HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Moderator: Biker
- Burn1dwn
- Non-Gay Omar
- Posts: 3735
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:23 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
They should make all voters read this article before they show their ID to vote. Long but worth the read.
https://www.yahoo.com/now/rudy-giuliani ... 28439.html
https://www.yahoo.com/now/rudy-giuliani ... 28439.html
-
- Not UJR's Military Attaché
- Posts: 6742
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
- Location: South Carolina
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
You should have to pass the test to become a naturalized citizen to be able to vote.
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
So if you fail the test you are exempt from all state, local and federal taxes correct?
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- Biker
- Official UJR Russian Asset
- Posts: 13084
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7948
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
No person shall solicit votes [or] distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to [a voter] … This Code section shall not be construed to prohibit a poll officer…from making available self-service water from an unattended receptacle to [a voter] waiting in line to voteAnimal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 2:55 pmdoes the law actually say "its a crime to give water to someone in line to vote?" Or is that some extrapolation of what the law says to make some stupid point to morons like you that lap it up?Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:50 pmThe problem is that the republicans have gone way beyond reasonable in their efforts. Included in Arizona is a proposal that the legislature can overrule the popular vote. In Georgia they want to restrict Sunday voting, does that secure the vote? They want to make it a crime to give water to someone in line to vote, does that secure the vote?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:22 pmBut you understand what youre saying by that statment is that you DONT want elections to be more secure and youre ok with the amount of fraud, right?Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:00 pmI think it’s because we see it as a blatant effort by republicans to suppress democratic voting.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:01 amC'mon Wut. This is just the instances that we know about; you know there are more. Why is it so hard to acknowledge that it happens more than we'd like it to? If we know it happens, and it not only happens but it happens more than we'd like, why cant we agree that we should take steps to make sure elections are more secure instead of less secure? I honestly cannot see the reasoning here behind all Democrat attempts to deflect and deny the problem.
Lets put it this way: If you think all R suggestions are just coy attempts to suppress the vote, how do YOU suggest we make elections more secure? What is the Democrat answer? And it cant be "Meh, leave well enough alone." because you are smart enough to know we need to do something.
They want to reduce availability of early voting and general access to the polls, but also make mail in voting more difficult, while there are multiple states whose voting method is primarily mail in.
It looks like a mass vote suppression effort so it’s being resisted completely.
Here's the rest of it for all the dupes leaving off the end of it.
- Biker
- Official UJR Russian Asset
- Posts: 13084
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28047
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
and that's my point. These are grown adults trying to twist simple words into something stupid to sell their points to the uniformed retards. They are probably only even re-quoting it because they are the uninformed retards that bought it when they heard some other uninformed retard say it. Shit, I even heard Biden say it on TV the other day. The fucking president of the US lying straight into a camera to sell his opinion on voter laws. He has to lie about what a law says in order to sell his agenda. Why? Why the lies?necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 6:32 pm No person shall solicit votes [or] distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to [a voter] … This Code section shall not be construed to prohibit a poll officer…from making available self-service water from an unattended receptacle to [a voter] waiting in line to vote
Here's the rest of it for all the dupes leaving off the end of it.
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28047
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
- Biker
- Official UJR Russian Asset
- Posts: 13084
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm
- Stapes
- World's Only Blue Collar Guy
- Posts: 12853
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
- Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Smarter than you retards. The bar isn't that high
I blame Biker.
- Stapes
- World's Only Blue Collar Guy
- Posts: 12853
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
- Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Let what sink in retard? Are you really trying to equate guns with voting? God damn you are some simple fucks
I blame Biker.
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28047
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
^ Its orbiting his giant melon but apparently gravity hasn't taken effect yet.
- Stapes
- World's Only Blue Collar Guy
- Posts: 12853
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
- Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey
- Who
- Adult Diaper Enthusiast
- Posts: 4243
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:33 am
- Location: God's Waiting Room
- Interests: Breasts
- Occupation: Trigger Man
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
A Legend In His Own Mind
All Posts Fair & Balanced
All Posts Fair & Balanced
- Biker
- Official UJR Russian Asset
- Posts: 13084
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
PA Republican Who Objected to Trump’s Election Loss Has Concluded That Fraud Was Committed… By Republicans
By Ken MeyerApr 22nd, 2021, 9:41 am
In an interesting twist, Pennsylvania House representative Seth Grove has admitted that Republicans were responsible for voter fraud in the state during the 2020 election.
Grove, who is also the chairman of the PA House State Government Committee, was among the Republicans who wanted Congress to reject the results from his state during the 2020 election. He conducted multiple hearings to question the state’s results in favor of Joe Biden, took part in events that revolved around election conspiracy theories, and spearheaded a letter that claimed administrative actions and legal rulings “undermined the lawful certification of Pennsylvania’s delegation to the Electoral College.”
The Pennsylvania Capital-Star interviewed Grove to ask him about the 10 hearings he conducted on the 2020 vote, plus his sponsorship of legislation to eliminate absentee ballots while proposing voter ID. When reporter Stephen Caruso pressed Grove on his objections to the election results — asking him point-blank “Was there election fraud in 2020?”
Here’s how that went:
Grove: Yes, there was. They have confirmed cases of election fraud.
Caruso: Who committed that fraud in Pennsylvania?
Grove: Right, Republicans. But it’s still election fraud. It doesn’t matter who [commits] it. We don’t want that fraud to occur. And to say there wasn’t any is a lie. Now, I will say there’s not like this mass amount of fraud, that’s going to shift hundreds of thousands of votes. But there was election fraud. We have had repeated, repeated election fraud in this commonwealth for decades.
Caruso: This is not the message that, particularly Republican politicians, were giving to their constituents-
Grove: Some. Not all.
