Major win for choice!

For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul commies to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.

In memory of our lost political forum members. :cry:

Moderator: Biker

Post Reply
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 13084
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Major win for choice!

#1

Post by Biker »

And before the knee jerkers chime in, yes, I believe Islamic schools deserve the same treatment as Chirstian and Jew ones

Supreme Court rules Maine tuition program violates First Amendment for excluding religious schools

The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Carson v. Makin


The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 Tuesday that a Maine tuition assistance program violated the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause for excluding religious schools from eligibility.

The program provides tuition assistance for students without a local public school to attend private institutions – as long as the funding is not used for religious or "sectarian" teaching.

"Maine’s ‘nonsectarian’ requirement for its otherwise generally available tuition assistance payments violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the court's opinion in the case of Carson v. Maykin. "Regardless of how the benefit and restriction are described, the program operates to identify and exclude otherwise eligible schools on the basis of their religious exercise."

Roberts stated that with Maine providing the benefit of tuition assistance, they cannot condition those benefits in a way that "effectively penalizes the free exercise of religion."

Religious schools were allowed under the program before 1981, but then Maine adopted its "non-sectarian" requirement, citing the First Amendment. Roberts noted that this addition was made after Maine’s attorney general determined that funding private religious schools would violate the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. The Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that a program where private citizens made the decision as to where the money was going would not violate the clause.

The Supreme Court made that same determination on Tuesday.

"[A] neutral benefit program in which public funds flow to religious organizations through the independent choices of private benefit recipients does not offend the Establishment Clause," Roberts wrote.

A lower court ruling in Maine's favor had said that the real benefit was not tuition assistance, but the provision of the "rough equivalent of the public school education that Maine may permissible require to be secular."
User avatar
CentralTexasCrude
Pumpkin Muppet
Posts: 8282
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: In the middle of frickin everywhere's bad thoughts.

Re: Major win for choice!

#2

Post by CentralTexasCrude »

I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
User avatar
Deathproof
UJR гитара герой чемпион
Posts: 5089
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:42 pm
Location: Чикаго, Иллинойс
Interests: музыка, сиськи, литература, сыр и Леттеркенни
Occupation: Я играю на гитаре для жизни

Re: Major win for choice!

#3

Post by Deathproof »

CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
Don't get too comfortable. You know liberals: when they can't win (like the 2020 election), they change the rules. Don't put it past them to add 4 more seats and install more liberal activists as justices. Four more carbon copies of that evil, corrupt old cunt Ruth Vader Ginsburg, may she rot in hell.
"Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids. Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids... no I really mean it, but think how we think about it.” -- lifelong segregationist Joe Biden
User avatar
saltydog
Chief Biden Ballwasher
Posts: 5313
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: Major win for choice!

#4

Post by saltydog »

Deathproof wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:43 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
Don't get too comfortable. You know liberals: when they can't win (like the 2020 election), they change the rules. Don't put it past them to add 4 more seats and install more liberal activists as justices. Four more carbon copies of that evil, corrupt old cunt Ruth Vader Ginsburg, may she rot in hell.
Wonderful representation of humanity you two.
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
User avatar
CentralTexasCrude
Pumpkin Muppet
Posts: 8282
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: In the middle of frickin everywhere's bad thoughts.

Re: Major win for choice!

#5

Post by CentralTexasCrude »

saltydog wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:50 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:43 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
Don't get too comfortable. You know liberals: when they can't win (like the 2020 election), they change the rules. Don't put it past them to add 4 more seats and install more liberal activists as justices. Four more carbon copies of that evil, corrupt old cunt Ruth Vader Ginsburg, may she rot in hell.
Wonderful representation of humanity you two.
Don't lump me in with his opinions- I have my own. I totally agree with him about RVG but the whole court packing is never happening. FDR tried it back in the 1930's and probably the biggest stain of his 3 term Presidency. Of course, Liberals back then had scruples like putting Country before Party. Now- not so much.
User avatar
saltydog
Chief Biden Ballwasher
Posts: 5313
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: Major win for choice!

