You've argued no facts at all. Your arguments have been nu uh, look at this pic, and the courts never lie. So, your arguments are shit.
January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
Moderator: Biker
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 8156
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
- CHEEZY17
- Libertarian house cat
- Posts: 15632
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
Nope. Your whole argument is "the facts of that day" and "the definition". Both of those things are known and have been evaluated by people smarter than you over hundreds of cases and each and every time they decided insurrection didnt fit. Once again it is YOU that needs to explain why the experts are wrong and you are right. Failing that bud, youre just pissing in the wind. Hey, if thats your thing then so be it but always remember that WE are on the same side as the United States Justice Department and you are not.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
-
- Not UJR's Military Attaché
- Posts: 7119
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
- Location: South Carolina
- dot
- Dodgin’ Ese
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
You're the one who pretended because one picture exists it cancelled out documented violence. Weak af.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:48 pm You've argued no facts at all. Your arguments have been nu uh, look at this pic, and the courts never lie. So, your arguments are shit.
Which ultimately you can't argue against which is why you have yet to even try. Hack is still a hack.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 8156
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
THAT NO ONE WAS CHARGED WITH. So evidence of what? Not a goddamn thing. They are either negligent in their duties or what they are claiming occurred never did. If they committed treason fucking lock the bastards up. Otherwise, you're full of shit and so are they.dot wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 9:30 pmYou're the one who pretended because one picture exists it cancelled out documented violence. Weak af.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:48 pm You've argued no facts at all. Your arguments have been nu uh, look at this pic, and the courts never lie. So, your arguments are shit.
Which ultimately you can't argue against which is why you have yet to even try. Hack is still a hack.
- CHEEZY17
- Libertarian house cat
- Posts: 15632
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
I dont need to try because its already been done by people smarter than you. I am not a lawyer so its better suited to have people who actually know and understand the law argue the "facts of that day". They did that for 3 years and decided in every single case that insurrection didnt fit. Thats the bottom line home school.dot wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 9:30 pmYou're the one who pretended because one picture exists it cancelled out documented violence. Weak af.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:48 pm You've argued no facts at all. Your arguments have been nu uh, look at this pic, and the courts never lie. So, your arguments are shit.
Which ultimately you can't argue against which is why you have yet to even try. Hack is still a hack.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
- dot
- Dodgin’ Ese
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
Subpoenas were disobeyed. According to you, that means without charges, that didn't happen. Except we know it happened, therefore your argument is weak and that's why you can't prove it wasn't an insurrection. Otherwise, you'd have done it already.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 11:55 pm THAT NO ONE WAS CHARGED WITH. So evidence of what? Not a goddamn thing. They are either negligent in their duties or what they are claiming occurred never did. If they committed treason fucking lock the bastards up. Otherwise, you're full of shit and so are they.
Translation, hack can't back up what he says. Whether that's Joe Biden being corrupt, January 6 not being an insurrection, cultist hack is going to be a cultist hack.
- CHEEZY17
- Libertarian house cat
- Posts: 15632
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
Except it's already "backed up" by the literally hundreds of cases of "not insurrection".dot wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 8:00 pmSubpoenas were disobeyed. According to you, that means without charges, that didn't happen. Except we know it happened, therefore your argument is weak and that's why you can't prove it wasn't an insurrection. Otherwise, you'd have done it already.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 11:55 pm THAT NO ONE WAS CHARGED WITH. So evidence of what? Not a goddamn thing. They are either negligent in their duties or what they are claiming occurred never did. If they committed treason fucking lock the bastards up. Otherwise, you're full of shit and so are they.
Translation, hack can't back up what he says. Whether that's Joe Biden being corrupt, January 6 not being an insurrection, cultist hack is going to be a cultist hack.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
- dot
- Dodgin’ Ese
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
Hack shifting the goalposts to avoid the reality of what was incited, what was committed. Nothing changes, hack can't prove January 6 wasn't an insurrection so he relies on never engaging on the subject. Hack does hack things.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 8156
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
Lol. You can mental gymnastics all you want but the people in jail aren't in jail for treason. And they certainly didn't ignore a subpoena. Again, people are either not doing their job, or there was no treason/insurrection, not both.dot wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 8:00 pmSubpoenas were disobeyed. According to you, that means without charges, that didn't happen. Except we know it happened, therefore your argument is weak and that's why you can't prove it wasn't an insurrection. Otherwise, you'd have done it already.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 11:55 pm THAT NO ONE WAS CHARGED WITH. So evidence of what? Not a goddamn thing. They are either negligent in their duties or what they are claiming occurred never did. If they committed treason fucking lock the bastards up. Otherwise, you're full of shit and so are they.
