Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2023 8:21 pm
WTF Mississippi?
UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://ujrefugees.net/





This is misleading as it implies there is a finite amount or a pie and they have a bigger piece and you can not get a bigger piece yourself. That maybe true due to government interference, lobbyists, etc, but not because money is finite. It's fiat, you literally create it out of thin air. We are supposed to base it off of capital whether labor or physical items, but we just say fuck it and print print print.
School makes teachers grow fondlers.
Clueless.
a lot of this skew was greatly helped by all of that stimulus money. Even though it went into the poor people's hands in $2,000 (or whatever) chunks, it all immediately trickeled up to the rich people's hands when those people spent it on stuff.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Jul 10, 2023 11:11 pmThis is misleading as it implies there is a finite amount or a pie and they have a bigger piece and you can not get a bigger piece yourself. That maybe true due to government interference, lobbyists, etc, but not because money is finite. It's fiat, you literally create it out of thin air. We are supposed to base it off of capital whether labor or physical items, but we just say fuck it and print print print.
HA! I thought the exact same thing when I saw that pic!BigChiefin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 11, 2023 11:51 amThat kid needs to take a lesson from Courtney Cox's kid.

About? Are you saying my statement denies the other statement or are you saying the amount of teachers raping kids hasn't dramatically risen in the past several years, that we know about. Either way you're wrongsaltydog wrote: ↑Mon Jul 10, 2023 11:34 pmClueless.
Agreed, and then back down when they paid their employees.Animal wrote: ↑Mon Jul 10, 2023 11:40 pma lot of this skew was greatly helped by all of that stimulus money. Even though it went into the poor people's hands in $2,000 (or whatever) chunks, it all immediately trickeled up to the rich people's hands when those people spent it on stuff.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Jul 10, 2023 11:11 pmThis is misleading as it implies there is a finite amount or a pie and they have a bigger piece and you can not get a bigger piece yourself. That maybe true due to government interference, lobbyists, etc, but not because money is finite. It's fiat, you literally create it out of thin air. We are supposed to base it off of capital whether labor or physical items, but we just say fuck it and print print print.
It does go back and forth, but of the two there is only one that ever saves any of it. The key to all of this is saving and building wealth. The people that become wealthy learn to do it while they are still poor. Some people never learn to do it and always spend everything they get and some even borrow (use credit) to spend more than that. Regardless, as this cycle continues, the only ones that are taking any money out of the cycle and saving it are the 1% (or soon to be 1%).necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Jul 11, 2023 2:02 pmAgreed, and then back down when they paid their employees.Animal wrote: ↑Mon Jul 10, 2023 11:40 pma lot of this skew was greatly helped by all of that stimulus money. Even though it went into the poor people's hands in $2,000 (or whatever) chunks, it all immediately trickeled up to the rich people's hands when those people spent it on stuff.necronomous wrote: ↑Mon Jul 10, 2023 11:11 pmThis is misleading as it implies there is a finite amount or a pie and they have a bigger piece and you can not get a bigger piece yourself. That maybe true due to government interference, lobbyists, etc, but not because money is finite. It's fiat, you literally create it out of thin air. We are supposed to base it off of capital whether labor or physical items, but we just say fuck it and print print print.