but...but....Hunter Biden!!

For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul commies to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.
Anyone posting Ben Garrison comics gets a three-day vacation.

In memory of our lost political forum members. :cry:

Moderator: Biker

Post Reply
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28376
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1076

Post by Animal »

CHEEZY17 wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:07 am I honestly don't know which is why I said "if" in my original comment. If not that, what is his reasoning?
Wimbledon.


actually, his reasoning is abortion. He is very much opposed to a rule that the military put into place after that Rowe decision. The military now grants leave and pays a service member to travel out of state to get an abortion if they are stationed in a state that has laws against it. Alabama is one of those states and Tubberville is from Alabama. He thinks that rule violates the Hyde Amendment that bans federal funding for abortions. He thinks the tax payers should not be on the hook to fund any of this.

It would seems that a simple solution would be to put a non profit in place that picked up the slack and funding these things and ended this whole matter, but I guess no one is looking for a solution. So the non issue of approving military appointments waits for the abortion point to get made.

And, of course, this whole issue of why one person can create so much havoc, is because the Senate has an age old rule that they require "unanimous consent" for much of what they do. And (hopefully) they are not going to change that just because of this one issue.
User avatar
saltydog
Chief Biden Ballwasher
Posts: 5313
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1077

Post by saltydog »

Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 1:17 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:07 am I honestly don't know which is why I said "if" in my original comment. If not that, what is his reasoning?
Wimbledon.


actually, his reasoning is abortion. He is very much opposed to a rule that the military put into place after that Rowe decision. The military now grants leave and pays a service member to travel out of state to get an abortion if they are stationed in a state that has laws against it. Alabama is one of those states and Tubberville is from Alabama. He thinks that rule violates the Hyde Amendment that bans federal funding for abortions. He thinks the tax payers should not be on the hook to fund any of this.

It would seems that a simple solution would be to put a non profit in place that picked up the slack and funding these things and ended this whole matter, but I guess no one is looking for a solution. So the non issue of approving military appointments waits for the abortion point to get made.

And, of course, this whole issue of why one person can create so much havoc, is because the Senate has an age old rule that they require "unanimous consent" for much of what they do. And (hopefully) they are not going to change that just because of this one issue.
So, this action by Tuberville. Would say that it's popular within the military?

Because, when I want someone to have the decision making power of the US Military, I think of a disgraced college football coach that was paid a $5m buyout?
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28376
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1078

Post by Animal »

saltydog wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:42 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 1:17 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:07 am I honestly don't know which is why I said "if" in my original comment. If not that, what is his reasoning?
Wimbledon.


actually, his reasoning is abortion. He is very much opposed to a rule that the military put into place after that Rowe decision. The military now grants leave and pays a service member to travel out of state to get an abortion if they are stationed in a state that has laws against it. Alabama is one of those states and Tubberville is from Alabama. He thinks that rule violates the Hyde Amendment that bans federal funding for abortions. He thinks the tax payers should not be on the hook to fund any of this.

It would seems that a simple solution would be to put a non profit in place that picked up the slack and funding these things and ended this whole matter, but I guess no one is looking for a solution. So the non issue of approving military appointments waits for the abortion point to get made.

And, of course, this whole issue of why one person can create so much havoc, is because the Senate has an age old rule that they require "unanimous consent" for much of what they do. And (hopefully) they are not going to change that just because of this one issue.
So, this action by Tuberville. Would say that it's popular within the military?

Because, when I want someone to have the decision making power of the US Military, I think of a disgraced college football coach that was paid a $5m buyout?
I honestly don't think he gives a fuck if its popular within the military. It seems that he is more concerned about the laws that are in place to protect the tax payers and how money is spent. Its either legal for the federal government to fund abortions or it isn't. right?
User avatar
saltydog
Chief Biden Ballwasher
Posts: 5313
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1079

Post by saltydog »

Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:49 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:42 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 1:17 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:07 am I honestly don't know which is why I said "if" in my original comment. If not that, what is his reasoning?
Wimbledon.


actually, his reasoning is abortion. He is very much opposed to a rule that the military put into place after that Rowe decision. The military now grants leave and pays a service member to travel out of state to get an abortion if they are stationed in a state that has laws against it. Alabama is one of those states and Tubberville is from Alabama. He thinks that rule violates the Hyde Amendment that bans federal funding for abortions. He thinks the tax payers should not be on the hook to fund any of this.