#6

Post by saltydog »

CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:05 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:50 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:43 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
Don't get too comfortable. You know liberals: when they can't win (like the 2020 election), they change the rules. Don't put it past them to add 4 more seats and install more liberal activists as justices. Four more carbon copies of that evil, corrupt old cunt Ruth Vader Ginsburg, may she rot in hell.
Wonderful representation of humanity you two.
Don't lump me in with his opinions- I have my own. I totally agree with him about RVG but the whole court packing is never happening. FDR tried it back in the 1930's and probably the biggest stain of his 3 term Presidency. Of course, Liberals back then had scruples like putting Country before Party. Now- not so much.
I know what I said.
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28034
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Major win for choice!

#7

Post by Animal »

CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:05 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:50 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:43 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
Don't get too comfortable. You know liberals: when they can't win (like the 2020 election), they change the rules. Don't put it past them to add 4 more seats and install more liberal activists as justices. Four more carbon copies of that evil, corrupt old cunt Ruth Vader Ginsburg, may she rot in hell.
Wonderful representation of humanity you two.
Don't lump me in with his opinions- I have my own. I totally agree with him about RVG but the whole court packing is never happening. FDR tried it back in the 1930's and probably the biggest stain of his 3 term Presidency. Of course, Liberals back then had scruples like putting Country before Party. Now- not so much.
* 4 terms.
User avatar
CentralTexasCrude
Pumpkin Muppet
Posts: 8282
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: In the middle of frickin everywhere's bad thoughts.

Re: Major win for choice!

#8

Post by CentralTexasCrude »

Animal wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:11 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:05 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:50 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:43 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
Don't get too comfortable. You know liberals: when they can't win (like the 2020 election), they change the rules. Don't put it past them to add 4 more seats and install more liberal activists as justices. Four more carbon copies of that evil, corrupt old cunt Ruth Vader Ginsburg, may she rot in hell.
Wonderful representation of humanity you two.
Don't lump me in with his opinions- I have my own. I totally agree with him about RVG but the whole court packing is never happening. FDR tried it back in the 1930's and probably the biggest stain of his 3 term Presidency. Of course, Liberals back then had scruples like putting Country before Party. Now- not so much.
* 4 terms.
3 terms and dead in his mistresses arm at Hot Springs Ga starting his 4th. If you've ever seen photos of his butch wife Eleanor, probably see why 3 is more appropriate.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28034
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Major win for choice!

#9

Post by Animal »

CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:22 pm 3 terms and dead in his mistresses arm at Hot Springs Ga starting his 4th. If you've ever seen photos of his butch wife Eleanor, probably see why 3 is more appropriate.
I like to think of this place as another wikipedia. So let's go with 4 terms to stay consistent with the facts. Thanks.

We ask you, humbly, to help.
We'll get straight to the point: Today we ask you to defend You Gee Are's independence.

We're a non-profit that depends on donations to stay online and thriving, but 98% of our readers don't give; they simply look the other way. If everyone who reads You Gee Are gave just a little, we could keep You Gee Are thriving for years to come. The price of a cup of coffee is all we ask.

When we made You Gee Are a non-profit, people told us we’d regret it. But if You Gee Are were to become commercial, it would be a great loss to the world.

You Gee Are is a place to learn, not a place for advertising. The heart and soul of You Gee Are is a community of people working to bring you unlimited access to reliable, neutral information.

We know that most people will ignore this message. But if You Gee Are is useful to you, please consider making a donation of or whatever you can to protect and sustain You Gee Are.

Thanks,

Animal
You Gee Are Moderator
User avatar
CentralTexasCrude
Pumpkin Muppet
Posts: 8282
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: In the middle of frickin everywhere's bad thoughts.

Re: Major win for choice!

#10

Post by CentralTexasCrude »

Eleanor was still a butch/Dyke. Just ask Who.
User avatar
Charliesheen
Snarky Fucker
Posts: 9252
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:49 am

Re: Major win for choice!

#11

Post by Charliesheen »

Animal wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:47 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:22 pm 3 terms and dead in his mistresses arm at Hot Springs Ga starting his 4th. If you've ever seen photos of his butch wife Eleanor, probably see why 3 is more appropriate.
I like to think of this place as another wikipedia. So let's go with 4 terms to stay consistent with the facts. Thanks.

