Page 6 of 6
Re: US buying Greenland
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2026 12:18 am
by Tuesday
You believed Hillary's emails too didn't you? Was there a little red "c" in the corner or not, Mark?
Re: US buying Greenland
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2026 12:19 am
by dot
necronomous wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2026 12:13 am
Again, none were charged with it. Nice try though.
The fallacy in your logic is still clear and on the record. Well done, Red, you're still as intelligently bankrupt as ever.
dot wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:03 pm
necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 7:39 pm
If the crime was insurrection, the would be indicteed for it. But they weren't. So it's either important or it's not. Fun times.
Subpoenas defied with no charges. Your logic would say the subpoenas were never defied. Charges filed was never the argument, the argument was always what the crime was. You, just like the rest of the usual crowd, couldn't disprove the literal definition of insurrection. Thus you have as little to offer now as you did then. Run along until you have something to contribute, Red.
Re: US buying Greenland
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2026 12:21 am
by Tuesday
Brainwashed zombies will say its fake
Re: US buying Greenland
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2026 12:36 am
by necronomous
dot wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2026 12:19 am
necronomous wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2026 12:13 am
Again, none were charged with it. Nice try though.
The fallacy in your logic is still clear and on the record. Well done, Red, you're still as intelligently bankrupt as ever.
dot wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:03 pm
necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 7:39 pm
If the crime was insurrection, the would be indicteed for it. But they weren't. So it's either important or it's not. Fun times.
Subpoenas defied with no charges. Your logic would say the subpoenas were never defied. Charges filed was never the argument, the argument was always what the crime was. You, just like the rest of the usual crowd, couldn't disprove the literal definition of insurrection. Thus you have as little to offer now as you did then. Run along until you have something to contribute, Red.
How is following the law a fallacy? Neat try though.
Re: US buying Greenland
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2026 12:49 am
by necronomous
Tuesday wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2026 12:21 am
Brainwashed zombies will say its fake
Hey look a news article that proves fuck all.
Re: US buying Greenland
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2026 1:43 am
by Tuesday
Its not easy to admit youre duped easily and often. I forgot to add the VoTeR FrAuD scam to the list. That'll be another donut for you.
Re: US buying Greenland
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2026 1:45 am
by Tuesday
Raise your hand if you thought Hunter's laptop was real.
Re: US buying Greenland
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2026 1:56 am
by dot
necronomous wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2026 12:36 am
How is following the law a fallacy? Neat try though.
I'm sorry, I didn't know you were stupid enough to still think pivoting to avoid answering the question was valid. Enjoy struggling to answer.
dot wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:03 pm
necronomous wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 7:39 pm
If the crime was insurrection, the would be indicteed for it. But they weren't. So it's either important or it's not. Fun times.
Subpoenas defied with no charges. Your logic would say the subpoenas were never defied. Charges filed was never the argument, the argument was always what the crime was. You, just like the rest of the usual crowd, couldn't disprove the literal definition of insurrection. Thus you have as little to offer now as you did then. Run along until you have something to contribute, Red.