Translation, hack can't back up what he says. Whether that's Joe Biden being corrupt, January 6 not being an insurrection, cultist hack is going to be a cultist hack.
- CHEEZY17
- Libertarian house cat
- Posts: 15632
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
I dont need to "shift the goalposts" as there is literally an entire Government Justice Department tasked with investigating and determining crimes. This department filled with lawyers and legal experts took all of the same evidence (the facts of that day) that YOU claim is undeniable and rock solid and decided insurrection was not the correct fit. Not just once or twice but hundreds of times. The legal professionals that are smarter than you have already made their determination regarding "the facts of that day". Until you can explain WHY your conclusion is right and the conclusions of the legal professionals are wrong you are just pissing in the wind.
Never forget that YOU are on the opposite side of the legal professionals and we are not.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
- dot
- Dodgin’ Ese
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
It's mental gymnastics now to identify actions as defined in the dictionary? Visual evidence to the contrary of your Do you know that I'm a fag? True Story!'s excuse? Lawful subpoenas were not defied? As proven, your arguments are weak because they're not based on facts. Try harder, Red. Pretend it's a Democrat that did all this instead of a Republican. Maybe then you'll find the motivation you need.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 9:29 pm Lol. You can mental gymnastics all you want but the people in jail aren't in jail for treason. And they certainly didn't ignore a subpoena. Again, people are either not doing their job, or there was no treason/insurrection, not both.
You say that and yet you do, every single time. Like now. Either it was or it was not an insurrection. Definition fits, the actions taken fit, but you expect that to be thrown out because charges were not filed and because you don't like those facts. Well charges weren't filed on those subpoenas either and yet we both know they were still defied. Man up and accept responsibility for what you voted for and will again. Facts don't care about your feelings. Hack does hack things.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 8156
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
Your Dunning/Kruger effect levels are off the chartsdot wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2024 9:15 pmIt's mental gymnastics now to identify actions as defined in the dictionary? Visual evidence to the contrary of your Do you know that I'm a fag? True Story!'s excuse? Lawful subpoenas were not defied? As proven, your arguments are weak because they're not based on facts. Try harder, Red. Pretend it's a Democrat that did all this instead of a Republican. Maybe then you'll find the motivation you need.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 9:29 pm Lol. You can mental gymnastics all you want but the people in jail aren't in jail for treason. And they certainly didn't ignore a subpoena. Again, people are either not doing their job, or there was no treason/insurrection, not both.
You say that and yet you do, every single time. Like now. Either it was or it was not an insurrection. Definition fits, the actions taken fit, but you expect that to be thrown out because charges were not filed and because you don't like those facts. Well charges weren't filed on those subpoenas either and yet we both know they were still defied. Man up and accept responsibility for what you voted for and will again. Facts don't care about your feelings. Hack does hack things.
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28744
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
We know that Hillary paid for the Russian dossier and no charges were filed. Can we count that too?dot wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2024 9:15 pmIt's mental gymnastics now to identify actions as defined in the dictionary? Visual evidence to the contrary of your Do you know that I'm a fag? True Story!'s excuse? Lawful subpoenas were not defied? As proven, your arguments are weak because they're not based on facts. Try harder, Red. Pretend it's a Democrat that did all this instead of a Republican. Maybe then you'll find the motivation you need.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 9:29 pm Lol. You can mental gymnastics all you want but the people in jail aren't in jail for treason. And they certainly didn't ignore a subpoena. Again, people are either not doing their job, or there was no treason/insurrection, not both.
You say that and yet you do, every single time. Like now. Either it was or it was not an insurrection. Definition fits, the actions taken fit, but you expect that to be thrown out because charges were not filed and because you don't like those facts. Well charges weren't filed on those subpoenas either and yet we both know they were still defied. Man up and accept responsibility for what you voted for and will again. Facts don't care about your feelings. Hack does hack things.
