January 6th Protest/Stolen Election Thread (Was: Trump Nuts Storm the Capitol)

[CHEEZY17]

After evaluating the "facts of that day", the DOJ, the FBI and the Supreme Court dont think insurrection fits.
Dodgin' Dot thinks it does.
Man, thats a tough one. Who should we believe?

Face it bud, the people smarter than you think you are wrong.

[Animal]

I know what an insurrection is. But what happened wasn't one.

Except it was. Which is why you can't say why it wasn't so you just have to insist that it wasn't. I've already shown how January 6 fit what an insurrection is, it falls on those of you saying in bad faith that it's not an insurrection to show how it's not.

Cut and paste. Its all been addressed, retard.

If that was true, then you wouldn't keep going back to proven lies and falsehoods when you can't address facts or reality. Hack still does hack things.

“was a riot; it was not an insurrection. The events were shameful, criminal, violent—all of those things—but it did not qualify as insurrection.” Justice Samuel Alito

[CHEEZY17]

I know what an insurrection is. But what happened wasn't one.

Except it was. Which is why you can't say why it wasn't so you just have to insist that it wasn't. I've already shown how January 6 fit what an insurrection is, it falls on those of you saying in bad faith that it's not an insurrection to show how it's not.

Cut and paste. Its all been addressed, retard.

If that was true, then you wouldn't keep going back to proven lies and falsehoods when you can't address facts or reality. Hack still does hack things.

“was a riot; it was not an insurrection. The events were shameful, criminal, violent—all of those things—but it did not qualify as insurrection.” Justice Samuel Alito

I think that sums it up pretty well.

[dot]

Face it bud, the people smarter than you think you are wrong.

Face it bud, you can't argue against investigations or rulings or the dictionary, which is why you won't even attempt to disprove the elements of an insurrection. A test that I didn't come up with, that was Animal. Yet another dodge from hack.

“was a riot; it was not an insurrection. The events were shameful, criminal, violent—all of those things—but it did not qualify as insurrection.” Justice Samuel Alito

Please, tell me your next defense is going to cite Clarence Thomas. Those text messages from his wife aren't going to post themselves.

I think that sums it up pretty well.

Indeed, insurrectionists covering for insurrection. I couldn't say it better myself.

[necronomous]

I know what an insurrection is. But what happened wasn't one.

Except it was. Which is why you can't say why it wasn't so you just have to insist that it wasn't. I've already shown how January 6 fit what an insurrection is, it falls on those of you saying in bad faith that it's not an insurrection to show how it's not.

Cut and paste. Its all been addressed, retard.

If that was true, then you wouldn't keep going back to proven lies and falsehoods when you can't address facts or reality. Hack still does hack things.

It wasn't. That's I can say it wasn't. Supreme Court agreed. Have a good day.

[necronomous]

Face it bud, the people smarter than you think you are wrong.

Face it bud, you can't argue against investigations or rulings or the dictionary, which is why you won't even attempt to disprove the elements of an insurrection. A test that I didn't come up with, that was Animal. Yet another dodge from hack.

“was a riot; it was not an insurrection. The events were shameful, criminal, violent—all of those things—but it did not qualify as insurrection.” Justice Samuel Alito

Please, tell me your next defense is going to cite Clarence Thomas. Those text messages from his wife aren't going to post themselves.

I think that sums it up pretty well.

Indeed, insurrectionists covering for insurrection. I couldn't say it better myself.

Oh, so the ones supporting outcomes that agree with the right is corrupt and the fact Biden and hundreds of other leftists politicians haven't been charged with shit is not corruption. Lol that's funny.

[dot]

It wasn't. That's I can say it wasn't. Supreme Court agreed. Have a good day.

Except it was, with evidence investigations and the dictionary proving so. Bought and paid for justices with their compromised positions exposed and on display will not and did not change any of that.

Oh, so the ones supporting outcomes that agree with the right is corrupt and the fact Biden and hundreds of other leftists politicians haven't been charged with shit is not corruption. Lol that's funny.

Charges filed is not the same as committing the crime. Just answer what it was without dodging the question, unless you don't have the facts on your side. In that case, then just admit you can't prove your claim. It's not a matter of supporting outcomes that agree with the right, it's the fact that their bribes and gifts have been exposed tainting rulings on matters in front of them which an honest justice would have recused from. Which reminds me, shouldn't you claiming as a neutral party on these matters be terrified of a Supreme Court ruling an executive now has carte blanche to break the law and be walled off from checks and balances?

[necronomous]

It wasn't. That's I can say it wasn't. Supreme Court agreed. Have a good day.

Except it was, with evidence investigations and the dictionary proving so. Bought and paid for justices with their compromised positions exposed and on display will not and did not change any of that.

Oh, so the ones supporting outcomes that agree with the right is corrupt and the fact Biden and hundreds of other leftists politicians haven't been charged with shit is not corruption. Lol that's funny.

Charges filed is not the same as committing the crime. Just answer what it was without dodging the question, unless you don't have the facts on your side. In that case, then just admit you can't prove your claim. It's not a matter of supporting outcomes that agree with the right, it's the fact that their bribes and gifts have been exposed tainting rulings on matters in front of them which an honest justice would have recused from. Which reminds me, shouldn't you claiming as a neutral party on these matters be terrified of a Supreme Court ruling an executive now has carte blanche to break the law and be walled off from checks and balances?

You're fucking delusional.

[CHEEZY17]

Face it bud, the people smarter than you think you are wrong.

Face it bud, you can't argue against investigations or rulings or the dictionary, which is why you won't even attempt to disprove the elements of an insurrection. A test that I didn't come up with, that was Animal. Yet another dodge from hack.

“was a riot; it was not an insurrection. The events were shameful, criminal, violent—all of those things—but it did not qualify as insurrection.” Justice Samuel Alito

I dont need to dodge anything, retard, because the DOJ, the FBI and the Supreme Court all agree with me. There is nothing to dodge as they have looked at everything you claim amounts to insurrection and decided differently than you.
The only one dodging anything is you; STILL.
Why are the DOJ and FBI wrong but you are right?
Do you think you understand insurrection better than they do?

Its a binary choice, bud. One of you is right and one of you is wrong.
Either those folks are wrong and you are right or they are right and you are wrong. I'm going to go ahead and stay comfortable over here on the same side as the legal professionals.

[Antknot]

After evaluating the "facts of that day", the DOJ, the FBI and the Supreme Court dont think insurrection fits.
Dodgin' Dot thinks it does.
Man, thats a tough one. Who should we believe?

Face it bud, the people smarter than you think you are wrong.

He’s not even on the radar of the people that make the decisions.

[CHEEZY17]

After evaluating the "facts of that day", the DOJ, the FBI and the Supreme Court dont think insurrection fits.
Dodgin' Dot thinks it does.
Man, thats a tough one. Who should we believe?

Face it bud, the people smarter than you think you are wrong.

He’s not even on the radar of the people that make the decisions.

Keyboard warrior Dodgin' Dot thinks he understands insurrection better than the top legal professionals in our government.

[Animal]

Dot can't stop railing on Trump for not being able to accept the outcome of an election.

That's the same Dot that can't accept the outcome of a supreme court ruling.

[Biker]

Things just not happening

[CHEEZY17]

Things just not happening

Of course it happens.
Over the years its evolved from "Voter fraud just doesnt happen." into "Well, it doesnt really happen all that much."
As if that makes it ok and we shouldnt make the process better when we can.