Re: UJ Photo Thread

All the news from the peanut gallery and where all the nasty trash talk fails miserably.
It can get NSFW-ish here: you have been warned!

If you want to become a new member of our board, please read the announcement topic at the top of the list!
Otherwise your new account will be banned and later deleted. You -do- want to be a new member, don't you?...

Moderator: Animal

Post Reply
disco.moon
Simply Exhausting
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:11 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#976

Post by disco.moon »

We're going through alot of old boxes in the basement today. I found this collection of the BF's old High Times. 2005 and 2006.

Image
Slappy7
Forum Regular
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2022 11:44 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#977

Post by Slappy7 »

[img][
disco.moon
Simply Exhausting
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:11 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#978

Post by disco.moon »

Beautiful sunset!
Slappy7
Forum Regular
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2022 11:44 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#979

Post by Slappy7 »

disco.moon wrote: Sat Aug 20, 2022 9:17 pm Beautiful sunset!
Sunrise. Thanks
User avatar
Burn1dwn
Non-Gay Omar
Posts: 4010
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:23 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#980

Post by Burn1dwn »

Slappy7 wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 4:21 pm
disco.moon wrote: Sat Aug 20, 2022 9:17 pm Beautiful sunset!
Sunrise. Thanks
I was trying to figure out where it was taken and thought that might be the case.
User avatar
CentralTexasCrude
Pumpkin Muppet
Posts: 8564
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: In the middle of frickin everywhere's bad thoughts.

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#981

Post by CentralTexasCrude »

Burn1dwn wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 4:21 pm
Slappy7 wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 4:21 pm
disco.moon wrote: Sat Aug 20, 2022 9:17 pm Beautiful sunset!
Sunrise. Thanks
I was trying to figure out where it was taken and thought that might be the case.
How can you tell the difference?
rule34
No life apart from this stupid forum board
Posts: 1646
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 7:08 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#982

Post by rule34 »

CentralTexasCrude wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 5:37 pm
Burn1dwn wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 4:21 pm
Slappy7 wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 4:21 pm
disco.moon wrote: Sat Aug 20, 2022 9:17 pm Beautiful sunset!
Sunrise. Thanks
I was trying to figure out where it was taken and thought that might be the case.
How can you tell the difference?
The sun rises in the east and sets in the west.
du.du.du.dude looks like a lady
User avatar
CentralTexasCrude
Pumpkin Muppet
Posts: 8564
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: In the middle of frickin everywhere's bad thoughts.

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#983

Post by CentralTexasCrude »

rule34 wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 5:48 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 5:37 pm
Burn1dwn wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 4:21 pm
Slappy7 wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 4:21 pm
disco.moon wrote: Sat Aug 20, 2022 9:17 pm Beautiful sunset!
Sunrise. Thanks
I was trying to figure out where it was taken and thought that might be the case.
How can you tell the difference?
The sun rises in the east and sets in the west.
Thanks, Copernicus.
User avatar
Burn1dwn
Non-Gay Omar
Posts: 4010
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:23 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#984

Post by Burn1dwn »

CentralTexasCrude wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 5:37 pm
How can you tell the difference?
I couldn't but for not seeing the sun it seemed like a lot of blue. So I thought maybe its a sunrise.

Here are some sunsets from last week.

User avatar
CentralTexasCrude
Pumpkin Muppet
Posts: 8564
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: In the middle of frickin everywhere's bad thoughts.

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#985

Post by CentralTexasCrude »

Burn1dwn wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 6:11 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 5:37 pm
How can you tell the difference?
I couldn't but for not seeing the sun it seemed like a lot of blue. So I thought maybe its a sunrise.

Here are some sunsets from last week.

Thanks. I could understand if the location was next to a large body of water (for example) and you knew the location, then you could tell whether the photo was pointing East or West. But all I saw in that photo was a parking lot.
disco.moon
Simply Exhausting
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:11 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#986

Post by disco.moon »

Slappy7 wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 4:21 pm
disco.moon wrote: Sat Aug 20, 2022 9:17 pm Beautiful sunset!
Sunrise. Thanks
Word ☺
disco.moon
Simply Exhausting
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:11 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#987

Post by disco.moon »

Burn1dwn wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 6:11 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Sun Aug 21, 2022 5:37 pm
How can you tell the difference?
I couldn't but for not seeing the sun it seemed like a lot of blue. So I thought maybe its a sunrise.

