Page 17 of 59

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2020 6:48 pm
by Stapes
Join the Navy they said. See the world they said.


Image

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2020 7:01 pm
by Charliesheen
Probably Urine from old UJ. Skip to last 3 minutes or so. Pretty obvious how these guys effed up.


Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2020 8:08 pm
by CaptQuint
Akagi, Kaga, Shokaku and Enterprise

Image

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2020 9:39 pm
by Blast
CaptQuint wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2020 8:08 pm Akagi, Kaga, Shokaku and Enterprise

Image
No wonder we won WW2

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2020 9:43 pm
by CaptQuint
Blast wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2020 9:39 pm
CaptQuint wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2020 8:08 pm Akagi, Kaga, Shokaku and Enterprise

Image
No wonder we won WW2
The Yellow Peril had no chance vs photon torpedoes

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 1:41 am
by CaptQuint
Image

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 1:48 am
by WestTexasCrude
Anybody have a clue who the German General(s) was defending North Italy late 1943-until the end of the war. Brilliant tactics. Tied down maybe 2 million troops and they never came close to invading South Germany. I'm guessing it's taught at the military schools.

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 2:01 am
by FSchmertz
WestTexasCrude wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2020 1:48 am Anybody have a clue who the German General(s) was defending North Italy late 1943-until the end of the war. Brilliant tactics. Tied down maybe 2 million troops and they never came close to invading South Germany. I'm guessing it's taught at the military schools.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Kesselring

Though his second should get some credit too https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_von_Vietinghoff

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 2:10 am
by WestTexasCrude
FSchmertz wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2020 2:01 am
WestTexasCrude wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2020 1:48 am Anybody have a clue who the German General(s) was defending North Italy late 1943-until the end of the war. Brilliant tactics. Tied down maybe 2 million troops and they never came close to invading South Germany. I'm guessing it's taught at the military schools.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Kesselring

Though his second should get some credit too https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_von_Vietinghoff
Thank you very much.

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 6:03 am
by CHEEZY17
Stapes wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2020 6:48 pm Join the Navy they said. See the world they said.


Image
Why they gotta send the black guys down there? RACIST.

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 6:04 am
by Stapes
CHEEZY17 wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2020 6:03 am
Stapes wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2020 6:48 pm Join the Navy they said. See the world they said.


Image
Why they gotta send the black guys down there? RACIST.

I was going to say the same thing....lol...... And you know those two guys were saying the same thing...lol

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 1:40 am
by WestTexasCrude

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 11:53 am
by CaptQuint
Image

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2020 12:42 am
by CaptQuint
Image

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2020 6:45 pm
by windrunner
CHEEZY17 wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2020 6:03 am
Stapes wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2020 6:48 pm Join the Navy they said. See the world they said.


Image
Why they gotta send the black guys down there? RACIST.
Low ASVAB scores.

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 6:21 pm
by CaptQuint
A Japanese machine gun from an A6M Zero Kamikaze lodged in the barrels of a Quad 40 mm Bofors AA gun after impact aboard USS Missouri (April 11, 1945)

Image

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2020 9:50 pm
by FreakShowFanatic
Tribute to our Vietnam veterans

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:35 pm
by Stapes
Is that you John Wayne?


Image

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:41 pm
by megman
Stapes wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:35 pm Is that you John Wayne?


Image
I have a half a dozen of those kicking around. I can open a can faster with that than anything. 8-)

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2020 6:52 pm
by FreakShowFanatic
Mobile Nuclear Reactors for the US Military...

Now that's an interesting concept. You have to be concerned about what might happen if one of these mobile reactors got hit with a bomb though.

Good read (I thought):
Pentagon awards $39.7million in contracts to three companies that will compete to build mobile nuclear reactors
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... newcomment

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2020 7:00 pm
by CaptQuint
FreakShowFanatic wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2020 6:52 pm Mobile Nuclear Reactors for the US Military...

Now that's an interesting concept. You have to be concerned about what might happen if one of these mobile reactors got hit with a bomb though.

