Sure, just confirm for me that you understand collusion occurred, then we'll look at trump's involvement in it. You started by dismissing the whole idea of collusion as a conspiracy theory, you've just dismissed trump on live TV asking for interference as him joking around, despite now knowing he has been doing the same thing over and over, secretly as well as publicly. You're never going to admit anything can be collusion, so why pretend you can look at the evidence? Since you're going to dismiss anything I say, I'm going to dish it out one example at a time and maximise how stupid you look doing it. Or that was the plan if you hadn't gone straight to full retard. I'm happy to keep you at full retard though, so let's get back to it.necronomous wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2019 12:59 pmJust go. Stop stalling. You don't need my confirmation to lay out proof, just do it. If the proof is there, go.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:24 amYes, I am treating you like an idiot. This is because you are behaving like an idiot. Is meeting someone from the russian government offering to help interfere in the election colluding with the election interference? You know it is. Answer 'yes' and we will cover Trump's involvement in that one, then move on to the next example. If you're going to deny any collusion, you can't admit trump's involvement in it.necronomous wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:38 pmYou wanna treat everyone like an idiot and you're smarter blah blah. I can play the game of you're an idiot as long as you want. And no matter how many ways you attempt to dodge the original question, I'm still going ask you to answer the question, what's Trump's collusion.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:28 pmI'm trying, but you've been refusing for five pages to admit you can see that collusion actually occurred. You can't bring yourself to deny it either. It's very odd.necronomous wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:16 pmI asked can you prove Trump colluded and you said yes then you proceeded to answer a different question. So walk me down the trump collusion evidence. That's all I've asked for.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 8:39 pm
Yes there is, but if you're denying the campaign colluded or, as you both are doing, just refusing to even admit seeing the question did the campaign collude, what would be the point in exploring which members of the campaign were involved? I said clearly and explicitly on page 1 I would prove to any of you delusional trump cucks that the trump campaign colluded. Once we have established you can grasp that reality, I will be happy to take any of you who are interested through the evidence that trump himself was personally involved. If you deny collusion occurred at all in the face of overwhelming evidence there's no point trying to get you to admit who participated in it.
Pussies.
Show me Trump's collusion.
No, let me answer this question instead? And on top of that I'm going to refuse to answer the original question because nah nah nah nah nah nah.
Dude, it's totally obvious you just can't admit seeing blatant collusion. Admit it, run away, or face this thread every day until you do. These are your choices, it doesn't matter how many ways you try saying derrr me no reply to your question.
Just keep going. You were at russia/trump campaign meet. Now what? Just continue. Stop treating people like they are stupid just so you can feel superior on a message board. Just go.
So, if someone goes to a meeting with someone claiming to be from the russian government, offering help with the election, does that constitute collusion with the interference? If you can't admit that it does, we cannot proceed. You are just admitting you will deny collusion can have occurred no matter what the evidence.