Here are some sunsets from last week.

Awesome! Thanks for sharing!
disco.moon
Simply Exhausting
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:11 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#988

Post by disco.moon »

It was difficult to discern rise from set. Very pretty picture nonetheless, thanks for sharing.
User avatar
stonedmegman
In search of vitamin "T"
Posts: 3819
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2021 11:41 pm
Location: Looking for Dave

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#989

Post by stonedmegman »

Hey smart ass bitch, in all your photo trips to cemeteries, have you ever done any gravestone rubbings?
Be careful when you follow the masses. Sometimes the "M" is silent
User avatar
Reservoir Dog
Ricky
Posts: 14579
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#990

Post by Reservoir Dog »

stonedmegman wrote: Mon Aug 22, 2022 2:35 am Hey smart ass bitch, in all your photo trips to cemeteries, have you ever done any gravestone rubbings?
8-)
User avatar
stonedmegman
In search of vitamin "T"
Posts: 3819
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2021 11:41 pm
Location: Looking for Dave

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#991

Post by stonedmegman »

Reservoir Dog wrote: Mon Aug 22, 2022 2:46 am
stonedmegman wrote: Mon Aug 22, 2022 2:35 am Hey smart ass bitch, in all your photo trips to cemeteries, have you ever done any gravestone rubbings?
8-)
I know what you're thinking. :cheers:
Be careful when you follow the masses. Sometimes the "M" is silent
disco.moon
Simply Exhausting
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:11 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#992

Post by disco.moon »

stonedmegman wrote: Mon Aug 22, 2022 2:35 am Hey smart ass bitch, in all your photo trips to cemeteries, have you ever done any gravestone rubbings?
No,I feel intrusive if I touch the gravestones. I will pick up their fallen cherubs or flowers, that's about it.
disco.moon
Simply Exhausting
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:11 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#993

Post by disco.moon »

Favorite tree 08/19

Image
Slappy7
Forum Regular
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2022 11:44 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#994

Post by Slappy7 »

disco.moon wrote: Mon Aug 22, 2022 11:55 pm Favorite tree 08/19

Image
Nice 😎
disco.moon
Simply Exhausting
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:11 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#995

Post by disco.moon »

Image

Found this old barn at an abandoned farm in the Delaware Water Gap.
theclap
Needs to step away from the keyboard.
Posts: 576
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:45 am

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#996

Post by theclap »

Who cuts the grass at an abandoned farm?
disco.moon
Simply Exhausting
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:11 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#997

Post by disco.moon »

theclap wrote: Wed Aug 24, 2022 1:13 pm Who cuts the grass at an abandoned farm?
This is part of the Delaware Water gap, and the houses that sit abandoned along there are owned by the state it's like a state park thing, so the grass and everything is mowed by the state. There was a whole story I told about these houses on the Delaware Water Gap but I don't have time right now.
disco.moon
Simply Exhausting
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:11 pm

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#998

Post by disco.moon »

Here's the write up. Old Mine Road is my jam.

"A 1950s proposal to construct a dam near Tocks Island across the Delaware River was met with considerable controversy and protest. Tocks Island is located in the Delaware River a short distance north from the Delaware Water Gap. In order to control damaging flooding and provide clean water to supply New York City and Philadelphia, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers proposed building a dam. When completed, the Tocks Island Dam would have created a 37-mile long lake between Pennsylvania and New Jersey, with depths of up to 140 feet and permanently destroying and flooding many homes, towns and villages on both sides of the river. This lake and the land surrounding it were to be organized as the Tocks Island National Recreation Area. Although the dam was never built, 72,000 acres of land were acquired by condemnation and eminent domain. This incited environmental protesters (some say spurred the environmental movement) and embittering local residents displaced by the project's preparations when their property was condemned, then later rented or squatted on by others after they were evicted. After the Tocks Island Dam project failed, the lands seized and acquired by the Army Corps of Engineers was transferred to the oversight of the National Park Service which reorganized them to establish the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area.



