January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)

[CHEEZY17]

The DOJ and FBI looked at the exact same "facts of that day" as you and decided insurrection didn't fit. That's just factual, retard.
Why are they wrong in their evaluation but you are right?

[dot]

Charges filed will never be the argument, no matter how much you need to shift it to that, hack. Yet another line item you can't admit. Deflection discarded.

You got anything else or is hack just gonna bleat hack things inconsequentially?

[CHEEZY17]

Charges filed will never be the argument, no matter how much you need to shift it to that, hack. Yet another line item you can't admit. Deflection discarded.

You got anything else or is hack just gonna bleat hack things inconsequentially?

Did the DOJ and FBI examine the same evidence (and more) as you?
Until you can explain why you are right and they are wrong you got Jack shit, retard.

[dot]

Charges filed will never be the argument, no matter how much you need to shift it to that, hack. Yet another line item you can't admit. Deflection discarded.

You got anything else or is hack just gonna bleat hack things inconsequentially?

[CHEEZY17]

Delete and dodge. Rinse and repeat.

[dot]

Given you can't make your case, I don't waste my time with bad faith partisan hacks duped on a daily basis. Like your case for corruption, you've got nothin'.

[necronomous]

All of the evidence

Zero acknowledgement of case being debunked, yet another line item you can't admit. Deflection discarded.

You're wrong. There I proved it. That's all you're doing and all your evidence is. So apparently that's enough for you. You're wrong.

Except my posts and proof are on the record here, which leaves you the one that has to prove your claim asserting fraud isn't fraud or insurrection isn't insurrection because you haven't done either of those yet. Try again, Red.

They're exactly the same! You know except for the part where the DOJ and FBI agree with us and disagree with Dodgin' Dot.

Charges filed will never be the argument, no matter how much you need to shift it to that, hack. Yet another line item you can't admit. Deflection discarded.

Well pointing at the evidence does nothing

You could start there, but neither of you have shown the balls to do that. Pick your subject, you have no shortage of claims to prove. Whether that's hack's claim of Joe Biden's corruption now debunked, or Red's claim that fraud isn't fraud. This back and forth clearly shows you won't go there on your apologist's claim about insurrection, but you also aren't keen on tackling the subjects where you have guilty verdicts to disprove too. Wouldn't want to be in either of your shoes given the side you chose to defend. Hack does hack things, and Both Sides™ doesn't apply where only one side is actively trying to usurp power over an election they lost leaving them to defend the convicted felon adjudicated rapist serial fraudster of a candidate they chose to blindly support.

Your posts have 0 evidence, all is bullshit and hearsay. We've proved it, you are in denial.

[CHEEZY17]

Given you can't make your case, I don't waste my time with bad faith partisan hacks duped on a daily basis. Like your case for corruption, you've got nothin'.

Riiiight. You delete and dodge because you cant answer the simple question that destroys your entire argument:
Why are the DOJ and FBI wrong in their evaluation but you are right?

You HAVE to delete and dodge this question because you have no answer and its patently obvious. You know that its a binary option and you cant face the realization of an actual answer. One of you is right and one of you is wrong; thats it. Thats the end game here. The United States Justice Department and FBI after evaluating the same facts as you decided insurrection didnt fit. If they are right you have to be wrong and if you are right the DOJ and FBI have to be wrong.
You do you and continue being a retard thinking you understand the "facts of that day" better the professionals. Meanwhile, I'll stay over here on the side of the legal experts.

[dot]

Your posts have 0 evidence, all is bullshit and hearsay. We've proved it, you are in denial.

Except you didn't, none of you except for Animal could even try with insurrection and that was still a fail. Fraud? You all made bold claims and no one stepped up to prove your assertions, which now leaves you to argue against verdicts. Try again, Red.

Riiiight. You delete and dodge because

You can't answer any of the things you avoid every single time it's brought up. If all you're going to do is ignore that your case for corruption blew up from lack of evidence and exposed fabrication, or that you can't acknowledge your claims of corruption were discarded on live television by your own bought and paid for guy, or that you can't prove your apologist's excuse for insurrection, then why give your bad faith partisan hackery any time it doesn't deserve? Hack did hack things again.

[necronomous]

Your posts have 0 evidence, all is bullshit and hearsay. We've proved it, you are in denial.