- dot
- Dodgin’ Ese
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
Is this your way of sidestepping the fact that you can't prove your claims? Too difficult for ya? And to think, you had a lot of time to try and do the work but still rely on your shtick to get by.
Deflection and refusal to prove the Do you know that I'm a fag? True Story!'s claim is noted. You can still try, but it's pretty clear you won't ever come that close again to putting in effort.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 8156
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
No I have already proven my point and you can't understand it so you're stupid and this is the outcome of that.dot wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:14 pmIs this your way of sidestepping the fact that you can't prove your claims? Too difficult for ya? And to think, you had a lot of time to try and do the work but still rely on your shtick to get by.
Deflection and refusal to prove the Do you know that I'm a fag? True Story!'s claim is noted. You can still try, but it's pretty clear you won't ever come that close again to putting in effort.
- dot
- Dodgin’ Ese
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
If your point is that there was no insurrection despite investigations, fact finding, court decisions, the dictionary itself all proving the counter to your claim, then it's clear that you're the one too stupid to accept reality. Which kinda holds true since that's exactly what a red cultist would think. Carry on making a fool of yourself.necronomous wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:20 pm No I have already proven my point and you can't understand it so you're stupid and this is the outcome of that.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 8156
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
Except no one found guilty of it. Neat.dot wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:26 pmIf your point is that there was no insurrection despite investigations, fact finding, court decisions, the dictionary itself all proving the counter to your claim, then it's clear that you're the one too stupid to accept reality. Which kinda holds true since that's exactly what a red cultist would think. Carry on making a fool of yourself.necronomous wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:20 pm No I have already proven my point and you can't understand it so you're stupid and this is the outcome of that.
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28744
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
So, if Hillary paid for the Russian dossier that tried to tie Trump to the Russians and she labeled those payments as "campaign legal fees", which she has admitted to when she agreed to pay the fine to the Federal Election Committee, then aren't those pretty much the exact same type of charges and crimes that they just prosecuted Trump over? I mean, wanting to keep a prostitutes mouth shut seems much less invasive to influencing voters than attempting to make a candidate look like he was in bed with the Russians.
Wouldn't you agree?
- CHEEZY17
- Libertarian house cat
- Posts: 15632
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
Until you can explain WHY you are right and the experts are wrong youre just pissing in the wind. Never forget that it is YOU that is on the opposite side of the legal experts here.dot wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2024 9:15 pmIt's mental gymnastics now to identify actions as defined in the dictionary? Visual evidence to the contrary of your Do you know that I'm a fag? True Story!'s excuse? Lawful subpoenas were not defied? As proven, your arguments are weak because they're not based on facts. Try harder, Red. Pretend it's a Democrat that did all this instead of a Republican. Maybe then you'll find the motivation you need.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 9:29 pm Lol. You can mental gymnastics all you want but the people in jail aren't in jail for treason. And they certainly didn't ignore a subpoena. Again, people are either not doing their job, or there was no treason/insurrection, not both.
You say that and yet you do, every single time. Like now. Either it was or it was not an insurrection. Definition fits, the actions taken fit, but you expect that to be thrown out because charges were not filed and because you don't like those facts. Well charges weren't filed on those subpoenas either and yet we both know they were still defied. Man up and accept responsibility for what you voted for and will again. Facts don't care about your feelings. Hack does hack things.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
- dot
- Dodgin’ Ese
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
The investigations verdicts judgements and the dictionary, you know the things you ignored, prove you wrong. Try harder, you're still embarrassing yourself.
Try again. Or are you still thinking you can Jedi mind trick away the insurrection existing with a picture?dot wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:26 pm If your point is that there was no insurrection despite investigations, fact finding, court decisions, the dictionary itself all proving the counter to your claim, then it's clear that you're the one too stupid to accept reality. Which kinda holds true since that's exactly what a red cultist would think. Carry on making a fool of yourself.
