For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul socialists to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.
Anyone posting Ben Garrison political cartoons gets a three-day vacation.
Animal wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2024 10:39 pm
i hate these stories where people spend the next 2 years trying to uncover something that proves they were right all along.
But... but... Hunter Biden's laptop!
Yes, we were right about Hunters laptop. It was real, the contents were real and not Russian disinformation like you were told.
Or wait, do you still think it was fake?
Oh, stop it.
You spent 3 1/2 years shouting from the rafters that that stupid laptop was going to be the downfall of the entire "Biden crime family".
How did that work out for ya?
Then like I said before: it should be very easy to quote where I said that. Go ahead and quote where I said "This laptop will be the downfall of Joe Biden and/or the entire Biden crime family." I mean, there are probably literally hundreds of posts across multiple threads for you to find one.
We've been over this, Rick. We spent the last 3 years telling you the laptop was real, the contents were real and that the contents would corroborate other evidence found via subpoena (thus further proving its authenticity).
Face it bud, you were told it was fake and you believed it.
You made a claim. You were wrong. I explained how were wrong. I understand how you THINK that's what was said but the reality is, unfortunately for you, not what the actual claim was.
You were told it was fake and you trusted the liars completely. Don't sweat it Rick: lot's of people fell for the "Russian disinformation" lie.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
Yes, we were right about Hunters laptop. It was real, the contents were real and not Russian disinformation like you were told.
Or wait, do you still think it was fake?
Oh, stop it.
You spent 3 1/2 years shouting from the rafters that that stupid laptop was going to be the downfall of the entire "Biden crime family".
How did that work out for ya?
Then like I said before: it should be very easy to quote where I said that. Go ahead and quote where I said "This laptop will be the downfall of Joe Biden and/or the entire Biden crime family." I mean, there are probably literally hundreds of posts across multiple threads for you to find one.
We've been over this, Rick. We spent the last 3 years telling you the laptop was real, the contents were real and that the contents would corroborate other evidence found via subpoena (thus further proving its authenticity).
Face it bud, you were told it was fake and you believed it.
You made a claim. You were wrong. I explained how were wrong. I understand how you THINK that's what was said but the reality is, unfortunately for you, not what the actual claim was.
You were told it was fake and you trusted the liars completely. Don't sweat it Rick: lot's of people fell for the "Russian disinformation" lie.
Dodgin' Cheezy dodges again.
CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 2:00 am
You both fucked up. You trusted me.
Yes, we were right about Hunters laptop. It was real, the contents were real and not Russian disinformation like you were told.
Or wait, do you still think it was fake?
Oh, stop it.
You spent 3 1/2 years shouting from the rafters that that stupid laptop was going to be the downfall of the entire "Biden crime family".
How did that work out for ya?
Then like I said before: it should be very easy to quote where I said that. Go ahead and quote where I said "This laptop will be the downfall of Joe Biden and/or the entire Biden crime family." I mean, there are probably literally hundreds of posts across multiple threads for you to find one.
We've been over this, Rick. We spent the last 3 years telling you the laptop was real, the contents were real and that the contents would corroborate other evidence found via subpoena (thus further proving its authenticity).
Face it bud, you were told it was fake and you believed it.
You made a claim. You were wrong. I explained how were wrong. I understand how you THINK that's what was said but the reality is, unfortunately for you, not what the actual claim was.
You were told it was fake and you trusted the liars completely. Don't sweat it Rick: lot's of people fell for the "Russian disinformation" lie.
Dodgin' Cheezy dodges again.
Come on, Ricky. You know that's not the way this works. You are the one that made the claim so it's up to you to provide the proof. It's not my fault you cant find examples of me saying something I never said.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 28, 2024 3:19 am
Come on, Ricky. You know that's not the way this works. You are the one that made the claim so it's up to you to provide the proof. It's not my fault you cant find examples of me saying something I never said.
Funny how this stance is the one hack takes, forgetting he had to provide his proof that Joe Biden is corrupt, a claim he made that came up along the way with the Hunter laptop as well as the foreign agents, falsified evidence, contrary testimony, etc. Disingenuous hack couldn't make his case, hoping RD would've forgotten that.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 28, 2024 3:19 am
Come on, Ricky. You know that's not the way this works. You are the one that made the claim so it's up to you to provide the proof. It's not my fault you cant find examples of me saying something I never said.
Funny how this stance is the one hack takes, forgetting he had to provide his proof that Joe Biden is corrupt, a claim he made that came up along the way with the Hunter laptop as well as the foreign agents, falsified evidence, contrary testimony, etc. Disingenuous hack couldn't make his case, hoping RD would've forgotten that.
Aw, It's sweet of you to try and White Knight for Ricky.
Cut and paste again, I suppose.
Here it is yet again:
But while they poked holes in previous statements by Joe Biden and the White House, Republicans have struggled to find the proverbial smoking gun that would garner the near-unanimous GOP support needed to impeach the president. Investigators, in Monday’s report, argue that they don’t need to show evidence that Joe Biden committed a crime — but some of their skeptical colleagues have said that is the bar leaders need to clear to earn their impeachment vote.