Except you didn't, none of you except for Animal could even try with insurrection and that was still a fail. Fraud? You all made bold claims and no one stepped up to prove your assertions, which now leaves you to argue against verdicts. Try again, Red.

Riiiight. You delete and dodge because

You can't answer any of the things you avoid every single time it's brought up. If all you're going to do is ignore that your case for corruption blew up from lack of evidence and exposed fabrication, or that you can't acknowledge your claims of corruption were discarded on live television by your own bought and paid for guy, or that you can't prove your apologist's excuse for insurrection, then why give your bad faith partisan hackery any time it doesn't deserve? Hack did hack things again.

Don't need to. I'm good. You're wrong.

[CHEEZY17]

Riiiight. You delete and dodge because

So not only are you a retard but youre a lying retard as well because every single one of those things you mention has been addressed by me or someone else many times over. I will do it again, right here, to once again prove your retardation.

You can't answer any of the things you avoid every single time it's brought up. If all you're going to do is ignore that your case for corruption blew up from lack of evidence and exposed fabrication,

Except that is just not true. There is still ample evidence and it is all gathered for you right here: https://oversight.house.gov/landing/bid ... stigation/
Just because you dont believe the shell companies, the bank records, the emails, the evidence on the laptop, the phone calls, the texts etc. doesnt make them go away. Sorry, retard. Your claim is simply false.

or that you can't acknowledge your claims of corruption were discarded on live television by your own bought and paid for guy,

Again, simply not true and has been proven to you multiple times. No matter how many times you make your retarded claim, Turleys actual statement is easily retrievable. Turley addressed retards like you misrepresenting what he said right here: "...Rep. Raskin (D., Md.) just stated that I testified with other witnesses that "nothing would approach" an impeachable offense in this inquiry. That again is not true. I said the opposite. I stated that there was ample evidence for the inquiry and, if proven, the allegations would amount to impeachable offenses."

or that you can't prove your apologist's excuse for insurrection,

My proof is that the legal authorities and actual legal experts have looked at all of the exact same evidence as you and came to a different conclusion. Unlike you, I dont think I understand legalities better than the United States Justice Department. You can go ahead and be retarded and think you understand "insurrection" better than the Justice Department but until you can explain why their conclusion is wrong and yours is right your opinion is simply a fart in the wind and means nothing.

then why give your bad faith partisan hackery any time it doesn't deserve? Hack did hack things again.

Because you are a coward that is scared to address the questions presented to him...like I just did (again).
You HAVE to delete and dodge this question because you have no answer and its patently obvious. You know that its a binary option and you cant face the realization of an actual answer. One of you is right and one of you is wrong; thats it. Thats the end game here. The United States Justice Department and FBI after evaluating the same facts as you decided insurrection didnt fit. If they are right you have to be wrong and if you are right the DOJ and FBI have to be wrong.
You can do you and continue being a retard thinking you understand the "facts of that day" better than the professionals. Meanwhile, I'll stay over here on the side of the legal experts.

[dot]

Don't need to. I'm good. You're wrong.

Except you can't prove your claims, and reality stands counter to what you say is true. But as long as you're comfortable being wrong and a coward, then you do you, Red.

So not only

Are you never going to acknowledge the reality that your case for corruption fell apart in public, that your claims of proof of corruption was blown apart by your own bought and paid for pundit, that you'll never admit what January 6 and insurrection is, and then, and then, you get the picture. You will never admit you are proven wrong. You backed the wrong horse and you are too much of a hack to ever admit you chose wrong. Bad faith partisan hacks duped by criminals and foreign intelligence operatives are not worth the time spent to continuously refute their demonstrably false claims. Maybe when you actually address that you have no case for corruption against Joe Biden, or when you acknowledge that your prophetic claims of such for months were dispelled on live television, or finally admit anything on the list of things that destroy your cultist perspective, maybe then you are worth time spent to refute. But since you refuse to play on the plane of reality, there is no reason to humor your bad faith deflections with anything more than the derision you get. Or put simply, hack did hack things. Again.

[CHEEZY17]

Don't need to. I'm good. You're wrong.

Except you can't prove your claims, and reality stands counter to what you say is true. But as long as you're comfortable being wrong and a coward, then you do you, Red.