The Army Corps or Engineers began acquiring properties in the proposed area of the lake before the dam itself was even begun, or geologic surveys had even been made! (the arrogance). The Corps had such "confidence" in their ability to do this "big dam project" that nothing was going to stand in their way. Starting in 1960, land in the present day area of the Recreation Area was acquired by the Corps through buy outs and eminent domain. Approximately 15,000 people were displaced by the condemnation of personal property along the Delaware River and the surrounding area. Many residents complained that their property was taken at values well below "fair market value" and they they were "strong armed" out of their properties. Those that refused to take the government's offer were simply condemned, given a buy out price, and forced off their land. An estimated 3,000 to 5,000 dwellings and outbuildings were demolished in preparation for the dam project and subsequent flooding of the valley. This included many irreplaceable historical sites and structures connected with the valley's colonial and Native American heritage. The plan was embroiled in controversy and protest by environmental groups and embittered displaced residents. Eventually, because of considerable opposition from environmental activists, the unavailability of government funding, and a geological assessment of the dam's safety due to no bedrock being found in the area where the dam was to be built, the project was never built, but stayed on the books as "active" until it eventually died a quiet death in 1992.


Although a sizable number of structures were demolished during this period, many structures were not demolished.
User avatar
Charliesheen
Snarky Fucker
Posts: 9194
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:49 am

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#999

Post by Charliesheen »

Image

Lake Tahoe is historically low.
A cunt is a cunt by any other name.
User avatar
stonedmegman
In search of vitamin "T"
Posts: 3819
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2021 11:41 pm
Location: Looking for Dave

Re: UJ Photo Thread

#1000

Post by stonedmegman »

disco.moon wrote: Wed Aug 24, 2022 2:20 pm Here's the write up. Old Mine Road is my jam.

"A 1950s proposal to construct a dam near Tocks Island across the Delaware River was met with considerable controversy and protest. Tocks Island is located in the Delaware River a short distance north from the Delaware Water Gap. In order to control damaging flooding and provide clean water to supply New York City and Philadelphia, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers proposed building a dam. When completed, the Tocks Island Dam would have created a 37-mile long lake between Pennsylvania and New Jersey, with depths of up to 140 feet and permanently destroying and flooding many homes, towns and villages on both sides of the river. This lake and the land surrounding it were to be organized as the Tocks Island National Recreation Area. Although the dam was never built, 72,000 acres of land were acquired by condemnation and eminent domain. This incited environmental protesters (some say spurred the environmental movement) and embittering local residents displaced by the project's preparations when their property was condemned, then later rented or squatted on by others after they were evicted. After the Tocks Island Dam project failed, the lands seized and acquired by the Army Corps of Engineers was transferred to the oversight of the National Park Service which reorganized them to establish the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area.



The Army Corps or Engineers began acquiring properties in the proposed area of the lake before the dam itself was even begun, or geologic surveys had even been made! (the arrogance). The Corps had such "confidence" in their ability to do this "big dam project" that nothing was going to stand in their way. Starting in 1960, land in the present day area of the Recreation Area was acquired by the Corps through buy outs and eminent domain. Approximately 15,000 people were displaced by the condemnation of personal property along the Delaware River and the surrounding area. Many residents complained that their property was taken at values well below "fair market value" and they they were "strong armed" out of their properties. Those that refused to take the government's offer were simply condemned, given a buy out price, and forced off their land. An estimated 3,000 to 5,000 dwellings and outbuildings were demolished in preparation for the dam project and subsequent flooding of the valley. This included many irreplaceable historical sites and structures connected with the valley's colonial and Native American heritage. The plan was embroiled in controversy and protest by environmental groups and embittered displaced residents. Eventually, because of considerable opposition from environmental activists, the unavailability of government funding, and a geological assessment of the dam's safety due to no bedrock being found in the area where the dam was to be built, the project was never built, but stayed on the books as "active" until it eventually died a quiet death in 1992.


Although a sizable number of structures were demolished during this period, many structures were not demolished.
Damn...
Be careful when you follow the masses. Sometimes the "M" is silent
Post Reply