UJRefugees.net

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:01 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:12 am Well, Ol' Joe is giving money away like its going out of style so I'd hope the market would be high. Dont get me wrong I'm loving the gains but I worry that these highs are built on smoke and mirrors ie: stimulus checks etc. The government wont be giving money away for ever and a correction will come due eventually.

Trump didn't give money away?

Oh, he did too but the market was already going gangbusters before that.

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:24 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:01 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:12 am Well, Ol' Joe is giving money away like its going out of style so I'd hope the market would be high. Dont get me wrong I'm loving the gains but I worry that these highs are built on smoke and mirrors ie: stimulus checks etc. The government wont be giving money away for ever and a correction will come due eventually.

Trump didn't give money away?

Oh, he did too but the market was already going gangbusters before that.

As in before his election

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:31 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:24 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:01 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:12 am Well, Ol' Joe is giving money away like its going out of style so I'd hope the market would be high. Dont get me wrong I'm loving the gains but I worry that these highs are built on smoke and mirrors ie: stimulus checks etc. The government wont be giving money away for ever and a correction will come due eventually.

Trump didn't give money away?

Oh, he did too but the market was already going gangbusters before that.

As in before his election

No. We've been over this countless times. Look at any chart and you can see that the last to years of Barry's administration were basically flat and then in November of 2016 the market started rising again. Barry oversaw the market coming out of the recession- that is true and he was a solid friend to Wall Street but there is no denying that his last 2 years did not produce much growth. His first 6 coming out were nice but those last 2? Meh.

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:40 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:31 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:24 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:01 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:12 am Well, Ol' Joe is giving money away like its going out of style so I'd hope the market would be high. Dont get me wrong I'm loving the gains but I worry that these highs are built on smoke and mirrors ie: stimulus checks etc. The government wont be giving money away for ever and a correction will come due eventually.

Trump didn't give money away?

Oh, he did too but the market was already going gangbusters before that.

As in before his election

No. We've been over this countless times. Look at any chart and you can see that the last to years of Barry's administration were basically flat and then in November of 2016 the market started rising again. Barry oversaw the market coming out of the recession- that is true and he was a solid friend to Wall Street but there is no denying that his last 2 years did not produce much growth. His first 6 coming out were nice but those last 2? Meh.

then in November of 2016 the market started rising again


so when Obama's policies were still in effect then?

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:42 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:40 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:31 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:24 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:01 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:12 am Well, Ol' Joe is giving money away like its going out of style so I'd hope the market would be high. Dont get me wrong I'm loving the gains but I worry that these highs are built on smoke and mirrors ie: stimulus checks etc. The government wont be giving money away for ever and a correction will come due eventually.

Trump didn't give money away?

Oh, he did too but the market was already going gangbusters before that.

As in before his election

No. We've been over this countless times. Look at any chart and you can see that the last to years of Barry's administration were basically flat and then in November of 2016 the market started rising again. Barry oversaw the market coming out of the recession- that is true and he was a solid friend to Wall Street but there is no denying that his last 2 years did not produce much growth. His first 6 coming out were nice but those last 2? Meh.

then in November of 2016 the market started rising again


so when Obama's policies were still in effect then?

Do we really need to rehash this? Yes, Barry was still POTUS. The Trump win in November and the prospect of a business friendly administration kick started the stagnant market. Look at a chart. Almost immediately after the win the market starts rising.

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:51 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:42 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:40 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:31 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:24 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:01 am


Trump didn't give money away?

Oh, he did too but the market was already going gangbusters before that.

As in before his election

No. We've been over this countless times. Look at any chart and you can see that the last to years of Barry's administration were basically flat and then in November of 2016 the market started rising again. Barry oversaw the market coming out of the recession- that is true and he was a solid friend to Wall Street but there is no denying that his last 2 years did not produce much growth. His first 6 coming out were nice but those last 2? Meh.

then in November of 2016 the market started rising again


so when Obama's policies were still in effect then?

Do we really need to rehash this? Yes, Barry was still POTUS. The Trump win in November and the prospect of a business friendly administration kick started the stagnant market. Look at a chart. Almost immediately after the win the market starts rising.

So it was based on a feeling? And not anything Trump really did

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:58 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:51 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:42 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:40 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:31 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:24 am

Oh, he did too but the market was already going gangbusters before that.

As in before his election

No. We've been over this countless times. Look at any chart and you can see that the last to years of Barry's administration were basically flat and then in November of 2016 the market started rising again. Barry oversaw the market coming out of the recession- that is true and he was a solid friend to Wall Street but there is no denying that his last 2 years did not produce much growth. His first 6 coming out were nice but those last 2? Meh.

then in November of 2016 the market started rising again


so when Obama's policies were still in effect then?