We ask you, humbly, to help.
We'll get straight to the point: Today we ask you to defend You Gee Are's independence.

We're a non-profit that depends on donations to stay online and thriving, but 98% of our readers don't give; they simply look the other way. If everyone who reads You Gee Are gave just a little, we could keep You Gee Are thriving for years to come. The price of a cup of coffee is all we ask.

When we made You Gee Are a non-profit, people told us we’d regret it. But if You Gee Are were to become commercial, it would be a great loss to the world.

You Gee Are is a place to learn, not a place for advertising. The heart and soul of You Gee Are is a community of people working to bring you unlimited access to reliable, neutral information.

We know that most people will ignore this message. But if You Gee Are is useful to you, please consider making a donation of or whatever you can to protect and sustain You Gee Are.

Thanks,

Animal
You Gee Are Moderator
Does UJ take VENMO?
A cunt is a cunt by any other name.
User avatar
DiverTexas
No life apart from this stupid forum board
Posts: 1614
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:56 pm

Re: Major win for choice!

#12

Post by DiverTexas »

Animal wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:47 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:22 pm 3 terms and dead in his mistresses arm at Hot Springs Ga starting his 4th. If you've ever seen photos of his butch wife Eleanor, probably see why 3 is more appropriate.
I like to think of this place as another wikipedia. So let's go with 4 terms to stay consistent with the facts. Thanks.

We ask you, humbly, to help.
We'll get straight to the point: Today we ask you to defend You Gee Are's independence.

We're a non-profit that depends on donations to stay online and thriving, but 98% of our readers don't give; they simply look the other way. If everyone who reads You Gee Are gave just a little, we could keep You Gee Are thriving for years to come. The price of a cup of coffee is all we ask.

When we made You Gee Are a non-profit, people told us we’d regret it. But if You Gee Are were to become commercial, it would be a great loss to the world.

You Gee Are is a place to learn, not a place for advertising. The heart and soul of You Gee Are is a community of people working to bring you unlimited access to reliable, neutral information.

We know that most people will ignore this message. But if You Gee Are is useful to you, please consider making a donation of or whatever you can to protect and sustain You Gee Are.

Thanks,

Animal
You Gee Are Moderator
$$$
User avatar
stonedmegman
In Search of vitamin T
Posts: 3445
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2021 11:41 pm
Location: Looking for Dave

Re: Major win for choice!

#13

Post by stonedmegman »

Animal wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:47 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:22 pm 3 terms and dead in his mistresses arm at Hot Springs Ga starting his 4th. If you've ever seen photos of his butch wife Eleanor, probably see why 3 is more appropriate.
I like to think of this place as another wikipedia. So let's go with 4 terms to stay consistent with the facts. Thanks.

We ask you, humbly, to help.
We'll get straight to the point: Today we ask you to defend You Gee Are's independence.

We're a non-profit that depends on donations to stay online and thriving, but 98% of our readers don't give; they simply look the other way. If everyone who reads You Gee Are gave just a little, we could keep You Gee Are thriving for years to come. The price of a cup of coffee is all we ask.

When we made You Gee Are a non-profit, people told us we’d regret it. But if You Gee Are were to become commercial, it would be a great loss to the world.

You Gee Are is a place to learn, not a place for advertising. The heart and soul of You Gee Are is a community of people working to bring you unlimited access to reliable, neutral information.

We know that most people will ignore this message. But if You Gee Are is useful to you, please consider making a donation of or whatever you can to protect and sustain You Gee Are.

Thanks,

Animal
You Gee Are Moderator
TL:DR
QANON IS JUST SCIENTOLOGY FOR HILLBILLIES
User avatar
saltydog
Chief Biden Ballwasher
Posts: 5313
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: Major win for choice!

#14

Post by saltydog »

Any objections taxing churches?
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
User avatar
Who
Adult Diaper Enthusiast
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:33 am
Location: God's Waiting Room
Interests: Breasts
Occupation: Trigger Man

Re: Major win for choice!

#15

Post by Who »

saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
Like Republicans pay taxes, :lol: :lol:
A Legend In His Own Mind

All Posts Fair & Balanced
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28034
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Major win for choice!

