2024 Stolen Election thread

[Antknot]

RNC sues Georgia counties over election integrity claims



https://justthenews.com/nation/states/c ... ity-claims

[Antknot]

The Pentagon Fails to Send Absentee Ballots to Active Military Service Members


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharno ... s-n2647157

[Biker]

The Pentagon Fails to Send Absentee Ballots to Active Military Service Members


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharno ... s-n2647157

They're just not trying to hide it anymore

[Who]

FCC commissioner claims Harris on ‘SNL’ violates ‘equal time’ rule



https://thehill.com/homenews/4968217-fc ... -rule/amp/

Do you ever read the entire article that you continue to post?

[Biker]

FCC commissioner claims Harris on ‘SNL’ violates ‘equal time’ rule



https://thehill.com/homenews/4968217-fc ... -rule/amp/

Do you ever read the entire article that you continue to post?

Did you?

[CHEEZY17]

Oh noes! The FCC, RNC and the Pentagon have all been infiltrated by the Russians!

[Who]

FCC commissioner claims Harris on ‘SNL’ violates ‘equal time’ rule



https://thehill.com/homenews/4968217-fc ... -rule/amp/

Do you ever read the entire article that you continue to post?

Did you?

I did , a 45 appointee whining but NBC let 45 run an none fact checked ad at the end of its NASCAR coverage today.

[Antknot]

FCC commissioner claims Harris on ‘SNL’ violates ‘equal time’ rule



https://thehill.com/homenews/4968217-fc ... -rule/amp/

Do you ever read the entire article that you continue to post?

Did you?

I did , a 45 appointee whining but NBC let 45 run an none fact checked ad at the end of its NASCAR coverage today.

Having to pay for an ad is comparable to a free exposure on TV? Possibly she was even paid I don’t know what the legal requirements are for being on a television show. The one ad I was in they paid us one dollar and other value received.

[Who]

FCC commissioner claims Harris on ‘SNL’ violates ‘equal time’ rule



https://thehill.com/homenews/4968217-fc ... -rule/amp/

Do you ever read the entire article that you continue to post?

Did you?

I did , a 45 appointee whining but NBC let 45 run an none fact checked ad at the end of its NASCAR coverage today.

Having to pay for an ad is comparable to a free exposure on TV? Possibly she was even paid I don’t know what the legal requirements are for being on a television show. The one ad I was in they paid us one dollar and other value received.

His ad was free

[Geist]

The guy who stole national secrets for profit isn't being treated "fairly" by SNL

[Biker]

FCC commissioner claims Harris on ‘SNL’ violates ‘equal time’ rule



https://thehill.com/homenews/4968217-fc ... -rule/amp/

Do you ever read the entire article that you continue to post?

Did you?

I did , a 45 appointee whining but NBC let 45 run an none fact checked ad at the end of its NASCAR coverage today.

And yet, that appointee was correct

https://www.fox9.com/news/nbc-files-equ ... SHwj7pszYg

[Antknot]

Breaking: Shady Election Groups Dump 90,000 Ballot Registrations in Maricopa County Before Sign-Up Deadline Ends – At Least 40,000 Damaged, Thousands Incomplete


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/1 ... strations/

[Who]

Breaking: Shady Election Groups Dump 90,000 Ballot Registrations in Maricopa County Before Sign-Up Deadline Ends – At Least 40,000 Damaged, Thousands Incomplete


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/1 ... strations/

Darn the author of the article failed to list any sources of his allegations, strange huh

[Biker]

The American modern woman

[Who]

The American modern woman

Is that your birthplace?

[Animal]

The most common outcome on 538 for the electoral college is Trump winning with 312 electoral votes. I think they use a random generator to take the polls from each state and they run the possible outcomes in 1,000 election simulations. The most common outcome is Trump winning with 312 electoral votes. I think that right now Trump wins 52% of the simulated outcomes.

Control of the house is the closes one. 51 to 49 in favor of republicans. I don't see how the house can function if its split as closely as it will probably end up. there could actually only be a couple of seats difference in the two sides.

[dot]

Well your comprehension is lacking. I said at the start of J6 the election wasn’t a facial. I didn’t say no we’re on that day what is the election not official.

