The Necro-Hammy Romance - aka Necro's epic dodge

[dot]

[necronomous]

How's the mental menopause going?

[AnalHamster]

Yes, we've established you are too chickenshit to confirm or deny if you can understand whether the trump tower meeting was collusion. That's why I'm going to keep asking you, over and over and over.

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.

So you still haven't presented anything against Trump. So again all evidence presented shows trump didn't collude. You can keep going over and over how trump didn't collude. I will look at ALL evidence you show. I admit you showed me all the evidence you seem to have. And nothing in this bit shows Trump colluded. All done then. Anyone else?

You say all done every post, yet you are compelled to make another. You just can't face running away and you can't answer. Sucks to be you I guess.

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.

I'm fair, and want to give you a chance. You're not taking it.

I can show one piece of evidence, you have to look at it.

I've looked at it. It doesn't prove Trump colluded. Got anything else?

Looked at what? What does it show? Does it show collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians?

I can show plenty of evidence, you just have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.

[necronomous]

So you still haven't presented anything against Trump. So again all evidence presented shows trump didn't collude. You can keep going over and over how trump didn't collude. I will look at ALL evidence you show. I admit you showed me all the evidence you seem to have. And nothing in this bit shows Trump colluded. All done then. Anyone else?

You say all done every post, yet you are compelled to make another. You just can't face running away and you can't answer. Sucks to be you I guess.

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.

I'm fair, and want to give you a chance. You're not taking it.

I can show one piece of evidence, you have to look at it.

I've looked at it. It doesn't prove Trump colluded. Got anything else?

Looked at what? What does it show? Does it show collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians?

I can show plenty of evidence, you just have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.

The evidence you presented about the trump tower meeting. It shows no evidence for Trump collusion. I didn't ask about the campaign.

[VinceBordenIII]

This is some retarded version of the Socratic method.

[AnalHamster]

This is some retarded version of the Socratic method.

The socratic method doesn't operate with someone who refuses to answer questions. He's pleading the ffith, running because he fears being taken step by step through the collusion. This is why he is unable to reach step 1, admitting there actually was any.

[AnalHamster]

You say all done every post, yet you are compelled to make another. You just can't face running away and you can't answer. Sucks to be you I guess.

I can show the evidence, you have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.

I'm fair, and want to give you a chance. You're not taking it.

I can show one piece of evidence, you have to look at it.

I've looked at it. It doesn't prove Trump colluded. Got anything else?

Looked at what? What does it show? Does it show collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians?

I can show plenty of evidence, you just have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.

The evidence you presented about the trump tower meeting. It shows no evidence for Trump collusion. I didn't ask about the campaign.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

[necronomous]

I'm fair, and want to give you a chance. You're not taking it.

I can show one piece of evidence, you have to look at it.

I've looked at it. It doesn't prove Trump colluded. Got anything else?

Looked at what? What does it show? Does it show collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians?

I can show plenty of evidence, you just have to look at it. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is the first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that.

The evidence you presented about the trump tower meeting. It shows no evidence for Trump collusion. I didn't ask about the campaign.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

This is like you having a girl say, AH will you suck my left nipple. And you say yes, but first I'm going to suck on your right, and she's ok, but no I want the left one firsT. And you say no admit I'm gonna suck this one first or I'll never suck the left one. And she's says no left one first. And you say no right or never left. And she's motherfucker are you gay? And you say yes, and begin to cry and explain how you've been in the closet and are afraid to come out and that daddy touched you and you liked it. You were on her lap for hours.

So plot twist: that doesn't prove Trump colluded either. So prove Trump colluded.

[necronomous]

This is some retarded version of the Socratic method.

The socratic method doesn't operate with someone who refuses to answer questions. He's pleading the ffith, running because he fears being taken step by step through the collusion. This is why he is unable to reach step 1, admitting there actually was any.

Also not pleading the fifth, just waiting on all youR info.

[AnalHamster]

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

[VinceBordenIII]

This is some retarded version of the Socratic method.

The socratic method doesn't operate with someone who refuses to answer questions. He's pleading the ffith, running because he fears being taken step by step through the collusion. This is why he is unable to reach step 1, admitting there actually was any.

And so, you could say “did the campaign collude with Russia? I say they did when they met with that chick. Now, stipulating that, .....”

[necronomous]

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

So nO evidence for Trump. I got it, you don't have to keep saying it over and over.

[AnalHamster]

This is some retarded version of the Socratic method.

The socratic method doesn't operate with someone who refuses to answer questions. He's pleading the ffith, running because he fears being taken step by step through the collusion. This is why he is unable to reach step 1, admitting there actually was any.

And so, you could say “did the campaign collude with Russia? I say they did when they met with that chick. Now, stipulating that, .....”

That would be not the socratic method. Necro pleading the 5th on whether collusion is collusion renders it kinda pointless to explore the collusion further with him, no? He just can't bring himself to do it. Would you like to discuss the collusion instead? It is an open offer to everyone. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion. Can you admit that is the case? If not we need to go into the details of the meeting and agree on what collusion means.

[AnalHamster]

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

So nO evidence for Trump. I got it, you don't have to keep saying it over and over.

