Is there a thread on Project 2025?

[necronomous]

So the federal government eliminates the doj, schools and their curriculum fall onto the states.
No more federal interference, no more money.
All funding comes from taxpayers. Federal taxes will come down.
State taxes going up?
And this is just one agency

All funding already comes from tax payers. The government has 0 dollars.

[Antknot]

So the federal government eliminates the doj, schools and their curriculum fall onto the states.
No more federal interference, no more money.
All funding comes from taxpayers. Federal taxes will come down.
State taxes going up?
And this is just one agency

All funding already comes from tax payers. The government has 0 dollars.

And the government prints more paper “money” that’s reducing the value of part is already in existence.

[Who]

So the federal government eliminates the doj, schools and their curriculum fall onto the states.
No more federal interference, no more money.
All funding comes from taxpayers. Federal taxes will come down.
State taxes going up?
And this is just one agency

All funding already comes from tax payers. The government has 0 dollars.

Federal dollars versus state dollars, hopefully your head doesn’t explode

[Antknot]

So the federal government eliminates the doj, schools and their curriculum fall onto the states.
No more federal interference, no more money.
All funding comes from taxpayers. Federal taxes will come down.
State taxes going up?
And this is just one agency

All funding already comes from tax payers. The government has 0 dollars.

Federal dollars versus state dollars, hopefully your head doesn’t explode

Both come from taxes. No matter if they’re called taxes, Fees, licenses.

[necronomous]

So the federal government eliminates the doj, schools and their curriculum fall onto the states.
No more federal interference, no more money.
All funding comes from taxpayers. Federal taxes will come down.
State taxes going up?
And this is just one agency

All funding already comes from tax payers. The government has 0 dollars.

Federal dollars versus state dollars, hopefully your head doesn’t explode

I dont care what level it is, neither of them have money. It's all yours and mine.

[Reservoir Dog]

So the federal government eliminates the doj, schools and their curriculum fall onto the states.
No more federal interference, no more money.
All funding comes from taxpayers. Federal taxes will come down.
State taxes going up?
And this is just one agency

All funding already comes from tax payers. The government has 0 dollars.

Federal dollars versus state dollars, hopefully your head doesn’t explode

I dont care what level it is, neither of them have money. It's all yours and mine.

You pay rent to your landlord but that doesn't mean you own the apartment.

[Antknot]

So the federal government eliminates the doj, schools and their curriculum fall onto the states.
No more federal interference, no more money.
All funding comes from taxpayers. Federal taxes will come down.
State taxes going up?
And this is just one agency

All funding already comes from tax payers. The government has 0 dollars.

Federal dollars versus state dollars, hopefully your head doesn’t explode

I dont care what level it is, neither of them have money. It's all yours and mine.

You pay rent to your landlord but that doesn't mean you own the apartment.

That’s a piss poor analogy. If you don’t think you’re getting a fair shake on the rent you can always go find someplace else. If you don’t think you’re getting a fair shake on taxes you can’t go somewhere else.

[necronomous]

So the federal government eliminates the doj, schools and their curriculum fall onto the states.
No more federal interference, no more money.
All funding comes from taxpayers. Federal taxes will come down.
State taxes going up?
And this is just one agency

All funding already comes from tax payers. The government has 0 dollars.

Federal dollars versus state dollars, hopefully your head doesn’t explode

I dont care what level it is, neither of them have money. It's all yours and mine.

You pay rent to your landlord but that doesn't mean you own the apartment.

I know in your head you think you made a point.

[Who]

So the federal government eliminates the doj, schools and their curriculum fall onto the states.
No more federal interference, no more money.
All funding comes from taxpayers. Federal taxes will come down.
State taxes going up?
And this is just one agency

All funding already comes from tax payers. The government has 0 dollars.

Federal dollars versus state dollars, hopefully your head doesn’t explode

I dont care what level it is, neither of them have money. It's all yours and mine.

You pay rent to your landlord but that doesn't mean you own the apartment.

I know in your head you think you made a point.

Think of it this way you pay $1 a month in federal taxes to support education for all 50 states.
That’s $12 per year for every taxpayer.
Depending where you live taking into account the number of taxpayers in your state and whether there is a state income tax in place, what type of education would $12 a year provide?

[Animal]

All funding already comes from tax payers. The government has 0 dollars.

Federal dollars versus state dollars, hopefully your head doesn’t explode

I dont care what level it is, neither of them have money. It's all yours and mine.

You pay rent to your landlord but that doesn't mean you own the apartment.

I know in your head you think you made a point.

Think of it this way you pay $1 a month in federal taxes to support education for all 50 states.
That’s $12 per year for every taxpayer.
Depending where you live taking into account the number of taxpayers in your state and whether there is a state income tax in place, what type of education would $12 a year provide?

Hypothetically? Exactly the same as before.

[Antknot]

All funding already comes from tax payers. The government has 0 dollars.

Federal dollars versus state dollars, hopefully your head doesn’t explode

I dont care what level it is, neither of them have money. It's all yours and mine.

You pay rent to your landlord but that doesn't mean you own the apartment.

I know in your head you think you made a point.

Think of it this way you pay $1 a month in federal taxes to support education for all 50 states.
That’s $12 per year for every taxpayer.
Depending where you live taking into account the number of taxpayers in your state and whether there is a state income tax in place, what type of education would $12 a year provide?

Better for most, because they’re not putting tampons in boys rooms.

[necronomous]

All funding already comes from tax payers. The government has 0 dollars.

Federal dollars versus state dollars, hopefully your head doesn’t explode

I dont care what level it is, neither of them have money. It's all yours and mine.

