This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
Moderator: Biker
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7948
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
- Stapes
- World's Only Blue Collar Guy
- Posts: 12853
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
- Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
You really find some doozys. You should look up John Solomon. He's about as credible as your orange leader.
I blame Biker.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7948
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
- CHEEZY17
- Libertarian house cat
- Posts: 14909
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
Pee tape!
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
- PopcornSutton
- Shit Meme Poster
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2019 9:11 am
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
- Charliesheen
- Snarky Fucker
- Posts: 9252
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:49 am
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
Clearly no.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:28 amDid you read it
And it destroys the Perfessors narrative as well. So obvious. As with Flynn, the original accusation was bullshit. Once you know that, set a perjury trap and throw the federal government at him.
A cunt is a cunt by any other name.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
Misinformation for dimwits, but people dumb enough to fall for it are too dumb to discuss it.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7948
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
Ahhhhhh, You shouldn't be so hard on yourself. Cheer up champ. People will think you're smart one day. I'm sure of it.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:11 pm Misinformation for dimwits, but people dumb enough to fall for it are too dumb to discuss it.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
People think I'm smart today, and that you are a moron. Seems to matter to you, so you should be aware of the basic reality. You are too afraid to answer the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians'. There's just no working around that, you exposed yourself. It's done. Sorry.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:21 pmAhhhhhh, You shouldn't be so hard on yourself. Cheer up champ. People will think you're smart one day. I'm sure of it.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:11 pm Misinformation for dimwits, but people dumb enough to fall for it are too dumb to discuss it.
- Stapes
- World's Only Blue Collar Guy
- Posts: 12853
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
- Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
These are the same morons still twisting in their sleep about Benghazi and Hillary's emails.
I blame Biker.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7948
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
And those people are you. You're too afraid to show the proof you said you had. You exposed yourself as a liar. It's done. Sorry.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:29 pmPeople think I'm smart today, and that you are a moron. Seems to matter to you, so you should be aware of the basic reality. You are too afraid to answer the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians'. There's just no working around that, you exposed yourself. It's done. Sorry.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:21 pmAhhhhhh, You shouldn't be so hard on yourself. Cheer up champ. People will think you're smart one day. I'm sure of it.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:11 pm Misinformation for dimwits, but people dumb enough to fall for it are too dumb to discuss it.
If you could just answer the question I asked first "what's the proof" we could move on and I might answer your question. But you're too much of a coward to answer it. We all know it.
Last edited by necronomous on Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7948
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7948
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
No one has ever mentioned perjury traps until republicans elected a pathological liar, then it was panic because poor little Trump would somehow get snookered into lying by the evil Democrats who, I guess, would have been smarter than the stable genius.Charliesheen wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:03 pmClearly no.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:28 amDid you read it
And it destroys the Perfessors narrative as well. So obvious. As with Flynn, the original accusation was bullshit. Once you know that, set a perjury trap and throw the federal government at him.
wut?
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
Proof is ready any time you grow up a little and are capable of admitting that it is in fact collusion to collude with the russians. While you are unable to do that, proof is just not possible for you as you simply cannot communicate.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:07 pmAnd those people are you. You're too afraid to show the proof you said you had. You exposed yourself as a liar. It's done. Sorry.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:29 pmPeople think I'm smart today, and that you are a moron. Seems to matter to you, so you should be aware of the basic reality. You are too afraid to answer the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians'. There's just no working around that, you exposed yourself. It's done. Sorry.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:21 pmAhhhhhh, You shouldn't be so hard on yourself. Cheer up champ. People will think you're smart one day. I'm sure of it.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:11 pm Misinformation for dimwits, but people dumb enough to fall for it are too dumb to discuss it.
If you could just answer the question I asked first "what's the proof" we could move on and I might answer your question. But you're too much of a coward to answer it. We all know it.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7948
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
Ok show it. I'm ready when you are. But you won't. You're too cowardly to discuss it. Either your facts are so weak that if I don't automatically agree to a statement that, I am assuming would be in your proof, you have nothing to stand on, so you're relying on a gotcha, or you have none. Either way, you can't admit that you have nothing because you're a fucking coward. Everyone knows it. Even your mom knows it.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:20 pmProof is ready any time you grow up a little and are capable of admitting that it is in fact collusion to collude with the russians. If you are unable to do that, proof is not possible fr you as you simply cannot communicate.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:07 pmAnd those people are you. You're too afraid to show the proof you said you had. You exposed yourself as a liar. It's done. Sorry.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:29 pmPeople think I'm smart today, and that you are a moron. Seems to matter to you, so you should be aware of the basic reality. You are too afraid to answer the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians'. There's just no working around that, you exposed yourself. It's done. Sorry.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:21 pmAhhhhhh, You shouldn't be so hard on yourself. Cheer up champ. People will think you're smart one day. I'm sure of it.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:11 pm Misinformation for dimwits, but people dumb enough to fall for it are too dumb to discuss it.
