Re: NFL
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 3:04 am
I'm a huge Rams fan but if not for that blown pass interference call by the refs, The Saints would've won that.
Bull. I saw at least 3 non called facemask penalties on the Saints. One call does not make a win.peterosehaircut wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 3:04 am I'm a huge Rams fan but if not for that blown pass interference call by the refs, The Saints would've won that.
It does with 1:49 left in the game and they were on the Rams 13 yard line.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 5:06 pmBull. I saw at least 3 non called facemask penalties on the Saints. One call does not make a win.peterosehaircut wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 3:04 am I'm a huge Rams fan but if not for that blown pass interference call by the refs, The Saints would've won that.
Illogical argument. Doesn't mean they would have scored. And what does 1:49 left in the game have to with it. A non-call against the Saints in the first quarter that would have allowed a Rams TD is just as important. I thought the refs did a great job the whole game letting both sides just play. Better than the flag-fest we usually get.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 5:45 pmIt does with 1:49 left in the game and they were on the Rams 13 yard line.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 5:06 pmBull. I saw at least 3 non called facemask penalties on the Saints. One call does not make a win.peterosehaircut wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 3:04 am I'm a huge Rams fan but if not for that blown pass interference call by the refs, The Saints would've won that.
Are you serious?WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 7:03 pm Illogical argument. Doesn't mean they would have scored. And what does 1:49 left in the game have to with it.
Of the at least 3 non-called facemask penalties and at least 1 non called (zero on the clock) delay of games on Brees, Rams score an additional TD and a field goal in the first 3 quarters. Now, it's 1:49 in the game with the Saints driving deep and down by 10 and needing 2 scores. Again, just because it's 1:49 doesn't mean shit. Non calls from the very first can have the exact same impact. Just not as dramatic.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 8:26 pmAre you serious?WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 7:03 pm Illogical argument. Doesn't mean they would have scored. And what does 1:49 left in the game have to with it.
The penalty would have given the Saints a first down. They run the ball 3 times, run down the clock, then kick the game winning field goal.
The Saints could wind down the clock and kick the game winning field goal on the last play of the game, and you're saying that's the same as a non-called facemask penalty from an hour earlier in the game when the Rams where on their own 27 yard line?WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 9:51 pmOf the at least 3 non-called facemask penalties and at least 1 non called (zero on the clock) delay of games on Brees, Rams score an additional TD and a field goal in the first 3 quarters. Now, it's 1:49 in the game with the Saints driving deep and down by 10 and needing 2 scores. Again, just because it's 1:49 doesn't mean shit. Non calls from the very first can have the exact same impact. Just not as dramatic.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 8:26 pmAre you serious?WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 7:03 pm Illogical argument. Doesn't mean they would have scored. And what does 1:49 left in the game have to with it.
The penalty would have given the Saints a first down. They run the ball 3 times, run down the clock, then kick the game winning field goal.
I'll start a Super Bowl thread right now so everyone can move over there. We have 2 weeks of posts before the game.PimpDaddy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 9:55 pm
Yup, that single non-call was a game changer. Just one of dozens of plays you can point out, but that was a good one.
Go Pats...again. Damn, sitting here in NE even I get tired of cheering them on. No, not really. I figure we only have TB12 for another year? and then no one ever has to hear about the Pats ever again.
At the very minimum each team should get an offensive opportunity.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 10:52 pm So I've come full circle on this. I used to be a strong believer in the OT rules; that a team needs to play solid defense and stop the opposing offense. Over the past several years though the NFL has made no secret that it wants more offense. This has put defenses at a decided disadvantage. Its no longer a fair fight. Both teams should get an offensive opportunity.
It's really no secret. NCAA has led the way in overtime scenarios for what 15 years. They had to tweek it so it stopped going 7 overtimes, but they've been spot on. NFL is loath to adopt a reasonable approach that seems to appear to acknowledge their subservient NCAA slaves.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 10:52 pm So I've come full circle on this. I used to be a strong believer in the OT rules; that a team needs to play solid defense and stop the opposing offense. Over the past several years though the NFL has made no secret that it wants more offense. This has put defenses at a decided disadvantage. Its no longer a fair fight. Both teams should get an offensive opportunity.
That "fucking loser" is raking in millions from Nike. I think he'll be okay.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:37 pm Problem solved and Kap will still never play one down on any NFL team in his life. Fucking loser.
FTFY and nobody will remember him in the not so distant future.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:48 pmThat "fucking loser" is raking in millions from Chines slave labor that Nike uses. I think he'll be okay.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:37 pm Problem solved and Kap will still never play one down on any NFL team in his life. Fucking loser.