Re: Way to go Texas
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:54 am
the key to all of that was in the first sentence. "Sprang into action".
I wouldn't say "nothing has been done". I mean, the liberals have thrown their usual "guns are scary" temper tantrums, the Dems have politicized it like they always do, and decent Americans have stood up for freedom and 2nd Amendment rights in the face of dems' calls to disarm law-abiding people, like always.Animal wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:25 amboth were tragic events in their own regard. in one they made several policy changes to keep the event from ever occurring again. And they did it in less than one month.CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:18 amNo. But I'll take that "might" with a large M because I haven't heard anything remotely connected between the two.Animal wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 11:45 pmdo you know how this story about the escaped inmate might tie into the story about uvalde?CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 10:53 pm Of course it is. Inmates have been escaping Texas transportation custody for almost 200 years. I'm pretty sure after every one, "officials" met and came up with a new Super Duper plan so it would never happen again. The problem isn't the new plans, it's forgetting about them and getting lax over the years.
In the other, nothing has been done yet
But poor Brett Kavenaugh needs special protection but the nasty liberals don’t want to help.Deathproof wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:15 pmI wouldn't say "nothing has been done". I mean, the liberals have thrown their usual "guns are scary" temper tantrums, the Dems have politicized it like they always do, and decent Americans have stood up for freedom and 2nd Amendment rights in the face of dems' calls to disarm law-abiding people, like always.Animal wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:25 amboth were tragic events in their own regard. in one they made several policy changes to keep the event from ever occurring again. And they did it in less than one month.CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:18 amNo. But I'll take that "might" with a large M because I haven't heard anything remotely connected between the two.Animal wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 11:45 pmdo you know how this story about the escaped inmate might tie into the story about uvalde?CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 10:53 pm Of course it is. Inmates have been escaping Texas transportation custody for almost 200 years. I'm pretty sure after every one, "officials" met and came up with a new Super Duper plan so it would never happen again. The problem isn't the new plans, it's forgetting about them and getting lax over the years.
In the other, nothing has been done yet
Nothing sick about it. It's 100% valid. Double-digit shooting deaths every weekend, and just like in Uvalde, the cops do nothing. Just like in Uvalde, the victims are kids (sometimes). The only difference is that Uvalde makes the news because it helps the idiot left's anti-gun, anti-freedom narrative. The Chicago shootings don't make the news because black-on-black violence 1)disproves the retarded "White Supremacy" narrative, and 2)demonstrate how a liberal-led city in a liberal-led state leafs to failure.Who wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:24 pmBut poor Brett Kavenaugh needs special protection but the nasty liberals don’t want to help.Deathproof wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:15 pmI wouldn't say "nothing has been done". I mean, the liberals have thrown their usual "guns are scary" temper tantrums, the Dems have politicized it like they always do, and decent Americans have stood up for freedom and 2nd Amendment rights in the face of dems' calls to disarm law-abiding people, like always.Animal wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:25 amboth were tragic events in their own regard. in one they made several policy changes to keep the event from ever occurring again. And they did it in less than one month.CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:18 amNo. But I'll take that "might" with a large M because I haven't heard anything remotely connected between the two.Animal wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 11:45 pmdo you know how this story about the escaped inmate might tie into the story about uvalde?CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 10:53 pm Of course it is. Inmates have been escaping Texas transportation custody for almost 200 years. I'm pretty sure after every one, "officials" met and came up with a new Super Duper plan so it would never happen again. The problem isn't the new plans, it's forgetting about them and getting lax over the years.
In the other, nothing has been done yet
Did I do that right?
And I haven’t changed my opinion, you are sick individual if you think a daily killing in Chicago is the same as 19 innocent children murdered while a whole police force waited outside.