Good read (I thought):
Pentagon awards $39.7million in contracts to three companies that will compete to build mobile nuclear reactors
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... newcomment
Well they wouldn't be placed in a unfortified area with a big sign saying "nuke reactor here please bomb" with a big arrow

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2020 7:23 pm
by FreakShowFanatic
CaptQuint wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2020 7:00 pm
FreakShowFanatic wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2020 6:52 pm Mobile Nuclear Reactors for the US Military...

Now that's an interesting concept. You have to be concerned about what might happen if one of these mobile reactors got hit with a bomb though.

Good read (I thought):
Pentagon awards $39.7million in contracts to three companies that will compete to build mobile nuclear reactors
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... newcomment
Well they wouldn't be placed in a unfortified area with a big sign saying "nuke reactor here please bomb" with a big arrow
True. I could see where it would be hugely beneficial to have handy and take the place of conventional power generation. You could generate a whole hell of a lot of power and not need to keep shipping fuel tankers along the supply line.

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2020 7:29 pm
by CaptQuint
FreakShowFanatic wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2020 7:23 pm
CaptQuint wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2020 7:00 pm
FreakShowFanatic wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2020 6:52 pm Mobile Nuclear Reactors for the US Military...

Now that's an interesting concept. You have to be concerned about what might happen if one of these mobile reactors got hit with a bomb though.

Good read (I thought):
Pentagon awards $39.7million in contracts to three companies that will compete to build mobile nuclear reactors
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... newcomment
Well they wouldn't be placed in a unfortified area with a big sign saying "nuke reactor here please bomb" with a big arrow
True. I could see where it would be hugely beneficial to have handy and take the place of conventional power generation. You could generate a whole hell of a lot of power and not need to keep shipping fuel tankers along the supply line.
Well yeah that is a huge benefit, but so are huge killy laser death rays

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:05 pm
by CaptQuint
As reported by USNI News, Captain Brett Crozier was recently relieved of command of the USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) by Acting Secretary of the Navy Thomas Modly for showing “extremely poor judgement” while attempting to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 among the 4,800 members of his crew. According to Modly, Crozier allowed a letter he wrote to his chain of command, which outlines his view of the problem the ship faces and the immediate support he requires to deal with it, to reach informal channels by sending an email out “pretty broadly.” While not sent directly from Crozier, a copy of the letter ultimately fell into the hands of a reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle where it was published to wide national interest.

Modly’s firing of Crozier has caused a firestorm of criticism across mainstream and social media, with many pundits claiming Cozier’s leaking of the letter put the spurs to an unresponsive chain of command and ultimately saved lives and that Modly only fired the commanding officer because he embarrassed high-ranking officials. Modly has responded to that criticism by stating that Cozier’s actions actually slowed down a process that was already in motion and induced fear among the aircraft carrier crew’s dependents.

In an interesting twist of history, the aircraft carrier’s namesake was involved in a similar situation. During the summer of 1898, Colonel Theodore Roosevelt, U.S. Army, was leading the famed “Rough Riders” in Cuba. The Rough Riders were part of the Army’s Fifth Corps garrisoned near Santiago de Cuba. At the time, more than 4,000 of the Fifth Corps’ 4,270 soldiers were sick with malaria and yellow fever. Many were on the verge of dying. The eight divisional commanders, including Roosevelt, were convinced that if they remained in Cuba Fifth Corps would be wiped out.

The divisional commanders met with Major General William R. Shafter, Fifth Corps Commander, and requested that Fifth Corps immediately redeploy to the United States. While it is unclear how Shafter responded to the request, he was certainly aware that President McKinley wanted to maintain a military presence in Cuba until the United States was able to finish peace negotiations with Spain. Whatever his reaction, the divisional commanders left the meeting compelled to put their request in writing.

