Cheezy's Very Own Conservative Echo Chamber!

[Biker]

Aren’t soldiers known for obeying commands?

[CaptQuint]

Aren’t soldiers known for obeying commands?

Lawful commands

[CaptQuint]

[Biker]

Dang....he woke af

[CaptQuint]

Dang....he woke af

And a better American than you

[Biker]

Dang....he woke af

And a better American than you

And certainly better than a Confederate flag waving that shames white women fir taking black dick

Fuck off, cunt

[CaptQuint]

Oh, he's reverted back to lying. Typical Republican.

[Biker]

Oh, he's reverted back to lying. Typical Republican.

Sure thing, traitor. What I posted is true

[CaptQuint]

Oh, he's reverted back to lying. Typical Republican.

Sure thing, traitor. What I posted is true

No, it isn't.

[Biker]

Oh, he's reverted back to lying. Typical Republican.

Sure thing, traitor. What I posted is true

No, it isn't.

Oh cool, we’re going to pretend you never shamed BG for taking black dick.

[CaptQuint]

Oh, he's reverted back to lying. Typical Republican.

Sure thing, traitor. What I posted is true

No, it isn't.

Oh cool, we’re going to pretend you never shamed BG for taking black dick.

Whatever you say Buckwheat

[Biker]

Oh, he's reverted back to lying. Typical Republican.

Sure thing, traitor. What I posted is true

No, it isn't.

Oh cool, we’re going to pretend you never shamed BG for taking black dick.

Whatever you say Buckwheat

Lying, traitorous, racist fuck

[CaptQuint]

Oh, he's reverted back to lying. Typical Republican.

Sure thing, traitor. What I posted is true

No, it isn't.

Oh cool, we’re going to pretend you never shamed BG for taking black dick.

Whatever you say Buckwheat

Lying, traitorous, racist fuck

You lost your little argument and now you're at the point of personal attacks and name calling. Move along little cowpoke.

[Animal]

What the fuck is wrong with you

He is wondering why they didn't shoot him. They were in the clear.

i heard some of this story on the way home from work today. that was bullshit and the cops involved need to be dealt with. that guy did nothing wrong that i heard.

[CaptQuint]

What the fuck is wrong with you

He is wondering why they didn't shoot him. They were in the clear.

i heard some of this story on the way home from work today. that was bullshit and the cops involved need to be dealt with. that guy did nothing wrong that i heard.

The guy at Buc-ees who told you that is correct, it was a bad stop, and certainly not a felony stop. One cop has already been fired.

[CaptQuint]

https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout ... th_2_cops/

[Biker]

https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout ... th_2_cops/

Really is a shame that his feelings were not taken into consideration. I mean, the guy literally said he was afraid to get out of the car when ordered to. How can any officer refute and ignore the mans feelings??!?!???

[CaptQuint]

https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout ... th_2_cops/

Really is a shame that his feelings were not taken into consideration. I mean, the guy literally said he was afraid to get out of the car when ordered to. How can any officer refute and ignore the mans feelings??!?!???

How about violating his rights under the color of law when no crime was committed?

[Biker]

https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout ... th_2_cops/

Really is a shame that his feelings were not taken into consideration. I mean, the guy literally said he was afraid to get out of the car when ordered to. How can any officer refute and ignore the mans feelings??!?!???

How about violating his rights under the color of law when no crime was committed?

Which law was violated, cuntface?

[CaptQuint]

https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout ... th_2_cops/

Really is a shame that his feelings were not taken into consideration. I mean, the guy literally said he was afraid to get out of the car when ordered to. How can any officer refute and ignore the mans feelings??!?!???

How about violating his rights under the color of law when no crime was committed?

Which law was violated, cuntface?

Section 242 of Title 18

[Biker]

https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout ... th_2_cops/

Really is a shame that his feelings were not taken into consideration. I mean, the guy literally said he was afraid to get out of the car when ordered to. How can any officer refute and ignore the mans feelings??!?!???

How about violating his rights under the color of law when no crime was committed?

Which law was violated, cuntface?

Section 242 of Title 18

Oh wow, a vague code. Yeah, dude was violated!!!?!?!

[CaptQuint]

New law bans police from pulling over Virginia drivers solely for certain car safety violations
Officers can also not stop people if they smell marijuana

ROANOKE COUNTY, Va. – New legislation taking effect Monday makes it harder for authorities in Virginia to pull over drivers.

Several minor infractions, while still illegal, can no longer be the primary reason police stop you while you’re driving.

These include certain defective equipment, objects dangling from your rearview mirror, loud exhaust, tinted windows and smelling marijuana to name a few.

An expired inspection or registration sticker can only get you pulled; however, it has to be at least four months late. The legislation lists more changes here.

For social justice advocates, this is a win.

“I think it’s a first step. It’s a huge first step,” said Brad Haywood, founder and executive director of Justice Forward Virginia.

Haywood said these violations have long been used to stop people for drug investigations and disproportionately target people of color.

“Why should they be allowed to investigate people based on hunches when they have no evidence? Why don’t we expect them to actually get probable cause for drug possession or gun possession before they pull a car over?” Haywood said.

On the other side, Roanoke County Police Chief Howard Hall said it’s not about race, but safety and enforcing the law.

“This has got to be one of the dumbest pieces of legislation I’ve ever read,” Hall said. “If someone’s getting arrested off one of these traffic stops, it’s because they’re wanted, they’ve committed some other crime, perhaps we found drugs or an illegal weapon. Those are people that we want to arrest because they’re criminals.”

The battle over whether these changes are more dangerous or more just is still drawing a sharp divide.

“We ought to expect better of our police than to just shake people down because they feel like it,” Haywood said.

“There really isn’t much point behind this and it’s really not going to accomplish anything positive,” Hall said.

These changes were approved during the General Assembly’s Special Session in 2020.


https://www.wsls.com/news/local/2021/03 ... iolations/

[CaptQuint]

https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout ... th_2_cops/

Really is a shame that his feelings were not taken into consideration. I mean, the guy literally said he was afraid to get out of the car when ordered to. How can any officer refute and ignore the mans feelings??!?!???

How about violating his rights under the color of law when no crime was committed?

Which law was violated, cuntface?

Section 242 of Title 18

Oh wow, a vague code. Yeah, dude was violated!!!?!?!

It's a Federal Law

[Biker]

Really is a shame that his feelings were not taken into consideration. I mean, the guy literally said he was afraid to get out of the car when ordered to. How can any officer refute and ignore the mans feelings??!?!???

How about violating his rights under the color of law when no crime was committed?

Which law was violated, cuntface?

Section 242 of Title 18

Oh wow, a vague code. Yeah, dude was violated!!!?!?!

It's a Federal Law

So not a single person is required to obey a police officer?

[CaptQuint]

DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW
SUMMARY:
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation ... -color-law