Rittenhouse *update* no charges (in Illinois because if I don't clarify liberals have a shit fit of idiocy)

For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul commies to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.
Anyone posting Ben Garrison comics gets a three-day vacation.

In memory of our lost political forum members. :cry:

Moderator: Biker

User avatar
CaptQuint
Biker's Biatch
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: Rittenhouse

#51

Post by CaptQuint »

There is no evidence to say he isn't telling the truth. The United States Postal Inspectors agreed.
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 13232
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: Rittenhouse

#52

Post by Biker »

2.1 million raised so far. Time for another donation
User avatar
CaptQuint
Biker's Biatch
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: Rittenhouse

#53

Post by CaptQuint »

Internal investigation: Louisville police told no 'suspicious' packages sent to Breonna Taylor's home

https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/internal- ... 5f0ed.html
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28306
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Rittenhouse

#54

Post by Animal »

CaptQuint wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:02 pm Internal investigation: Louisville police told no 'suspicious' packages sent to Breonna Taylor's home

https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/internal- ... 5f0ed.html
what would make a package look "suspicious? you realize that they are trying to get a post man to rat out a drug dealer, right? The FACT is that the drug dealer was having packages delivered to her apartment. i highly doubt whoever mails them tries to make them look suspicious.
User avatar
CaptQuint
Biker's Biatch
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: Rittenhouse

#55

Post by CaptQuint »

Flumper wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:44 pm
CaptQuint wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:02 pm Internal investigation: Louisville police told no 'suspicious' packages sent to Breonna Taylor's home

https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/internal- ... 5f0ed.html
what would make a package look "suspicious? you realize that they are trying to get a post man to rat out a drug dealer, right? The FACT is that the drug dealer was having packages delivered to her apartment. i highly doubt whoever mails them tries to make them look suspicious.
You calling a US Postal Inspector a Letter Carrier you dumb fuck?
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28306
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Rittenhouse

#56

Post by Animal »

CaptQuint wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:47 pm
Flumper wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:44 pm
CaptQuint wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:02 pm Internal investigation: Louisville police told no 'suspicious' packages sent to Breonna Taylor's home

https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/internal- ... 5f0ed.html
what would make a package look "suspicious? you realize that they are trying to get a post man to rat out a drug dealer, right? The FACT is that the drug dealer was having packages delivered to her apartment. i highly doubt whoever mails them tries to make them look suspicious.
You calling a US Postal Inspector a Letter Carrier you dumb fuck?
Yeah, because that US Postal Inspector delivered the packages to her house. :lol:
User avatar
CaptQuint
Biker's Biatch
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: Rittenhouse

#57

Post by CaptQuint »

The US Postal Inspectors examined packages and saw they were not clearly labeled drugs :roll:
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28306
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Rittenhouse

#58

Post by Animal »

CaptQuint wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:10 pm The US Postal Inspectors examined packages and saw they were not clearly labeled drugs :roll:
you should read that link you posted. holy shit, those guys are all over the place on what they said might or might not have happened with mail to that address. they even say they don't cooperate with police. one said that "packages could have been delivered to another name to that address". wtf?
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 8007
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Rittenhouse

#59

Post by necronomous »

User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 1928
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges

#60

Post by dot »

Y’all are pretty low information idiots. Antioch and Lake County in Illinois are not Kenosha County in Wisconsin. You know, where the murder took place.
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 15113
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges

#61

Post by CHEEZY17 »

All I know is that when I mail illegal material I always label it as such. I also put a "FRAGILE" sticker on there because I am careful like that.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 8007
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges

#62

Post by necronomous »

dot wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 12:28 pm Y’all are pretty low information idiots. Antioch and Lake County in Illinois are not Kenosha County in Wisconsin. You know, where the murder took place.
I guess other places can't report on other places popular stories if it's not that place. Also it's talking about Illinois, where this place is located. Not Wisconsin.
Last edited by necronomous on Wed Oct 14, 2020 1:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 8007
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges

#63

Post by necronomous »

Now it's up to Wisconsin on what happens.
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 1928
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges

#64

Post by dot »

necronomous wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 1:15 pm I guess other places can't report on other places popular stories if it's not that place. Also it's talking about Illinois, where this place is located. Not Wisconsin.
Is that your subtle way of saying, oops I didn’t read for content and thus not realize a completely different jurisdiction than where the kid murdered someone chose not to charge him for related crimes? Cause it comes off a lot differently crowing “no charges!” when you take, oh I don’t know, facts into the equation.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 8007
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges

