Deathproof wrote: ↑Wed Feb 23, 2022 11:20 pm
I am well aware that President Putin was in the KGB. So what? I feel like -- and correct me if I'm wrong here -- you're implying that the KGB, and by extension its personnel, were inherently evil, which is not the case.
And to be clear, I am not Russian. I am an American, a proud and patriotic American, of Russian ancestry.
My next non fiction read will definitely be about Russia since the Revolution until present day. I would like to learn how all the different arms of the Soviet Union worked together. Especially the KGB. But yes they are typically referred to in a negative light. Deservedly or not.
Deathproof wrote: ↑Wed Feb 23, 2022 11:20 pm
Agreed, which is why I don't involve myself in "rooting for a side". I'm not cheerleading for the right. It's just that the right is almost always... well, right, and the left is almost always wrong.
That looks like
Da Bears to me.
Both sides are typically wrong in my experience.
Deathproof wrote: ↑Wed Feb 23, 2022 11:20 pm
They didn't force anything. He invaded because he
chose to. Nothing Ukraine did
necessitated an invasion. President Putin saw the Alzheimers patient's weakness and mental infirmity as an opening and took it. It's that simple. Just like he saw Hussein's weakness and make-America-look-like-a-bitch agenda as an opening and took it when he invaded Crimea.
Give this a thought and see if any of these factors might have contributed to Putin not continuing to invaded Ukraine for 7 years after annexing Crimea.
1)The two Russian majority regions of Ukraine began separist movements and carved out Kremlim controlled land in the "Ukraine". He supported this conflict through proxy while denying he was doing so. An invasion would obviously be different language.
2)The Kremlin controlled opposition party in the Ukraine was gaining momentum and winning a large share of the parliament. He supported these parties and helped push the narrative that Russia was the real protector of the Ukraine through Kremlin controlled Ukranian media.
3)He made energy deals with Europe (especially Germany) that he thought would protect his political interests because they would have a way to control energy flowing to Europe.
4)Russia was at the table negotiating Minsk agreements in 2014 and 2015. Seeking a political solution to the conflict.
5)Not only was the US president not supporting expanding NATO into Ukraine during 2016-2019, he was publicly talking about pulling the US outfof the agreement. Something that would have pleased Putin immensely. Either way it showed cracks in the alliance that Putin could look to exploit.
6)Ukranian President cracks down on the opposition party and arrests one of Putins main Ukranian allies. They also shut down Kremlin run media. Ukraine also starts to pull away from the Minsk agreements due to Russian actions.
Could any of those factors (actually occurring in the region) dictate the timing of this conflict? Or is it just "Biden sucks, now is the time" for you?
Deathproof wrote: ↑Wed Feb 23, 2022 11:20 pm
Except it
is provable fact. And I'll do you a favor and prove it: Did he try it with President Trump?
No, he did not. Thus proving that he would
not try it with President Trump. He knew better. President Trump was an actual leader, unlike Hussein and the Alzheimers patient, and Putin knew that.
Da Bears!