Bad faith arguments to avoid admitting the fact that your candidate is a convicted felon? Why am I not surprised? 34 counts of falsification of business records in the first degree, which is a felony in New York. Let me know when you can successfully make a case like that over Clinton. Hope you're ready to do homework for once.Animal wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2024 11:26 pm So, if Hillary paid for the Russian dossier that tried to tie Trump to the Russians and she labeled those payments as "campaign legal fees", which she has admitted to when she agreed to pay the fine to the Federal Election Committee, then aren't those pretty much the exact same type of charges and crimes that they just prosecuted Trump over? I mean, wanting to keep a prostitutes mouth shut seems much less invasive to influencing voters than attempting to make a candidate look like he was in bed with the Russians.
Wouldn't you agree?
That's the thing, the experts judges and scholars are on my side. You got investigations and fact finding proving it was an insurrection, judges making that determination based on facts and evidence, and language scholars showing how January 6 is the literal definition of insurrection. So while you would like to pretend you have a leg to stand on, you forget that you literally can't prove your Do you know that I'm a fag? True Story!'s claim because the facts are not and have never been on your side to say nothing of the fact you're too much of a coward to even try. Now clean your pants, hack. You're covered in your own piss.
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28744
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
I wouldn't need to let you know when i can successfully make that case for Clinton. She made it herself when she agreed to pay the fine imposed by the Federal Election Committee.dot wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:45 pmBad faith arguments to avoid admitting the fact that your candidate is a convicted felon? Why am I not surprised? 34 counts of falsification of business records in the first degree, which is a felony in New York. Let me know when you can successfully make a case like that over Clinton. Hope you're ready to do homework for once.Animal wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2024 11:26 pm So, if Hillary paid for the Russian dossier that tried to tie Trump to the Russians and she labeled those payments as "campaign legal fees", which she has admitted to when she agreed to pay the fine to the Federal Election Committee, then aren't those pretty much the exact same type of charges and crimes that they just prosecuted Trump over? I mean, wanting to keep a prostitutes mouth shut seems much less invasive to influencing voters than attempting to make a candidate look like he was in bed with the Russians.
Wouldn't you agree?
- dot
- Dodgin’ Ese
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
Except you're still missing the parallel of falsification of business records in the first degree. See what I mean when I said you'd need to do your homework? Thanks for not disappointing.
- CHEEZY17
- Libertarian house cat
- Posts: 15632
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
Its so obvious literally hundreds of people involved in January 6th have been prosecuted for "not insurrection"!dot wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:45 pmThe investigations verdicts judgements and the dictionary, you know the things you ignored, prove you wrong. Try harder, you're still embarrassing yourself.
Try again. Or are you still thinking you can Jedi mind trick away the insurrection existing with a picture?dot wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:26 pm If your point is that there was no insurrection despite investigations, fact finding, court decisions, the dictionary itself all proving the counter to your claim, then it's clear that you're the one too stupid to accept reality. Which kinda holds true since that's exactly what a red cultist would think. Carry on making a fool of yourself.
Bad faith arguments to avoid admitting the fact that your candidate is a convicted felon? Why am I not surprised? 34 counts of falsification of business records in the first degree, which is a felony in New York. Let me know when you can successfully make a case like that over Clinton. Hope you're ready to do homework for once.Animal wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2024 11:26 pm So, if Hillary paid for the Russian dossier that tried to tie Trump to the Russians and she labeled those payments as "campaign legal fees", which she has admitted to when she agreed to pay the fine to the Federal Election Committee, then aren't those pretty much the exact same type of charges and crimes that they just prosecuted Trump over? I mean, wanting to keep a prostitutes mouth shut seems much less invasive to influencing voters than attempting to make a candidate look like he was in bed with the Russians.
Wouldn't you agree?
That's the thing, the experts judges and scholars are on my side. You got investigations and fact finding proving it was an insurrection, judges making that determination based on facts and evidence, and language scholars showing how January 6 is the literal definition of insurrection. So while you would like to pretend you have a leg to stand on, you forget that you literally can't prove your Do you know that I'm a fag? True Story!'s claim because the facts are not and have never been on your side to say nothing of the fact you're too much of a coward to even try. Now clean your pants, hack. You're covered in your own piss.
The only legal experts that matter dont agree with you retard.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28744
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)
they admitted that they called the payments "legal fees". same thing, dumbass. If that was falsification for Trump, then its falsification for Hillary. You must agree, right?