UJRefugees.net

Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 9:45 pm https://www.vice.com/en/article/4a3bdm/ ... d-to-drugs

Less Canadians in this world? I fail to see the downside

Biker wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 10:53 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 9:45 pm https://www.vice.com/en/article/4a3bdm/ ... d-to-drugs

Less Canadians in this world? I fail to see the downside

The worst Canadian alive is still a better human being than you will ever be.

Suck it, bitch!

Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 4:33 am https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... rooms.html

What a pathetic, cucked country

Biker wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 9:26 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 4:33 am https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... rooms.html

I am a pathetic, cucked moderator

proof
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], hawkfan8812 and 0 guests

hawkfan8812 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 10:31 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 9:26 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 4:33 am https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... rooms.html

I am a pathetic, cucked moderator

proof
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], hawkfan8812 and 0 guests

hawkfan8812 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 10:31 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 9:26 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 4:33 am https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... rooms.html

I am a pathetic, cucked moderator

proof
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], hawkfan8812 and 0 guests

Warning sent

#Cucked

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 4:28 am

#Cucked

Wow.
Cant have folks asking tough questions, can we?

Montreal Police warns against defamation for posting videos of porch thieves online

https://tnc.news/2024/01/10/montrea ...

Bunch of cucks

B-Tender wrote: ↑Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:52 pm Montreal Police warns against defamation for posting videos of porch thieves online

https://tnc.news/2024/01/10/montrea ...

How could posting a video of something that someone actually did be considered defamation?

peterosehaircut wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:12 am

B-Tender wrote: ↑Thu Jan 11, 2024 4:52 pm Montreal Police warns against defamation for posting videos of porch thieves online

https://tnc.news/2024/01/10/montrea ...

How could posting a video of something that someone actually did be considered defamation?

Apparently Canada cares more about the feelings of the criminals than those of the victims.

Oh I don't know, how about innocent until proven guilty?

It is one thing to be admissible in court, it is another thing to poison the jury pool. Maybe the neighbor was picking up packages to help.

FYI I did not click or look at anything involved in the link.

Or maybe the thief was Jeffery Dahmer and the video could have led to his capture before he kidnapped his last victim, then raped, ate and buried his bones under the house.

Video evidence isnt enough for Hawk apparently

Trudeau gets crushed.

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 30, 2024 11:32 pm Trudeau gets crushed.

#Cucked

#RapistDonaldTrump

Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:57 am #RapistDonaldTrump

Trump wasn’t convicted of rape. The recent ruling against him was for defamation of character.

Antknot wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 1:59 am

Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:57 am #RapistDonaldTrump

Trump wasn’t convicted of rape. The recent ruling against him was for defamation of character.

Rick doesn’t understand the legal system. Fuck, he doesn’t understand the edit button here

Antknot wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 1:59 am

Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:57 am #RapistDonaldTrump

Trump wasn’t convicted of rape. The recent ruling against him was for defamation of character.

Ya. He just stuck his fingers in her vagina and as small as they were probably still bigger.

Antknot wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 1:59 am

Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:57 am #RapistDonaldTrump

Trump wasn’t convicted of rape. The recent ruling against him was for defamation of character.

Because the statue of limitations ran out on the original rape charges several decades ago.
The defamation came because he couldn't keep his fat mouth shut when she made the charges public.
If he had simply said "I didn't do it, the event(s) didn't occur" she'd have had no cause to sue for defamation.
But his response as usual was to demean her and her reputation and appearance in a vile manner. my edit...

Remember, Trump was shown a picture of Carroll and testified the image was of Maples. In court and under oath.
So at one time Carroll was definitely "his type". And he's already publicly admitted to possible rape and sexual assault.
But again, those charges have lapsed due to prosecutorial time restraints. And there are practical reasons why.
Much of Trump's basic issues with the courts and the law is that it's beyond his character to quietly sit down and shut up.

QillerDaemon wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 2:44 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 1:59 am

Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:57 am #RapistDonaldTrump

Trump wasn’t convicted of rape. The recent ruling against him was for defamation of character.

it's beyond his character to quietly sit down and shut up.

which is obviously worth $83 million.

QillerDaemon wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 2:44 pm

Antknot wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 1:59 am

Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:57 am #RapistDonaldTrump

Trump wasn’t convicted of rape. The recent ruling against him was for defamation of character.

Because the statue of limitations ran out on the original rape charges several decades ago.
The defamation came because he couldn't keep his fat mouth shut when she made the charges public.
If he had simply said "I didn't do it, the event(s) didn't occur" she'd have had no cause to sue for defamation.
But his response was to demean her and her reputation and appearance in a vile manner.

Remember, Trump was shown a picture of Carroll and testified the image was of Maples. In court and under oath.
So at one time Carroll was definitely "his type". And he's already publicly admitted to possible rape and sexual assault.
But again, those charges have lapsed due to prosecutorial time restraints. And there are practical reasons why.
Much of Trump's basic issues with the courts and the law is that it's beyond his character to quietly sit down and shut up.

Are you aware of the special law the NYSA created so she could sue? I'm guessing no