UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://ujrefugees.net/
Way to be on top of the real issues.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 2:00 am Schumer changes Senator dress rules for Fetterman. For staff and visitors the more formal attire will still be expected.
Be proud Dims.
Schumer loosens Senate’s informal dress code
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/420 ... ress-code/
--------------
Once again, some people can think about multiple issues at the same time!saltydog wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:12 pmWay to be on top of the real issues.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 2:00 am Schumer changes Senator dress rules for Fetterman. For staff and visitors the more formal attire will still be expected.
Be proud Dims.
Schumer loosens Senate’s informal dress code
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/420 ... ress-code/
--------------
Any word on Tuberville withholding military assignments?
Ok there goalpost moved.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:50 pmOnce again, some people can think about multiple issues at the same time!saltydog wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:12 pmWay to be on top of the real issues.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 2:00 am Schumer changes Senator dress rules for Fetterman. For staff and visitors the more formal attire will still be expected.
Be proud Dims.
Schumer loosens Senate’s informal dress code
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/420 ... ress-code/
--------------
Any word on Tuberville withholding military assignments?
It's a little thing but it demonstrates your parties hypocrisy. Schumer is ok with Fetterturd wearing shorts and a Hoodie on the senate floor but not for anyone else.
You're the one that avoided the issue, hoss. I've already addressed yours.saltydog wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:44 amOk there goalpost moved.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:50 pmOnce again, some people can think about multiple issues at the same time!saltydog wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:12 pmWay to be on top of the real issues.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 2:00 am Schumer changes Senator dress rules for Fetterman. For staff and visitors the more formal attire will still be expected.
Be proud Dims.
Schumer loosens Senate’s informal dress code
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/420 ... ress-code/
--------------
Any word on Tuberville withholding military assignments?
It's a little thing but it demonstrates your parties hypocrisy. Schumer is ok with Fetterturd wearing shorts and a Hoodie on the senate floor but not for anyone else.
Hoss!CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:54 amYou're the one that avoided the issue, hoss. I've already addressed yours.saltydog wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:44 amOk there goalpost moved.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:50 pmOnce again, some people can think about multiple issues at the same time!saltydog wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:12 pmWay to be on top of the real issues.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 2:00 am Schumer changes Senator dress rules for Fetterman. For staff and visitors the more formal attire will still be expected.
Be proud Dims.
Schumer loosens Senate’s informal dress code
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/420 ... ress-code/
--------------
Any word on Tuberville withholding military assignments?
It's a little thing but it demonstrates your parties hypocrisy. Schumer is ok with Fetterturd wearing shorts and a Hoodie on the senate floor but not for anyone else.
So, in your mind the clothing is the problem; not that Schumer changed the rules for one senator but still expects everyone else to still follow those rules?saltydog wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 1:35 amHoss!CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:54 amYou're the one that avoided the issue, hoss. I've already addressed yours.saltydog wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:44 amOk there goalpost moved.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:50 pmOnce again, some people can think about multiple issues at the same time!saltydog wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:12 pmWay to be on top of the real issues.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 2:00 am Schumer changes Senator dress rules for Fetterman. For staff and visitors the more formal attire will still be expected.
Be proud Dims.
Schumer loosens Senate’s informal dress code
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/420 ... ress-code/
--------------
Any word on Tuberville withholding military assignments?
It's a little thing but it demonstrates your parties hypocrisy. Schumer is ok with Fetterturd wearing shorts and a Hoodie on the senate floor but not for anyone else.
What issue? Oh, that's right. Clothing is a problem, especially tan suits.
Screw the military's needs right?
Oh, so as a Republican, we now need to follow the rules?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:20 pmSo, in your mind the clothing is the problem; not that Schumer changed the rules for one senator but still expects everyone else to still follow those rules?saltydog wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 1:35 amHoss!CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:54 amYou're the one that avoided the issue, hoss. I've already addressed yours.saltydog wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:44 amOk there goalpost moved.
What issue? Oh, that's right. Clothing is a problem, especially tan suits.
Screw the military's needs right?
You dont understand the irony of this post one bit, so you?saltydog wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:04 pmOh, so as a Republican, we now need to follow the rules?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:20 pmSo, in your mind the clothing is the problem; not that Schumer changed the rules for one senator but still expects everyone else to still follow those rules?saltydog wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 1:35 amHoss!
What issue? Oh, that's right. Clothing is a problem, especially tan suits.
Screw the military's needs right?
Like honoring a subpoena by congress?
Like faithfully fulfilling the office of the President?
GTFOH.
How's that Kool Aid taste?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:10 pmYou dont understand the irony of this post one bit, so you?saltydog wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:04 pmOh, so as a Republican, we now need to follow the rules?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:20 pmSo, in your mind the clothing is the problem; not that Schumer changed the rules for one senator but still expects everyone else to still follow those rules?
Like honoring a subpoena by congress?
Like faithfully fulfilling the office of the President?
GTFOH.
1.) Many notable Dims have ignored subpoenas
2.) Shit Show by any definition has not faithfully upheld his duties as POTUS. The most obvious being our open southern border.
I criticize R's all the time. I've NEVER seen you criticize your beloved Dims.saltydog wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:26 pmHow's that Kool Aid taste?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:10 pmYou dont understand the irony of this post one bit, so you?saltydog wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:04 pmOh, so as a Republican, we now need to follow the rules?
Like honoring a subpoena by congress?
Like faithfully fulfilling the office of the President?
GTFOH.
1.) Many notable Dims have ignored subpoenas
2.) Shit Show by any definition has not faithfully upheld his duties as POTUS. The most obvious being our open southern border.
How's DeShitbag doing?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:17 pmI criticize R's all the time. I've NEVER seen you criticize your beloved Dims.saltydog wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:26 pmHow's that Kool Aid taste?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:10 pmYou dont understand the irony of this post one bit, so you?saltydog wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:04 pmOh, so as a Republican, we now need to follow the rules?
Like honoring a subpoena by congress?
Like faithfully fulfilling the office of the President?
GTFOH.
1.) Many notable Dims have ignored subpoenas
2.) Shit Show by any definition has not faithfully upheld his duties as POTUS. The most obvious being our open southern border.
Hes not doing as well as I would hope. Hes still my first choice though.saltydog wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:42 pmHow's DeShitbag doing?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:17 pmI criticize R's all the time. I've NEVER seen you criticize your beloved Dims.saltydog wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:26 pmHow's that Kool Aid taste?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:10 pmYou dont understand the irony of this post one bit, so you?
1.) Many notable Dims have ignored subpoenas
2.) Shit Show by any definition has not faithfully upheld his duties as POTUS. The most obvious being our open southern border.
Casey must be pleased.
Good fascist puppy.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:14 pmHes not doing as well as I would hope. Hes still my first choice though.saltydog wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:42 pmHow's DeShitbag doing?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:17 pmI criticize R's all the time. I've NEVER seen you criticize your beloved Dims.saltydog wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:26 pmHow's that Kool Aid taste?
Casey must be pleased.
Is this your way of admitting you never criticize Dims?saltydog wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:32 pmGood fascist puppy.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:14 pmHes not doing as well as I would hope. Hes still my first choice though.
DeSantis is a fascist. You're voting for him. Good boy.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4502 ... ding-bill/
Cindy Crawford has other desirable attributes, you not so much.