Also, you're right: Brett Kavanagh does need protection, as demonstrated by the leftist assassination attempt of June 8th.Who wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:24 pmBut poor Brett Kavenaugh needs special protection but the nasty liberals don’t want to help.Deathproof wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:15 pmI wouldn't say "nothing has been done". I mean, the liberals have thrown their usual "guns are scary" temper tantrums, the Dems have politicized it like they always do, and decent Americans have stood up for freedom and 2nd Amendment rights in the face of dems' calls to disarm law-abiding people, like always.Animal wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:25 amboth were tragic events in their own regard. in one they made several policy changes to keep the event from ever occurring again. And they did it in less than one month.CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:18 amNo. But I'll take that "might" with a large M because I haven't heard anything remotely connected between the two.Animal wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 11:45 pmdo you know how this story about the escaped inmate might tie into the story about uvalde?CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 10:53 pm Of course it is. Inmates have been escaping Texas transportation custody for almost 200 years. I'm pretty sure after every one, "officials" met and came up with a new Super Duper plan so it would never happen again. The problem isn't the new plans, it's forgetting about them and getting lax over the years.
In the other, nothing has been done yet
Did I do that right?
And I haven’t changed my opinion, you are sick individual if you think a daily killing in Chicago is the same as 19 innocent children murdered while a whole police force waited outside.
Are you Don Imus?CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 11:02 pmI'll bet the hardest job ever is Head Security for the WNBA/NCAA Women's basketball.Geist wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 10:45 pm When i used to do corrections, 9/10 someone got something past a checkpoint it was because some of timer didn't want to do his job and properly strip search. You'd be the surpised at the crevaces you can conceal something, especially if you have flaps or nappy hair
What does security have to do with anything?Deathproof wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:43 pmAlso, you're right: Brett Kavanagh does need protection, as demonstrated by the leftist assassination attempt of June 8th.Who wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:24 pmBut poor Brett Kavenaugh needs special protection but the nasty liberals don’t want to help.Deathproof wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:15 pmI wouldn't say "nothing has been done". I mean, the liberals have thrown their usual "guns are scary" temper tantrums, the Dems have politicized it like they always do, and decent Americans have stood up for freedom and 2nd Amendment rights in the face of dems' calls to disarm law-abiding people, like always.Animal wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:25 amboth were tragic events in their own regard. in one they made several policy changes to keep the event from ever occurring again. And they did it in less than one month.CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:18 amNo. But I'll take that "might" with a large M because I haven't heard anything remotely connected between the two.
In the other, nothing has been done yet
Did I do that right?
And I haven’t changed my opinion, you are sick individual if you think a daily killing in Chicago is the same as 19 innocent children murdered while a whole police force waited outside.
No surprise Drunk Nancy Pelosi is stalling a bill that would grant such protection to Supreme Court justices. I would imagine she's doing so in the hopes he gets killed so the dems can replace him with another liberal activist. Meanwhile, Drunk Nancy, her alcoholic drunk-driving husband, and their extended family enjoy 24-hour taxpayer-funded security. All armed with GUNS, by the way.
BRING OUT PENCE!!!Deathproof wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:43 pm Also, you're right: Brett Kavanagh does need protection, as demonstrated by the leftist assassination attempt of June 8th.
Yeah that whole UConn "nappy ho's" thing didn't work out. Nobody got the message. Freak Griner is still sitting in a Russian jail 10 months later and the message here seems to be "you can keep her/him/it/ whatever.saltydog wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 5:23 pmAre you Don Imus?CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 11:02 pmI'll bet the hardest job ever is Head Security for the WNBA/NCAA Women's basketball.Geist wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 10:45 pm When i used to do corrections, 9/10 someone got something past a checkpoint it was because some of timer didn't want to do his job and properly strip search. You'd be the surpised at the crevaces you can conceal something, especially if you have flaps or nappy hair
Just ironic how Drunk Nancy Pelosi is holding up legislation that would give enhanced protection to Supreme Court Justices, after the left's assassination attempt against Justice Kavanagh.... but sure has no issue with 24/7 armed security for herself and her drunk-deiving husband, and I assume her wine cellar.Who wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:11 pmWhat does security have to do with anything?Deathproof wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:43 pmAlso, you're right: Brett Kavanagh does need protection, as demonstrated by the leftist assassination attempt of June 8th.Who wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:24 pmBut poor Brett Kavenaugh needs special protection but the nasty liberals don’t want to help.Deathproof wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:15 pmI wouldn't say "nothing has been done". I mean, the liberals have thrown their usual "guns are scary" temper tantrums, the Dems have politicized it like they always do, and decent Americans have stood up for freedom and 2nd Amendment rights in the face of dems' calls to disarm law-abiding people, like always.Animal wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:25 amboth were tragic events in their own regard. in one they made several policy changes to keep the event from ever occurring again. And they did it in less than one month.CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:18 am
No. But I'll take that "might" with a large M because I haven't heard anything remotely connected between the two.
