I Think President Donald J. Trump's Worst Fear

[Who]

Is catching himself telling the truth.

Even when the news is good, he has to make it sound better.

#Sad

[kwebber]

His worst fears are his tax returns being made public, because they'll show that he's lying about his wealth, and that he's been evading taxes. He also fears his university grades being release, because it'll show he's an idiot. And also, he fears his actual height and weight being released. He doesn't want to admit he's obese. So, in closing,

1 - Tax information released
2 - School grades released
3 - Height and weight becoming known.

[Stapes]

[windrunner]

Sorry gents but there is still no cure for TDS. I'm not sure anyone is working on a cure either. Looks like your conditions are terminal.

[CHEEZY17]

Pace yourself boys: You still have 5 more years of Donny to go.

[Charliesheen]

Enjoy.

When You Strike At A King, You Must Kill Him

https://www.redstate.com/darth641/2020/ ... -kill-him/

[CaptQuint]

Pace yourself boys: You still have 5 more years of Donny to go.

What are mondays powerball numbers Kreskin?

[spudoc]

Enjoy.

When You Strike At A King, You Must Kill Him

https://www.redstate.com/darth641/2020/ ... -kill-him/

And a king is what you conservatives have always wanted.

[CaptQuint]

Enjoy.

When You Strike At A King, You Must Kill Him

https://www.redstate.com/darth641/2020/ ... -kill-him/

And a king is what you conservatives have always wanted.

A Republican King

[Charliesheen]

Enjoy.

When You Strike At A King, You Must Kill Him

https://www.redstate.com/darth641/2020/ ... -kill-him/

And a king is what you conservatives have always wanted.

Didn't read the article, didja.

[spudoc]

Enjoy.

When You Strike At A King, You Must Kill Him

https://www.redstate.com/darth641/2020/ ... -kill-him/

And a king is what you conservatives have always wanted.

Didn't read the article, didja.

Don't need to. It's not like the phrase "when you strike at a king.." is arcane or has some deep hidden meaning.
However your disdain of the Constitution over the last, oh hell the entire time you have been on whatever form of UJ, was never more on display than during the last few months. The fact that you were gleeful that Trump refused any congressional oversight in any of his dealings makes you, at the very least, a king enabler.

[necronomous]

Enjoy.

When You Strike At A King, You Must Kill Him

https://www.redstate.com/darth641/2020/ ... -kill-him/

And a king is what you conservatives have always wanted.

Obama Messiah, trump king. You people and your idol worshipping.

[Charliesheen]

Enjoy.

When You Strike At A King, You Must Kill Him

https://www.redstate.com/darth641/2020/ ... -kill-him/

And a king is what you conservatives have always wanted.

Didn't read the article, didja.

Don't need to. It's not like the phrase "when you strike at a king.." is arcane or has some deep hidden meaning.
However your disdain of the Constitution over the last, oh hell the entire time you have been on whatever form of UJ, was never more on display than during the last few months. The fact that you were gleeful that Trump refused any congressional oversight in any of his dealings makes you, at the very least, a king enabler.

I must have missed your outrage over Eric Holder’s sidestepping the constitution.

[spudoc]

Don't need to. It's not like the phrase "when you strike at a king.." is arcane or has some deep hidden meaning.

Yeah, because Ralph Waldo Emerson is a two bit hack

Jackass

The fact that Emerson is the author of the quote doesn’t give it deeper meaning. It’s fairly obvious except to the incredibly dense.
If you need me to walk you through it pm me.

[spudoc]

Enjoy.

When You Strike At A King, You Must Kill Him

https://www.redstate.com/darth641/2020/ ... -kill-him/

And a king is what you conservatives have always wanted.

Didn't read the article, didja.

Don't need to. It's not like the phrase "when you strike at a king.." is arcane or has some deep hidden meaning.
However your disdain of the Constitution over the last, oh hell the entire time you have been on whatever form of UJ, was never more on display than during the last few months. The fact that you were gleeful that Trump refused any congressional oversight in any of his dealings makes you, at the very least, a king enabler.

I must have missed your outrage over Eric Holder’s sidestepping the constitution.

The old “b-b-b-but Obama!” defense.

[CaptQuint]

Enjoy.

When You Strike At A King, You Must Kill Him

https://www.redstate.com/darth641/2020/ ... -kill-him/

And a king is what you conservatives have always wanted.

Didn't read the article, didja.

Don't need to. It's not like the phrase "when you strike at a king.." is arcane or has some deep hidden meaning.
However your disdain of the Constitution over the last, oh hell the entire time you have been on whatever form of UJ, was never more on display than during the last few months. The fact that you were gleeful that Trump refused any congressional oversight in any of his dealings makes you, at the very least, a king enabler.

I must have missed your outrage over Eric Holder’s sidestepping the constitution.

Maybe you did miss the outrage, but did you miss the fact the subpoenaed documents were in fact released?

[necronomous]

Enjoy.

When You Strike At A King, You Must Kill Him

https://www.redstate.com/darth641/2020/ ... -kill-him/

And a king is what you conservatives have always wanted.

Didn't read the article, didja.

Don't need to. It's not like the phrase "when you strike at a king.." is arcane or has some deep hidden meaning.
However your disdain of the Constitution over the last, oh hell the entire time you have been on whatever form of UJ, was never more on display than during the last few months. The fact that you were gleeful that Trump refused any congressional oversight in any of his dealings makes you, at the very least, a king enabler.

I must have missed your outrage over Eric Holder’s sidestepping the constitution.

The old “b-b-b-but Obama!” defense.

I don't think it's excusing what trump has done, as much as wondering where your outrage was when Obama did all his shit? Your outrage seems selective so they in turn feel like they can reciprocate your actions.

[Stapes]

If Trump had killed al-Awlaki you'd be cheering his death and saying fuck him..... He gave up his American citizenship when he became a terrorist... You hypocrites

[Charliesheen]

No defense necessary.

Selectively criminalizing a presidents foreign policy moves is without precedent. Your nimrods were talking impeachment before the inauguration.

This “defending the constitution” is a straw man talking point you got from PMSNBC.

Golly, that was easy.

[Stapes]

No defense necessary.

Selectively criminalizing a presidents foreign policy moves is without precedent. Your nimrods were talking impeachment before the inauguration.

This “defending the constitution” is a straw man talking point you got from PMSNBC.

Golly, that was easy.

Asking a foreign government to open a sham investigation on your election rival for personal benefit is not foreign policy.

[Charliesheen]

What do you call threatening to withhold Congress approved funds unless a prosecutor is sacked?

[spudoc]

What do you call threatening to withhold Congress approved funds unless a prosecutor is sacked?

I'd call that presenting a united front with the rest of our allies to root out corruption in the Ukraine.
Because that's what it was

[CaptQuint]

What do you call threatening to withhold Congress approved funds unless a prosecutor is sacked?

Foreign policy

[AnalHamster]

If it is carried out to meet the goals of the United States, it is foreign policy. If it is carried out for the personal benefit of the corrupt president, it is corruption. This ain't rocket science.

[CaptQuint]

But if its the benefit of a VP's son, its all good

How does getting rid of a prosecutor that is corrupt and does not investigate corruption benefit Biden?