UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://ujrefugees.net/
A. More than 6
If we know about them, then doesn't that mean they got caught?Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 11:29 amA. More than 6
B. If they broke the law they should be charged. Political affiliation, Skin color, sexual orientation, or ethnic background it does not matter if they broke the law they should be charged. And it doesn’t matter what lol they broke they should be charged.
Sure, and that's a good thing. The question is how much stuff happens that we DON'T know about? I'm speaking on a very broad level of election integrity not on a specific instance. Which is why, if very easy steps are available to improve the system, why not enact them? With every instance, small or large, it proves that there are people that are going to try and game the system. I don't think that will ever stop. So why shouldn't we take every measure we can to improve the process?Animal wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:05 pmIf we know about them, then doesn't that mean they got caught?Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 11:29 amA. More than 6
B. If they broke the law they should be charged. Political affiliation, Skin color, sexual orientation, or ethnic background it does not matter if they broke the law they should be charged. And it doesn’t matter what lol they broke they should be charged.
The fine folks that live in the Villages many of which are snowbirds have a habit of voting absentee in their birth state and vote in person in their adopted state.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:42 pmSure, and that's a good thing. The question is how much stuff happens that we DON'T know about? I'm speaking on a very broad level of election integrity not on a specific instance. Which is why, if very easy steps are available to improve the system, why not enact them? With every instance, small or large, it proves that there are people that are going to try and game the system. I don't think that will ever stop. So why shouldn't we take every measure we can to improve the process?Animal wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:05 pmIf we know about them, then doesn't that mean they got caught?Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 11:29 amA. More than 6
B. If they broke the law they should be charged. Political affiliation, Skin color, sexual orientation, or ethnic background it does not matter if they broke the law they should be charged. And it doesn’t matter what lol they broke they should be charged.
Doesn’t sound right. However it depends on the individual states laws.Who wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 4:12 pmThe fine folks that live in the Villages many of which are snowbirds have a habit of voting absentee in their birth state and vote in person in their adopted state.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:42 pmSure, and that's a good thing. The question is how much stuff happens that we DON'T know about? I'm speaking on a very broad level of election integrity not on a specific instance. Which is why, if very easy steps are available to improve the system, why not enact them? With every instance, small or large, it proves that there are people that are going to try and game the system. I don't think that will ever stop. So why shouldn't we take every measure we can to improve the process?Animal wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:05 pmIf we know about them, then doesn't that mean they got caught?Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 11:29 amA. More than 6
B. If they broke the law they should be charged. Political affiliation, Skin color, sexual orientation, or ethnic background it does not matter if they broke the law they should be charged. And it doesn’t matter what lol they broke they should be charged.
Other than federal candidates are they allowed to vote for down ballot candidates? Or do they have to pick a state and forego local elections in their other state?
Are you saying they vote twice?Who wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 4:12 pmThe fine folks that live in the Villages many of which are snowbirds have a habit of voting absentee in their birth state and vote in person in their adopted state.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:42 pmSure, and that's a good thing. The question is how much stuff happens that we DON'T know about? I'm speaking on a very broad level of election integrity not on a specific instance. Which is why, if very easy steps are available to improve the system, why not enact them? With every instance, small or large, it proves that there are people that are going to try and game the system. I don't think that will ever stop. So why shouldn't we take every measure we can to improve the process?Animal wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:05 pmIf we know about them, then doesn't that mean they got caught?Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 11:29 amA. More than 6
B. If they broke the law they should be charged. Political affiliation, Skin color, sexual orientation, or ethnic background it does not matter if they broke the law they should be charged. And it doesn’t matter what lol they broke they should be charged.
Other than federal candidates are they allowed to vote for down ballot candidates? Or do they have to pick a state and forego local elections in their other state?
