Ashley Biden confirms showers with ShitShow are true

[necronomous]

You don’t care about having a pedophile as president? How caring of you

Has he been charged with a crime?
45 on the other hand was found guilty of rape.

So you think Ashley is lying? Well there goes your believe all women mantra

I could care less about Ashley, 45 raped E Jean Carroll.
Biker should be happy he doesn’t get tested

No he didn't. But you're saying you don't care if your president is a pedophile. Interesting take.

When 46 is charged with a crime then I will consider facts, 45 has been found guilty and was ordered to pay 5 million dollars

So you support pedophiles. Got it.

[dot]

From the Washington post article that who was too chickenshit to post.

Despite Carroll’s claims that Trump had raped her, they noted, the jury stopped short of saying he committed that particular offense. Instead, jurors opted for a second option: sexual abuse.

If only you could've kept reading just a bit more.

“This was a rape claim, this was a rape case all along, and the jury rejected that — made other findings,” his lawyer, Joe Tacopina, said outside the courthouse.

A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.

The filing from Judge Lewis A. Kaplan came as Trump’s attorneys have sought a new trial and have argued that the jury’s $5 million verdict against Trump in the civil suit was excessive. The reason, they argue, is that sexual abuse could be as limited as the “groping” of a victim’s breasts.

Kaplan roundly rejected Trump’s motion Tuesday, calling that argument “entirely unpersuasive.”

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”

The former requires forcible, unconsented-to penetration with one’s penis. But he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape. He cited definitions offered by the American Psychological Association and the Justice Department, which in 2012 expanded its definition of rape to include penetration “with any body part or object.”

Good to know a long break changes absolutely nothing with how the cult behaves.

[Antknot]

From the Washington post article that who was too chickenshit to post.

Despite Carroll’s claims that Trump had raped her, they noted, the jury stopped short of saying he committed that particular offense. Instead, jurors opted for a second option: sexual abuse.

If only you could've kept reading just a bit more.

“This was a rape claim, this was a rape case all along, and the jury rejected that — made other findings,” his lawyer, Joe Tacopina, said outside the courthouse.

A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.

The filing from Judge Lewis A. Kaplan came as Trump’s attorneys have sought a new trial and have argued that the jury’s $5 million verdict against Trump in the civil suit was excessive. The reason, they argue, is that sexual abuse could be as limited as the “groping” of a victim’s breasts.

Kaplan roundly rejected Trump’s motion Tuesday, calling that argument “entirely unpersuasive.”

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”

The former requires forcible, unconsented-to penetration with one’s penis. But he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape. He cited definitions offered by the American Psychological Association and the Justice Department, which in 2012 expanded its definition of rape to include penetration “with any body part or object.”

Good to know a long break changes absolutely nothing with how the cult behaves.

In the first sentence of watching quoted: “… The jury rejected that… “

[dot]

In the first sentence of watching quoted: “… The jury rejected that… “

A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.

Maybe putting it in big letters will help for those of you that will keep ignoring what we've said since the verdict came down. That verdict, not the new one. That's another wall of ignorance y'all will have to put up.

[necronomous]

In the first sentence of watching quoted: “… The jury rejected that… “

A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.

Maybe putting it in big letters will help for those of you that will keep ignoring what we've said since the verdict came down. That verdict, not the new one. That's another wall of ignorance y'all will have to put up.

So the judge declared something the jury denied happened. Sounds like a corrupt judge.

[CHEEZY17]

In the first sentence of watching quoted: “… The jury rejected that… “

A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.

Maybe putting it in big letters will help for those of you that will keep ignoring what we've said since the verdict came down. That verdict, not the new one. That's another wall of ignorance y'all will have to put up.

So in the trial for rape the jury had the opportunity to convict Trump of rape but decided on something else because they felt rape was not appropriate. Gotcha.
So, to summarize, Trump was not convicted of rape.

[Animal]

the jury decided not to go with rape, and go with a different charge, because they knew it was the same exact thing.

[dot]

So the judge declared something the jury denied happened. Sounds like a corrupt judge.

So in the trial for rape the jury had the opportunity to convict Trump of rape but decided on something else because they felt rape was not appropriate. Gotcha.
So, to summarize, Trump was not convicted of rape.

the jury decided not to go with rape, and go with a different charge, because they knew it was the same exact thing.