If you could just answer the question I asked first "what's the proof" we could move on and I might answer your question. But you're too much of a coward to answer it. We all know it.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7948
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
Did you read it?Wut wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:30 pmNo one has ever mentioned perjury traps until republicans elected a pathological liar, then it was panic because poor little Trump would somehow get snookered into lying by the evil Democrats who, I guess, would have been smarter than the stable genius.Charliesheen wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:03 pmClearly no.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:28 amDid you read it
And it destroys the Perfessors narrative as well. So obvious. As with Flynn, the original accusation was bullshit. Once you know that, set a perjury trap and throw the federal government at him.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
You know the drill by now, you poor fool. If you want me to school you on the russian collusion you already conceded is very likely, you need to start by answering the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians.' You simply cannot pretend you can look at or acknowledge anything at all when you have to evade the question is it collusion to collude. That is just ridiculous. And then you need to get back to the point you were already at, admitting based on point 1 that it was already very likely, and then we can move forward.
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
I was responding to his concern about a perjury trap, did you read my post?necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:28 pmDid you read it?Wut wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:30 pmNo one has ever mentioned perjury traps until republicans elected a pathological liar, then it was panic because poor little Trump would somehow get snookered into lying by the evil Democrats who, I guess, would have been smarter than the stable genius.Charliesheen wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:03 pmClearly no.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:28 amDid you read it
And it destroys the Perfessors narrative as well. So obvious. As with Flynn, the original accusation was bullshit. Once you know that, set a perjury trap and throw the federal government at him.
wut?
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7948
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
Yes. I was asking if you read the articleWut wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:39 pmI was responding to his concern about a perjury trap, did you read my post?necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:28 pmDid you read it?Wut wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:30 pmNo one has ever mentioned perjury traps until republicans elected a pathological liar, then it was panic because poor little Trump would somehow get snookered into lying by the evil Democrats who, I guess, would have been smarter than the stable genius.Charliesheen wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:03 pmClearly no.
And it destroys the Perfessors narrative as well. So obvious. As with Flynn, the original accusation was bullshit. Once you know that, set a perjury trap and throw the federal government at him.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7948
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
I've pretended nothing. Everything in that paragraph is an assumption of stupidity made on your behalf because you are a coward to just point out the proof you supposedly have. I've evaded no questions as I am still waiting for my question to be answered that you have clearly failed to answer. You know the drill by now, that if you have proof, it should stand regardless of anything I have to say. Thus we all know you have no proof. Because you're a moron. Your parents are ashamed of you. We all are.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:31 pm You know the drill by now, you poor fool. If you want me to school you on the russian collusion you already conceded is very likely, you need to start by answering the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians.' You simply cannot pretend you can look at or acknowledge anything at all when you have to evade the question is it collusion to collude. That is just ridiculous. And then you need to get back to the point you were already at, admitting based on point 1 that it was already very likely, and then we can move forward.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
I was pointing out the proof I have, you conceded on the first part it showed a high probability trump colluded, then you backtracked and started to, and continue to, evade the question "is it collusion to collude with the Russians." Don't you understand that refusing to answer that question means you are simply a joke? How can anyone communicate with someone who can't answer is 2+2 4? Poor fool.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 7:39 pmI've pretended nothing. Everything in that paragraph is an assumption of stupidity made on your behalf because you are a coward to just point out the proof you supposedly have. I've evaded no questions as I am still waiting for my question to be answered that you have clearly failed to answer. You know the drill by now, that if you have proof, it should stand regardless of anything I have to say. Thus we all know you have no proof. Because you're a moron. Your parents are ashamed of you. We all are.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:31 pm You know the drill by now, you poor fool. If you want me to school you on the russian collusion you already conceded is very likely, you need to start by answering the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians.' You simply cannot pretend you can look at or acknowledge anything at all when you have to evade the question is it collusion to collude. That is just ridiculous. And then you need to get back to the point you were already at, admitting based on point 1 that it was already very likely, and then we can move forward.
- beagleboy
- Biker's Biatch
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:23 pm
- Location: Free born
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
Fuckit. The Russians probably wrote that damn article. They are everywhere.
- Charliesheen
- Snarky Fucker
- Posts: 9252
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:49 am
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
You meant person. Not people. One person is wowed by your wiki trips. Send out some bottles or a barrel and maybe that will change.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:29 pmPeople think I'm smart today, and that you are a moron. Seems to matter to you, so you should be aware of the basic reality. You are too afraid to answer the question 'is it collusion to collude with the Russians'. There's just no working around that, you exposed yourself. It's done. Sorry.necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:21 pmAhhhhhh, You shouldn't be so hard on yourself. Cheer up champ. People will think you're smart one day. I'm sure of it.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:11 pm Misinformation for dimwits, but people dumb enough to fall for it are too dumb to discuss it.
A cunt is a cunt by any other name.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: This article states it was known from the beginning Russian collusion was bunk
'Wiki trips' is the term used by my obsessive fan club to whine about me always knowing what I am talking about. Sometimes wiki is one of the multiple sources I have looked at, what really chafes y'alls balls though is simply that I only talk about things I have researched and know about. If something interests me and I don't know about it already, then I inform myself. I do so more thoroughly and rapidly than you can comprehend, because you can't do it. I'm simply smarter than you. I understand how that must be frustrating for a lesser mind.