UJRefugees.net

183,000 dead Americans

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 3:59 pm 183,000 dead Americans

1/3 of them in New York, New Jersey and California.

Areas that got the virus first, too bad red states didn't learn from their sacrifice.

FSchmertz wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 11:34 pm One of the things not brought up in these discussions are the folks that may have permanent health effects after "recovery."

Likely that's far more people than were killed by it. Sorta like military "casualties" inclusive of the wounded, where usually there's orders of magnitude more wounded than killed.

P.S. I've read that medical folks think some of the "recovered" are going to need organ replacements in the future. Severely damaged lungs and kidneys and brain issues.

Are you going to use 5 years as the cutoff for Covid for complications? Like cancer?

We're all gonna die!!!!1!1

Antknot wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 4:21 pm

FSchmertz wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 11:34 pm One of the things not brought up in these discussions are the folks that may have permanent health effects after "recovery."

Likely that's far more people than were killed by it. Sorta like military "casualties" inclusive of the wounded, where usually there's orders of magnitude more wounded than killed.

P.S. I've read that medical folks think some of the "recovered" are going to need organ replacements in the future. Severely damaged lungs and kidneys and brain issues.

Are you going to use 5 years as the cutoff for Covid for complications? Like cancer?

Various statisticians will be fooling around with reporting long-term effects of this forever, probably.

And the results will probably vary with the biases of the "figure-ers," as usual.

P.S. But whatever, the actual (health) damage done really can't be totally based on deaths and/or recovery. This sucker is going to cost us long-term. I'm thinking sorta like folks who were smokers are now. Minus the responsibility for unhealthy behavior i.e. getting sick was probably not their fault.

California's virus plan adopted by Newsome. Might as well close it all down forever. We dont want to scare the Capt's of the world

if its 5-8% on one category, then why is it 2-4.9% on the next?

Shouldn't it be 5-7.9% and then 2-4.9% or 5-8% and 2-5%? fucking democrats.

and, since he's only the governor of 1 state, why not go ahead and do the math (per 100,000) since it only applies to this one state. Jesus, you fucking democrats are stupid.

Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:39 pm if its 5-8% on one category, then why is it 2-4.9% on the next?

Shouldn't it be 5-7.9% and then 2-4.9% or 5-8% and 2-5%? fucking democrats.

and, since he's only the governor of 1 state, why not go ahead and do the math (per 100,000) since it only applies to this one state. Jesus, you fucking democrats are stupid.

Some on that feed did the math and said that if you tested the low amount that SD county is doing daily, that the false positives alone would never fall below the minimal. Shut it all down. Forever

BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:39 pm if its 5-8% on one category, then why is it 2-4.9% on the next?

Shouldn't it be 5-7.9% and then 2-4.9% or 5-8% and 2-5%? fucking democrats.

and, since he's only the governor of 1 state, why not go ahead and do the math (per 100,000) since it only applies to this one state. Jesus, you fucking democrats are stupid.

They are scaredycrats

Just take a look at Capt. The dude is literally terrified and he's a young, healthy man

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:39 pm if its 5-8% on one category, then why is it 2-4.9% on the next?

Shouldn't it be 5-7.9% and then 2-4.9% or 5-8% and 2-5%? fucking democrats.

and, since he's only the governor of 1 state, why not go ahead and do the math (per 100,000) since it only applies to this one state. Jesus, you fucking democrats are stupid.

They are scaredycrats

Just take a look at Capt. The dude is literally terrified and he's a young, healthy man

You got any evidence to back that statement old sick man?

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:53 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:39 pm if its 5-8% on one category, then why is it 2-4.9% on the next?

Shouldn't it be 5-7.9% and then 2-4.9% or 5-8% and 2-5%? fucking democrats.

and, since he's only the governor of 1 state, why not go ahead and do the math (per 100,000) since it only applies to this one state. Jesus, you fucking democrats are stupid.

They are scaredycrats

Just take a look at Capt. The dude is literally terrified and he's a young, healthy man

You got any evidence to back that statement old sick man?

6 months of posts on the subject, son

Pelosi getting her hair done in a closed hair salon. No mask BTW. Yeah, this bullshit is over

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:39 pm if its 5-8% on one category, then why is it 2-4.9% on the next?

Shouldn't it be 5-7.9% and then 2-4.9% or 5-8% and 2-5%? fucking democrats.

and, since he's only the governor of 1 state, why not go ahead and do the math (per 100,000) since it only applies to this one state. Jesus, you fucking democrats are stupid.

Some on that feed did the math and said that if you tested the low amount that SD county is doing daily, that the false positives alone would never fall below the minimal. Shut it all down. Forever

That is a fucking insane plan. The population of California is about 39.5 million. If you take that to "per 100,000" that is 395.

Now, the worst category that he has is to shut everything down, meaning the daily new cases have to be below 7 x 395 = 2,765. California has been below that number since back in May. That is economic suicide.

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:54 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:53 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:39 pm if its 5-8% on one category, then why is it 2-4.9% on the next?