The jury came back with guilty. The defense post verdict tried splitting hairs to spin his guilty verdict. The judge clarified publicly that the common definition of rape is what he committed. And that's all those of us have been saying on the subject since then. Please feel free to keep insisting that his assault of this woman and further defamation should be overlooked and disregarded. It's very Both Sides™ of the first, hackish of the second, intentionally stupid of the third. In other words, all standard operating procedure from the usual suspects.

[CHEEZY17]

So the judge declared something the jury denied happened. Sounds like a corrupt judge.

So in the trial for rape the jury had the opportunity to convict Trump of rape but decided on something else because they felt rape was not appropriate. Gotcha.
So, to summarize, Trump was not convicted of rape.

the jury decided not to go with rape, and go with a different charge, because they knew it was the same exact thing.

The jury came back with guilty. The defense post verdict tried splitting hairs to spin his guilty verdict. The judge clarified publicly that the common definition of rape is what he committed. And that's all those of us have been saying on the subject since then. Please feel free to keep insisting that his assault of this woman and further defamation should be overlooked and disregarded. It's very Both Sides™ of the first, hackish of the second, intentionally stupid of the third. In other words, all standard operating procedure from the usual suspects.

That's a lot of words to admit that Trump was not convicted of rape.

[dot]

That's a lot of words to admit that Trump was not convicted of rape.

Keep clinging to that like there's a difference. We already know you'd vote for a criminal before democracy, you don't need to keep double downing on being a hack.

[necronomous]

That's a lot of words to admit that Trump was not convicted of rape.

Keep clinging to that like there's a difference. We already know you'd vote for a criminal before democracy, you don't need to keep double downing on being a hack.

Well, you voted for a pedophile criminal, so I would cast stones too far. And no conviction of rape. Got it.

[Who]

That's a lot of words to admit that Trump was not convicted of rape.

Keep clinging to that like there's a difference. We already know you'd vote for a criminal before democracy, you don't need to keep double downing on being a hack.

Well, you voted for a pedophile criminal, so I would cast stones too far. And no conviction of rape. Got it.

Have you heard the term, Every Accusation is a Confession?

Have you ever googled trump nda’s ?

You might want to tone down the pedo rhetoric lol

[necronomous]

That's a lot of words to admit that Trump was not convicted of rape.

Keep clinging to that like there's a difference. We already know you'd vote for a criminal before democracy, you don't need to keep double downing on being a hack.

Well, you voted for a pedophile criminal, so I would cast stones too far. And no conviction of rape. Got it.

Have you heard the term, Every Accusation is a Confession?

Have you ever googled trump nda’s ?

You might want to tone down the pedo rhetoric lol

I've seen Biden sniff and touch kids inappropriately. You just have some words on paper that people can lie about. My eyes don't lie.

[CHEEZY17]

That's a lot of words to admit that Trump was not convicted of rape.

Keep clinging to that like there's a difference. We already know you'd vote for a criminal before democracy, you don't need to keep double downing on being a hack.

Well, you voted for a pedophile criminal, so I would cast stones too far. And no conviction of rape. Got it.

Have you heard the term, Every Accusation is a Confession?

Have you ever googled trump nda’s ?

You might want to tone down the pedo rhetoric lol

Your boy showered with his daughter to the point of making her un-comfortable. Oh wait, you still think Ashley's diary is fake.

[Who]

That's a lot of words to admit that Trump was not convicted of rape.

Keep clinging to that like there's a difference. We already know you'd vote for a criminal before democracy, you don't need to keep double downing on being a hack.

Well, you voted for a pedophile criminal, so I would cast stones too far. And no conviction of rape. Got it.

Have you heard the term, Every Accusation is a Confession?

Have you ever googled trump nda’s ?

You might want to tone down the pedo rhetoric lol

Your boy showered with his daughter to the point of making her un-comfortable. Oh wait, you still think Ashley's diary is fake.

Biden may be an inbreeder but 45 is the pedophile

[dot]

Well, you voted for a pedophile criminal, so I would cast stones too far. And no conviction of rape. Got it.

