you are undoubtedly the dumbest fuck on the internet. do you think anyone understands this retarded crypto talk that you think makes you sound smart?
HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Moderator: Biker
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28028
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
- Who
- Adult Diaper Enthusiast
- Posts: 4243
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:33 am
- Location: God's Waiting Room
- Interests: Breasts
- Occupation: Trigger Man
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
I don’t care what you think, I stated a fact, try reading more and posting less.Animal wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:03 pmyou are undoubtedly the dumbest fuck on the internet. do you think anyone understands this retarded crypto talk that you think makes you sound smart?
Speaking of dumb shouldn’t you be counting diesel fuel usage?
A Legend In His Own Mind
All Posts Fair & Balanced
All Posts Fair & Balanced
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28028
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
counting diesel fuel usage? If you mean tracking the gallons used by every piece of equipment I own, then yeah. that is being done as you drool on your window.Who wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:53 pmI don’t care what you think, I stated a fact, try reading more and posting less.Animal wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:03 pmyou are undoubtedly the dumbest fuck on the internet. do you think anyone understands this retarded crypto talk that you think makes you sound smart?
Speaking of dumb shouldn’t you be counting diesel fuel usage?
- Who
- Adult Diaper Enthusiast
- Posts: 4243
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:33 am
- Location: God's Waiting Room
- Interests: Breasts
- Occupation: Trigger Man
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Nice one Diego , now go play in trafficAnimal wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:57 pmcounting diesel fuel usage? If you mean tracking the gallons used by every piece of equipment I own, then yeah. that is being done as you drool on your window.Who wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:53 pmI don’t care what you think, I stated a fact, try reading more and posting less.Animal wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:03 pmyou are undoubtedly the dumbest fuck on the internet. do you think anyone understands this retarded crypto talk that you think makes you sound smart?
Speaking of dumb shouldn’t you be counting diesel fuel usage?
A Legend In His Own Mind
All Posts Fair & Balanced
All Posts Fair & Balanced
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
That’s 1300 instances over 40 years? With elections happening every year, and primaries as well, there must be billions of votes cast during that period.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 2:15 amI guess I need to post the link RD provided yet again. Over 1300 proven instances of fraud and over 1100 convictions nationwide.
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
wut?
- Cassandros
- Hamsterphile
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:38 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Does that database really go back 40 years?
Regardless, I think they hit the nail on the head when they wrote:
Regardless, I think they hit the nail on the head when they wrote:
The big problem is that nobody really knows the extent of election fraud, including us. While we are not making any definitive claims about the extent of election fraud in our country, we are confident in saying that there are far too many vulnerabilities in our current system. The important thing is that people must have trust in the outcome, which is difficult to do, in large part, because of the vulnerabilities that currently exist.
“The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither, the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great deal of both.” --Milton Friedman
- CHEEZY17
- Libertarian house cat
- Posts: 14904
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
C'mon Wut. This is just the instances that we know about; you know there are more. Why is it so hard to acknowledge that it happens more than we'd like it to? If we know it happens, and it not only happens but it happens more than we'd like, why cant we agree that we should take steps to make sure elections are more secure instead of less secure? I honestly cannot see the reasoning here behind all Democrat attempts to deflect and deny the problem.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:33 amThat’s 1300 instances over 40 years? With elections happening every year, and primaries as well, there must be billions of votes cast during that period.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 2:15 amI guess I need to post the link RD provided yet again. Over 1300 proven instances of fraud and over 1100 convictions nationwide.
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
I think it’s because we see it as a blatant effort by republicans to suppress democratic voting.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:01 amC'mon Wut. This is just the instances that we know about; you know there are more. Why is it so hard to acknowledge that it happens more than we'd like it to? If we know it happens, and it not only happens but it happens more than we'd like, why cant we agree that we should take steps to make sure elections are more secure instead of less secure? I honestly cannot see the reasoning here behind all Democrat attempts to deflect and deny the problem.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:33 amThat’s 1300 instances over 40 years? With elections happening every year, and primaries as well, there must be billions of votes cast during that period.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 2:15 amI guess I need to post the link RD provided yet again. Over 1300 proven instances of fraud and over 1100 convictions nationwide.
