America's ongoing humiliation

[dot]

Your misinformation, lies, straight up denial of the truth, and all around dumbassery doesnt help either, but here you are.

Go peddle your bs like that in the shallow end, cause down here you're gonna have to prove your claims as the lil bitch has been finding out for the last several weeks. Thanks for proving me right immediately.

Oh lord dipshit has returned.

Way to self announce.

[necronomous]

Your misinformation, lies, straight up denial of the truth, and all around dumbassery doesnt help either, but here you are.

Go peddle your bs like that in the shallow end, cause down here you're gonna have to prove your claims as the lil bitch has been finding out for the last several weeks. Thanks for proving me right immediately.

Oh lord dipshit has returned.

Way to self announce.

You've never proven anything, why would anyone start now.

[dot]

You've never proven anything, why would anyone start now.

I'm not the one that defended an insurrection happening, so your opinion is worthless. Have fun struggling in GD.

[necronomous]

You've never proven anything, why would anyone start now.

I'm not the one that defended an insurrection happening, so your opinion is worthless. Have fun struggling in GD.

Thats because one didnt happen.

[dot]

Thats because one didnt happen.

Except it did, your inability to admit that doesn't change that fact. But it's nice you're still willing to demonstrate the idiocy of your chosen team. No wonder you're having trouble up there.

[necronomous]

Thats because one didnt happen.

Except it did, your inability to admit that doesn't change that fact. But it's nice you're still willing to demonstrate the idiocy of your chosen team. No wonder you're having trouble up there.

All you have to do is provide 1 court record of anyone being charged and indicted and convicted and put in jail for an insurrection. Just 1 so called insurrectionist. Otherwise, all this time and you still cant prove shit.

[dot]

All you have to do is provide 1 court record of anyone being charged and indicted and convicted and put in jail for an insurrection. Just 1 so called insurrectionist. Otherwise, all this time and you still cant prove shit.

Except that's your fallacious argument, yours and the traitors defending what happened. The argument was never about what charges were filed, the argument was always about what happened, what was done. And then, just like now, you can't get away from what happening on that day being an insurrection. Keep defending traitors, Red, cause it's about all you do well.

[necronomous]

All you have to do is provide 1 court record of anyone being charged and indicted and convicted and put in jail for an insurrection. Just 1 so called insurrectionist. Otherwise, all this time and you still cant prove shit.

Except that's your fallacious argument, yours and the traitors defending what happened. The argument was never about what charges were filed, the argument was always about what happened, what was done. And then, just like now, you can't get away from what happening on that day being an insurrection. Keep defending traitors, Red, cause it's about all you do well.

1. You dont understand what a fallacy is.

2. You do not know how to present an argument.

3. You dont understand law in any capacity.

4. You expect me to entertain your delusion.

Nah im good knowing the truth.

[dot]

1. You dont understand what a fallacy is.

Fallacious (adjective) means based on incorrect reasoning, a mistaken belief, or deceptive logic that tends to mislead.

So your brilliant idea to get out of this is to argue yet another definition when you lost on the first and pertinent one because your idea to only argue charges filed failed? You really are stupid ain't ya?

2. You do not know how to present an argument.

Then why have you had so much trouble for going on years now to refute it?

3. You dont understand law in any capacity.

Says the guy desperate to shift goalposts to argue literally anything else except what January 6 was.

4. You expect me to entertain your delusion.

Idgaf what you do, I am content down here in the deep end schooling the lil bitch on his latest blunder. You're the one that couldn't resist namedropping me or Hammy when I don't think about you at all.

Nah im good knowing the truth.

Yeah, we both know the truth, the difference is I'm the one saying it while you run cover for your team, Red. Such an odd hill to die on, but that's your choice and another reason why your opinion is worthless.

[BombaySapphire]

The US has pulled out of Iraq

[necronomous]

1. You dont understand what a fallacy is.

Fallacious (adjective) means based on incorrect reasoning, a mistaken belief, or deceptive logic that tends to mislead.

So your brilliant idea to get out of this is to argue yet another definition when you lost on the first and pertinent one because your idea to only argue charges filed failed? You really are stupid ain't ya?

2. You do not know how to present an argument.

Then why have you had so much trouble for going on years now to refute it?

3. You dont understand law in any capacity.

Says the guy desperate to shift goalposts to argue literally anything else except what January 6 was.

4. You expect me to entertain your delusion.

Idgaf what you do, I am content down here in the deep end schooling the lil bitch on his latest blunder. You're the one that couldn't resist namedropping me or Hammy when I don't think about you at all.

Nah im good knowing the truth.

Yeah, we both know the truth, the difference is I'm the one saying it while you run cover for your team, Red. Such an odd hill to die on, but that's your choice and another reason why your opinion is worthless.

1. You giving a definition and knowing what it means is two different things

2. You haven't presented any evidence to argue against. Just a bunch of trust me bros

3. I've just asked for evidence of your claim over and over. The exact thing over and over. No goalposts moved. You've just never provided it. You just attack and call it a fallacy to ask for the exact evidence you say is plain as day, yet doesnt exist.

R. Yeah you do. You care so much for everyone's validation and attempt to prove youre the smartest person in the room while being the dumbest. You prove that by saying kindergarten shit like schooling people. I and everyone else here that constantly proves your wrong live in your head lol the time. Your existence is sitting around waiting for us to respond. It makes you moist thinking about the next thing youre going to say. I thats why I stop engaging with you. Not because I lost, but to take away your maturation material. And just like that, im gone again.

Respond all you want im out.