A guilty verdict that the judge had to clarify was for a common definition of rape because spinsters like you were trying to say it wasn't rape. But please, keep hanging your hat on this. And while you're at it, feel free to prove Biden is guilty of your accusations. You already failed on the defense of fraud and insurrection fronts, lord knows why you'd add to your plate but you do you, Red.

[Biker]

Well, you voted for a pedophile criminal, so I would cast stones too far. And no conviction of rape. Got it.

A guilty verdict that the judge had to clarify was for a common definition of rape because spinsters like you were trying to say it wasn't rape. But please, keep hanging your hat on this. And while you're at it, feel free to prove Biden is guilty of your accusations. You already failed on the defense of fraud and insurrection fronts, lord knows why you'd add to your plate but you do you, Red.

Then OJ is a convicted murderer?

[dot]

Then OJ is a convicted murderer?

I'm sure we'll find someone here defending OJ any minute now so you can deflect further. Meanwhile, Trump remains a convicted felon, adjudicated rapist, proven fraud.

[necronomous]

Well, you voted for a pedophile criminal, so I would cast stones too far. And no conviction of rape. Got it.

A guilty verdict that the judge had to clarify was for a common definition of rape because spinsters like you were trying to say it wasn't rape. But please, keep hanging your hat on this. And while you're at it, feel free to prove Biden is guilty of your accusations. You already failed on the defense of fraud and insurrection fronts, lord knows why you'd add to your plate but you do you, Red.

I mean, really all this is you just admitting you have no idea what you're talking about. And it's hilarious.

[Biker]

Then OJ is a convicted murderer?

I'm sure we'll find someone here defending OJ any minute now so you can deflect further. Meanwhile, Trump remains a convicted felon, adjudicated rapist, proven fraud.

According to your definition, OJ is a convicted murderer. Your standards, not mine. Own it, Dodgin'

[dot]

I mean, really all this is you just admitting you have no idea what you're talking about. And it's hilarious.

Quoting the judge back to the smoothbrains here because they couldn't read past what they wanted to read is me admitting I don't know what I'm talking about. Got it. Again, try harder, this is embarrassing on your part.

According to your definition, OJ is a convicted murderer. Your standards, not mine. Own it, Dodgin'

OJ was acquitted. Where's Trump's acquittal that was predicted? Oh, that's right. He got found guilty, 34 times. He got found liable for rape and defamation of his victim. He got found liable for committing fraud to the tune of millions of dollars. Standards? Get some, asshole.

[necronomous]

I mean, really all this is you just admitting you have no idea what you're talking about. And it's hilarious.

Quoting the judge back to the smoothbrains here because they couldn't read past what they wanted to read is me admitting I don't know what I'm talking about. Got it. Again, try harder, this is embarrassing on your part.

According to your definition, OJ is a convicted murderer. Your standards, not mine. Own it, Dodgin'

OJ was acquitted. Where's Trump's acquittal that was predicted? Oh, that's right. He got found guilty, 34 times. He got found liable for rape and defamation of his victim. He got found liable for committing fraud to the tune of millions of dollars. Standards? Get some, asshole.

If you think so chuck.

[dot]

If you think so chuck.

Well you couldn't ever argue against the judge on fraud, you're welcome to take up the rape defense instead if you think you got a strong case. I hear he's gonna need the help yet again since he won't stop defaming her. Your call, Red.

[necronomous]

If you think so chuck.

Well you couldn't ever argue against the judge on fraud, you're welcome to take up the rape defense instead if you think you got a strong case. I hear he's gonna need the help yet again since he won't stop defaming her. Your call, Red.

Already have, you're, again, just to fucking stupid.

[CHEEZY17]

Well, you voted for a pedophile criminal, so I would cast stones too far. And no conviction of rape. Got it.

A guilty verdict that the judge had to clarify was for a common definition of rape because spinsters like you were trying to say it wasn't rape. But please, keep hanging your hat on this. And while you're at it, feel free to prove Biden is guilty of your accusations. You already failed on the defense of fraud and insurrection fronts, lord knows why you'd add to your plate but you do you, Red.

So in the trial for rape, in which the jurors had the opportunity to convict Trump of rape, they decided to go a different route that wasnt rape. Gotcha. If the jurors wanted to convict Trump of rape they would have and could have done so.