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
wut?
- CHEEZY17
- Libertarian house cat
- Posts: 14904
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
But you understand what youre saying by that statment is that you DONT want elections to be more secure and youre ok with the amount of fraud, right?Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:00 pmI think it’s because we see it as a blatant effort by republicans to suppress democratic voting.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:01 amC'mon Wut. This is just the instances that we know about; you know there are more. Why is it so hard to acknowledge that it happens more than we'd like it to? If we know it happens, and it not only happens but it happens more than we'd like, why cant we agree that we should take steps to make sure elections are more secure instead of less secure? I honestly cannot see the reasoning here behind all Democrat attempts to deflect and deny the problem.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:33 amThat’s 1300 instances over 40 years? With elections happening every year, and primaries as well, there must be billions of votes cast during that period.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 2:15 amI guess I need to post the link RD provided yet again. Over 1300 proven instances of fraud and over 1100 convictions nationwide.
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
Lets put it this way: If you think all R suggestions are just coy attempts to suppress the vote, how do YOU suggest we make elections more secure? What is the Democrat answer? And it cant be "Meh, leave well enough alone." because you are smart enough to know we need to do something.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
- Stapes
- World's Only Blue Collar Guy
- Posts: 12853
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
- Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Cheezy just can't face the facts on their own merit. There is no widespread election fraud.........but he will nitpick every little shitty school board election or town mayor to try and make his point.
Trump’s own officials say 2020 was America’s most secure election in history
Homeland Security put out a statement with state and local officials that countered the president’s fraud claims.
By Jen Kirbyjen.kirby@vox.com Nov 13, 2020, 4:40pm EST
The 2020 US election was the most secure in American history, according to US elections officials.
“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double-checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result,” the coordinating bodies on election infrastructure and security said in a joint statement issued by the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
The statement directly contradicts President Donald Trump, who has made unfounded allegations of widespread voting irregularities and fraud. The president is using these claims to challenge the vote counts in several key states that delivered President-elect Joe Biden his apparent Electoral College victory.
Trump’s own officials say 2020 was America’s most secure election in history
Homeland Security put out a statement with state and local officials that countered the president’s fraud claims.
By Jen Kirbyjen.kirby@vox.com Nov 13, 2020, 4:40pm EST
The 2020 US election was the most secure in American history, according to US elections officials.
“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double-checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result,” the coordinating bodies on election infrastructure and security said in a joint statement issued by the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
The statement directly contradicts President Donald Trump, who has made unfounded allegations of widespread voting irregularities and fraud. The president is using these claims to challenge the vote counts in several key states that delivered President-elect Joe Biden his apparent Electoral College victory.
I blame Biker.
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
The problem is that the republicans have gone way beyond reasonable in their efforts. Included in Arizona is a proposal that the legislature can overrule the popular vote. In Georgia they want to restrict Sunday voting, does that secure the vote? They want to make it a crime to give water to someone in line to vote, does that secure the vote?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:22 pmBut you understand what youre saying by that statment is that you DONT want elections to be more secure and youre ok with the amount of fraud, right?Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:00 pmI think it’s because we see it as a blatant effort by republicans to suppress democratic voting.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:01 amC'mon Wut. This is just the instances that we know about; you know there are more. Why is it so hard to acknowledge that it happens more than we'd like it to? If we know it happens, and it not only happens but it happens more than we'd like, why cant we agree that we should take steps to make sure elections are more secure instead of less secure? I honestly cannot see the reasoning here behind all Democrat attempts to deflect and deny the problem.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:33 amThat’s 1300 instances over 40 years? With elections happening every year, and primaries as well, there must be billions of votes cast during that period.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 2:15 amI guess I need to post the link RD provided yet again. Over 1300 proven instances of fraud and over 1100 convictions nationwide.
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
Lets put it this way: If you think all R suggestions are just coy attempts to suppress the vote, how do YOU suggest we make elections more secure? What is the Democrat answer? And it cant be "Meh, leave well enough alone." because you are smart enough to know we need to do something.
