CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2024 8:05 pm
Nope. The only thing right in that pile of hot garbage is that yes, investigations took place.
Denial of reality strikes again. Hack can't resist ignoring that his narrative got shattered. Color me surprised.
necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2024 8:13 pm
So you're ignoring completely what I'm saying and answering something else entirely.
No, it's pretty clear that I'm not. It's an either or situation, and your words show how you're refusing to take a stand with reality.
necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2024 8:13 pm
Listen to my words. If it's insurrection, fine
It is. Pure and simple. Not a single one of you can dispute this, evidenced by the fact that none of you have or will try. If you can't prove the claim that insurrection isn't insurrection, then what we're left with is it is insurrection. But you can't even get to admitting facts as they stand. The entire question is whether January 6 was or was not an insurrection, what was actually done that day, or if the word itself is incorrectly defined. That's the core issue here, everything else y'all have conjured up is a distraction or deflection. I'm not ignoring what you say, I'm just taking everything into account. Remember the
picture war you tried to pull off saying no violence took place that day despite video and photo evidence? Cause I do and I didn't force you to do that. You could've admitted reality before you tried that ridiculous excuse. But you didn't, and now here you are. Maybe if you cared about facts more than shtick, you wouldn't have dug yourself into the hole you're in.