Shouldn't it be 5-7.9% and then 2-4.9% or 5-8% and 2-5%? fucking democrats.

and, since he's only the governor of 1 state, why not go ahead and do the math (per 100,000) since it only applies to this one state. Jesus, you fucking democrats are stupid.

They are scaredycrats

Just take a look at Capt. The dude is literally terrified and he's a young, healthy man

You got any evidence to back that statement old sick man?

6 months of posts on the subject, son

Not wanting unnecessary deaths of my fellow countrymen is far from being terrified. But you be your retarded self.

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:02 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:54 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:53 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:39 pm if its 5-8% on one category, then why is it 2-4.9% on the next?

Shouldn't it be 5-7.9% and then 2-4.9% or 5-8% and 2-5%? fucking democrats.

and, since he's only the governor of 1 state, why not go ahead and do the math (per 100,000) since it only applies to this one state. Jesus, you fucking democrats are stupid.

They are scaredycrats

Just take a look at Capt. The dude is literally terrified and he's a young, healthy man

You got any evidence to back that statement old sick man?

6 months of posts on the subject, son

Not wanting unnecessary deaths of my fellow countrymen is far from being terrified. But you be your retarded self.

If you really did believe that the first thing you would want is to ban automobiles

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:04 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:02 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:54 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:53 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

They are scaredycrats

Just take a look at Capt. The dude is literally terrified and he's a young, healthy man

You got any evidence to back that statement old sick man?

6 months of posts on the subject, son

Not wanting unnecessary deaths of my fellow countrymen is far from being terrified. But you be your retarded self.

If you really did believe that the first thing you would want is to ban automobiles

Keep reaching tiger!

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:04 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:04 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:02 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:54 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:53 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

Just take a look at Capt. The dude is literally terrified and he's a young, healthy man

You got any evidence to back that statement old sick man?

6 months of posts on the subject, son

Not wanting unnecessary deaths of my fellow countrymen is far from being terrified. But you be your retarded self.

If you really did believe that the first thing you would want is to ban automobiles

Keep reaching tiger!

So deaths caused by man is different than ones caused by nature? Please explain

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:04 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:04 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:02 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:54 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:53 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

Just take a look at Capt. The dude is literally terrified and he's a young, healthy man

You got any evidence to back that statement old sick man?

6 months of posts on the subject, son

Not wanting unnecessary deaths of my fellow countrymen is far from being terrified. But you be your retarded self.

If you really did believe that the first thing you would want is to ban automobiles

Keep reaching tiger!

how about cigarettes. why don't you nutters just outlaw them and look at the lives that would be saved. and you wouldn't have to wreck the economy in the process.

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:04 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:02 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:54 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:53 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

They are scaredycrats

Just take a look at Capt. The dude is literally terrified and he's a young, healthy man

You got any evidence to back that statement old sick man?

6 months of posts on the subject, son

Not wanting unnecessary deaths of my fellow countrymen is far from being terrified. But you be your retarded self.

If you really did believe that the first thing you would want is to ban automobiles

Or maybe mandate seat belts, airbags, crash testing, speed limits etc. Derp on.

AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:11 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:04 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:02 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:54 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:53 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:50 pm

Just take a look at Capt. The dude is literally terrified and he's a young, healthy man

You got any evidence to back that statement old sick man?

6 months of posts on the subject, son

Not wanting unnecessary deaths of my fellow countrymen is far from being terrified. But you be your retarded self.

If you really did believe that the first thing you would want is to ban automobiles

Or maybe mandate seat belts, airbags, crash testing, speed limits etc. Derp on.

No, Capt said unnecessary deaths, which would mean all deaths since we can function without private automobiles

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:14 pm

AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:11 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:04 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:02 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:54 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:53 pm

You got any evidence to back that statement old sick man?

6 months of posts on the subject, son

Not wanting unnecessary deaths of my fellow countrymen is far from being terrified. But you be your retarded self.

If you really did believe that the first thing you would want is to ban automobiles

Or maybe mandate seat belts, airbags, crash testing, speed limits etc. Derp on.

No, Capt said unnecessary deaths, which would mean all deaths since we can function without private automobiles

How would we do that?

480,000 lives lost in the US every year from cigarettes.

AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:16 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:14 pm

AnalHamster wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:11 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:04 pm

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:02 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:54 pm

6 months of posts on the subject, son

Not wanting unnecessary deaths of my fellow countrymen is far from being terrified. But you be your retarded self.

If you really did believe that the first thing you would want is to ban automobiles

Or maybe mandate seat belts, airbags, crash testing, speed limits etc. Derp on.

No, Capt said unnecessary deaths, which would mean all deaths since we can function without private automobiles

How would we do that?

Walk, bicycles, maybe all public transport. If maintaining all life is so important to the dear Capt then we should pull out all the stops and not half ass it.

Flumper wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:17 pm 480,000 lives lost in the US every year from cigarettes.

Whoa now......Capt gets to decide what is a need and what is a want