For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul socialists to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.
Anyone posting Ben Garrison political cartoons gets a three-day vacation.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:53 am
Lefty progression on the issue:
It never happens
It almost never happens
It really doesn't happen that much
ok, it happens but it doesn't happen enough to really care about it
meh <----------------------We are here
How much of your tax money is spent chasing 6 stupid people? And at least 4 are going to be cons.
If it makes you happy I’m all in
A. More than 6
B. If they broke the law they should be charged. Political affiliation, Skin color, sexual orientation, or ethnic background it does not matter if they broke the law they should be charged. And it doesn’t matter what lol they broke they should be charged.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:53 am
Lefty progression on the issue:
It never happens
It almost never happens
It really doesn't happen that much
ok, it happens but it doesn't happen enough to really care about it
meh <----------------------We are here
How much of your tax money is spent chasing 6 stupid people? And at least 4 are going to be cons.
If it makes you happy I’m all in
A. More than 6
B. If they broke the law they should be charged. Political affiliation, Skin color, sexual orientation, or ethnic background it does not matter if they broke the law they should be charged. And it doesn’t matter what lol they broke they should be charged.
If we know about them, then doesn't that mean they got caught?
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:53 am
Lefty progression on the issue:
It never happens
It almost never happens
It really doesn't happen that much
ok, it happens but it doesn't happen enough to really care about it
meh <----------------------We are here
How much of your tax money is spent chasing 6 stupid people? And at least 4 are going to be cons.
If it makes you happy I’m all in
A. More than 6
B. If they broke the law they should be charged. Political affiliation, Skin color, sexual orientation, or ethnic background it does not matter if they broke the law they should be charged. And it doesn’t matter what lol they broke they should be charged.
If we know about them, then doesn't that mean they got caught?
Sure, and that's a good thing. The question is how much stuff happens that we DON'T know about? I'm speaking on a very broad level of election integrity not on a specific instance. Which is why, if very easy steps are available to improve the system, why not enact them? With every instance, small or large, it proves that there are people that are going to try and game the system. I don't think that will ever stop. So why shouldn't we take every measure we can to improve the process?
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
Living in San Diego, some of our radio stations have towers across the border in Tijuana. They do this because Mexico allows them to broadcast at a higher wattage. If a station broadcasts from Mexico, they are required to air Mexican public service announcements. One of the most common announcements is that all Mexican citizens must have a current voter registration card, or they will not be allowed to participate in any elections.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:53 am
Lefty progression on the issue:
It never happens
It almost never happens
It really doesn't happen that much
ok, it happens but it doesn't happen enough to really care about it
meh <----------------------We are here
How much of your tax money is spent chasing 6 stupid people? And at least 4 are going to be cons.
If it makes you happy I’m all in
A. More than 6
B. If they broke the law they should be charged. Political affiliation, Skin color, sexual orientation, or ethnic background it does not matter if they broke the law they should be charged. And it doesn’t matter what lol they broke they should be charged.
If we know about them, then doesn't that mean they got caught?
Sure, and that's a good thing. The question is how much stuff happens that we DON'T know about? I'm speaking on a very broad level of election integrity not on a specific instance. Which is why, if very easy steps are available to improve the system, why not enact them? With every instance, small or large, it proves that there are people that are going to try and game the system. I don't think that will ever stop. So why shouldn't we take every measure we can to improve the process?
The fine folks that live in the Villages many of which are snowbirds have a habit of voting absentee in their birth state and vote in person in their adopted state.
Other than federal candidates are they allowed to vote for down ballot candidates? Or do they have to pick a state and forego local elections in their other state?
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:53 am
Lefty progression on the issue:
It never happens
It almost never happens
It really doesn't happen that much
ok, it happens but it doesn't happen enough to really care about it
meh <----------------------We are here
How much of your tax money is spent chasing 6 stupid people? And at least 4 are going to be cons.
If it makes you happy I’m all in
A. More than 6
B. If they broke the law they should be charged. Political affiliation, Skin color, sexual orientation, or ethnic background it does not matter if they broke the law they should be charged. And it doesn’t matter what lol they broke they should be charged.
If we know about them, then doesn't that mean they got caught?
Sure, and that's a good thing. The question is how much stuff happens that we DON'T know about? I'm speaking on a very broad level of election integrity not on a specific instance. Which is why, if very easy steps are available to improve the system, why not enact them? With every instance, small or large, it proves that there are people that are going to try and game the system. I don't think that will ever stop. So why shouldn't we take every measure we can to improve the process?
The fine folks that live in the Villages many of which are snowbirds have a habit of voting absentee in their birth state and vote in person in their adopted state.
Other than federal candidates are they allowed to vote for down ballot candidates? Or do they have to pick a state and forego local elections in their other state?
Doesn’t sound right. However it depends on the individual states laws.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:53 am
Lefty progression on the issue:
It never happens
It almost never happens
It really doesn't happen that much
ok, it happens but it doesn't happen enough to really care about it
meh <----------------------We are here
How much of your tax money is spent chasing 6 stupid people? And at least 4 are going to be cons.
