UJRefugees.net

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 7:04 pm During the season those boys have strict dietary requirements. And they don't include Mickey D's. I'll bet they were delighted with junk-food gluttony, in the White House. You cucks would rather have them served lunch As the former henpecker in chief would, dry watercress sandwiches on gluten-free toast points.

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 8:02 pm Not by 30% though...

Blow yourself, wiki dip.

The average Connecticut state government employee in our data sample receives an annual salary of $70,970, plus annual benefits, either received in that year or accrued toward retirement, worth between $54,561 and $75,641, depending upon how future pension benefits are valued. A private sector employee with similar education, experience and other characteristics would receive $71,112 in average annual salary, but only $29,371 in annual benefits. In total, the average Connecticut state employee receives between $125,531 and $146,611 in annual salaries and benefits, versus $96,177 for a comparable private sector employees. On average, Connecticut state employees receive total pay and benefits from 25 to 46 percent higher than comparable private sector employees.

And:

Whether public-sector employees receive above-market compensation is an empirical question that demands a thorough accounting of wages, benefits, and job security. In the case of California public employees, wages are slightly lower in the public sector. Initially, benefits appear only slightly higher, implying rough parity in compensation between the public and private sectors. However, properly accounting for retiree health benefits and defined-benefit pension plans generates a public compensation premium of around 15 percent. The additional job security granted to public-sector employees is equivalent to an approximately 15 percent increase in public compensation, meaning that the total public-sector pay premium in California may be as high as 30 percent.

But hey, I can steer you to a study done in Berkeley that says they are paid the same or more because they're worth it. Oh, and more experienced because your average apparatchik has 6%'chance of getting sacked, vs 20% in the private sector. Great odds, if you can get them.

PimpDaddy wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:22 pm Jesus Christ, are we back on the 3rd wave stuff again? To make these threads more efficient, can we just combine Stymie and AH posts under one account? How about AnalStymie? That way the rest of us can skim past the nonsense. TIA

PimpDaddy wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:22 pm Jesus Christ, are we back on the 3rd wave stuff again? To make these threads more efficient, can we just combine Stymie and AH posts under one account? How about AnalStymie? That way the rest of us can skim past the nonsense. TIA

PimpDaddy wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:22 pm Jesus Christ, are we back on the 3rd wave stuff again? To make these threads more efficient, can we just combine Stymie and AH posts under one account? How about AnalStymie? That way the rest of us can skim past the nonsense. TIA

dot wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:28 pm

PimpDaddy wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:22 pm Jesus Christ, are we back on the 3rd wave stuff again? To make these threads more efficient, can we just combine Stymie and AH posts under one account? How about AnalStymie? That way the rest of us can skim past the nonsense. TIA

We have to suffer through yours and Charlie's and Biker's ditto'ing each other since you all post from the same hivemind. Suck it up, snowflake.

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 8:05 pm One exception. My DMV is a rare example of a well-run gubmint entity. Or it was, until it was decided to give illegals drivers licenses. And make them democrat voter mills. Now it's a goddamn mad-house.

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 7:04 pm During the season those boys have strict dietary requirements. And they don't include Mickey D's. I'll bet they were delighted with junk-food gluttony, in the White House. You cucks would rather have them served lunch As the former henpecker in chief would, dry watercress sandwiches on gluten-free toast points.

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 7:04 pm During the season those boys have strict dietary requirements. And they don't include Mickey D's. I'll bet they were delighted with junk-food gluttony, in the White House. You cucks would rather have them served lunch As the former henpecker in chief would, dry watercress sandwiches on gluten-free toast points.

stymiegreen wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 1:13 am

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 7:04 pm During the season those boys have strict dietary requirements. And they don't include Mickey D's. I'll bet they were delighted with junk-food gluttony, in the White House. You cucks would rather have them served lunch As the former henpecker in chief would, dry watercress sandwiches on gluten-free toast points.

They watch their diet in the off-season when they map out their strengthening regimen...during the season they eat plenty of calories including all sorts of shit food...But this would just be issue number 597 that you had no fucking clue about but you tried to sound smart on anyway and failed miserably. I forgot more about Football then you'll ever know so stop making shit up because you continue to look like a dickbag.

He fed the National Champions dogshit and looked like an asshole doing it. I guess there are no catering joints in all of DC. Stop blindly defending everytihng he does, TrumpCuck. You had to even do a "Bbbbbbbut Obama" on something this dumb because you are a pathetic hack. You continue to be wrong about everything ever. Your record is still in tact!

Stapes wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 12:48 am

DandyDon wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 2:04 am At least he didnt offer any fancy dijon mustard; imagine what a scandal that would have been.