Do we really need to rehash this? Yes, Barry was still POTUS. The Trump win in November and the prospect of a business friendly administration kick started the stagnant market. Look at a chart. Almost immediately after the win the market starts rising.

So it was based on a feeling? And not anything Trump really did

yeah, it was based on the FACT that Trump won and a "feeling" that he would do what he said and lower taxes on corporations. If you don't understand these simple concepts, then this entire topic is way out of your reach.

Biden is throwing money around that is pointless. This economy, right now is flush with cash. All the money put into stimulus programs last year hasn't even been given out completely. And then this $2 trillion deal, even his own CBO told him that it was unnecessary. But he did it to pay back the voters and to help democratic states. Everyone knows that. But, what motivates this $3 trillion infrastructure package is mind blowing. There isn't an economist on this planet that would recommend now to be a good time to throw that log on the fire.

Animal wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:27 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:58 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:51 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:42 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:40 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:31 am

As in before his election

No. We've been over this countless times. Look at any chart and you can see that the last to years of Barry's administration were basically flat and then in November of 2016 the market started rising again. Barry oversaw the market coming out of the recession- that is true and he was a solid friend to Wall Street but there is no denying that his last 2 years did not produce much growth. His first 6 coming out were nice but those last 2? Meh.

then in November of 2016 the market started rising again


so when Obama's policies were still in effect then?

Do we really need to rehash this? Yes, Barry was still POTUS. The Trump win in November and the prospect of a business friendly administration kick started the stagnant market. Look at a chart. Almost immediately after the win the market starts rising.

So it was based on a feeling? And not anything Trump really did

yeah, it was based on the FACT that Trump won and a "feeling" that he would do what he said and lower taxes on corporations. If you don't understand these simple concepts, then this entire topic is way out of your reach.

Biden is throwing money around that is pointless. This economy, right now is flush with cash. All the money put into stimulus programs last year hasn't even been given out completely. And then this $2 trillion deal, even his own CBO told him that it was unnecessary. But he did it to pay back the voters and to help democratic states. Everyone knows that. But, what motivates this $3 trillion infrastructure package is mind blowing. There isn't an economist on this planet that would recommend now to be a good time to throw that log on the fire.

When would be a good time? I have an idea.... when republicans are in office how about stop giving tax breaks to the 1%and big corporations and just paying lip service to job plans and infrastructure. And just the opposite of the pipeline from kwiky mart most of wall Street and economist think it's a great idea

Trump had how many infrastructure weeks?

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:44 pm Trump had how many infrastructure weeks?

he was going to get it done in that fourth year until covid. now, like he did, it needs to be put on the shelf until we see how we come out of this.

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:34 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:44 pm Trump had how many infrastructure weeks?

he was going to get it done in that fourth year until covid. now, like he did, it needs to be put on the shelf until we see how we come out of this.

So just have many infrastructure weeks over four years and then do them again in the fourth year? Was that to occur right before he released his healthcare plan?

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:37 am

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:34 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:44 pm Trump had how many infrastructure weeks?

he was going to get it done in that fourth year until covid. now, like he did, it needs to be put on the shelf until we see how we come out of this.

So just have many infrastructure weeks over four years and then do them again in the fourth year? Was that to occur right before he released his healthcare plan?

well, you are forgetting that he presented a $200 billion plan to the House in 2018. With over a $1 trillion coming from private investment. But, of course, that retard Pelosi and all of the democrats opposed it because it cost too much.

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:46 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:37 am

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:34 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:44 pm Trump had how many infrastructure weeks?

he was going to get it done in that fourth year until covid. now, like he did, it needs to be put on the shelf until we see how we come out of this.

So just have many infrastructure weeks over four years and then do them again in the fourth year? Was that to occur right before he released his healthcare plan?

well, you are forgetting that he presented a $200 billion plan to the House in 2018. With over a $1 trillion coming from private investment. But, of course, that retard Pelosi and all of the democrats opposed it because it cost too much.

President Trump held a meeting with top Democrats in Congress, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, on April 30, 2019, but failed to strike a deal. He wanted Congress to first pass the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), the newly negotiated version of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), to stop investigating him and to remove the threat of impeachment. He also wanted a package with automatic re-authorization of highway and transit funding rather than a broader plan with money for a variety of items from hospitals to broadband Internet.



to stop investigating him and to remove the threat of impeachment.

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:54 am

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:46 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:37 am

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:34 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:44 pm Trump had how many infrastructure weeks?

he was going to get it done in that fourth year until covid. now, like he did, it needs to be put on the shelf until we see how we come out of this.