So not only

Are you never going to acknowledge the reality that your case for corruption fell apart in public, that your claims of proof of corruption was blown apart by your own bought and paid for pundit, that you'll never admit what January 6 and insurrection is, and then, and then, you get the picture. You will never admit you are proven wrong. You backed the wrong horse and you are too much of a hack to ever admit you chose wrong. Bad faith partisan hacks duped by criminals and foreign intelligence operatives are not worth the time spent to continuously refute their demonstrably false claims. Maybe when you actually address that you have no case for corruption against Joe Biden, or when you acknowledge that your prophetic claims of such for months were dispelled on live television, or finally admit anything on the list of things that destroy your cultist perspective, maybe then you are worth time spent to refute. But since you refuse to play on the plane of reality, there is no reason to humor your bad faith deflections with anything more than the derision you get. Or put simply, hack did hack things. Again.

Yet you somehow found the time and energy to post this drivel. How about answering the very simple question that cuts to the heart of your entire argument?
Why are the DOJ and FBI wrong in their evaluation but you are right?
You'll delete and dodge again because...Coward does coward things.

[dot]

Yet you somehow found the time and energy to post this drivel.

Mocking your cowardice and pointing it out in public discourse takes little to no energy and is helpful because it highlights that you will never admit being wrong despite being proven to be so. Hack's false claims and fabrications are what are not worth the time of day because hack can't admit hack got duped into believing them. Hack did hack things again.

[CHEEZY17]

Yet you somehow found the time and energy to post this drivel.

Mocking your cowardice and pointing it out in public discourse takes little to no energy and is helpful because it highlights that you will never admit being wrong despite being proven to be so. Hack's false claims and fabrications are what are not worth the time of day because hack can't admit hack got duped into believing them. Hack did hack things again.

Thanks for proving me right, coward.
I've addressed everything youve ever asked (multiple times). You simply dont like the answers so you delete and dodge because you are coward. The United States Department of Justice conclusions are not "false claims" you fucking retard.
Once again: Never forget that it is YOU that is on the opposite of the legal authorities.
So, once again:
Why are the DOJ and FBI wrong in their evaluation but you are right?

[dot]

Disingenuous delusional intellectually dishonest functionally retarded partisan hack dupe.

[necronomous]

Don't need to. I'm good. You're wrong.

Except you can't prove your claims, and reality stands counter to what you say is true. But as long as you're comfortable being wrong and a coward, then you do you, Red.

So not only

Are you never going to acknowledge the reality that your case for corruption fell apart in public, that your claims of proof of corruption was blown apart by your own bought and paid for pundit, that you'll never admit what January 6 and insurrection is, and then, and then, you get the picture. You will never admit you are proven wrong. You backed the wrong horse and you are too much of a hack to ever admit you chose wrong. Bad faith partisan hacks duped by criminals and foreign intelligence operatives are not worth the time spent to continuously refute their demonstrably false claims. Maybe when you actually address that you have no case for corruption against Joe Biden, or when you acknowledge that your prophetic claims of such for months were dispelled on live television, or finally admit anything on the list of things that destroy your cultist perspective, maybe then you are worth time spent to refute. But since you refuse to play on the plane of reality, there is no reason to humor your bad faith deflections with anything more than the derision you get. Or put simply, hack did hack things. Again.

Neither can you. You're wrong. Have a good one.

[CHEEZY17]

Disingenuous delusional intellectually dishonest functionally retarded partisan hack dupe.

You probably dont understand that you literally just dodged and proved me right again. You are a coward so no one is surprised.
Why are the DOJ and FBI wrong in their evaluation but you are right?

[dot]

Neither can you. You're wrong. Have a good one.

Never had to, verdicts and investigations prove you wrong on multiple front. Either try again or accept being a coward, Red.

You probably dont understand that you literally just dodged and proved me right again.

Until you acknowledge reality and that your claims and excuses are debunked and discarded, you don't deserve more than the derision you get. Grow a set and admit your case fell apart, your claims were dismissed on live television, and on and on and on with all the things you can't accept because truth and facts shattered your narrative long ago. Hack did hack things.

[CHEEZY17]

Until you acknowledge reality and that your claims and excuses are debunked and discarded, you don't deserve more than the derision you get.