The writing allegedly fell to Colonel Roosevelt, as he was the lowest ranking officer among them and the only volunteer, which meant he had the least to lose, career-wise, in the event the chain of command was to react negatively to the letter. As documented in Roosevelt’s book The Rough Riders, published in 1899, the letter, known as the Round-Robin letter and signed by all of them, reads as follows:

MAJOR-GENERAL SHAFTER. SIR: In a meeting of the general and medical officers called by you at the Palace this morning we were all, as you know, unanimous in our views of what should be done with the army. To keep us here, in the opinion of every officer commanding a division or a brigade, will simply involve the destruction of thousands. There is no possible reason for not shipping practically the entire command North at once. Yellow-fever cases are very few in the cavalry division, where I command one of the two brigades, and not one true case of yellow fever has occurred in this division, except among the men sent to the hospital at Siboney, where they have, I believe, contracted it. But in this division there have been 1,500 cases of malarial fever. Hardly a man has yet died from it, but the whole command is so weakened and shattered as to be ripe for dying like rotten sheep, when a real yellow-fever epidemic instead of a fake epidemic, like the present one, strikes us, as it is bound to do if we stay here at the height of the sickness season, August and the beginning of September. Quarantine against malarial fever is much like quarantining against the toothache. All of us are certain that as soon as the authorities at Washington fully appreciate the condition of the army, we shall be sent home. If we are kept here it will in all human possibility mean an appalling disaster, for the surgeons here estimate that over half the army, if kept here during the sickly season, will die. This is not only terrible from the stand-point of the individual lives lost, but it means ruin from the stand-point of military efficiency of the flower of the American army, for the great bulk of the regulars are here with you. The sick list, large though it is, exceeding four thousand, affords but a faint index of the debilitation of the army. Not twenty per cent. are fit for active work. Six weeks on the North Maine coast, for instance, or elsewhere where the yellow-fever germ cannot possibly propagate, would make us all as fit as fighting-cocks, as able as we are eager to take a leading part in the great campaign against Havana in the fall, even if we are not allowed to try Porto Rico. We can be moved North, if moved at once, with absolute safety to the country, although, of course, it would have been infinitely better if we had been moved North or to Porto Rico two weeks ago. If there were any object in keeping us here, we would face yellow fever with as much indifference as we faced bullets. But there is no object. The four immune regiments ordered here are sufficient to garrison the city and surrounding towns, and there is absolutely nothing for us to do here, and there has not been since the city surrendered. It is impossible to move into the interior. Every shifting of camp doubles the sick-rate in our present weakened condition, and, anyhow, the interior is rather worse than the coast, as I have found by actual reconnoissance. Our present camps are as healthy as any camps at this end of the island can be. I write only because I cannot see our men, who have fought so bravely and who have endured extreme hardship and danger so uncomplainingly, go to destruction without striving so far as lies in me to avert a doom as fearful as it is unnecessary and undeserved. Yours respectfully,THEODORE ROOSEVELT, Colonel Commanding Second Cavalry Brigade.

Roosevelt delivered the letter to Shafter, but, presumably not convinced the corps commander would act on it in a timely fashion, also allegedly handed a copy of it to the Associated Press correspondent who was covering the Cuba beat. That correspondent quickly cabled the letter to AP headquarters and it published nationwide the same day.

The public outcry was overwhelming and unanimous in accusing the McKinley Administration of not caring about the troops. McKinley summoned his Secretary of War, Russell A. Alger, and vented his fury that the letter was leaked and ordered him to do what he could to make the problem go away. Alger ordered the Navy to send transport ships to retrieve Fifth Corps from Cuba and the Army to ready facilities at Camp Wikoff on Long Island to house the stricken soldiers once they arrived back in the United States.

Alger demurred when asked by the press whether the leak had caused him to react faster than he otherwise would have; however, he was on record as previously having asserted that no ships were available to bring Fifth Corps back from Cuba.

Whatever the truth is regarding how Captain Crozier’s letter ended up in the San Francisco Chronicle, it should be no small comfort to Crozier’s supporters that the Round-Robin letter was equally bold and risky, and ultimately served the best interests of the Army soldiers in the Fifth Corps.


https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedi ... mple-ships

Re: CQ's Military thread

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:30 pm
by Stapes
Captain Crozier!!!