[dot]

1. You giving a definition and knowing what it means is two different things

Already demonstrated back then how your attempt to reframe the argument away from what the crime of January 6 was towards what charges were filed was deceptive and failed in its logic by showcasing that legitimate tangible crimes which resulted in no charges being brought does not wipe the crimes from being committed. You lost this then, you've lost it now, so keep throwing your tantrum.

2. You haven't presented any evidence to argue against. Just a bunch of trust me bros

Coming from the disingenuous bad faith actor that you are on this subject, we have yet another false statement summary of a thread 2 years old that still exists.

3. I've just asked for evidence of your claim over and over. The exact thing over and over. No goalposts moved. You've just never provided it. You just attack and call it a fallacy to ask for the exact evidence you say is plain as day, yet doesnt exist.

Just because I refused to shift the argument to what you wanted to argue instead does not mean there is no evidence, it just means you weren't willing to engage in good faith discussion because you were intent on defending the traitors and your team. Tantrum noted.

R. Yeah you do. You care so much for everyone's validation and attempt to prove youre the smartest person in the room while being the dumbest. You prove that by saying kindergarten shit like schooling people. I and everyone else here that constantly proves your wrong live in your head lol the time. Your existence is sitting around waiting for us to respond. It makes you moist thinking about the next thing youre going to say. I thats why I stop engaging with you. Not because I lost, but to take away your maturation material. And just like that, im gone again.

Then stay gone, Idgaf about you. I don't spend my time on this forum calling you out, that's your thing. Unless you choose to stick your trolling ways into discourse or namedrop me, I don't care what you do. As to the subject that you're running from again, if it was so easy to prove me wrong, then why is it no one can still successfully argue against the literal definition of insurrection and how January 6 fit? That's the only relevant question, not whatever the apologists wanted to deflect to because they couldn't argue against what insurrection is. Judging by your multiple mistakes in that little melt, it's clear the only one between us animated and stressing about this is you.

Respond all you want im out.

Bye, Red, until your next tantrum.

[necronomous]

1. You giving a definition and knowing what it means is two different things

Already demonstrated back then how your attempt to reframe the argument away from what the crime of January 6 was towards what charges were filed was deceptive and failed in its logic by showcasing that legitimate tangible crimes which resulted in no charges being brought does not wipe the crimes from being committed. You lost this then, you've lost it now, so keep throwing your tantrum.

2. You haven't presented any evidence to argue against. Just a bunch of trust me bros

Coming from the disingenuous bad faith actor that you are on this subject, we have yet another false statement summary of a thread 2 years old that still exists.

3. I've just asked for evidence of your claim over and over. The exact thing over and over. No goalposts moved. You've just never provided it. You just attack and call it a fallacy to ask for the exact evidence you say is plain as day, yet doesnt exist.

Just because I refused to shift the argument to what you wanted to argue instead does not mean there is no evidence, it just means you weren't willing to engage in good faith discussion because you were intent on defending the traitors and your team. Tantrum noted.

R. Yeah you do. You care so much for everyone's validation and attempt to prove youre the smartest person in the room while being the dumbest. You prove that by saying kindergarten shit like schooling people. I and everyone else here that constantly proves your wrong live in your head lol the time. Your existence is sitting around waiting for us to respond. It makes you moist thinking about the next thing youre going to say. I thats why I stop engaging with you. Not because I lost, but to take away your maturation material. And just like that, im gone again.

Then stay gone, Idgaf about you. I don't spend my time on this forum calling you out, that's your thing. Unless you choose to stick your trolling ways into discourse or namedrop me, I don't care what you do. As to the subject that you're running from again, if it was so easy to prove me wrong, then why is it no one can still successfully argue against the literal definition of insurrection and how January 6 fit? That's the only relevant question, not whatever the apologists wanted to deflect to because they couldn't argue against what insurrection is. Judging by your multiple mistakes in that little melt, it's clear the only one between us animated and stressing about this is you.

Respond all you want im out.

Bye, Red, until your next tantrum.

Idgaf about you.

Wink wink

[dot]

Idgaf about you.

Wink wink

Thought you were out, Red. Make up your mind and stop being governed by your tantrums cause we both know you won't engage on the substance.

[necronomous]

Idgaf about you.

Wink wink

Thought you were out, Red. Make up your mind and stop being governed by your tantrums cause we both know you won't engage on the substance.

Mmmmm so good. You think about me rubbing our nipples dont you when you stroke it to this shit. Just waiting on me to respond so you can think about me more.

[dot]

Mmmmm so good. You think about me rubbing our nipples dont you when you stroke it to this shit. Just waiting on me to respond so you can think about me more.

Thought you were out, Red. Make up your mind and stop being governed by your tantrums cause we both know you won't engage on the substance.

[AnalHamster]

I posted the quote from the Times of London, along with a screenshot. You and your bro don't have shit. You got owned, again.

And what was the question asked?

Care to quote that provision, you stupid cunt?

Did you figure it out yet, lil bitch?

That literally is the provision, you ignorant peasant

No it isn't you lying twat.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st ... f-27-apri/

Are you actually capable of reading the agreement? It's not very long.

At least bicker has the sense to drop it once he realises he was wrong

[necronomous]

Mmmmm so good. You think about me rubbing our nipples dont you when you stroke it to this shit. Just waiting on me to respond so you can think about me more.

Thought you were out, Red. Make up your mind and stop being governed by your tantrums cause we both know you won't engage on the substance.

Holy fuck, cant get enough of me can you. Mmmmm so good. You can type pretty fast one handed

[dot]

Holy fuck, cant get enough of me can you. Mmmmm so good. You can type pretty fast one handed

Thought you were out, Red. Make up your mind and stop being governed by your tantrums cause we both know you won't engage on the substance.