It would seems that a simple solution would be to put a non profit in place that picked up the slack and funding these things and ended this whole matter, but I guess no one is looking for a solution. So the non issue of approving military appointments waits for the abortion point to get made.

And, of course, this whole issue of why one person can create so much havoc, is because the Senate has an age old rule that they require "unanimous consent" for much of what they do. And (hopefully) they are not going to change that just because of this one issue.
So, this action by Tuberville. Would say that it's popular within the military?

Because, when I want someone to have the decision making power of the US Military, I think of a disgraced college football coach that was paid a $5m buyout?
I honestly don't think he gives a fuck if its popular within the military. It seems that he is more concerned about the laws that are in place to protect the tax payers and how money is spent. Its either legal for the federal government to fund abortions or it isn't. right?
"protecting tax payers"?

This is the US Military. That's never been an issue before!
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28376
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1080

Post by Animal »

saltydog wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:51 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:49 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:42 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 1:17 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:07 am I honestly don't know which is why I said "if" in my original comment. If not that, what is his reasoning?
Wimbledon.


actually, his reasoning is abortion. He is very much opposed to a rule that the military put into place after that Rowe decision. The military now grants leave and pays a service member to travel out of state to get an abortion if they are stationed in a state that has laws against it. Alabama is one of those states and Tubberville is from Alabama. He thinks that rule violates the Hyde Amendment that bans federal funding for abortions. He thinks the tax payers should not be on the hook to fund any of this.

It would seems that a simple solution would be to put a non profit in place that picked up the slack and funding these things and ended this whole matter, but I guess no one is looking for a solution. So the non issue of approving military appointments waits for the abortion point to get made.

And, of course, this whole issue of why one person can create so much havoc, is because the Senate has an age old rule that they require "unanimous consent" for much of what they do. And (hopefully) they are not going to change that just because of this one issue.
So, this action by Tuberville. Would say that it's popular within the military?

Because, when I want someone to have the decision making power of the US Military, I think of a disgraced college football coach that was paid a $5m buyout?
I honestly don't think he gives a fuck if its popular within the military. It seems that he is more concerned about the laws that are in place to protect the tax payers and how money is spent. Its either legal for the federal government to fund abortions or it isn't. right?
"protecting tax payers"?

This is the US Military. That's never been an issue before!
some people think abortion is murder and they don't want their tax dollars paying for it. so they elect people like Tubberville to help make sure that doesn't happen.
User avatar
saltydog
Chief Biden Ballwasher
Posts: 5313
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1081

Post by saltydog »

Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 3:01 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:51 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:49 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:42 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 1:17 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:07 am I honestly don't know which is why I said "if" in my original comment. If not that, what is his reasoning?
Wimbledon.


actually, his reasoning is abortion. He is very much opposed to a rule that the military put into place after that Rowe decision. The military now grants leave and pays a service member to travel out of state to get an abortion if they are stationed in a state that has laws against it. Alabama is one of those states and Tubberville is from Alabama. He thinks that rule violates the Hyde Amendment that bans federal funding for abortions. He thinks the tax payers should not be on the hook to fund any of this.

It would seems that a simple solution would be to put a non profit in place that picked up the slack and funding these things and ended this whole matter, but I guess no one is looking for a solution. So the non issue of approving military appointments waits for the abortion point to get made.

And, of course, this whole issue of why one person can create so much havoc, is because the Senate has an age old rule that they require "unanimous consent" for much of what they do. And (hopefully) they are not going to change that just because of this one issue.
So, this action by Tuberville. Would say that it's popular within the military?

Because, when I want someone to have the decision making power of the US Military, I think of a disgraced college football coach that was paid a $5m buyout?
I honestly don't think he gives a fuck if its popular within the military. It seems that he is more concerned about the laws that are in place to protect the tax payers and how money is spent. Its either legal for the federal government to fund abortions or it isn't. right?
"protecting tax payers"?

This is the US Military. That's never been an issue before!
some people think abortion is murder and they don't want their tax dollars paying for it. so they elect people like Tubberville to help make sure that doesn't happen.
Many women see abortion as a form of health care.