You have yet to say what you think was left that would've changed the result from Joe Biden winning to Donald Trump winning, outside of the insurrection on January 6. Here, let's remind you since you clearly don't know what you said.

At the start of J6 had the election been officially called? It’s a simple question but I expect you to dodge it

Now, you wanna man up and say what you think was left up in the air about the election? Or you gonna dodge and run away?

I still got nothin'

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/rep ... -115480288

Some Republican-led states refuse to let Justice Department monitors into polling places
Some Republican-led states say they they will block Justice Department’s election monitors from going inside polling places on Election Day, pushing back on federal authorities’ decades-long practice of watching for violations of federal voting laws

Some Republican-led states say they will block the Justice Department's election monitors from going inside polling places on Election Day, pushing back on federal authorities' decades-long practice of watching for violations of federal voting laws.

Officials in Florida and Texas have said they won't allow federal election monitors into polling sites on Tuesday. And on Monday, Missouri filed a federal lawsuit seeking a court order to block federal officials from observing inside polling places.

The Justice Department announced last week that it's deploying election monitors in 86 jurisdictions across 27 states on Election Day. The Justice Department declined to comment on Monday on the Missouri lawsuit and the moves by other Republican-led states.

The race between Democratic nominee Kamala Harris and Republican nominee Donald Trump is a dead heat, and both sides are bracing for potential legal challenges to vote tallies. The Justice Department’s election monitoring effort, a long practice under both Democratic and Republican administrations, is meant to ensure that federal voting rights are being followed.

Election monitors are lawyers who work for the Justice Department, including in the civil rights division and U.S. attorney's offices across the country. They are not law enforcement officers or federal agents.

For decades, the Justice Department's civil rights division has sent attorneys and staff members to monitor polling places across the country in both federal and non-federal elections. The monitors are tasked with ensuring the compliance of federal voting rights laws.

The Justice Department's Civil Rights Division enforces a number of statutes protecting the right to vote. That includes Voting Rights Act, which prohibits intimidation and threats against those who are casting ballots or counting votes. And it includes the Americans with Disabilities Act, which mandates that election officials ensure people with disabilities have the full and equal opportunity to vote.

The 86 jurisdictions that the Justice Department will send monitors to on Tuesday include Maricopa County, Arizona and Fulton County, Georgia, which in 2020 became the center of election conspiracy theories spread by Trump and other Republicans. Another place on the list is Portage County, Ohio, where a sheriff came under fire for a social media post in which he said people with Harris yard signs should have their addresses recorded so that immigrants can be sent to live with them if the Democrat wins the presidency

Other areas where federal monitors will be sent include Detroit, Michigan; Queens, New York; Providence, Rhode Island; Jackson County, South Dakota; Salem, Massachusetts; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Manassas, Virginia; Cuyahoga County, Ohio and Northwest Arctic Borough, Alaska. The Justice Department's monitors will be in St. Louis, Missouri; four jurisdictions in Florida and eight jurisdictions in Texas.

In filing the lawsuit on Monday, Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft said state law “clearly and specifically limits who may be in polling places." He also accused the federal government of "attempting to illegally interfere in Missouri’s elections.”

The lawsuit states that Missouri law “permits only certain categories of persons to be present in voting locations, including voters, minor children accompanying voters, poll workers, election judges, etc.,” and not federal officials.

The Justice Department also sought to monitor polling places in Missouri in 2022. The agency planned to have officials at Cole County, which includes Jefferson City, the state capital. County Clerk Steve Korsmeyer had said he wouldn’t let them in if they show up.

The federal agency backed down after Ashcroft showed Justice Department officials the state law, Ashcroft said. He says the Justice Department is now “trying to go through the back door" by contacting local election officials for access.

Messages were left Monday with the St. Louis Board of Election Commissioners.

The St. Louis Board of Election Commissioners reached a settlement in 2021 with the Justice Department aimed at ensuring people with mobility and vision impairments can access to polling places after federal officials found problems, such as ramps that were too steep and inaccessible parking, according to the court papers. The settlement, which expires next year, says the board must “cooperate fully” with Justice Department's efforts to monitor compliance, “including but not limited to providing the United States with timely access to polling places (including on Election Day).”

In a letter to the Justice Department on Friday, Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson said wrote that “Texas law is clear: Justice Department monitors are not permitted inside polling places where ballots are being cast or a central counting station where ballots are being counted.”

