UJRefugees.net

dot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 4:16 pm So let's break this down here. You crow "no charges" and provide link. I read and point out that your link is about another county in another state where the murder did not take place. Thus "no charges" is not vindication which indicates you didn't read your own provided link. Since then you've thrown a temper tantrum, stamped your feet, and now think that you telling me what I already told you is dictating to me what I had to inform you of. What's more likely here, given how emotional you've reacted? You read what you posted, thought lulz let's pwn the libz with this despite it having zero to do with the kid pulling the trigger, they won't know the difference. Or the more simple explanation, you read the headline of no charges filed and crowed "no charges" without reading deeper. I get that you don't want it to look like you got showed up, sorry not sorry.

It'd help your case in the future if you don't blatantly lie. I observe more than I post, so you nipping at heels cause you got embarrassed in the past doesn't jive with what you're saying about Hammy at this moment. And if you think that's trollish, I'd be a lot more active wouldn't I?

Flumper wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 4:22 pm look, stupid. half the bullshit brought up about the kid was that he committed a felony when he brought a gun across state lines. This ruling puts that to bed, since it proves that he did not do that. Now all they are left to prove is that the other guy trying to wrestle his legally possessed gun was self defense. If you can't see the enormity of this case in how it helps the other, then I can't help you.

dot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 4:28 pm

Flumper wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 4:22 pm look, stupid. half the bullshit brought up about the kid was that he committed a felony when he brought a gun across state lines. This ruling puts that to bed, since it proves that he did not do that. Now all they are left to prove is that the other guy trying to wrestle his legally possessed gun was self defense. If you can't see the enormity of this case in how it helps the other, then I can't help you.

The majority of the problem people have with the kid is he came across state lines to "defend" that which is not his. If he didn't bring the gun with him and in fact obtained it once inside the state, that's a distinction without a difference since he still had no business being there. He went looking to perpetrate violence. It's also not a ruling, it's prosecutors declining to bring charges. You know, like how prosecutors decline to charge cops for killing innocent people. Run along.

dot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 4:38 pm You've already established you're not the brightest bulb here, no need for you to keep confirming it by transferring perception of his rage over to me.

dot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 4:16 pm So let's break this down here. You crow "no charges" and provide link. I read and point out that your link is about another county in another state where the murder did not take place. Thus "no charges" is not vindication which indicates you didn't read your own provided link. Since then you've thrown a temper tantrum, stamped your feet, and now think that you telling me what I already told you is dictating to me what I had to inform you of. What's more likely here, given how emotional you've reacted? You read what you posted, thought lulz let's pwn the libz with this despite it having zero to do with the kid pulling the trigger, they won't know the difference. Or the more simple explanation, you read the headline of no charges filed and crowed "no charges" without reading deeper. I get that you don't want it to look like you got showed up, sorry not sorry.

It'd help your case in the future if you don't blatantly lie. I observe more than I post, so you nipping at heels cause you got embarrassed in the past doesn't jive with what you're saying about Hammy at this moment. And if you think that's trollish, I'd be a lot more active wouldn't I?

dot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 7:46 pm "No charges." (In a jurisdiction where the crime did not take place.) Just a curious omission, if you know, you had read and knew that in the first place. You also follow it up afterwards still with no mention of how the report has nothing to do with the actual murder, just an after the fact admission that these are two different places and a strawman argument of how other places can't report on other places. Finally minutes later, like say after you finally read what you yourself provided, you subtly acknowledge that maybe it falls on Wisconsin to charge, cause that's where the murder happened. But from there, you've been having a conniption fit because you don't like the highlights of what you've done. And I already said it helps your credibility if you don't lie, but you do you. It does make for interesting albeit self humiliating entertainment.

AnalHamster wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 7:48 pm Poor little guy followed me around for months. He just can't take a schooling.

dot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 7:56 pm No no, he just happened to post where you're posting, addressing your posts. Can't actually challenge the content, but he can nip nip nip. But he's not following you around. Nope.

necronomous wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 8:07 pm I didn't lie you idiot. I'm not your court reporter that needs to dictate to you what you're reading. Assuming you can fucking read and not getting dictated to now. I went back and added it, so I wouldn't have more little whiny bitches like you complaining I didn't dictate the whole article for you, that as an adult you can clearly fucking read. You lost little puppy. In other words, read your own fucking shit for yourself. Stop depending on others to read it for you.

dot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 1:49 pm Aw, you’re embarrassed. Try not to be stupid next time, you’ll get better at this.

dot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 8:22 pm

necronomous wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 8:07 pm I didn't lie you idiot. I'm not your court reporter that needs to dictate to you what you're reading. Assuming you can fucking read and not getting dictated to now. I went back and added it, so I wouldn't have more little whiny bitches like you complaining I didn't dictate the whole article for you, that as an adult you can clearly fucking read. You lost little puppy. In other words, read your own fucking shit for yourself. Stop depending on others to read it for you.

dot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 1:49 pm Aw, you’re embarrassed. Try not to be stupid next time, you’ll get better at this.

Echo.

necronomous wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 8:24 pm

dot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 8:35 pm I speak nonsense

Stapes wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 10:38 pm Necro it was pretty obvious you were ecstatic to run in here with "no charges" as your header. You didn't read your own article and now won't be a man and own it. It's embarrassing now watching dot humiliate you

CaptQuint wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 10:57 pm NO CHARGES

Rittenhouse charged with multiple counts of homicide

https://theeagle.com/news/local/rittenh ... 20homicide.

necronomous wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 11:01 pm Lol in Illinois he wasn't.

dot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 11:10 pm

necronomous wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 11:01 pm Lol in Illinois he wasn't.

Again, your subtle way of acknowledging you didn’t read for content? It’s ok to admit you did a dumb.