You must be amused by stories of pregnant women with complications during pregnancy and are forced to give birth to a dead fetus.
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28376
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1082

Post by Animal »

saltydog wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 3:39 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 3:01 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:51 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:49 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:42 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 1:17 pm

Wimbledon.


actually, his reasoning is abortion. He is very much opposed to a rule that the military put into place after that Rowe decision. The military now grants leave and pays a service member to travel out of state to get an abortion if they are stationed in a state that has laws against it. Alabama is one of those states and Tubberville is from Alabama. He thinks that rule violates the Hyde Amendment that bans federal funding for abortions. He thinks the tax payers should not be on the hook to fund any of this.

It would seems that a simple solution would be to put a non profit in place that picked up the slack and funding these things and ended this whole matter, but I guess no one is looking for a solution. So the non issue of approving military appointments waits for the abortion point to get made.

And, of course, this whole issue of why one person can create so much havoc, is because the Senate has an age old rule that they require "unanimous consent" for much of what they do. And (hopefully) they are not going to change that just because of this one issue.
So, this action by Tuberville. Would say that it's popular within the military?

Because, when I want someone to have the decision making power of the US Military, I think of a disgraced college football coach that was paid a $5m buyout?
I honestly don't think he gives a fuck if its popular within the military. It seems that he is more concerned about the laws that are in place to protect the tax payers and how money is spent. Its either legal for the federal government to fund abortions or it isn't. right?
"protecting tax payers"?

This is the US Military. That's never been an issue before!
some people think abortion is murder and they don't want their tax dollars paying for it. so they elect people like Tubberville to help make sure that doesn't happen.
Many women see abortion as a form of health care.

You must be amused by stories of pregnant women with complications during pregnancy and are forced to give birth to a dead fetus.
unlike you, i don't really have an opinion on it. if it was left up to me i would make abortions legal. i'm just pointing out Tubberville's reasoning.
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 2024
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1083

Post by dot »

Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 3:51 pm unlike you, i don't really have an opinion on it. if it was left up to me i would make abortions legal. i'm just pointing out Tubberville's reasoning.
His reasoning is flawed on multiple levels. Abortion is not outlawed everywhere, only in backwards thinking areas. Service members don't get to pick their deployments. If they need the care, and their deployment is in said backwards thinking area, that's not on the service members and they should not be punished for it. I look at it from the broad scope of their anti abortion goal as well, to banning it outright, because it puts the full push of what they're doing in perspective. Banning abortion, then charging people that assist people to get to abortion care where it is legal, it's reprehensible to do. As Salty pointed out, the taxpayers money excuse doesn't hold water either when floated against the sheer bloat of other funding that's never accountable for the military.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28376
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1084

Post by Animal »

dot wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 8:30 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 3:51 pm unlike you, i don't really have an opinion on it. if it was left up to me i would make abortions legal. i'm just pointing out Tubberville's reasoning.
His reasoning is flawed on multiple levels. Abortion is not outlawed everywhere, only in backwards thinking areas. Service members don't get to pick their deployments. If they need the care, and their deployment is in said backwards thinking area, that's not on the service members and they should not be punished for it. I look at it from the broad scope of their anti abortion goal as well, to banning it outright, because it puts the full push of what they're doing in perspective. Banning abortion, then charging people that assist people to get to abortion care where it is legal, it's reprehensible to do. As Salty pointed out, the taxpayers money excuse doesn't hold water either when floated against the sheer bloat of other funding that's never accountable for the military.
then i suggest you get the law repealed that says that the federal government can't pay for abortions. that shouldn't take long and that would clear up this whole thing. Thanks.
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 2024
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1085

Post by dot »

Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 9:11 pm then i suggest you get the law repealed that says that the federal government can't pay for abortions. that shouldn't take long and that would clear up this whole thing. Thanks.
They aren't. There, cleared up.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28376
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1086

Post by Animal »

dot wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 9:29 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 9:11 pm then i suggest you get the law repealed that says that the federal government can't pay for abortions. that shouldn't take long and that would clear up this whole thing. Thanks.
They aren't. There, cleared up.
The Hyde Amendment and Coverage for Abortion Services

