UJRefugees.net

Powerful rebuttal. When do you graduate kindergarten? And do your parents know you’re surfing porn on the family pc?

I’d ask you to be honest but you have a bad track record on that. That being said, did you get a stern talking to for breaching the nsfw line?

dot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 11:23 pm Powerful rebuttal. When do you graduate kindergarten? And do your parents know you’re surfing porn on the family pc?

I’d ask you to be honest but you have a bad track record on that. That being said, did you get a stern talking to for breaching the nsfw line?

I always give what I get. So if you feel the jokes are lackluster, it's because you're worth the amount you put forward.
I'm honest about everything. Not once have I lied about anything here and never will. Im sure you don't know what honesty looks like so that's no surprise you think I'm not.
And no.

Biker wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 9:07 pm Link to his defense fund. I donated

https://fightback.law/

Thank you for posting this. I didnt know he had a defense fund. Now that I do, it's about to get a hefty donation.

dot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 12:28 pm Y’all are pretty low information idiots. Antioch and Lake County in Illinois are not Kenosha County in Wisconsin. You know, where the murder took place.

No murder took place.

Colorado shooter charged with 2nd degree murder, as I predicted.

Denver DA to charge security guard with second-degree murder in fatal shooting of “Patriot Rally” participant

https://www.denverpost.com/2020/10/15/d ... f-charges/

VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:12 pm Colorado shooter charged with 2nd degree murder, as I predicted.

Denver DA to charge security guard with second-degree murder in fatal shooting of “Patriot Rally” participant

https://www.denverpost.com/2020/10/15/d ... f-charges/

just so i am clear. the dude got slapped and sprayed with bear repellent and he shot the guy. seems to me that if i got attacked and sprayed with something that would stop a bear id put a few rounds in them too. am i wrong?

porky wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 3:53 pm

VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:12 pm Colorado shooter charged with 2nd degree murder, as I predicted.

Denver DA to charge security guard with second-degree murder in fatal shooting of “Patriot Rally” participant

https://www.denverpost.com/2020/10/15/d ... f-charges/

just so i am clear. the dude got slapped and sprayed with bear repellent and he shot the guy. seems to me that if i got attacked and sprayed with something that would stop a bear id put a few rounds in them too. am i wrong?

although it sounds BIGGER, i think bear spray is actually less effective on humans than pepper spray.

If I were armed , I’d be afraid I’d be incapacitated and they’d take my weapon

so shooting the guy isnt the right move?

The judicial system as a whole frowns upon duels between civilians......especially when somebody winds up dead.

porky wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:04 pm so shooting the guy isnt the right move?

personally, i don't even think being at the rally in the first place is the right move. But, that's me. you go to stupid places and stupid things happen.

i wouldn't be at a rally on purpose. the guy was working if i recall. so he didn't have a choice. f hes a security guard on duty is he still considered a civilian?

porky wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:38 pm i wouldn't be at a rally on purpose. the guy was working if i recall. so he didn't have a choice. f hes a security guard on duty is he still considered a civilian?

Yes, police officers are civilians. The dead guy was there to start shit and own libs.

Flumper wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:23 pm

porky wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:04 pm so shooting the guy isnt the right move?

personally, i don't even think being at the rally in the first place is the right move. But, that's me. you go to stupid places and stupid things happen.