In the other, nothing has been done yet
Did I do that right?
And I haven’t changed my opinion, you are sick individual if you think a daily killing in Chicago is the same as 19 innocent children murdered while a whole police force waited outside.
No surprise Drunk Nancy Pelosi is stalling a bill that would grant such protection to Supreme Court justices. I would imagine she's doing so in the hopes he gets killed so the dems can replace him with another liberal activist. Meanwhile, Drunk Nancy, her alcoholic drunk-driving husband, and their extended family enjoy 24-hour taxpayer-funded security. All armed with GUNS, by the way.
What's the point you're trying to make here? That Pence needs protection? He has it.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:06 amBRING OUT PENCE!!!Deathproof wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:43 pm Also, you're right: Brett Kavanagh does need protection, as demonstrated by the leftist assassination attempt of June 8th.
BRING OUT PENCE!!!
BRING OUT PENCE!!!
![]()
Back in the 1860s, a bunch of other states also couldn't. And then they did anyway.CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 12:26 amMyth/ We can't. The only thing extra we were allowed when we joined was the option to split into up to 5 separate States. Of course, at that time we claimed half of present day NM/Colorado and way up to Montana.
What's a bother state? Is that the condition you suffer from when an opinion that doesn't agree with your own dares to appear?Deathproof wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:14 amBack in the 1860s, a bunch of bother states also couldn't. And then they did anyway.CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 12:26 amMyth/ We can't. The only thing extra we were allowed when we joined was the option to split into up to 5 separate States. Of course, at that time we claimed half of present day NM/Colorado and way up to Montana.
I made a typo using my phone. Obviously I meant OTHER states. I'll fix it.saltydog wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 1:03 pmWhat's a bother state? Is that the condition you suffer from when an opinion that doesn't agree with your own dares to appear?Deathproof wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:14 amBack in the 1860s, a bunch of bother states also couldn't. And then they did anyway.CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 12:26 amMyth/ We can't. The only thing extra we were allowed when we joined was the option to split into up to 5 separate States. Of course, at that time we claimed half of present day NM/Colorado and way up to Montana.
But only with the approval of the federal government. That is, can't split on their own volition, legally.CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 12:26 amMyth/ We can't. The only thing extra we were allowed when we joined was the option to split into up to 5 separate States. Of course, at that time we claimed half of present day NM/Colorado and way up to Montana.
I thought California was the state known for talking about secession?QillerDaemon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 2:05 pmBut only with the approval of the federal government. That is, can't split on their own volition, legally.CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 12:26 amMyth/ We can't. The only thing extra we were allowed when we joined was the option to split into up to 5 separate States. Of course, at that time we claimed half of present day NM/Colorado and way up to Montana.
Of course, this whole notion is bullshit and saber rattling. First thing off, that means if Texas decides to become its own country (again, since the feds in the 1830's didn't want it as a state), its citizens are no longer Americans, and have no rights and liberties of acting as Americans. The US Constitution no longer applies to Texas and its citizens. As a country, all international (since Texas will be outside the bounds of the USA, it's now an international state) agreements have to be renegotiated. Mexico (and Canada) may decide you need a visa to enter their countries, which is not needed by Americans. And they provide no mechanism to obtain one. Extra points if the US govt also decides to implement an entry visa. Crossing the Sabine or the Red River won't be so easy.
Right off the bat, Texas is going to need income, a lot of it, and that means taxes. No more funds from DC, Texas is on its own for the cash to run its new state. All new treaties with the same countries the US had treaties with, but without the power of the US to make those treaties. Those lucrative military bases, potentially gone. O yea, you hate the federal govt, but love the money those bases make. You have to come up with your own constitution, what are the articles that make it up? I really don't think a single person in Texas has the real political will to make succession actually happen. Just more hot air out of a state full of it.
Don't forget the banners and placards.