Since the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, abortion has been squarely in the middle of political debates at the national and state levels. Soon after the Court’s ruling, Congress enacted the Hyde Amendment, which blocks federal funds from being used to pay for abortion outside of the exceptions for rape, incest, or if the pregnancy is determined to endanger the woman’s life, resulting in dramatically limited coverage of abortion under Medicaid and other federal programs.1 Since it was first enacted over 40 years ago, the amendment has been sponsored and supported by legislators who oppose abortion and, in particular, object to the federal government’s use of taxpayer money for abortion services. The policy is not a permanent law, but rather has been attached as a temporary “rider” to the Congressional appropriations bill for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and has been renewed annually by Congress. While abortion policy has been a hotly contested issue in most presidential elections, the Hyde Amendment was not the focus of these debates.
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 2024
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1087

Post by dot »

And they aren't being used for abortion. That's all the criteria you cited, so what's the problem?
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28376
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1088

Post by Animal »

saltydog wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:22 am He's a con man. Go look up how awesome his college football record was and tell me he didn't fleece Auburn.

Granted, it's probably easy to win an election based on name recognition.
jeeze. he hasn't coached at Auburn in 15 years. The last coach before the one now was Sweater Vest.
User avatar
saltydog
Chief Biden Ballwasher
Posts: 5313
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1089

Post by saltydog »

Animal wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 9:53 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:22 am He's a con man. Go look up how awesome his college football record was and tell me he didn't fleece Auburn.

Granted, it's probably easy to win an election based on name recognition.
jeeze. he hasn't coached at Auburn in 15 years. The last coach before the one now was Sweater Vest.
Football.... talk about a waste of dollars.
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
Antknot
Not UJR's Military Attaché
Posts: 6945
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1090

Post by Antknot »

Signatories of Hunter Biden laptop letter get plum jobs after pumping disinformation into election



https://justthenews.com/accountability/ ... -plum-jobs
User avatar
saltydog
Chief Biden Ballwasher
Posts: 5313
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1091

Post by saltydog »

Antknot wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:01 pm Signatories of Hunter Biden laptop letter get plum jobs after pumping disinformation into election



https://justthenews.com/accountability/ ... -plum-jobs
Right. :roll:
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 15228
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1092

Post by CHEEZY17 »

Antknot wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:01 pm Signatories of Hunter Biden laptop letter get plum jobs after pumping disinformation into election



https://justthenews.com/accountability/ ... -plum-jobs
Frowny face Brennan and Clapper are the definition of "Deep State". And the Deep State takes care of its own. Its not a surprise they would get a cushy paycheck here.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
User avatar
saltydog
Chief Biden Ballwasher
Posts: 5313
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1093

Post by saltydog »

CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:19 pm
Antknot wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:01 pm Signatories of Hunter Biden laptop letter get plum jobs after pumping disinformation into election



https://justthenews.com/accountability/ ... -plum-jobs
Frowny face Brennan and Clapper are the definition of "Deep State". And the Deep State takes care of its own. Its not a surprise they would get a cushy paycheck here.
Ah yes. The "Deep State". How convenient.
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 15228
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1094

Post by CHEEZY17 »

saltydog wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:41 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:19 pm
Antknot wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:01 pm Signatories of Hunter Biden laptop letter get plum jobs after pumping disinformation into election



https://justthenews.com/accountability/ ... -plum-jobs
Frowny face Brennan and Clapper are the definition of "Deep State". And the Deep State takes care of its own. Its not a surprise they would get a cushy paycheck here.
Ah yes. The "Deep State". How convenient.
Let me guess: The "Deep State" is another thing you think is fake? Do you even know what is meant by "Deep State"?
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
User avatar
saltydog
Chief Biden Ballwasher
Posts: 5313
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1095

Post by saltydog »

CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:14 pm
saltydog wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:41 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:19 pm
Antknot wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:01 pm Signatories of Hunter Biden laptop letter get plum jobs after pumping disinformation into election



https://justthenews.com/accountability/ ... -plum-jobs
Frowny face Brennan and Clapper are the definition of "Deep State". And the Deep State takes care of its own. Its not a surprise they would get a cushy paycheck here.
Ah yes. The "Deep State". How convenient.
Let me guess: The "Deep State" is another thing you think is fake? Do you even know what is meant by "Deep State"?
Please, educate the class