Factually inaccurate. You can keep claiming it but that wont make the evidence go away. Its all accumulated here for you:
https://oversight.house.gov/landing/bid ... stigation/

Grow a set and admit your case fell apart, your claims were dismissed on live television

You just repeat the same blatant lie over and over so I'll just keep posting the actual quote from the guy whose words you are misrepresenting: "...Rep. Raskin (D., Md.) just stated that I testified with other witnesses that "nothing would approach" an impeachable offense in this inquiry. That again is not true. I said the opposite. I stated that there was ample evidence for the inquiry and, if proven, the allegations would amount to impeachable offenses."

Your misrepresentation gets shot down every time but with you being a retard and all its understandable why you keep trying.

and on and on and on with all the things you can't accept because truth and facts shattered your narrative long ago. Hack did hack things.

Sorry, retard, but thats factually inaccurate. Ive addressed everything youve tried to go full retard on while you cant even answer a basic question:
So, once again:
Why are the DOJ and FBI wrong in their evaluation but you are right?

[dot]

Factually inaccurate.

Denying reality, the charges of false statements and falsifying records, the admissions of lack of evidence, the live television dismissal of your months long claims, none of it will ever change that it all happened and you're stuck with debunked talking points like a typical partisan hack dupe.

You just repeat the same blatant lie over and over so I'll just keep posting the actual quote from the guy whose words you are misrepresenting: "...Rep. Raskin (D., Md.) just stated that I testified with other witnesses that "nothing would approach" an impeachable offense in this inquiry. That again is not true. I said the opposite. I stated that there was ample evidence for the inquiry and, if proven, the allegations would amount to impeachable offenses."

Actual quote:

In fact, I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment.

Thanks for proving me right again.

Your misrepresentation gets shot down every time but with you being a retard and all its understandable why you keep trying.

As seen above, you literally ignoring that he dismissed your months long claims of corruption proof on live television is never going to change because you want it to be. Busted again for projection, hack.

Sorry, retard, but thats factually inaccurate.

At this point, it's clear that anything you're going to accuse, you're admitting you're guilty of. Just like your guy, huh? How's that for cult behavior, hack?

Ive addressed everything youve tried to go full retard on

Except you literally couldn't do it again, in any form or fashion. Ignoring the reality in front of us will not change the facts, and the facts are you have no case, your claims were dismissed by your own guy, you can't prove the dictionary wrong, you can't absolve your idol of his crimes or his failures, and so on and so forth. Or in summation, hack did hack things. Again.

[necronomous]

Neither can you. You're wrong. Have a good one.

Never had to, verdicts and investigations prove you wrong on multiple front. Either try again or accept being a coward, Red.

You probably dont understand that you literally just dodged and proved me right again.

Until you acknowledge reality and that your claims and excuses are debunked and discarded, you don't deserve more than the derision you get. Grow a set and admit your case fell apart, your claims were dismissed on live television, and on and on and on with all the things you can't accept because truth and facts shattered your narrative long ago. Hack did hack things.

No they don't. Wrong again. Unless you can name a verdict that led to a conviction for insurrection or treason? No? Thought not.

[dot]

No they don't. Wrong again. Unless you can name a verdict that led to a conviction for insurrection or treason? No? Thought not.

Don't forget, your claims of fraud not being fraud are still unsubstantiated. New York v. Trump, et al. and The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump are just two verdicts against your claims regarding fraud not being fraud. As for insurrection, January 6 investigations, Colorado Supreme Court, the dictionary itself, all determine insurrection was incited on January 6. Your goalpost moving is discarded as you fall into the same go nowhere trap as all the rest of the cultists, in that the argument is not what was charged but what was committed. So given you are still wrong on multiple fronts, try again Red.

[necronomous]

No they don't. Wrong again. Unless you can name a verdict that led to a conviction for insurrection or treason? No? Thought not.

Don't forget, your claims of fraud not being fraud are still unsubstantiated. New York v. Trump, et al. and The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump are just two verdicts against your claims regarding fraud not being fraud. As for insurrection, January 6 investigations, Colorado Supreme Court, the dictionary itself, all determine insurrection was incited on January 6. Your goalpost moving is discarded as you fall into the same go nowhere trap as all the rest of the cultists, in that the argument is not what was charged but what was committed. So given you are still wrong on multiple fronts, try again Red.

So no convictions. Got it.

[CHEEZY17]

The same bullshit he repeatedly posts no matter how many times his assertions are addressed and disproven.

Dodgin' Dot could put this all to bed by addressing the question he continues to dodge:
Why are the DOJ and FBI wrong in their evaluation but you are right?