#65

Post by necronomous »

dot wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 1:37 pm
necronomous wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 1:15 pm I guess other places can't report on other places popular stories if it's not that place. Also it's talking about Illinois, where this place is located. Not Wisconsin.
Is that your subtle way of saying, oops I didn’t read for content and thus not realize a completely different jurisdiction than where the kid murdered someone chose not to charge him for related crimes? Cause it comes off a lot differently crowing “no charges!” when you take, oh I don’t know, facts into the equation.
No. It's my subtle way of saying there are no charges. If you open it you can read where.
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 1928
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges (in Illinois because if I don't clarify some idiot named dot has a shit fit of idioc

#66

Post by dot »

Aw, you’re embarrassed. Try not to be stupid next time, you’ll get better at this.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28306
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges (in Illinois because if I don't clarify some idiot named dot has a shit fit of idioc

#67

Post by Animal »

The Lake County State’s Attorney’s Office announced Tuesday that an extensive investigation was conducted by the Antioch Police Department.

The investigation revealed the gun used in the Kenosha shooting was purchased, stored and used in Wisconsin.

The Lake County State’s Attorney’s Office reviewed the investigation and determined no crimes were committed in Lake County.

Prosecutors said there is no evidence the gun was ever physically possessed by Rittenhouse in Illinois.

The following is a probable cause statement written by prosecutors based on information received from several police detectives with the Kenosha Police Department:

“On August 25th at approximately 11:45 pm a shooting occurred at Car Source which is located at the northwest corner of 63rd St. and Sheridan Road in the City and County of Kenosha, State of Wisconsin. The man who was shot at this location was identified as Joseph Rosenbaum. Rosenbaum was transported to a local hospital where a doctor declared him to be deceased on August 26, 2020 at 12:47 am.

In the course of investigating this incident, law enforcement reviewed and shared with your complainant [prosecutors] multiple videos that appeared to be recorded on cell phones. In the first video, a male who was later identified to be Kyle H. Rittenhouse, DOB: 01/03/03 (hereinafter “the defendant”), is running southwest across the eastern portion of the Car Source parking lot. The defendant is a resident of Antioch, IL.

The defendant can clearly be seen holding a long gun, which was later recovered by law enforcement and identified as a Smith & Wesson AR-15 style .223 rifle. The recovered magazine for this rifle holds 30 rounds of ammunition. Following the defendant is Rosenbaum and trailing behind the defendant and Rosenbaum is a male who was later identified as Richard McGinnis, a reporter.

The video shows that as they cross the parking lot, Rosenbaum appears to throw an object at the defendant. The object does not hit the defendant and a second video shows, based on where the object landed, that it was a plastic bag. Rosenbaum appears to be unarmed for the duration of this video.

A review of the second video shows that the defendant and Rosenbaum continue to move across the parking lot and approach the front of a black car parked in the lot. A loud bang is heard on the video, then a male shouts, “F–k you!”, then Rosenbaum appears to continue to approach the defendant and gets in near proximity to the defendant when 4 more loud bangs are heard. Rosenbaum then falls to the ground.

The defendant then circles behind the black car and approaches Rosenbaum. Rosenbaum remains on the ground. McGinnis also approaches, removes his shirt, and attempts to render aid to Rosenbaum. The defendant appears to get on his cell phone and place a call.

Another male approaches, and the defendant turns and begins to run away from the scene. As the defendant is running away, he can be heard saying on the phone, “I just killed somebody.”

Detective Cepress interviewed McGinnis and indicates the following: Before the shooting, McGinnis was interviewing the defendant. The defendant told McGinnis that he was a trained medic. McGinnis stated that he (McGinnis) has handled many ARs and that the defendant was not handling the weapon very well.

McGinnis said that as they were walking south another armed male who appeared to be in his 30s joined them and said he was there to protect the defendant. McGinnis stated that before the defendant reached the parking lot and ran across it, the defendant had moved from the middle of Sheridan Road to the sidewalk and that is when McGinnis saw a male (Rosenbaum) initially try to engage the defendant.

McGinnis stated that as the defendant was walking Rosenbaum was trying to get closer to the defendant. When Rosenbaum advanced, the defendant did a “juke” move and started running. McGinnis stated that there were other people that were moving very quickly.

McGinnis stated that they were moving towards the defendant. McGinnis said that according to what he saw the defendant was trying to evade these individuals.

McGinnis described the point where the defendant had reached the car. McGinnis described that the defendant had the gun in a low ready position. Meaning that he had the gun raised but pointed downward. The butt of the gun would have been at an angle downwards from the shoulder.