:popcorn:
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 15228
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1096

Post by CHEEZY17 »

saltydog wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:31 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:14 pm
saltydog wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:41 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:19 pm
Antknot wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:01 pm Signatories of Hunter Biden laptop letter get plum jobs after pumping disinformation into election



https://justthenews.com/accountability/ ... -plum-jobs
Frowny face Brennan and Clapper are the definition of "Deep State". And the Deep State takes care of its own. Its not a surprise they would get a cushy paycheck here.
Ah yes. The "Deep State". How convenient.
Let me guess: The "Deep State" is another thing you think is fake? Do you even know what is meant by "Deep State"?
Please, educate the class

:popcorn:
Are you unable to Google? Heres a quick wiki for you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_state

In essence the Deep State is/are unelected bureaucrats and government types that often operate on their own accord and usually in pursuit of their own agenda which may or may not occasionally line up with the elected Government in power. To simplify it further for you: it is the worst elements of the unelected Washington Bureaucracy.
Last edited by CHEEZY17 on Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28376
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1097

Post by Animal »

i'm almost certain that salty thinks the deep state has something to do with glory holes.
User avatar
saltydog
Chief Biden Ballwasher
Posts: 5313
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1098

Post by saltydog »

CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:45 pm
saltydog wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:31 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:14 pm
saltydog wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:41 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:19 pm
Antknot wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:01 pm Signatories of Hunter Biden laptop letter get plum jobs after pumping disinformation into election



https://justthenews.com/accountability/ ... -plum-jobs
Frowny face Brennan and Clapper are the definition of "Deep State". And the Deep State takes care of its own. Its not a surprise they would get a cushy paycheck here.
Ah yes. The "Deep State". How convenient.
Let me guess: The "Deep State" is another thing you think is fake? Do you even know what is meant by "Deep State"?
Please, educate the class

:popcorn:
Are you unable to Google? Heres a quick wiki for you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_state

In essence the Deep State is/are unelected bureaucrats and government types that often operate on their own accord and usually in pursuit of their own agenda which may or may not occasionally line up with the elected Government in power. To simplify it further for you: it is the worst elements of the unelected Washington Bureaucracy.
So, like Rupert Murdoch and the Koch brothers?
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 15228
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1099

Post by CHEEZY17 »

saltydog wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:24 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:45 pm
saltydog wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:31 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:14 pm
saltydog wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:41 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:19 pm

Frowny face Brennan and Clapper are the definition of "Deep State". And the Deep State takes care of its own. Its not a surprise they would get a cushy paycheck here.
Ah yes. The "Deep State". How convenient.
Let me guess: The "Deep State" is another thing you think is fake? Do you even know what is meant by "Deep State"?
Please, educate the class

:popcorn:
Are you unable to Google? Heres a quick wiki for you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_state

In essence the Deep State is/are unelected bureaucrats and government types that often operate on their own accord and usually in pursuit of their own agenda which may or may not occasionally line up with the elected Government in power. To simplify it further for you: it is the worst elements of the unelected Washington Bureaucracy.
So, like Rupert Murdoch and the Koch brothers?
No. Murdoch and the Koch brothers are not Deep State. Neither is George Soros.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28376
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: but...but....Hunter Biden!!

#1100

Post by Animal »

saltydog wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:24 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:45 pm
saltydog wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:31 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:14 pm
saltydog wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:41 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:19 pm

Frowny face Brennan and Clapper are the definition of "Deep State". And the Deep State takes care of its own. Its not a surprise they would get a cushy paycheck here.
Ah yes. The "Deep State". How convenient.
Let me guess: The "Deep State" is another thing you think is fake? Do you even know what is meant by "Deep State"?
Please, educate the class

:popcorn:
Are you unable to Google? Heres a quick wiki for you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_state

In essence the Deep State is/are unelected bureaucrats and government types that often operate on their own accord and usually in pursuit of their own agenda which may or may not occasionally line up with the elected Government in power. To simplify it further for you: it is the worst elements of the unelected Washington Bureaucracy.
So, like Rupert Murdoch and the Koch brothers?
sort of. but its more like the people that fill out Brandon's note cards and tell him what he can and can't talk about and who he can ask questions from, etc.
Post Reply