Swing and a miss again, huh hack? So how about you try one more time for old times' sake? Or you can take your ball and run home cause your claim was proven garbage.
Can someone explain to poor Dumb Dot that "stealing" has a literal definition. But not all stealing is the same. Some stealing isn't even a crime and some stealing is a very serious crime. But they are both stealing and both have the same literal definition. Literally, they do.
Animal wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2024 9:23 pm
Can someone explain to poor Dumb Dot that "stealing" has a literal definition. But not all stealing is the same.
You're free to take another swing at telling us insurrection isn't insurrection, but I didn't forget that you bailed before when the elements fit the definition that even you provided forcing you to hit the eject button. Go ahead, try again. Or you can dodge again like you did here, like all the others did, and avoid talking about it by shifting the goalposts. See how that works out for you, since definitions were never your strong suit.
It's funny how Dot thinks he's actually got something by desperately hanging on to his "the definition!!!!!!1" argument.
I guess it's possible that the literally thousands of law degrees within the DOJ and FBI dont understand the definition as well as he does but I think thats probably unlikely.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 12:44 am
It's funny how Dot thinks he's actually got something by desperately hanging on to his "the definition!!!!!!1" argument.
I guess it's possible that the literally thousands of law degrees within the DOJ and FBI dont understand the definition as well as he does but I think thats probably unlikely.
Seriously, if it's insurrection, prosecute. It's fucking treason. If they don't prosecute, then they are committing treason. So prosecute them.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 12:44 am
It's funny how Dot thinks he's actually got something by desperately hanging on to his "the definition!!!!!!1" argument.
I guess it's possible that the literally thousands of law degrees within the DOJ and FBI dont understand the definition as well as he does but I think thats probably unlikely.
Seriously, if it's insurrection, prosecute. It's fucking treason. If they don't prosecute, then they are committing treason. So prosecute them.
And that's the paradox Dodgin Dot finds himself in. For his argument to be correct the Department of Justice and the FBI must both be either wrong or themselves treasonous.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 12:44 am
It's funny how Dot thinks he's actually got something by desperately hanging on to his "the definition!!!!!!1" argument.
I guess it's possible that the literally thousands of law degrees within the DOJ and FBI dont understand the definition as well as he does but I think thats probably unlikely.
Seriously, if it's insurrection, prosecute. It's fucking treason. If they don't prosecute, then they are committing treason. So prosecute them.
And that's the paradox Dodgin Dot finds himself in. For his argument to be correct the Department of Justice and the FBI must both be either wrong or themselves treasonous.
Exactly. This is not some minor bullshit. It's fucking treason against our country. And if there is proof that it was, it absolutely should be prosecuted. Otherwise, dot is full of shit.
Five further posts and not a single one of you can prove your claim of insurrection not being insurrection and thusly you don't even attempt it. It either is or it isn't, which is why changing the argument to anything else does not change what happened that day. I don't mind being proven right again though, so have at it.
dot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 8:43 pm
Five further posts and not a single one of you can prove your claim of insurrection not being insurrection and thusly you don't even attempt it. It either is or it isn't, which is why changing the argument to anything else does not change what happened that day. I don't mind being proven right again though, so have at it.
Once again: you should show your undeniable evidence to the DOJ. I mean, after 3 years of investigating maybe they missed something that only you know about.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 11:51 pm
Once again
Still no proof of your claim. At this point, any of them. Yup, once again, you're still a disingenuous delusional intellectually dishonest functionally retarded partisan hack dupe.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 11:51 pm
Once again
Still no proof of your claim. At this point, any of them. Yup, once again, you're still a disingenuous delusional intellectually dishonest functionally retarded partisan hack dupe.
Sorry, bud. It looks youre mistaking my mocking you for whining but as always, it's only you that's crying because the people that matter don't agree with you. I am perfectly content being over here on the same side as the legal professionals. Never forget that it is YOU that thinks you understand insurrection better than the United States Department of Justice.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
dot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 05, 2024 5:40 am
Still no proof of your claim. At this point, any of them. Yup, once again, you're still a disingenuous delusional intellectually dishonest functionally retarded partisan hack dupe.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 11:51 pm
Once again
Still no proof of your claim. At this point, any of them. Yup, once again, you're still a disingenuous delusional intellectually dishonest functionally retarded partisan hack dupe.
Sorry, bud. It looks youre mistaking my mocking you for whining but as always, it's only you that's crying because the people that matter don't agree with you. I am perfectly content being over here on the same side as the legal professionals. Never forget that it is YOU that thinks you understand insurrection better than the United States Department of Justice.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 11:51 pm
Once again
Still no proof of your claim. At this point, any of them. Yup, once again, you're still a disingenuous delusional intellectually dishonest functionally retarded partisan hack dupe.
Sorry, bud. It looks youre mistaking my mocking you for whining but as always, it's only you that's crying because the people that matter don't agree with you. I am perfectly content being over here on the same side as the legal professionals. Never forget that it is YOU that thinks you understand insurrection better than the United States Department of Justice.
The people that matter? Talk about delusional
Let me guess: you think the DOJ and the FBI don't matter?
You probably don't understand that for Dodgin' Dot to be right the DOJ and FBI have to be wrong.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