“Texas has a robust processes and procedures in place to ensure that eligible voters may participate in a free and fair election," Nelson wrote.

In a similar letter Friday, Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd told the Justice Department that Florida law lists who is allowed inside the state's polling places and that Justice Department officials are not included. Byrd said that Florida is sending its own monitors to the four jurisdictions the Justice Department plans to send staff to and they will “ensure there is no interference with the voting process.”

[Antknot]

Well your comprehension is lacking. I said at the start of J6 the election wasn’t a facial. I didn’t say no we’re on that day what is the election not official.

You have yet to say what you think was left that would've changed the result from Joe Biden winning to Donald Trump winning, outside of the insurrection on January 6. Here, let's remind you since you clearly don't know what you said.

At the start of J6 had the election been officially called? It’s a simple question but I expect you to dodge it

Now, you wanna man up and say what you think was left up in the air about the election? Or you gonna dodge and run away?

I still got nothin'

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/rep ... -115480288

Some Republican-led states refuse to let Justice Department monitors into polling places
Some Republican-led states say they they will block Justice Department’s election monitors from going inside polling places on Election Day, pushing back on federal authorities’ decades-long practice of watching for violations of federal voting laws

Some Republican-led states say they will block the Justice Department's election monitors from going inside polling places on Election Day, pushing back on federal authorities' decades-long practice of watching for violations of federal voting laws.

Officials in Florida and Texas have said they won't allow federal election monitors into polling sites on Tuesday. And on Monday, Missouri filed a federal lawsuit seeking a court order to block federal officials from observing inside polling places.

The Justice Department announced last week that it's deploying election monitors in 86 jurisdictions across 27 states on Election Day. The Justice Department declined to comment on Monday on the Missouri lawsuit and the moves by other Republican-led states.

The race between Democratic nominee Kamala Harris and Republican nominee Donald Trump is a dead heat, and both sides are bracing for potential legal challenges to vote tallies. The Justice Department’s election monitoring effort, a long practice under both Democratic and Republican administrations, is meant to ensure that federal voting rights are being followed.

Election monitors are lawyers who work for the Justice Department, including in the civil rights division and U.S. attorney's offices across the country. They are not law enforcement officers or federal agents.

For decades, the Justice Department's civil rights division has sent attorneys and staff members to monitor polling places across the country in both federal and non-federal elections. The monitors are tasked with ensuring the compliance of federal voting rights laws.

The Justice Department's Civil Rights Division enforces a number of statutes protecting the right to vote. That includes Voting Rights Act, which prohibits intimidation and threats against those who are casting ballots or counting votes. And it includes the Americans with Disabilities Act, which mandates that election officials ensure people with disabilities have the full and equal opportunity to vote.

The 86 jurisdictions that the Justice Department will send monitors to on Tuesday include Maricopa County, Arizona and Fulton County, Georgia, which in 2020 became the center of election conspiracy theories spread by Trump and other Republicans. Another place on the list is Portage County, Ohio, where a sheriff came under fire for a social media post in which he said people with Harris yard signs should have their addresses recorded so that immigrants can be sent to live with them if the Democrat wins the presidency

Other areas where federal monitors will be sent include Detroit, Michigan; Queens, New York; Providence, Rhode Island; Jackson County, South Dakota; Salem, Massachusetts; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Manassas, Virginia; Cuyahoga County, Ohio and Northwest Arctic Borough, Alaska. The Justice Department's monitors will be in St. Louis, Missouri; four jurisdictions in Florida and eight jurisdictions in Texas.

In filing the lawsuit on Monday, Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft said state law “clearly and specifically limits who may be in polling places." He also accused the federal government of "attempting to illegally interfere in Missouri’s elections.”

The lawsuit states that Missouri law “permits only certain categories of persons to be present in voting locations, including voters, minor children accompanying voters, poll workers, election judges, etc.,” and not federal officials.

The Justice Department also sought to monitor polling places in Missouri in 2022. The agency planned to have officials at Cole County, which includes Jefferson City, the state capital. County Clerk Steve Korsmeyer had said he wouldn’t let them in if they show up.

The federal agency backed down after Ashcroft showed Justice Department officials the state law, Ashcroft said. He says the Justice Department is now “trying to go through the back door" by contacting local election officials for access.