I don't have to, but it's hell for you. You can't drop it, and you can't answer. Maybe after page 20 I'll switch to another example for you to plead the 5th on, just to mix it up a little.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

[necronomous]

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

So nO evidence for Trump. I got it, you don't have to keep saying it over and over.

I don't have to, but it's hell for you. You can't drop it, and you can't answer. Maybe after page 20 I'll switch to another example for you to plead the 5th on, just to mix it up a little.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

What's helL for me? That you can't prove it? That's not hell at alL. You can't seem to "drop" it either (which is why I'm having so much fun). You think I have to answer for you continue because you don't want to "waste your time" explaining something that it won't matter about any way if I don't agree with this premise. Yes you've gone on for 11 pages so clearly you can waste your time. So if you would just go on, you could have already shown me your evidence, and boom, left nipple licked.

[AnalHamster]

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

So nO evidence for Trump. I got it, you don't have to keep saying it over and over.

I don't have to, but it's hell for you. You can't drop it, and you can't answer. Maybe after page 20 I'll switch to another example for you to plead the 5th on, just to mix it up a little.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

What's helL for me? That you can't prove it? That's not hell at alL. You can't seem to "drop" it either (which is why I'm having so much fun). You think I have to answer for you continue because you don't want to "waste your time" explaining something that it won't matter about any way if I don't agree with this premise. Yes you've gone on for 11 pages so clearly you can waste your time. So if you would just go on, you could have already shown me your evidence, and boom, left nipple licked.

That you can't answer this simple question, which makes you look stupid, yet are still compelled to reply, over and over. How many times have you said we're done now, yet here you are and here you'll be in another 20 pages.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

[necronomous]

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

So nO evidence for Trump. I got it, you don't have to keep saying it over and over.

I don't have to, but it's hell for you. You can't drop it, and you can't answer. Maybe after page 20 I'll switch to another example for you to plead the 5th on, just to mix it up a little.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

What's helL for me? That you can't prove it? That's not hell at alL. You can't seem to "drop" it either (which is why I'm having so much fun). You think I have to answer for you continue because you don't want to "waste your time" explaining something that it won't matter about any way if I don't agree with this premise. Yes you've gone on for 11 pages so clearly you can waste your time. So if you would just go on, you could have already shown me your evidence, and boom, left nipple licked.

That you can't answer this simple question, which makes you look stupid, yet are still compelled to reply, over and over. How many times have you said we're done now, yet here you are and here you'll be in another 20 pages.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

Like I said, faIr chances and all. You can't say I didn't give you any. And sorry if I don't respond fast enough for you, my wife is currently sending nudes and then I have yard work. I wouldn't want you to think I'm ignoring you.

[AnalHamster]

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

So nO evidence for Trump. I got it, you don't have to keep saying it over and over.

I don't have to, but it's hell for you. You can't drop it, and you can't answer. Maybe after page 20 I'll switch to another example for you to plead the 5th on, just to mix it up a little.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

What's helL for me? That you can't prove it? That's not hell at alL. You can't seem to "drop" it either (which is why I'm having so much fun). You think I have to answer for you continue because you don't want to "waste your time" explaining something that it won't matter about any way if I don't agree with this premise. Yes you've gone on for 11 pages so clearly you can waste your time. So if you would just go on, you could have already shown me your evidence, and boom, left nipple licked.

That you can't answer this simple question, which makes you look stupid, yet are still compelled to reply, over and over. How many times have you said we're done now, yet here you are and here you'll be in another 20 pages.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

Like I said, faIr chances and all. You can't say I didn't give you any. And sorry if I don't respond fast enough for you, my wife is currently sending nudes and then I have yard work. I wouldn't want you to think I'm ignoring you.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

[necronomous]

So nO evidence for Trump. I got it, you don't have to keep saying it over and over.

I don't have to, but it's hell for you. You can't drop it, and you can't answer. Maybe after page 20 I'll switch to another example for you to plead the 5th on, just to mix it up a little.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

What's helL for me? That you can't prove it? That's not hell at alL. You can't seem to "drop" it either (which is why I'm having so much fun). You think I have to answer for you continue because you don't want to "waste your time" explaining something that it won't matter about any way if I don't agree with this premise. Yes you've gone on for 11 pages so clearly you can waste your time. So if you would just go on, you could have already shown me your evidence, and boom, left nipple licked.

That you can't answer this simple question, which makes you look stupid, yet are still compelled to reply, over and over. How many times have you said we're done now, yet here you are and here you'll be in another 20 pages.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

Like I said, faIr chances and all. You can't say I didn't give you any. And sorry if I don't respond fast enough for you, my wife is currently sending nudes and then I have yard work. I wouldn't want you to think I'm ignoring you.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

You want me to agree with you so we doNt waste time. Yet here we are. How much longer do you not want to waste time for?

[AnalHamster]

I don't have to, but it's hell for you. You can't drop it, and you can't answer. Maybe after page 20 I'll switch to another example for you to plead the 5th on, just to mix it up a little.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

What's helL for me? That you can't prove it? That's not hell at alL. You can't seem to "drop" it either (which is why I'm having so much fun). You think I have to answer for you continue because you don't want to "waste your time" explaining something that it won't matter about any way if I don't agree with this premise. Yes you've gone on for 11 pages so clearly you can waste your time. So if you would just go on, you could have already shown me your evidence, and boom, left nipple licked.