McGinnis stated that the defendant brought the gun up. McGinnis stated that he stepped back and he thinks the defendant fired 3 rounds in rapid succession.

[Suggested Article] Police preparing for civil unrest in Antioch after arrest of teen wanted in Kenosha shooting
McGinnis said when the first round went off, he thought it hit the pavement. McGinnis felt something on his leg and his first thought was wondering whether he had gotten shot. McGinnis was behind and slightly to the right of Rosenbaum, in the line of fire, when the defendant shot.

McGinnis stated that the first round went into the ground and when the second shot went off, the defendant actually had the gun aimed at Rosenbaum. McGinnis stated he did not hear the two exchange any words. McGinnis said that the unarmed guy (Rosenbaum) was trying to get the defendant’s gun.

McGinnis demonstrated by extending both of his hands in a quick grabbing motion and did that as a visual on how Rosenbaum tried to reach for the defendant’s gun.

Detective Cepress indicates that he asked McGinnis if Rosenbaum had his hands on the gun when the defendant shot. McGinnis said that he definitely made a motion that he was trying to grab the barrel of the gun. McGinnis stated that the defendant pulled it away and then raised it. McGinnis stated that right as they came together, the defendant fired. McGinnis said that when Rosenbaum was shot, he had leaned in (towards the defendant).

McGinnis stated that after the defendant shot he ran back towards the hospital towards the middle of the road. McGinnis stayed and turned his attention to Rosenbaum. McGinnis stated that he then heard other shots really soon after.

The third video that your complainant [prosecutors] reviewed shows the defendant running northbound on Sheridan Road after he had shot Rosenbaum. The street and the sidewalk are full of people. A group of several people begin running northbound on Sheridan Road behind the defendant. A person can be heard yelling what sounds like, “Beat him up!” Another person can be heard yelling what sounds like, “Hey, he shot him!”

Your complainant [prosecutors] reviewed a fourth video that showed a different angle of the defendant running northbound. In this video a person can be heard yelling, “Get him! Get that dude!” Then a male in a light-colored top runs towards the defendant and appears to swing at the defendant with his right arm. This swing makes contact with the defendant, knocking his hat off.

The defendant continues to run northbound. On the video a male can be heard saying something to the effect of, “What’d he do?” Another male can be heard responding something to the effect of, “Just shot someone.” Then a male can be heard yelling, “Get his a–!” The defendant then trips and falls to the ground.

As the defendant is on the ground, an unidentified male wearing a dark-colored top and light-colored pants jumps at and over the defendant. Based on the sounds of gunshots on the video and the positioning of the defendant’s gun, it appears that he fires two shots in quick succession at this person.

It appears that that person was not hit as he then runs away from the defendant. A second person who was later identified as Anthony Huber approaches the defendant who is still on the ground, on his back.

Huber has a skateboard in his right hand. When Huber reaches the defendant it appears that he is reaching for the defendant’s gun with his left hand as the skateboard makes contact with the defendant’s left shoulder. Huber appears to be trying to pull the gun away from the defendant.

The defendant rolls towards his left side and as Huber appears to be trying to grab the gun the gun is pointed at Huber’s body. The defendant then fires one round which can be heard on the video. Huber staggers away, taking several steps, then collapses to the ground. Huber subsequently died from this gunshot wound.

After shooting Huber, the defendant moves to a seated position and points his gun at a third male, later identified as Gaige Grosskreutz, who had begun to approach the defendant.

When the defendant shot Huber, Grosskreutz freezes and ducks and takes a step back. Grosskreutz puts his hands in the air. Grosskreutz then moves towards the defendant who aims his gun at Grosskreutz and shoots him, firing 1 shot.

Grosskreutz was shot in the right arm. Grosskreutz appears to be holding a handgun in his right hand when he was shot. Grosskreutz then runs southbound away from the defendant screaming for a medic and the defendant gets up and starts walking northbound.

The defendant turns around facing southbound while walking backwards northbound with his firearm in a ready position, pointed towards the people in the roadway.

Dr. Kelley of the Milwaukee Medical Examiner’s Office conducted an autopsy on Joseph Rosenbaum. Dr. Kelley indicated that Rosenbaum had a gunshot wound to the right groin which fractured his pelvis, a gunshot wound to the back which perforated his right lung and liver, a gunshot wound to the left hand, a superficial gunshot wound to his lateral left thigh, and a graze gunshot wound to the right side of his forehead.

Dr. Kelley also conducted an autopsy on Anthony Huber. Dr. Kelley indicated that Huber had a gunshot wound to his chest that perforated his heart, aorta, pulmonary artery, and right lung.