You pay rent to your landlord but that doesn't mean you own the apartment.

I know in your head you think you made a point.

Think of it this way you pay $1 a month in federal taxes to support education for all 50 states.
That’s $12 per year for every taxpayer.
Depending where you live taking into account the number of taxpayers in your state and whether there is a state income tax in place, what type of education would $12 a year provide?

I don't think any of you understand taxes except how to fill them out.

[Antknot]

Federal dollars versus state dollars, hopefully your head doesn’t explode

I dont care what level it is, neither of them have money. It's all yours and mine.

You pay rent to your landlord but that doesn't mean you own the apartment.

I know in your head you think you made a point.

Think of it this way you pay $1 a month in federal taxes to support education for all 50 states.
That’s $12 per year for every taxpayer.
Depending where you live taking into account the number of taxpayers in your state and whether there is a state income tax in place, what type of education would $12 a year provide?

I don't think any of you understand taxes except how to fill them out.

Understand? I just answer the questions Turbo Tax asks.

[CHEEZY17]

Why are people beginning to sour on the incestuous educational relationship between oversight and the teachers unions?
Here's just one reason:

Dishonest Media Strikes Again As Outlets Take Concealed Cash From Teachers Unions for Positive Coverage
https://redstate.com/beckynoble/2024/11 ... e-n2182471

"According to recent financial disclosures by the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the National Education Association (NEA), three liberal publications — The New Republic, American Prospect, and Courier Newsroom — have collectively accepted roughly $905,000 since 2022. The problem was that after receiving the cash from the Teachers' unions, the outlets failed to disclose the payments and published positive articles about the unions. Courier Newsroom, which runs outlets in 11 states, including those considered swing states during this year's presidential election, received $500,000 from the NEA and $35,000 from the AFT between 2022 and 2024. Again, all the outlets ran positive coverage of the NEA."

[Who]

Red State lol lol

[Antknot]

Red State lol lol

Try: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news ... zed-labor/

[Antknot]

And: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-c ... merged.pdf

[CHEEZY17]

Red State lol lol

Do you have a problem with the facts stated within or just the outlet bringing them to light?

[Who]

Red State lol lol

Do you have a problem with the facts stated within or just the outlet bringing them to light?

How did you miss the disclaimer?

The OPINIONS EXPRESSED yada yada yada

[CHEEZY17]

Red State lol lol

Do you have a problem with the facts stated within or just the outlet bringing them to light?

How did you miss the disclaimer?

The OPINIONS EXPRESSED yada yada yada

You understand the facts reported in the article are taken from the unions own financial disclosers, right?
The disclaimer you're referring to is for when a writer expresses a particular opinion on the facts within an article. It doesn't mean the facts themselves presented in the article are an "opinion" you nitwit.

[Who]

Red State lol lol

Do you have a problem with the facts stated within or just the outlet bringing them to light?

How did you miss the disclaimer?

The OPINIONS EXPRESSED yada yada yada

You understand the facts reported in the article are taken from the unions own financial disclosers, right?
The disclaimer you're referring to is for when a writer expresses a particular opinion on the facts within an article. It doesn't mean the facts themselves presented in the article are an "opinion" you nitwit.

Yes it does

[CHEEZY17]

Red State lol lol

Do you have a problem with the facts stated within or just the outlet bringing them to light?

How did you miss the disclaimer?

The OPINIONS EXPRESSED yada yada yada

You understand the facts reported in the article are taken from the unions own financial disclosers, right?
The disclaimer you're referring to is for when a writer expresses a particular opinion on the facts within an article. It doesn't mean the facts themselves presented in the article are an "opinion" you nitwit.

Yes it does

Ok, the unions own financial disclosures are now "opinion".

[Animal]

Red State lol lol

Do you have a problem with the facts stated within or just the outlet bringing them to light?

How did you miss the disclaimer?

The OPINIONS EXPRESSED yada yada yada

You understand the facts reported in the article are taken from the unions own financial disclosers, right?
The disclaimer you're referring to is for when a writer expresses a particular opinion on the facts within an article. It doesn't mean the facts themselves presented in the article are an "opinion" you nitwit.

Yes it does

Ok, the unions own financial disclosures are now "opinion".

don't mind who. he learned his trolling from Howie.

[Who]

Do you have a problem with the facts stated within or just the outlet bringing them to light?

How did you miss the disclaimer?

The OPINIONS EXPRESSED yada yada yada

You understand the facts reported in the article are taken from the unions own financial disclosers, right?
The disclaimer you're referring to is for when a writer expresses a particular opinion on the facts within an article. It doesn't mean the facts themselves presented in the article are an "opinion" you nitwit.

Yes it does

Ok, the unions own financial disclosures are now "opinion".

don't mind who. he learned his trolling from Howie.

And you learned from Gus @ the Circle K , your point, when someone writes an opinion when does it become a fact? When it fits with cheeseballs narrative

[necronomous]

How did you miss the disclaimer?

The OPINIONS EXPRESSED yada yada yada

You understand the facts reported in the article are taken from the unions own financial disclosers, right?
The disclaimer you're referring to is for when a writer expresses a particular opinion on the facts within an article. It doesn't mean the facts themselves presented in the article are an "opinion" you nitwit.

Yes it does

Ok, the unions own financial disclosures are now "opinion".

don't mind who. he learned his trolling from Howie.

And you learned from Gus @ the Circle K , your point, when someone writes an opinion when does it become a fact? When it fits with cheeseballs narrative

They wrote an opinion about the facts you fucking turd loaf.