Two residents that were caught voting in their home state and Florida in the last presidential electionCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 5:34 pmAre you saying they vote twice?Who wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 4:12 pmThe fine folks that live in the Villages many of which are snowbirds have a habit of voting absentee in their birth state and vote in person in their adopted state.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:42 pmSure, and that's a good thing. The question is how much stuff happens that we DON'T know about? I'm speaking on a very broad level of election integrity not on a specific instance. Which is why, if very easy steps are available to improve the system, why not enact them? With every instance, small or large, it proves that there are people that are going to try and game the system. I don't think that will ever stop. So why shouldn't we take every measure we can to improve the process?Animal wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:05 pmIf we know about them, then doesn't that mean they got caught?Antknot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 11:29 amA. More than 6
B. If they broke the law they should be charged. Political affiliation, Skin color, sexual orientation, or ethnic background it does not matter if they broke the law they should be charged. And it doesn’t matter what lol they broke they should be charged.
Other than federal candidates are they allowed to vote for down ballot candidates? Or do they have to pick a state and forego local elections in their other state?
Let's humor your idiocy and projection, in that order, for a moment. What else could possibly come about by the end of the certification process on January 6 that would've changed who won the election if the traitor criminal now felon hadn't incited his insurrection? Exactly what do you think was still up in the air? After all, if the result was in doubt, why was the certification process taking place to begin with?
Yep. Dodged it.dot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 7:45 pmLet's humor your idiocy and projection, in that order, for a moment. What else could possibly come about by the end of the certification process on January 6 that would've changed who won the election if the traitor criminal now felon hadn't incited his insurrection? Exactly what do you think was still up in the air? After all, if the result was in doubt, why was the certification process taking place to begin with?
"Narrow narrative" was never projected so hard by such a hack.
Suspected? Not proven... just suspected?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 3:22 pm A victory for sanity!
Supreme Court allows Virginia to purge suspected noncitizens from voter registration rolls
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/30/politics ... index.html
Projection. Try again if you have the courage. You're on the record saying the election was not officially called by January 6, the day the results are certified by Congress.
If you think the results were not determined by that day, what do you say was still in the works to change the outcome of Joe Biden's electoral victory? Don't be shy now.dot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 7:45 pm What else could possibly come about by the end of the certification process on January 6 that would've changed who won the election if the traitor criminal now felon hadn't incited his insurrection? Exactly what do you think was still up in the air? After all, if the result was in doubt, why was the certification process taking place to begin with?
You're not supposed to notice that part of their crusade against democracy. Only approved citizens can vote, and only they can approve from those citizens. Politicians picking their voters, literally.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 9:41 pmSuspected? Not proven... just suspected?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 3:22 pm A victory for sanity!
Supreme Court allows Virginia to purge suspected noncitizens from voter registration rolls
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/30/politics ... index.html
Well your comprehension is lacking. I said at the start of J6 the election wasn’t a facial. I didn’t say no we’re on that day what is the election not official.dot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 9:44 pmProjection. Try again if you have the courage. You're on the record saying the election was not officially called by January 6, the day the results are certified by Congress.
If you think the results were not determined by that day, what do you say was still in the works to change the outcome of Joe Biden's electoral victory? Don't be shy now.dot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 7:45 pm What else could possibly come about by the end of the certification process on January 6 that would've changed who won the election if the traitor criminal now felon hadn't incited his insurrection? Exactly what do you think was still up in the air? After all, if the result was in doubt, why was the certification process taking place to begin with?
You're not supposed to notice that part of their crusade against democracy. Only approved citizens can vote, and only they can approve from those citizens. Politicians picking their voters, literally.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 9:41 pmSuspected? Not proven... just suspected?CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 3:22 pm A victory for sanity!
Supreme Court allows Virginia to purge suspected noncitizens from voter registration rolls
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/30/politics ... index.html
Kentucky lol
lol
Y’all do realize that was a Democrat in the video clip don’t you?Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:40 pmThe MAGAt's are the kind of people who are going to spend the next year arguing tooth-and-nail on the internet that the Yankees won the World Series.
Yes. But perhaps you should look into the whole story instead of just relying on "X".Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2024 9:17 pmY’all do realize that was a Democrat in the video clip don’t you?Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:40 pmThe MAGAt's are the kind of people who are going to spend the next year arguing tooth-and-nail on the internet that the Yankees won the World Series.