If it makes you happy I’m all in
A. More than 6
B. If they broke the law they should be charged. Political affiliation, Skin color, sexual orientation, or ethnic background it does not matter if they broke the law they should be charged. And it doesn’t matter what lol they broke they should be charged.
If we know about them, then doesn't that mean they got caught?
Sure, and that's a good thing. The question is how much stuff happens that we DON'T know about? I'm speaking on a very broad level of election integrity not on a specific instance. Which is why, if very easy steps are available to improve the system, why not enact them? With every instance, small or large, it proves that there are people that are going to try and game the system. I don't think that will ever stop. So why shouldn't we take every measure we can to improve the process?
The fine folks that live in the Villages many of which are snowbirds have a habit of voting absentee in their birth state and vote in person in their adopted state.
Other than federal candidates are they allowed to vote for down ballot candidates? Or do they have to pick a state and forego local elections in their other state?
Are you saying they vote twice?
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
How much of your tax money is spent chasing 6 stupid people? And at least 4 are going to be cons.
If it makes you happy I’m all in
A. More than 6
B. If they broke the law they should be charged. Political affiliation, Skin color, sexual orientation, or ethnic background it does not matter if they broke the law they should be charged. And it doesn’t matter what lol they broke they should be charged.
If we know about them, then doesn't that mean they got caught?
Sure, and that's a good thing. The question is how much stuff happens that we DON'T know about? I'm speaking on a very broad level of election integrity not on a specific instance. Which is why, if very easy steps are available to improve the system, why not enact them? With every instance, small or large, it proves that there are people that are going to try and game the system. I don't think that will ever stop. So why shouldn't we take every measure we can to improve the process?
The fine folks that live in the Villages many of which are snowbirds have a habit of voting absentee in their birth state and vote in person in their adopted state.
Other than federal candidates are they allowed to vote for down ballot candidates? Or do they have to pick a state and forego local elections in their other state?
Are you saying they vote twice?
Two residents that were caught voting in their home state and Florida in the last presidential election
necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 12:35 am
Lol I still got nothin'
Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:26 am
At the start of J6 had the election been officially called? It’s a simple question but I expect you to dodge it
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:34 am
He knows exactly what you mean; it just doesn't fit his narrow narrative.
Let's humor your idiocy and projection, in that order, for a moment. What else could possibly come about by the end of the certification process on January 6 that would've changed who won the election if the traitor criminal now felon hadn't incited his insurrection? Exactly what do you think was still up in the air? After all, if the result was in doubt, why was the certification process taking place to begin with?
"Narrow narrative" was never projected so hard by such a hack.
necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 12:35 am
Lol I still got nothin'
Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:26 am
At the start of J6 had the election been officially called? It’s a simple question but I expect you to dodge it
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:34 am
He knows exactly what you mean; it just doesn't fit his narrow narrative.
Let's humor your idiocy and projection, in that order, for a moment. What else could possibly come about by the end of the certification process on January 6 that would've changed who won the election if the traitor criminal now felon hadn't incited his insurrection? Exactly what do you think was still up in the air? After all, if the result was in doubt, why was the certification process taking place to begin with?
"Narrow narrative" was never projected so hard by such a hack.
Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 9:24 pm
Yep. Dodged it.
Projection. Try again if you have the courage. You're on the record saying the election was not officially called by January 6, the day the results are certified by Congress.
dot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 7:45 pm
What else could possibly come about by the end of the certification process on January 6 that would've changed who won the election if the traitor criminal now felon hadn't incited his insurrection? Exactly what do you think was still up in the air? After all, if the result was in doubt, why was the certification process taking place to begin with?
If you think the results were not determined by that day, what do you say was still in the works to change the outcome of Joe Biden's electoral victory? Don't be shy now.
You're not supposed to notice that part of their crusade against democracy. Only approved citizens can vote, and only they can approve from those citizens. Politicians picking their voters, literally.
Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 9:24 pm
Yep. Dodged it.
Projection. Try again if you have the courage. You're on the record saying the election was not officially called by January 6, the day the results are certified by Congress.
dot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 7:45 pm
What else could possibly come about by the end of the certification process on January 6 that would've changed who won the election if the traitor criminal now felon hadn't incited his insurrection? Exactly what do you think was still up in the air? After all, if the result was in doubt, why was the certification process taking place to begin with?
If you think the results were not determined by that day, what do you say was still in the works to change the outcome of Joe Biden's electoral victory? Don't be shy now.
You're not supposed to notice that part of their crusade against democracy. Only approved citizens can vote, and only they can approve from those citizens. Politicians picking their voters, literally.
Well your comprehension is lacking. I said at the start of J6 the election wasn’t a facial. I didn’t say no we’re on that day what is the election not official.
"The Russians just happen to be spending millions of dollars on a disinformation campaign to influence Americans to believe the things I also believe. It's only a coincidence."