#16

Post by Animal »

Who wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:53 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
Like Republicans pay taxes, :lol: :lol:
if we don't, then why is the platform of every democrat to raise taxes on republicans?
User avatar
Deathproof
UJR гитара герой чемпион
Posts: 5089
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:42 pm
Location: Чикаго, Иллинойс
Interests: музыка, сиськи, литература, сыр и Леттеркенни
Occupation: Я играю на гитаре для жизни

Re: Major win for choice!

#17

Post by Deathproof »

saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
I've always been of the opinion that churches absolutely should pay taxes. But so should Jewish temples and whatever the muslims call their terrorist training centers. There's no legitimate reason for any of them to be tax-exempt.
"Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids. Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids... no I really mean it, but think how we think about it.” -- lifelong segregationist Joe Biden
User avatar
Deathproof
UJR гитара герой чемпион
Posts: 5089
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:42 pm
Location: Чикаго, Иллинойс
Interests: музыка, сиськи, литература, сыр и Леттеркенни
Occupation: Я играю на гитаре для жизни

Re: Major win for choice!

#18

Post by Deathproof »

saltydog wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:50 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:43 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
Don't get too comfortable. You know liberals: when they can't win (like the 2020 election), they change the rules. Don't put it past them to add 4 more seats and install more liberal activists as justices. Four more carbon copies of that evil, corrupt old cunt Ruth Vader Ginsburg, may she rot in hell.
Wonderful representation of humanity you two.
That's the thing: we are. Conservatives are better people than your crowd. I get that that's hard for you to admit, what with ingrained, misguided, unearned sense of moral superiority you liberals like to assume, but its a fact. You aren't the good guys.
"Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids. Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids... no I really mean it, but think how we think about it.” -- lifelong segregationist Joe Biden
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 14908
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: Major win for choice!

#19

Post by CHEEZY17 »

saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
Absolutely tax them. I could see at a lower rate though and if they want to get political then they can pay a regular rate like the rest of us.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
User avatar
Reservoir Dog
Ricky
Posts: 13708
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: Major win for choice!

#20

Post by Reservoir Dog »

Roe v. Wade overturned

Another "Major win for choice!", Biker?
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Mar 30, 2021 2:00 am You both fucked up. You trusted me.
User avatar
Who
Adult Diaper Enthusiast
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:33 am
Location: God's Waiting Room
Interests: Breasts
Occupation: Trigger Man

Re: Major win for choice!

#21

Post by Who »

Animal wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 1:27 am
Who wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:53 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
Like Republicans pay taxes, :lol: :lol:
if we don't, then why is the platform of every democrat to raise taxes on republicans?
Like Republicans pay taxes :lol:
A Legend In His Own Mind

All Posts Fair & Balanced
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 13084
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: Major win for choice!

#22

Post by Biker »

Who wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 1:49 pm
Animal wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 1:27 am
Who wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:53 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
Like Republicans pay taxes, :lol: :lol:
if we don't, then why is the platform of every democrat to raise taxes on republicans?
Like Republicans pay taxes :lol:
Shall we list all the high profile Democrats that were charged with tax evasion over the years vs GOP, or nah?

Dumbfuck
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7943
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Major win for choice!

#23

Post by necronomous »

Who wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:53 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
Like Republicans pay taxes, :lol: :lol:
As if the country would work if 85% of the tax payers stopped paying taxes.
User avatar
Who
Adult Diaper Enthusiast
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:33 am
Location: God's Waiting Room
Interests: Breasts
Occupation: Trigger Man

Re: Major win for choice!

#24

Post by Who »

Biker wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 3:35 pm
Who wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 1:49 pm
Animal wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 1:27 am
Who wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:53 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
Like Republicans pay taxes, :lol: :lol:
if we don't, then why is the platform of every democrat to raise taxes on republicans?
Like Republicans pay taxes :lol:
Shall we list all the high profile Democrats that were charged with tax evasion over the years vs GOP, or nah?

Dumbfuck
Sure have at it
A Legend In His Own Mind

All Posts Fair & Balanced
Post Reply