They want to reduce availability of early voting and general access to the polls, but also make mail in voting more difficult, while there are multiple states whose voting method is primarily mail in.
It looks like a mass vote suppression effort so it’s being resisted completely.
wut?
- CHEEZY17
- Libertarian house cat
- Posts: 14904
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
I agree R's tend to push too far. So, what is the middle ground? What do you suggest?Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:50 pmThe problem is that the republicans have gone way beyond reasonable in their efforts. Included in Arizona is a proposal that the legislature can overrule the popular vote. In Georgia they want to restrict Sunday voting, does that secure the vote? They want to make it a crime to give water to someone in line to vote, does that secure the vote?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:22 pmBut you understand what youre saying by that statment is that you DONT want elections to be more secure and youre ok with the amount of fraud, right?Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:00 pmI think it’s because we see it as a blatant effort by republicans to suppress democratic voting.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:01 amC'mon Wut. This is just the instances that we know about; you know there are more. Why is it so hard to acknowledge that it happens more than we'd like it to? If we know it happens, and it not only happens but it happens more than we'd like, why cant we agree that we should take steps to make sure elections are more secure instead of less secure? I honestly cannot see the reasoning here behind all Democrat attempts to deflect and deny the problem.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:33 amThat’s 1300 instances over 40 years? With elections happening every year, and primaries as well, there must be billions of votes cast during that period.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 2:15 am
I guess I need to post the link RD provided yet again. Over 1300 proven instances of fraud and over 1100 convictions nationwide.
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
Lets put it this way: If you think all R suggestions are just coy attempts to suppress the vote, how do YOU suggest we make elections more secure? What is the Democrat answer? And it cant be "Meh, leave well enough alone." because you are smart enough to know we need to do something.
They want to reduce availability of early voting and general access to the polls, but also make mail in voting more difficult, while there are multiple states whose voting method is primarily mail in.
It looks like a mass vote suppression effort so it’s being resisted completely.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
I actually don’t object to showing an Id for voting, but make easy for poor people to get a voter id, free, and in their locations. I like the idea of expanded access to polling places and I don’t want to see retractions of opening of polling places (which republicans are trying to do). I don’t see why drop boxes for mail votes can’t be made available (which republicans are trying to restrict) and I don’t see why mail voting has to be restricted. Set reasonable standards for mail votes, and make them uniform. Don’t create obstacles that are unnecessary.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 2:33 pmI agree R's tend to push too far. So, what is the middle ground? What do you suggest?Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:50 pmThe problem is that the republicans have gone way beyond reasonable in their efforts. Included in Arizona is a proposal that the legislature can overrule the popular vote. In Georgia they want to restrict Sunday voting, does that secure the vote? They want to make it a crime to give water to someone in line to vote, does that secure the vote?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:22 pmBut you understand what youre saying by that statment is that you DONT want elections to be more secure and youre ok with the amount of fraud, right?Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:00 pmI think it’s because we see it as a blatant effort by republicans to suppress democratic voting.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:01 amC'mon Wut. This is just the instances that we know about; you know there are more. Why is it so hard to acknowledge that it happens more than we'd like it to? If we know it happens, and it not only happens but it happens more than we'd like, why cant we agree that we should take steps to make sure elections are more secure instead of less secure? I honestly cannot see the reasoning here behind all Democrat attempts to deflect and deny the problem.
Lets put it this way: If you think all R suggestions are just coy attempts to suppress the vote, how do YOU suggest we make elections more secure? What is the Democrat answer? And it cant be "Meh, leave well enough alone." because you are smart enough to know we need to do something.
They want to reduce availability of early voting and general access to the polls, but also make mail in voting more difficult, while there are multiple states whose voting method is primarily mail in.
It looks like a mass vote suppression effort so it’s being resisted completely.
wut?