Grove was further pressed on why he didn’t call out the lies that shrouded the 2020 election, and his response to that was “I can’t help people believe everything on the Internet.”
“There are a lot of bad accusations out there. We did our due diligence to try to address them when members had questions,” he continued. “People are going to believe what they believe. The other reason for doing the hearings, you know, we looked at the actual election law, the actual administration [of the] election. And you can hear by the stakeholders testimony or public statements, there was a lot of appreciation for how we did it.”
https://www.mediaite.com/news/pa-republ ... publicans/
By Ken MeyerApr 22nd, 2021, 9:41 am
In an interesting twist, Pennsylvania House representative Seth Grove has admitted that Republicans were responsible for voter fraud in the state during the 2020 election.
Grove, who is also the chairman of the PA House State Government Committee, was among the Republicans who wanted Congress to reject the results from his state during the 2020 election. He conducted multiple hearings to question the state’s results in favor of Joe Biden, took part in events that revolved around election conspiracy theories, and spearheaded a letter that claimed administrative actions and legal rulings “undermined the lawful certification of Pennsylvania’s delegation to the Electoral College.”
The Pennsylvania Capital-Star interviewed Grove to ask him about the 10 hearings he conducted on the 2020 vote, plus his sponsorship of legislation to eliminate absentee ballots while proposing voter ID. When reporter Stephen Caruso pressed Grove on his objections to the election results — asking him point-blank “Was there election fraud in 2020?”
Here’s how that went:
Grove: Yes, there was. They have confirmed cases of election fraud.
Caruso: Who committed that fraud in Pennsylvania?
Grove: Right, Republicans. But it’s still election fraud. It doesn’t matter who [commits] it. We don’t want that fraud to occur. And to say there wasn’t any is a lie. Now, I will say there’s not like this mass amount of fraud, that’s going to shift hundreds of thousands of votes. But there was election fraud. We have had repeated, repeated election fraud in this commonwealth for decades.
Caruso: This is not the message that, particularly Republican politicians, were giving to their constituents-
Grove: Some. Not all.
Grove was further pressed on why he didn’t call out the lies that shrouded the 2020 election, and his response to that was “I can’t help people believe everything on the Internet.”
“There are a lot of bad accusations out there. We did our due diligence to try to address them when members had questions,” he continued. “People are going to believe what they believe. The other reason for doing the hearings, you know, we looked at the actual election law, the actual administration [of the] election. And you can hear by the stakeholders testimony or public statements, there was a lot of appreciation for how we did it.”
https://www.mediaite.com/news/pa-republ ... publicans/
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- CHEEZY17
- Libertarian house cat
- Posts: 14909
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Looks like they needed to check ID.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
-
- Most Likely To Have a Neckbeard
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 3:31 am
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
That's some garbled misinformation in there. You get automatically registered to vote when dealing with some other government agency, like the DMV, unless you opt out. You can register to vote same day but the requirements for doing so are identical to the requirements for registering to vote in advance - the requirements from the National Voter Registration act which was passed in 1993. It doesn't relax the requirements, it just means fewer people will get turned away because they didn't register in time
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BIL ... 6hr1eh.pdf
Section 1031.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BIL ... 6hr1eh.pdf
Section 1031.
- Cassandros
- Hamsterphile
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:38 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Hey spudoc, don't you think the murder and his confession of wanting to vote twice had a hand in them figuring it out?
That said, what a piece of shit.
That said, what a piece of shit.
“The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither, the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great deal of both.” --Milton Friedman
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Suzanne Morphew, 49, who shared two daughters with her husband, disappeared on May 10, 2020, near the small mountain town of Salida, in Chaffee County. She has yet to be found.
So when the Chaffee County Clerk's Office received a voter ballot in the mail for the missing person in October, the county clerk reported the alleged voter fraud to authorities, according to an arrest warrant affidavit.
The ballot did not have the required signature, but was allegedly signed by Barry Morphew on the witness' signature line on Oct. 15, according to the affidavit.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/man-arrested- ... d=77692708
So when the Chaffee County Clerk's Office received a voter ballot in the mail for the missing person in October, the county clerk reported the alleged voter fraud to authorities, according to an arrest warrant affidavit.
The ballot did not have the required signature, but was allegedly signed by Barry Morphew on the witness' signature line on Oct. 15, according to the affidavit.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/man-arrested- ... d=77692708
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
- Cassandros
- Hamsterphile
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:38 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Good research.
Well, there you go. A known missing person casting a ballot with no signature, with her husband as the witness...
So it seems the system not only noticed potential fraud but help solve a murder. Which is funny, doesn't HR 1 want to remove the witness signature portion of mail in ballots?
Well, there you go. A known missing person casting a ballot with no signature, with her husband as the witness...
So it seems the system not only noticed potential fraud but help solve a murder. Which is funny, doesn't HR 1 want to remove the witness signature portion of mail in ballots?
“The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither, the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great deal of both.” --Milton Friedman
- CaptQuint
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 30361
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Yes, what of it? Why should you need the cooperation of another person to vote?Cassandros wrote: ↑Sat May 15, 2021 3:58 pm Good research.
Well, there you go. A known missing person casting a ballot with no signature, with her husband as the witness...
So it seems the system not only noticed potential fraud but help solve a murder. Which is funny, doesn't HR 1 want to remove the witness signature portion of mail in ballots?
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
-
- Most Likely To Have a Neckbeard
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 3:31 am
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Colorado doesn’t require a witness. That is only there for people who otherwise can’t sign the ballot themselves.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sat May 15, 2021 3:58 pm Good research.
Well, there you go. A known missing person casting a ballot with no signature, with her husband as the witness...
So it seems the system not only noticed potential fraud but help solve a murder. Which is funny, doesn't HR 1 want to remove the witness signature portion of mail in ballots?