Flumper wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:39 pm
Hmm.. Doing more research into Al's dilemma. The average life expectancy of a 100 watt incandescent bulb is 1200 hours. So that is 50 days if he's going to meet this $40,000 minimum on usage.
If he has to use 5,000 of them to meet his goal and they each last 50 days, then he will have to set them up on a rotational basis, so he only has to change out 100 bulbs per day. It seems doable.
I wonder how much 36,500 light bulbs per year costs?
$107,857.50 if he buys the econo 60W two pack at Walmart.
nope. 60 watts won't do it. we'd only get to around $24,000 a month like that. We need 100 watt.
Flumper wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:39 pm
Hmm.. Doing more research into Al's dilemma. The average life expectancy of a 100 watt incandescent bulb is 1200 hours. So that is 50 days if he's going to meet this $40,000 minimum on usage.
If he has to use 5,000 of them to meet his goal and they each last 50 days, then he will have to set them up on a rotational basis, so he only has to change out 100 bulbs per day. It seems doable.
I wonder how much 36,500 light bulbs per year costs?
$107,857.50 if he buys the econo 60W two pack at Walmart.
nope. 60 watts won't do it. we'd only get to around $24,000 a month like that. We need 100 watt.
Well, now poor Al is up to $119,967.50 a year for light bulbs. (Walmart prices based on the 2 pack)
He'd be better off just buying a light bulb factory.
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:59 pm
by JackRabbit_Slim
I remember back when this was the lolz thread..
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:00 am
by Reservoir Dog
JackRabbit_Slim wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:59 pm
I remember back when this was the lolz thread..
It still is.
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:07 am
by JackRabbit_Slim
Umm... nope
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 1:11 am
by CaptQuint
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 1:14 am
by CaptQuint
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 2:27 pm
by CaptQuint
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:00 pm
by CaptQuint
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 7:38 pm
by Nero
Every time FSF post in a thread
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:11 pm
by Stapes
Sound would have been awesomer
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:13 pm
by Stapes
Mike Tyson at 52 would handle things
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:13 pm
by Reservoir Dog
Never fuck with a guy who's wearing really cool gloves for no apparent reason.
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:18 pm
by Reservoir Dog
Stapes wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:13 pm
Mike Tyson at 52 would handle things
He's actually only around 49 in this.
This was taken on the set of a low budget Steven Seagal movie about 3 years ago.
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:57 pm
by Nero
Stapes wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:11 pm
Sound would have been awesomer
Stapes wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:11 pm
Sound would have been awesomer
Had to find the vid and upload.
Ohhhh. The accents make it even better...lol
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 10:03 pm
by beagleboy
Stapes wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:59 pm
Ohhhh. The accents make it even better...lol
What language was that?
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 10:15 pm
by Stapes
Cockney? lol maybe AH can tell us
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 10:20 pm
by Animal
I think the guy with the "coach" on his back was Dick Van Dyke.
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 10:30 pm
by AnalHamster
Stapes wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 10:15 pm
Cockney? lol maybe AH can tell us
Sahnds like sarf london mate. Fuckin warned im.
Probably ok legally, provided the guy wakes up. Taking his shirt off and clearly wanting a fight makes it self defense, though the kick after he was unconscious pushed it a bit.
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 11:45 pm
by HighNDry
“CUNT!” Love it.
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 11:49 pm
by CaptQuint
Oi, you got a license for dem gloves????
Re: LOLZ (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 11:56 pm
by Stapes
longer version...….the kid crying is annoying.....Cant we have street fighting without the children???