Messages were left Monday with the St. Louis Board of Election Commissioners.

The St. Louis Board of Election Commissioners reached a settlement in 2021 with the Justice Department aimed at ensuring people with mobility and vision impairments can access to polling places after federal officials found problems, such as ramps that were too steep and inaccessible parking, according to the court papers. The settlement, which expires next year, says the board must “cooperate fully” with Justice Department's efforts to monitor compliance, “including but not limited to providing the United States with timely access to polling places (including on Election Day).”

In a letter to the Justice Department on Friday, Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson said wrote that “Texas law is clear: Justice Department monitors are not permitted inside polling places where ballots are being cast or a central counting station where ballots are being counted.”

“Texas has a robust processes and procedures in place to ensure that eligible voters may participate in a free and fair election," Nelson wrote.

In a similar letter Friday, Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd told the Justice Department that Florida law lists who is allowed inside the state's polling places and that Justice Department officials are not included. Byrd said that Florida is sending its own monitors to the four jurisdictions the Justice Department plans to send staff to and they will “ensure there is no interference with the voting process.”

Dodging Doctor strikes again. Didn’t answer my question. I tried to change goalposts. It doesn’t matter where the Roosevelt would’ve changed or not. My statement is still factual.

[necronomous]

I still got nothing

[Biker]

[dot]

Dodging Doctor strikes again.

Projection, you have yet to say what it is you think was holding up the election results.

Didn’t answer my question.

Kinda did. You tried to insinuate the election wasn't called by the time January 6 rolled around. Now that you're called on it, you've gotten squirrely and won't say what it is you think was holding up the election results.

I tried to change goalposts.

First time anyone's admitted they're intentionally being obtuse and not answer the question. Have a cookie.

It doesn’t matter where the Roosevelt would’ve changed or not. My statement is still factual.

The Roosevelt? And what statement is that exactly? Don't get shy now, you put forth a decent amount of words that said pretty much nothing. Put your back into it, assuming you've got the spine to tell everyone what you think was holding up the election results for 2020 before January 6.

I still got nothin'

[necronomous]

I still got nothing and I have sex with kids

[dot]

I still got nothin'

https://www.chron.com/politics/article/ ... 889589.php

Federal election monitors will not enter Texas polling locations after Paxton lawsuit
A Trump-appointed Texas judge denied a request to block the Department of Justice from monitoring polls.

Election monitors with the U.S. Department of Justice will be at a number of Texas polling locations on Election Day to ensure compliance with federal voting rights, but not in the way initially intended. The DOJ has agreed to keep its election monitors outside of Texas polling and central count locations. "The DOJ understands that within 100 feet of these locations, DOJ election monitors are subject to Texas law regarding electioneering and other conduct within 100 feet of polling and central count locations," reads the agreement.

On Monday, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit to prevent DOJ personnel from "being present at voting locations and central count stations in the 2024 election,"after the DOJ announced it will send election monitors to polls in eight Texas counties. While Paxton called the agreement a "major victory," Trump-appointed U.S. Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk did not issue the temporary restraining order that Paxton sought. Kacsmaryk ordered the DOJ to confirm that no "monitors" will be present at Texas polling locations or enter vote counting centers.

"Texans run Texas elections, and we will not be bullied by the Department of Justice," Paxton said in a statement. "The DOJ knows it has no authority to monitor Texas elections and backed down when Texas stood up for the rule of law. No federal agent will be permitted to interfere with Texas's free and fair elections."

Paxton's office said his lawsuit will remain pending until the conclusion of the election to ensure the DOJ's compliance. It's unclear whether monitors with the Republican AG's "Election Day Rapid Response Legal Team" will be allowed inside polling locations. The team was deployed on Monday to "monitor day-of election election activity and address litigation arising from the election, as necessary," according to a release. Paxton's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson's office will deploy state inspectors to polling locations and vote counting centers in Harris County. In a letter sent to the DOJ on Friday, Nelson said state law bars federal monitors from being inside polling locations or in central locations where ballots are counted. "Rest assured that Texas has robust processes and procedures in place to ensure that eligible voters may participate in a free and fair election," Nelson wrote.

[Biker]

Great question

[CHEEZY17]

Great question

I don't see any problem there.

Sin,
Every Lefty.