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28028
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
does the law actually say "its a crime to give water to someone in line to vote?" Or is that some extrapolation of what the law says to make some stupid point to morons like you that lap it up?Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:50 pmThe problem is that the republicans have gone way beyond reasonable in their efforts. Included in Arizona is a proposal that the legislature can overrule the popular vote. In Georgia they want to restrict Sunday voting, does that secure the vote? They want to make it a crime to give water to someone in line to vote, does that secure the vote?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:22 pmBut you understand what youre saying by that statment is that you DONT want elections to be more secure and youre ok with the amount of fraud, right?Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:00 pmI think it’s because we see it as a blatant effort by republicans to suppress democratic voting.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:01 amC'mon Wut. This is just the instances that we know about; you know there are more. Why is it so hard to acknowledge that it happens more than we'd like it to? If we know it happens, and it not only happens but it happens more than we'd like, why cant we agree that we should take steps to make sure elections are more secure instead of less secure? I honestly cannot see the reasoning here behind all Democrat attempts to deflect and deny the problem.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:33 amThat’s 1300 instances over 40 years? With elections happening every year, and primaries as well, there must be billions of votes cast during that period.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 2:15 am
I guess I need to post the link RD provided yet again. Over 1300 proven instances of fraud and over 1100 convictions nationwide.
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
Lets put it this way: If you think all R suggestions are just coy attempts to suppress the vote, how do YOU suggest we make elections more secure? What is the Democrat answer? And it cant be "Meh, leave well enough alone." because you are smart enough to know we need to do something.
They want to reduce availability of early voting and general access to the polls, but also make mail in voting more difficult, while there are multiple states whose voting method is primarily mail in.
It looks like a mass vote suppression effort so it’s being resisted completely.
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Here ya go, moron:Animal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 2:55 pmdoes the law actually say "its a crime to give water to someone in line to vote?" Or is that some extrapolation of what the law says to make some stupid point to morons like you that lap it up?Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:50 pmThe problem is that the republicans have gone way beyond reasonable in their efforts. Included in Arizona is a proposal that the legislature can overrule the popular vote. In Georgia they want to restrict Sunday voting, does that secure the vote? They want to make it a crime to give water to someone in line to vote, does that secure the vote?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:22 pmBut you understand what youre saying by that statment is that you DONT want elections to be more secure and youre ok with the amount of fraud, right?Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:00 pmI think it’s because we see it as a blatant effort by republicans to suppress democratic voting.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:01 amC'mon Wut. This is just the instances that we know about; you know there are more. Why is it so hard to acknowledge that it happens more than we'd like it to? If we know it happens, and it not only happens but it happens more than we'd like, why cant we agree that we should take steps to make sure elections are more secure instead of less secure? I honestly cannot see the reasoning here behind all Democrat attempts to deflect and deny the problem.
Lets put it this way: If you think all R suggestions are just coy attempts to suppress the vote, how do YOU suggest we make elections more secure? What is the Democrat answer? And it cant be "Meh, leave well enough alone." because you are smart enough to know we need to do something.
They want to reduce availability of early voting and general access to the polls, but also make mail in voting more difficult, while there are multiple states whose voting method is primarily mail in.
It looks like a mass vote suppression effort so it’s being resisted completely.
"No person shall solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, nor shall any person distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector," the bill states.
wut?
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28028
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Yeah. That's exactly what I thought.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:15 pm
Here ya go, moron:
"No person shall solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, nor shall any person distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector," the bill states.
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
That it makes it illegal to give a bottle of water to someone standing in line to vote?Animal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:22 pmYeah. That's exactly what I thought.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:15 pm
Here ya go, moron:
"No person shall solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, nor shall any person distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector," the bill states.
Yep, that’s what it does.
wut?
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28028
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
its people like you that make it so easy for the spin masters to succeed.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:26 pmThat it makes it illegal to give a bottle of water to someone standing in line to vote?Animal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:22 pmYeah. That's exactly what I thought.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:15 pm
Here ya go, moron:
"No person shall solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, nor shall any person distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector," the bill states.
Yep, that’s what it does.
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Does it not have that effect?Animal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:30 pmits people like you that make it so easy for the spin masters to succeed.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:26 pmThat it makes it illegal to give a bottle of water to someone standing in line to vote?Animal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:22 pmYeah. That's exactly what I thought.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:15 pm
Here ya go, moron:
"No person shall solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, nor shall any person distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector," the bill states.