Detective Antaramian spoke with Dominic Black on August 26, 2020. Dominic stated that he received a phone call from his friend Kyle Rittenhouse, the defendant, at 11:46 pm in which the defendant stated that he shot someone. Detective Antaramian saw the defendant in person at the Antioch, IL Police Department and identified the defendant as the shooter in the various videos.”
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 8007
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges (in Illinois because if I don't clarify some idiot named dot has a shit fit of idioc

#68

Post by necronomous »

dot wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 1:49 pm Aw, you’re embarrassed. Try not to be stupid next time, you’ll get better at this.
What a fucking moron. If you can't open it and read that's on you.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28306
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges (in Illinois because if I don't clarify some idiot named dot has a shit fit of idioc

#69

Post by Animal »

necronomous wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 2:12 pm
dot wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 1:49 pm Aw, you’re embarrassed. Try not to be stupid next time, you’ll get better at this.
What a fucking moron. If you can't open it and read that's on you.
i went ahead and posted it. in case his mom had some kind of restriction on the family laptop.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 8007
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges (in Illinois because if I don't clarify some idiot named dot has a shit fit of idioc

#70

Post by necronomous »

Flumper wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 2:14 pm
necronomous wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 2:12 pm
dot wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 1:49 pm Aw, you’re embarrassed. Try not to be stupid next time, you’ll get better at this.
What a fucking moron. If you can't open it and read that's on you.
i went ahead and posted it. in case his mom had some kind of restriction on the family laptop.
It's getting to the point that you have to put everything down, and clarify everything because if you don't they assume everything you don't say, you didn't know. People seem not to be able to use common sense or context clues. Reading comprehension is lost as well.
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 1928
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges (in Illinois because if I don't clarify some idiot named dot has a shit fit of idioc

#71

Post by dot »

It’s cute that you’re melting over this, all you had to do was read what you posted. Be better informed by your own selective data input next time.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 8007
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges (in Illinois because if I don't clarify some idiot named dot has a shit fit of idioc

#72

Post by necronomous »

dot wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 2:26 pm It’s cute that you’re melting over this, all you had to do was read what you posted. Be better informed by your own selective data input next time.
I did. I was not aware I had to post everything about the article you could clearly read to assist you in understanding the article. You dipshit. Melt is what you say when you know you've lost an argument. Glad we agree
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 1928
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges (in Illinois because if I don't clarify some idiot named dot has a shit fit of idioc

#73

Post by dot »

Right, that explains why you’re so angry over this. Maybe you should change the title again, or follow me from thread to thread nipping at my heels. That’ll show everyone that you totally didn’t make a fool of yourself. Again.

Fair warning, I don’t post as often as the hamster so following me around could get tedious if you’re impatient. But maybe you can use the downtime to be informed before you post.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 8007
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges (in Illinois because if I don't clarify some idiot named dot has a shit fit of idioc

#74

Post by necronomous »

dot wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 2:42 pm Right, that explains why you’re so angry over this. Maybe you should change the title again, or follow me from thread to thread nipping at my heels. That’ll show everyone that you totally didn’t make a fool of yourself. Again.

Fair warning, I don’t post as often as the hamster so following me around could get tedious if you’re impatient. But maybe you can use the downtime to be informed before you post.
Angry. Lol if you say so. I'm not the one that had to be dictated to and had an article clarified so my panties wouldn't bunch up.

Also I don't follow that idiot. He says shit in a thread that I happen to be in, I respond. Not everyone needs attention like you apparently do. You say the most trollish shit hoping for a response don't you. I'll remember that in the future.
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 1928
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Rittenhouse *update* no charges (in Illinois because if I don't clarify some idiot named dot has a shit fit of idioc

#75

Post by dot »

So let's break this down here. You crow "no charges" and provide link. I read and point out that your link is about another county in another state where the murder did not take place. Thus "no charges" is not vindication which indicates you didn't read your own provided link. Since then you've thrown a temper tantrum, stamped your feet, and now think that you telling me what I already told you is dictating to me what I had to inform you of. What's more likely here, given how emotional you've reacted? You read what you posted, thought lulz let's pwn the libz with this despite it having zero to do with the kid pulling the trigger, they won't know the difference. Or the more simple explanation, you read the headline of no charges filed and crowed "no charges" without reading deeper. I get that you don't want it to look like you got showed up, sorry not sorry.

It'd help your case in the future if you don't blatantly lie. I observe more than I post, so you nipping at heels cause you got embarrassed in the past doesn't jive with what you're saying about Hammy at this moment. And if you think that's trollish, I'd be a lot more active wouldn't I?
Post Reply