So just have many infrastructure weeks over four years and then do them again in the fourth year? Was that to occur right before he released his healthcare plan?

well, you are forgetting that he presented a $200 billion plan to the House in 2018. With over a $1 trillion coming from private investment. But, of course, that retard Pelosi and all of the democrats opposed it because it cost too much.

President Trump held a meeting with top Democrats in Congress, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, on April 30, 2019, but failed to strike a deal. He wanted Congress to first pass the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), the newly negotiated version of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), to stop investigating him and to remove the threat of impeachment. He also wanted a package with automatic re-authorization of highway and transit funding rather than a broader plan with money for a variety of items from hospitals to broadband Internet.



to stop investigating him and to remove the threat of impeachment.

Trump presented an infrastructure plan to Congress in February 2018, with $200 billion in federal funding and $1.5 trillion from the private sector. Democrats opposed this plan because of its emphasis on state and local funding and private investments.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastru ... 0Americans.

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 1:20 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:54 am

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:46 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:37 am

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:34 am

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:44 pm Trump had how many infrastructure weeks?

he was going to get it done in that fourth year until covid. now, like he did, it needs to be put on the shelf until we see how we come out of this.

So just have many infrastructure weeks over four years and then do them again in the fourth year? Was that to occur right before he released his healthcare plan?

well, you are forgetting that he presented a $200 billion plan to the House in 2018. With over a $1 trillion coming from private investment. But, of course, that retard Pelosi and all of the democrats opposed it because it cost too much.

President Trump held a meeting with top Democrats in Congress, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, on April 30, 2019, but failed to strike a deal. He wanted Congress to first pass the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), the newly negotiated version of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), to stop investigating him and to remove the threat of impeachment. He also wanted a package with automatic re-authorization of highway and transit funding rather than a broader plan with money for a variety of items from hospitals to broadband Internet.



to stop investigating him and to remove the threat of impeachment.

Trump presented an infrastructure plan to Congress in February 2018, with $200 billion in federal funding and $1.5 trillion from the private sector. Democrats opposed this plan because of its emphasis on state and local funding and private investments.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastru ... 0Americans.

Dude, just stop. Your ballwashing is pathetic.

i didn't write the wikipedia page. maybe you should edit it to correct the history.

here's another one you should edit:

APRIL 23, 2018
PRESIDENT TRUMP’S INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN: A CLOSER LOOK

As part of the President’s budget released earlier this year, the Administration included a blueprint for a comprehensive infrastructure initiative. Economists generally agree that public investment in infrastructure has a positive effect on productivity, and therefore on gross domestic product. Accordingly, the President proposes a $1.5 trillion plan, comprised of $200 billion in federal funding over 10 years, which the Administration hopes will spur at least $1.3 trillion in additional spending from states, localities, and private investors.

The funding specified in the President’s budget would be allocated as follows:

$100 billion for competitive incentive grants to states and other sponsors able to demonstrate innovative approaches and potential new revenue streams.
$50 billion for rural infrastructure projects like broadband internet service in underdeveloped areas of the country.
$20 billion for programs deemed to be new or innovative.
$14 billion to further subsidize existing credit programs for transportation, water, or other infrastructure projects.
$10 billion to establish a revolving fund to finance federal purchases of property where leasing is less cost effective.
$6 billion for private activity bonds (PABs), which are tax exempt bonds issued in the hopes of attracting and incentivizing private partnership.

It never got out of the House because Pelosi flushed it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastru ... 0Americans



President Trump held a meeting with top Democrats in Congress, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, on April 30, 2019, but failed to strike a deal. He wanted Congress to first pass the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), the newly negotiated version of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), to stop investigating him and to remove the threat of impeachment. He also wanted a package with automatic re-authorization of highway and transit funding rather than a broader plan with money for a variety of items from hospitals to broadband Internet.

https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na- ... story.html

I know, because Flumpy didn’t hear it from the corner store, he doesn’t know about it. Stay intentionally ignorant, midget.

Pelosi then stood up and left the meeting, the aide said.

As they left said, Trump shot back, "Goodbye, we'll see you at the polls."

Stocks jump, S&P 500 and Dow hit record highs after retail sales, jobless claims top estimates

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-ma ... 0_rysZhlES

its almost as if you can control the market by forcing businesses to open or close.

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 3:44 pm its almost as if you can control the market by forcing businesses to open or close.

So Trump closed businesses so that Joe would look good to open them?

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 3:51 pm

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 3:44 pm its almost as if you can control the market by forcing businesses to open or close.

So Trump closed businesses so that Joe would look good to open them?

you have to be a special kind of retarded to make a comment like that. congrats.

The media doesn't report covid deaths anymore