Re: Liar-in-Chief to give a Speech to the Nation on Tuesday
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:26 pm
You think the american public needs to be weighted so that the minority are oversampled in order to support your incorrect claim? Makes sense.
UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://ujrefugees.net/
You think the american public needs to be weighted so that the minority are oversampled in order to support your incorrect claim? Makes sense.
Your faulty math on that is still faulty. An increase of 5% does equal 20% of the original 25% but it doesn't mean that Dems represent 20% more of the sample. You are wrong. If there is 1147 people polled 25% is 287 people, 30% is 344 people...the difference being 344-287=57 people. those 57 people only represent 5% of the original 1147 people polled. Which is exactly the 5% difference highlighted in the methodology between Dems and Repubs.Biker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:28 pmDo you think there are 20% more Dems in this country than GOPers?analhamster wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:26 pmYou think the american public needs to be weighted so that the minority are oversampled in order to support your incorrect claim? Makes sense.
No, I have no reason to doubt the party affiliation figures found in the poll you're trying to dispute, which shows 5% more self identifying as dems and is backed by independent polling by gallup. Weighed against that all we appear to have is some random numbers pulled from your ass. Poll, don't pull.Biker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:28 pmDo you think there are 20% more Dems in this country than GOPers?analhamster wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:26 pmYou think the american public needs to be weighted so that the minority are oversampled in order to support your incorrect claim? Makes sense.
You miss the point about why your point is wrong when you just ignore the rest of what I typed, numbnuts. Your argument about the sampling is a false one. And again, it was one of 3 polls provided...and yet again...you haven't provided a single poll of your own that supports your initial contention. You are just blurting shit out like Trump does and ignoring any further questioning. Lulz.Biker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:52 pmThats my point, numbnuts. Thats statistically significant enough to skew a poll, especially one as close as the one you citedstymiegreen wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:35 pmYour faulty math on that is still faulty. An increase of 5% does equal 20% of the original 25%
Clearly the poll was so skewed that its skewiness broke the time space continuum and skewed independent gallup polling that looked specifically at party affiliation and found the same result. That's the only logical explanation for you not liking the consistent numbers.Biker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:52 pmThats my point, numbnuts. Thats statistically significant enough to skew a poll, especially one as close as the one you citedstymiegreen wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:35 pmYour faulty math on that is still faulty. An increase of 5% does equal 20% of the original 25%
The choice isn't open borders or magical overnight wall. Stop acting retarded.
I just talked to Pelosi, we are gonna have Disney build duck boat rides across the border so all of Mexico and Central and South America can ride in with style.analhamster wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:26 pmThe choice isn't open borders or magical overnight wall. Stop acting retarded.
The status quo includes a continuing reduction in crossings over the southern border for nearly 2 decades. The wall is simply a boondoggle supported by ignorant dimwits.Biker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:29 pmSo its a wall vs the status quo, which has allowed millions to pour in here. The Dems just dont have the balls to say open bordersanalhamster wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:26 pmThe choice isn't open borders or magical overnight wall. Stop acting retarded.
They continue to pour in at ever reducing rates, and only a 2000 mile wall built over the next two decades can solve this immediate crisis that has been getting better for two decades. America must become the only country in the world with walled borders because nothing else works. Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.Biker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:52 pmAll talk, yet they continue to pour in. Walls workanalhamster wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:36 pmThe status quo includes a continuing reduction in crossings over the southern border for nearly 2 decades. The wall is simply a boondoggle supported by ignorant dimwits.
Can't do that. That's the Republican constituency.
Record numbers of...?Biker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:59 pmReducing rates? Try record numbers, cuckyanalhamster wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:54 pmThey continue to pour in at ever reducing rates, and only a 2000 mile wall built over the next two decades can solve this immediate crisis that has been getting better for two decades. America must become the only country in the world with walled borders because nothing else works. Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 523034002/
So you say Democrats have problems with math? Seems some "Democrats" have difficulty with reading comprehension.Biker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:59 pmReducing rates? Try record numbers, cuckyanalhamster wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:54 pmThey continue to pour in at ever reducing rates, and only a 2000 mile wall built over the next two decades can solve this immediate crisis that has been getting better for two decades. America must become the only country in the world with walled borders because nothing else works. Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 523034002/
Wut wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 11:55 pmSo you say Democrats have problems with math? Seems some "Democrats" have difficulty with reading comprehension.Biker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:59 pmReducing rates? Try record numbers, cuckyanalhamster wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:54 pm
They continue to pour in at ever reducing rates, and only a 2000 mile wall built over the next two decades can solve this immediate crisis that has been getting better for two decades. America must become the only country in the world with walled borders because nothing else works. Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 523034002/
When a tub is nearing an overflow condition is reducing the water flowing in by 10% enough or do you try to turn it off completely?Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:06 amWut wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 11:55 pmSo you say Democrats have problems with math? Seems some "Democrats" have difficulty with reading comprehension.Biker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:59 pm
Reducing rates? Try record numbers, cucky
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 523034002/![]()
Are you trying to come up with excuses even dumber than trump?Antknot wrote: ↑Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:54 amWhen a tub is nearing an overflow condition is reducing the water flowing in by 10% enough or do you try to turn it off completely?