Yep, that’s what it does.
wut?
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28028
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
you could also say that if someone in line had a heart attack you couldn't give them CPR, but you don't bring up that point because it sounds foolish. because it is.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:30 pmDoes it not have that effect?Animal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:30 pmits people like you that make it so easy for the spin masters to succeed.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:26 pmThat it makes it illegal to give a bottle of water to someone standing in line to vote?Animal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:22 pmYeah. That's exactly what I thought.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:15 pm
Here ya go, moron:
"No person shall solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, nor shall any person distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector," the bill states.
Yep, that’s what it does.
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
No comment on the Arizona legislature overturning the popular vote?Animal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 2:55 pmdoes the law actually say "its a crime to give water to someone in line to vote?" Or is that some extrapolation of what the law says to make some stupid point to morons like you that lap it up?Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:50 pmThe problem is that the republicans have gone way beyond reasonable in their efforts. Included in Arizona is a proposal that the legislature can overrule the popular vote. In Georgia they want to restrict Sunday voting, does that secure the vote? They want to make it a crime to give water to someone in line to vote, does that secure the vote?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:22 pmBut you understand what youre saying by that statment is that you DONT want elections to be more secure and youre ok with the amount of fraud, right?Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:00 pmI think it’s because we see it as a blatant effort by republicans to suppress democratic voting.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:01 amC'mon Wut. This is just the instances that we know about; you know there are more. Why is it so hard to acknowledge that it happens more than we'd like it to? If we know it happens, and it not only happens but it happens more than we'd like, why cant we agree that we should take steps to make sure elections are more secure instead of less secure? I honestly cannot see the reasoning here behind all Democrat attempts to deflect and deny the problem.
Lets put it this way: If you think all R suggestions are just coy attempts to suppress the vote, how do YOU suggest we make elections more secure? What is the Democrat answer? And it cant be "Meh, leave well enough alone." because you are smart enough to know we need to do something.
They want to reduce availability of early voting and general access to the polls, but also make mail in voting more difficult, while there are multiple states whose voting method is primarily mail in.
It looks like a mass vote suppression effort so it’s being resisted completely.
wut?
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
I agree, it is a foolish law.Animal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:34 pmyou could also say that if someone in line had a heart attack you couldn't give them CPR, but you don't bring up that point because it sounds foolish. because it is.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:30 pmDoes it not have that effect?Animal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:30 pmits people like you that make it so easy for the spin masters to succeed.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:26 pmThat it makes it illegal to give a bottle of water to someone standing in line to vote?Animal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:22 pmYeah. That's exactly what I thought.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:15 pm
Here ya go, moron:
"No person shall solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, nor shall any person distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector," the bill states.
Yep, that’s what it does.
wut?
- Who
- Adult Diaper Enthusiast
- Posts: 4243
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:33 am
- Location: God's Waiting Room
- Interests: Breasts
- Occupation: Trigger Man
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
I didn’t read anything about a heart attack in the legislation. So your point is mootAnimal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:34 pmyou could also say that if someone in line had a heart attack you couldn't give them CPR, but you don't bring up that point because it sounds foolish. because it is.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:30 pmDoes it not have that effect?Animal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:30 pmits people like you that make it so easy for the spin masters to succeed.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:26 pmThat it makes it illegal to give a bottle of water to someone standing in line to vote?Animal wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:22 pmYeah. That's exactly what I thought.Wut wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:15 pm
Here ya go, moron:
"No person shall solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, nor shall any person distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector," the bill states.
Yep, that’s what it does.
A Legend In His Own Mind
All Posts Fair & Balanced
All Posts Fair & Balanced
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28028
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
- Who
- Adult Diaper Enthusiast
- Posts: 4243
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:33 am
- Location: God's Waiting Room
- Interests: Breasts
- Occupation: Trigger Man
Re: HR 1 - The Democrats Try to seal up all future elections
Always changing the subject, try to keep up.
A Legend In His Own Mind
All Posts Fair & Balanced
All Posts Fair & Balanced