actually an indication of is how far the media has moved in favor of the left. They don't even cover a story of the Biden administration covering up a border crisis and you are living proof of it. You are someone that lives and breathes the news and you never ran across a story that should be huge. And a story that was huge when the shoe was on Trump's foot. Which you pointed out when you started this by wagging your finger in our faces because Trump did it.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:19 pm
Well I generally am, I missed that story. More an indication of how much time I was spending reading american news sources than what the sources were, I've been busy. Seriously kinda weird how excited that made you isn't it?