I see it sort of like the Treyvon issue. The hispanic really shouldn't have been bothering that kid. If he thought the kid was doing something, the call to 911 was enough. However, the fact that he was bothering or following him was not enough to attack him unless he felt threatened. Which he may or may not have. If he did, and since he attacked the hispanic, we will say he did, he was defending himself. But the hispanic man also has a right to defend himself. It's a sucky situation that should have been avoided, but it was self defense. So with Kyle it's the same. The boy shouldn't really have been there, especially with a weapon. But he was. Then he was attacked, which should have never happened, but it did. And he has a right to defend himself. It definitely appears as though he was being chased. So what was the logical conclusion the guy chasing him or Kyle would come to? That the guy was going to shake Kyle's hand and let him go? It was unfortunate that someone popped off a shot causing Kyle to react. That being said. Kyle had a right to be there, even if he shouldn't. The fact that he was carrying the weapon when he shouldn't have does not mean he can not defend himself. If I had to say a guess of what should happen, is at most charged for carrying a weapon he shouldn't. But defense is defense. Same with the other two guys. He felt threatened. It's not like there isn't a history among the protesters that they wouldn't attack him. You think he was thinking, oh they will restrain me and take me to the cops. Yeah right. The guys that were coming at him had a gun. It's very reasonable to assume the man was intending to use it. Again, shouldn't have been there, but a right to defend himself.

pretty good analogy. i guess the best answer is stay the fuck away unless you are prepared for the shit show

Kyle didn't have a right to be there. Kenosha was under curfew and he isn't even a resident of that state. If Kyle was anfifa or BLM you'd call him an outside agitator

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 5:04 pm Kyle didn't have a right to be there. Kenosha was under curfew and he isn't even a resident of that state. If Kyle was anfifa or BLM you'd call him an outside agitator

Did the protesters have a right to be there? Then so did he. Also I didn't say he wasn't an outside agitator. But I also don't think he went there with the intent to hurt anyone as all the pictures/ video show. You can have your skewed view of someone carrying a gun all you want. That doesn't prove intent.

porky wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:59 pm pretty good analogy. i guess the best answer is stay the fuck away unless you are prepared for the shit show

Pretty much.

Instigating and escalating a confrontation isn't a valid excuse for lethal self defense. Either in the Martin case or the Kenosha murder. Zimmerman followed a black kid cause he was black despite being told not to by the cops in real time. Rittenhouse "defending" other people's property he had no connection to is also not a reason to show up and shoot people. I also am tickled over the no intent excuse being thrown around. If you walk around with a rifle slung, finger on the trigger, you're looking for a reason to shoot somebody. Anybody. But I don't expect legitimate arguments from this crowd.

dot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:18 pm Instigating and escalating a confrontation isn't a valid excuse for lethal self defense. Either in the Martin case or the Kenosha murder. Zimmerman followed a black kid cause he was black despite being told not to by the cops in real time. Rittenhouse "defending" other people's property he had no connection to is also not a reason to show up and shoot people. I also am tickled over the no intent excuse being thrown around. If you walk around with a rifle slung, finger on the trigger, you're looking for a reason to shoot somebody. Anybody. But I don't expect legitimate arguments from this crowd.

Yeah you're stupid. And full of shit. We're good. You can stop responding to me now. You're as delusional as AH.

Top of the line quality rebuttal. If you want to end this, all you have to do is stop following me around. All I did this time was point out the feigned ignorance over intent and where the line is drawn over self defense. I get you're still hurt over the previous exchanges, but that's your problem not mine.

dot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 7:04 pm Top of the line quality rebuttal. If you want to end this, all you have to do is stop following me around. All I did this time was point out the feigned ignorance over intent and where the line is drawn over self defense. I get you're still hurt over the previous exchanges, but that's your problem not mine.

You engaged me, in my thread, and I'm "following" you. More delusion. Jesus I hope you haven't reproduced.

To point out falsehoods and errors on your part. If you can't see the relevance and inherent value on that, again, that's your problem. Also your problem, you taking it so personally and making it a point to drag it out over a few pages when all you had to do was own up to it.

no one knows what the fuck you are talking about. literally. no one.

dot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 8:19 pm To point out falsehoods and errors on your part. If you can't see the relevance and inherent value on that, again, that's your problem. Also your problem, you taking it so personally and making it a point to drag it out over a few pages when all you had to do was own up to it.

Oh but when I do that to you or AH I'm nipping or following you. You're also full of shit.