That you can't answer this simple question, which makes you look stupid, yet are still compelled to reply, over and over. How many times have you said we're done now, yet here you are and here you'll be in another 20 pages.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

Like I said, faIr chances and all. You can't say I didn't give you any. And sorry if I don't respond fast enough for you, my wife is currently sending nudes and then I have yard work. I wouldn't want you to think I'm ignoring you.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

You want me to agree with you so we doNt waste time. Yet here we are. How much longer do you not want to waste time for?

I'll see if you can go until New Year. The whole thing is a waste of time, trump will be impeached for his confessed collusion with Ukraine before you'll be able to concede any with Russia. Did you think your time on UJ was productive?

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

[necronomous]

What's helL for me? That you can't prove it? That's not hell at alL. You can't seem to "drop" it either (which is why I'm having so much fun). You think I have to answer for you continue because you don't want to "waste your time" explaining something that it won't matter about any way if I don't agree with this premise. Yes you've gone on for 11 pages so clearly you can waste your time. So if you would just go on, you could have already shown me your evidence, and boom, left nipple licked.

That you can't answer this simple question, which makes you look stupid, yet are still compelled to reply, over and over. How many times have you said we're done now, yet here you are and here you'll be in another 20 pages.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

Like I said, faIr chances and all. You can't say I didn't give you any. And sorry if I don't respond fast enough for you, my wife is currently sending nudes and then I have yard work. I wouldn't want you to think I'm ignoring you.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

You want me to agree with you so we doNt waste time. Yet here we are. How much longer do you not want to waste time for?

I'll see if you can go until New Year. The whole thing is a waste of time, trump will be impeached for his confessed collusion with Ukraine before you'll be able to concede any with Russia. Did you think your time on UJ was productive?

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

No he won't. Won't make it past the Senate. And I doubt it will get there.
And who to say you can Go to the new year not presenting evidence you don't have.

[AnalHamster]

That you can't answer this simple question, which makes you look stupid, yet are still compelled to reply, over and over. How many times have you said we're done now, yet here you are and here you'll be in another 20 pages.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

Like I said, faIr chances and all. You can't say I didn't give you any. And sorry if I don't respond fast enough for you, my wife is currently sending nudes and then I have yard work. I wouldn't want you to think I'm ignoring you.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

You want me to agree with you so we doNt waste time. Yet here we are. How much longer do you not want to waste time for?

I'll see if you can go until New Year. The whole thing is a waste of time, trump will be impeached for his confessed collusion with Ukraine before you'll be able to concede any with Russia. Did you think your time on UJ was productive?

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

No he won't. Won't make it past the Senate. And I doubt it will get there.
And who to say you can Go to the new year not presenting evidence you don't have.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

[necronomous]

Like I said, faIr chances and all. You can't say I didn't give you any. And sorry if I don't respond fast enough for you, my wife is currently sending nudes and then I have yard work. I wouldn't want you to think I'm ignoring you.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

You want me to agree with you so we doNt waste time. Yet here we are. How much longer do you not want to waste time for?

I'll see if you can go until New Year. The whole thing is a waste of time, trump will be impeached for his confessed collusion with Ukraine before you'll be able to concede any with Russia. Did you think your time on UJ was productive?

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

No he won't. Won't make it past the Senate. And I doubt it will get there.
And who to say you can Go to the new year not presenting evidence you don't have.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

StiIll no evidence. Why afraid to present it?

[AnalHamster]

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

You want me to agree with you so we doNt waste time. Yet here we are. How much longer do you not want to waste time for?

I'll see if you can go until New Year. The whole thing is a waste of time, trump will be impeached for his confessed collusion with Ukraine before you'll be able to concede any with Russia. Did you think your time on UJ was productive?

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

No he won't. Won't make it past the Senate. And I doubt it will get there.
And who to say you can Go to the new year not presenting evidence you don't have.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

StiIll no evidence. Why afraid to present it?

You're refusing to admit you can see any evidence. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

[necronomous]

You want me to agree with you so we doNt waste time. Yet here we are. How much longer do you not want to waste time for?

I'll see if you can go until New Year. The whole thing is a waste of time, trump will be impeached for his confessed collusion with Ukraine before you'll be able to concede any with Russia. Did you think your time on UJ was productive?

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

No he won't. Won't make it past the Senate. And I doubt it will get there.
And who to say you can Go to the new year not presenting evidence you don't have.

We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

StiIll no evidence. Why afraid to present it?

You're refusing to admit you can see any evidence. We're starting with the evidence that collusion did in fact occur., which you are refusing to admit. The trump tower meeting is just a simple first example of evidence of collusion and you are refusing to admit it exists. We cannot progress while you continue to run away from that. Was the trump tower meeting an example of collusion between the campaign and the russian interference, or not?

Why so terrified of the question? You can always run away later. Again.

Why So afraid to present the evidence that Trump colluded?