Calexit

For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul socialists to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.
Anyone posting Ben Garrison political cartoons gets a three-day vacation.

In memory of our lost political forum members. :cry:

Moderator: Biker

Post Reply
Antknot
Not UJR's Military Attaché
Posts: 7402
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
Location: South Carolina

Calexit

#1

Post by Antknot »

New "Calexit" bid for California secession approved for signature gathering in effort to put measure on ballot


https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/ne ... ignatures/
Antknot
Not UJR's Military Attaché
Posts: 7402
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: Calexit

#2

Post by Antknot »

If they do exit, I wonder where they’re gonna replace the water that comes from other states. Nowhere in the article did it mention that little snag.
User avatar
Reservoir Dog
Ricky
Posts: 14208
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: Calexit

#3

Post by Reservoir Dog »

If California was a country, it would be the 5th largest economy in the world. California is 15% of the United States entire GDP.

You best hope this thing goes nowhere. :lol:
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Mar 30, 2021 2:00 am You both fucked up. You trusted me.
Antknot
Not UJR's Military Attaché
Posts: 7402
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: Calexit

#4

Post by Antknot »

It will drag out for years. Wasting money on the commission and their commissioners. And then Trump won’t be in the office, And then the desire will disappear
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 16284
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: Calexit

#5

Post by CHEEZY17 »

California isn't going anywhere. For that matter, neither is Texas.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 13842
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: Calexit

#6

Post by Biker »

CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:07 pm California isn't going anywhere. For that matter, neither is Texas.
We could always dream though, right?
User avatar
peterosehaircut
No life apart from this stupid forum board
Posts: 1959
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:30 pm

Re: Calexit

#7

Post by peterosehaircut »

Biker wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2025 12:26 am
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:07 pm California isn't going anywhere. For that matter, neither is Texas.
We could always dream though, right?
If Texas leaves I would seriously consider moving there.
User avatar
QillerDaemon
Crazy Old Cat Lady
Posts: 4227
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:35 pm
Location: Beautiful downtown OrloVista FL
Interests: キラーデモン
Occupation: Router/Switch Jockey.

Re: Calexit

#8

Post by QillerDaemon »

I presume the people thinking seriously about this idea have thought it through completely. You wanted to MAGA, and it leads to the idea of breaking away from America. Meaning you will no longer be Americans. How does that MAGA?

Won't you enjoy the trouble of getting a visa to go back into the US to do business. Oh wait, just get a student visa like Elon then violate it, no one will care.
If you can't be a good example, you can still serve as a horrible warning.
“All mushrooms are edible. Some even more than once!”
これを グーグル 翻訳に登録してくれておめでとう、バカ。
User avatar
Burn1dwn
Non-Gay Omar
Posts: 3909
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:23 pm

Re: Calexit

#9

Post by Burn1dwn »

Antknot wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 8:10 pm If they do exit, I wonder where they’re gonna replace the water that comes from other states. Nowhere in the article did it mention that little snag.
According to Trump logic, the Colorado River is unnecessary because all the water CA needs come from the Sierras and Newsome would rather give it to the Smelt.
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 16284
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: Calexit

#10

Post by CHEEZY17 »

Burn1dwn wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 4:38 pm
Antknot wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 8:10 pm If they do exit, I wonder where they’re gonna replace the water that comes from other states. Nowhere in the article did it mention that little snag.
According to Trump logic, the Colorado River is unnecessary because all the water CA needs come from the Sierras and Newsome would rather give it to the Smelt.
Bring back Lake Corcoran, or at least Tulare lake!
Image

Image
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
User avatar
Burn1dwn
Non-Gay Omar
Posts: 3909
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:23 pm

Re: Calexit

#11

Post by Burn1dwn »

CHEEZY17 wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 6:47 pm
Burn1dwn wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 4:38 pm
Antknot wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 8:10 pm If they do exit, I wonder where they’re gonna replace the water that comes from other states. Nowhere in the article did it mention that little snag.
According to Trump logic, the Colorado River is unnecessary because all the water CA needs come from the Sierras and Newsome would rather give it to the Smelt.
Bring back Lake Corcoran, or at least Tulare lake!
Image

Image
Maybe Trump can convince the farmers that own land in the San Joaquin Valley to just give it up and move elsewhere. To help bring back Tulare Lake and to benefit Southern California.

Since he is now in the business of moving people off land they have owned for 100s of years to benefit others. It should be easy for him to make the deal right?
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 16284
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: Calexit

#12

Post by CHEEZY17 »

Burn1dwn wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:19 am
CHEEZY17 wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 6:47 pm
Burn1dwn wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 4:38 pm
Antknot wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 8:10 pm If they do exit, I wonder where they’re gonna replace the water that comes from other states. Nowhere in the article did it mention that little snag.
According to Trump logic, the Colorado River is unnecessary because all the water CA needs come from the Sierras and Newsome would rather give it to the Smelt.
Bring back Lake Corcoran, or at least Tulare lake!
Image

Image
Maybe Trump can convince the farmers that own land in the San Joaquin Valley to just give it up and move elsewhere. To help bring back Tulare Lake and to benefit Southern California.

Since he is now in the business of moving people off land they have owned for 100s of years to benefit others. It should be easy for him to make the deal right?
Holy shit I was just joking, Burn! :lol:
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
User avatar
Burn1dwn
Non-Gay Omar
Posts: 3909
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:23 pm

Re: Calexit

#13

Post by Burn1dwn »

CHEEZY17 wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2025 2:20 am
Burn1dwn wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:19 am
CHEEZY17 wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 6:47 pm
Burn1dwn wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 4:38 pm
Antknot wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 8:10 pm If they do exit, I wonder where they’re gonna replace the water that comes from other states. Nowhere in the article did it mention that little snag.
According to Trump logic, the Colorado River is unnecessary because all the water CA needs come from the Sierras and Newsome would rather give it to the Smelt.
Bring back Lake Corcoran, or at least Tulare lake!
Image

Image
Maybe Trump can convince the farmers that own land in the San Joaquin Valley to just give it up and move elsewhere. To help bring back Tulare Lake and to benefit Southern California.

Since he is now in the business of moving people off land they have owned for 100s of years to benefit others. It should be easy for him to make the deal right?
Holy shit I was just joking, Burn! :lol:
:lol:

The way Trump is talking about the situation, you never know. Most of the water they released is going to evaporate in Tulare Lake and people think he is helping the fire ravaged Los Angeles area.

I wish Bakersfield to Fresno was a huge lake. It would make my yearly drive to Yosemite a lot more scenic.
Post Reply